Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 12/31/2011 3:09:39 AM   
No New Messages
Prince of Eckmühl
Matrix Elite Guard



Posts: 2459
Joined: 6/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd

KG - I genuinely do not mean to call into question the Marine Divisions contribution to the Pacific Theatre - nor did I want to suggest that you singled out that unit.

I have seen from your posts that you have some sort of affiliation with the Marines - to what degree I do not know - but the fact you have a respect for armed forces and their struggle in the world of Politics and Humanity is respected.

I just felt the need to point out that if other units took part in the Pacific Theatre (and I genuinely say if because I genuinely have no idea whether it was solely the Marines), then perhaps when you post these threads (which you do from time to time), that you maybe not "specifically" mention that particular unit (the US Marines) - and perhaps mention other units that are there. Of course it's not necessary to mention a total ToE - but perhaps mention the other units involved...at the very least give a cursory mention to other units.

Although - when you are talking about a specific battle, then it's totally acceptable to mention the specific unit.

But if other units were involved (and again, I have to mention my total ignorance of the region an it's fighting) then it's very derogatory to other units involvement when your posts specifically mention the Marine Corps. In fact, if I was to take my TOTAL knowledge of the Pacific Theatre from your posts then it would come across that it was solely the Marine Corps that fought the war in that theatre.

If that is correct, then so be it....but there is a part of me (with no idea of the region) that suspects that other units were involved - at some degree...be it lesser or more in certain places!

I have no real affiliation either way - having only a grandfather who fought in WWII through Normandy and beyond.........but it is VERY easy for units to be - mislaid.

I'm not saying you do that on purpose nor am I insinuating that you do it on purpose for the benefit of the Marines....but I do think there were other units that took part in the Pacific theatre and whilst I totally admire your admiration for the Marines, I seldom see your posts mention "the little people".

I do genuinely love that you love the people that fought for our freedom, but I do think your plaudits could be spread a bit wider. I have absolutely no problem with you praising the Marine Corps.......but if you do have the knowledge of the Pacific Theatre that I think you have then I suspect that you know (even though I just think I know) that it wasn't just the Marine Corps that fought the battles there.

I am absolutely totally willing to be told I'm talking crap - as I know zip about the region - and whilst I am happy to accept that perhaps the Marine Corps did the majority of the fighting - I cannot convince myself that they were the only unit.

Please, please continue to support the Marine Corps - but please think about praising all units involved....I guess there are very, very different criteria for working out what units where involved at what stage and at what proximity and to what level.

At the end of the day I think we can all say that ALL units were involved at ALL levels and for any length of time....is the best way I can "sum up" the "Pacificd Theatre" without leaving any countries (even with the smallest of contributors) out.

Have a great New Year and it's still a pleasure seeing you kicking around here...


I don't want to get too terribly involved in this whole USMC vs the rest of the "Allied invading forces" business, but I do feel somewhat duty-bound to comment on a peculiar quality of the FMF, that being its ability to sustain itself as a cohesive fighting force when similar formations might well have thrown in the towel. I raise the issue in part because a sober individual would not have been a bit surprised had a similar Allied force, USA or otherwise, which was tossed ashore on Tarawa, Peleliu, Iwo or Okinawa, had simply rolled over and played dead when its aggregate effectives drifted well south of that which had stormed the beaches. Jog my memory if I'm wrong in this regard, but it strikes me that these guys, the Jarheads, were functioning on a level that very few large units had, divisional for instance, in all of WW2, a notable comparo being the German Parachute units that descended on Crete in 1941, but very few others. Perhaps, I'm wrong in this regard, but that seems like awfully good company to me.


_____________________________

Government is the opiate of the masses.

(in reply to JudgeDredd)
Post #: 31
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 12/31/2011 5:37:06 AM   
No New Messages
planner 3
Matrix Hero


 

Posts: 616
Joined: 3/7/2008
Status: offline
Judge Dredd: Speaking in generalities only about the PTO. The Marines under the command of Adm. King did the majority of the island campaign in the Central Pacific in the period 42 to 44, they recieved assistance in late 44 from the US Army. The US Army and the Australian Armed Forces (I include New Zealand here), fought in the Western Pacific ie: Philliphines, New Guina (Sp?) and were under the command of Gen. MacArthur. The island hopping campaign got most of the news coverage because they were somewhat shorter and gave victories and proaganda that helped us on the home front. Mind you I not taking anything away from the USMC they did their part. My dates may not be precise but I said "in generalities".

