Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T76

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T76 Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T76 - 10/16/2011 6:53:07 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The front lines haven't changed all that much so I thought I'd just post my moves and show you where my attacks were:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 541
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T76 - 10/16/2011 7:01:48 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the oob, losses, destroyed units, and production:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 542
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T77 - 10/16/2011 11:16:18 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The T77 front lines didn't change all that much so I'll just post the front lines showing the attacks:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 543
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T77 - 10/16/2011 11:21:02 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the oob, losses, destroyed units, and production:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 544
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T77 - 10/16/2011 1:23:15 PM   
paullus99


Posts: 1985
Joined: 1/23/2002
Status: offline 		Larry - I'm confused. Why do you have Rifle Corps up facing the Finns when they could be down south participating in offensive operations?

_____________________________

Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 545
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T77 - 10/16/2011 4:07:50 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I had originally planned to use those Rifle Corps offensively against the Finns and the CV's for the Finns turned out to be a little bit higher than I had hoped to find.  However, I have no plans to abandon my offensive against the Finns permanently.  Just a postponement for now.

(in reply to paullus99)
Post #: 546
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T77 - 10/16/2011 5:03:55 PM   
gingerbread


Posts: 2994
Joined: 1/4/2007
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		If recon shows it empty, you could try to invade Osipenko (109, 106). Be sure to invade the turn you do recon, since it in itself will tip him of.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 547
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T77 - 10/16/2011 5:56:09 PM   
Flapdrol

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 8/18/2011
Status: offline 		If you want to attack the Finns, transport your Rifle Corps to Leningrad, where he has only regiments defending.

But, given that all his armor is off your radar, and is likely to strike somewhere soon, they may serve even better as a reserve for the main front.....

(in reply to gingerbread)
Post #: 548
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T78 - 10/16/2011 11:31:12 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		T78: I bought several new Rifle Divisions and Rifle Brigades and left them parked near Leningrad. I'm thinking I can use them to attack the
Finns near Leningrad and maybe push them back far enough to make the Finns abandon the war.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/17/2011 12:32:09 AM >

(in reply to Flapdrol)
Post #: 549
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T78 - 10/17/2011 12:35:30 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The turn is Dec. 10, 1942 and I probably jumped the gun a little too early with my moves in Northwest Front. I had some stacks of three
and spread them out to flip the hexes and form another front line and comparing the CV's of the enemy units I'm thinking on second
thought that maybe I shouldn't have done that. More people, I need more people there. But I'm out of AP's for this turn so the new
rifle brigades for this area will have to wait until next turn.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 550
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T78 - 10/17/2011 1:12:42 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I noticed this turn that most of my aircraft groups are now in size 32-at-a-time instead of 20-at-a-time. And there were some
squadrons that came 10 as a full group. I went through the air force disbanding those groups of size 10 to replace them with size
32 squadrons. I'm not sure how much of a difference it'll make but I'm guessing it might have some slight impact on the air war.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/17/2011 1:14:36 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 551
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T78 - 10/17/2011 2:33:43 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		It looks like KLilly started a push of his own. So I moved the 3rd Army over to help contain the schrapnel. The 3rd Army is the neon-blue
units.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 552
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T78 - 10/17/2011 5:37:02 AM   
randallw

 

Posts: 2057
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline 		Those air units of 10 planes sometimes convert over to a regular size unit, on their own.

Your tank fleet looks low.

If you have lots of artillery ( of the right type ) in the pool, consider building artillery divisions.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 553
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T78 - 10/17/2011 6:59:03 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: randallw
Those air units of 10 planes sometimes convert over to a regular size unit, on their own.

I did not know that. Thanks for the heads up.

quote:

ORIGINAL: randallw
Your tank fleet looks low.

I'm low on AP's right at the moment but I do plan on building a bunch of tank Corps.

quote:

ORIGINAL: randallw
If you have lots of artillery ( of the right type ) in the pool, consider building artillery divisions.

Are the right types the 152mm dudes or 122mm dudes? Or something else entirely?

(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 554
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T79 - 10/18/2011 10:50:38 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the T79 front lines before any recon or movement.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 555
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T79 - 10/18/2011 10:55:32 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		To my surprise KLilly pulled back in a major way in the north. I'm thinking I don't have enough people to sweep the territory and form a
longer front line. Maybe I need to buy some rifle brigades or something.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 556
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T79 - 10/18/2011 11:39:17 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I blew a hole in the lines but KLilly will be able to fix it I think.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 557
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T79 - 10/18/2011 11:55:59 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's my moves. I ventured out into the area NE of Riga but not very far. Also, I railed in some rifle brigades to help form a new
front line. I did a lot of deliberate attacks and flew a bunch of air base strikes. Reconed a bunch. Anyway, here's how it ended up.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 558
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T79 - 10/18/2011 12:01:43 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I'm running short of vehicles already. He must have destroyed more vehicle production factories than I thought. Or maybe that's just a
short-term shortfall due to my moving some vehicle factories from where-ever they were to safety. I really can't remember moving some
vehicle factories. I'll look on the production page for clues.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 559
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T79 - 10/18/2011 12:10:33 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the OOB, losses, destroyed units and production. The production page doesn't show any damaged vehicle factories, but I'm down
to the last 140 factories I had. So I guess I'll be hurting for vehicles for the rest of the game. And that kinda puts the kabosh on the
fielding of vast tank Armies. Oh well. It's going to be a long war.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 560
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T79 - 10/18/2011 1:24:13 PM   
DTurtle

 

Posts: 443
Joined: 4/26/2010
Status: offline 		Pushing the Finns back to Vyborg will cause them to surrender relatively quickly as you already control Narva and Pskov. So a strong offensive out of Leningrad could be quite successful, as he has most of his Finns in the far north. That would free up some forces on your side.

Be careful going on the offensive west of Narva, as he could relatively easily surround your forces against the sea if he pushes at the "hinge" at Lake Peipus.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 561
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T79 - 10/18/2011 3:24:41 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DTurtle
Pushing the Finns back to Vyborg will cause them to surrender relatively quickly as you already control Narva and Pskov. So a strong offensive out of Leningrad could be quite successful, as he has most of his Finns in the far north. That would free up some forces on your side.

Be careful going on the offensive west of Narva, as he could relatively easily surround your forces against the sea if he pushes at the "hinge" at Lake Peipus.

Good idea. Thanks for your input. I really like it when people give me good ideas. Keep 'em coming.

(in reply to DTurtle)
Post #: 562
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T79 - 10/18/2011 8:37:34 PM   
Flapdrol

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 8/18/2011
Status: offline 		I have to admit that KLilly has me stumped on what he is doing....given the sudden occurrence of armor near the Crimea, I'd expect an attack there. But why would he be withdrawing in the north and center? Is he hurting for manpower? Where is he withdrawing to?

And I *still* would not be concerned about Finland. You can hold him off with a few brigades and fortified zones and withdraw all other troops now to where the action is happening. Once Berlin is gone, you can easily withdraw 40 or so Guard corps and 60.000 airplanes to bulldoze into Helsinki.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 563
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T79 - 10/20/2011 2:35:27 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I like that phrase "bulldoze" into Helsinki.

(in reply to Flapdrol)
Post #: 564
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T80 - 10/20/2011 2:43:36 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		T80 ( Dec. 24, 1942 ) : Here's the front lines before any Soviet movement:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 565
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T80 - 10/20/2011 2:59:34 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I've still got the same problem I had last turn in the NorthWest Front, which is that I don't have enough people to expand into the vacant
space left when the Axis units pulled back to the south. I've got mostly rifle brigades in this area which I guess I'll keep moving into the
empty hexes and see if I can't manufacture some rifle Corps to rail up here or something.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 566
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T80 - 10/20/2011 3:02:46 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I've got lots of AP's and lots of rail cap. because it's still early in the turn....I haven't moved a lot of stuff yet so you guys can feel
welcome to post some advice if you'd like.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 567
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T80 - 10/20/2011 4:40:05 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's my moves for T80. With an overlay showing my attacks, which are many.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 568
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T80 - 10/20/2011 4:43:23 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Oh........and I moved the T-34's and SU-76's out of Stalingrad.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/20/2011 4:44:43 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 569
RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T80 - 10/20/2011 4:48:39 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the OOB, losses, destroyed units, and production:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 570
Page:   <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1.05.32beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T76 Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.406