< Message edited by planner 3 -- 12/31/2011 5:38:48 AM >


_____________________________

"As Pogo said, 'We have met the enemy and he is us' "

(in reply to Rosseau)
Post #: 32
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 12/31/2011 6:32:45 AM   
No New Messages
warspite1
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KG Erwin

One of the things that haunts me about the Pacific War is that one of my uncles, now deceased, served with the army on Okinawa. I was too young to know how to ask him the right questions, so there is an empty section in my memory. Uncle Dennis passed away without sharing many of his stories with me. This is part of the reason I am fascinated by the Pacific War, and why I ask questions of another uncle, who is still alive, who served in Vietnam. Uncle Harry has shared some stuff with me, which I'll keep to myself, as it is still painful to him.

As a wargamer, I don't take the typical "gamer's" POV in playing out these battles. Sure, I play to win, but it is out of respect to these family members that I keep in mind that each virtual man that I lose is someone's son or husband or brother. Some gamers have ridiculed me for my attitude, but they just don't understand. Minimizing my casualties and maximizing my use of weapons isn't out of any innate "bloodlust", but out of my respect for the veterans. Make of this what you will, but I hate war and I play these games with an element of seriousness -- it is a mission to be achieved, a job to get done, and to bring my men home. I keep this in mind whenever I play -- it is an unfortunate but necessary evil, and I want to be the best commander I can be in order to achieve those ends.

Warspite1

KG Erwin, I would not seek to riducule you for that POV, I have experienced something similar (albeit to a lesser degree). We all have our reasons for playing wargames, we all have our own preferences as to what we like e.g. tactical, strategic; what period is "our bag" e.g. WWII, Napoleonic or whatever; and, perhaps most importantly, what side we like to play.

My favourite game is World In Flames and I must say I "disliked" losing Commonwealth ships whenever I played as the Allies; some ships more than others i.e. the many I feel a particular affinity with - HM Ships Warspite, Penelope, Ark Royal and Coventry to name just four .

This feeling, which I can't really explain, was over and above the fact that from a gaming point of view, losing ships doesn't help with winning the game!

I must say of all the games I've played over the years, that is the only time I have felt that way about cardboard counters or images on a computer.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 33
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 12/31/2011 6:25:11 PM   
No New Messages
Jeffrey H.
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 3154
Joined: 4/13/2007
From: San Diego, Ca.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jim D Burns

I do have a vague recollection of an old PC title back in the late 80s that modeled individual men, but I can’t recall the name of it. Orders were plotted ahead of time and each turn was about one minute or so. Of course it was all ASCII graphics back then but the system seemed a sound idea on how to model such combats on a PC.



There was computer ambush I think that had a board and grease pencil. You typed in orders and plotted the results. It was kinda fun.


_____________________________

History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.

Ron Swanson

(in reply to Jim D Burns)
Post #: 34
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 12/31/2011 10:30:14 PM   
No New Messages
Titanwarrior89
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 3283
Joined: 8/28/2003
From: arkansas
Status: offline
Marine Raider's! USMC. These guys knew their stuff.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"

(in reply to Rosseau)
Post #: 35
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 12/31/2011 10:32:37 PM   
No New Messages
Titanwarrior89
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 3283
Joined: 8/28/2003
From: arkansas
Status: offline
U.S. Army Inf.(Regulars). - Rendova Island.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"

(in reply to Titanwarrior89)
Post #: 36
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 12/31/2011 10:52:22 PM   
No New Messages
Titanwarrior89
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 3283
Joined: 8/28/2003
From: arkansas
Status: offline
U.S. Navy - U.S.S Smith Hit by a Jap plane-Men Died at their stations. Battle of Santa Cruz. Seems like pretty good company to me as well. It was a Team effort by the Marines-Army and Navy with Marines and the Navy taking the worst of it during the begining weeks and months of guadalcanal. All heroes in my mind. God blessem all.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"

(in reply to Titanwarrior89)
Post #: 37
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 12/31/2011 11:57:13 PM   
No New Messages
KG Erwin
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 8981
Joined: 7/25/2000
From: Cross Lanes WV USA
Status: offline
Apart from their heroism in serving with the 1st Marine Division in WWII, I also am proud of the postwar writing of Robert Leckie and Eugene Sledge. Leckie wrote some 40 books after the war, and I believe that "Strong Men Armed" is one of the best single volumes of the PTO. As far as Eugene Sledge is concerned, his "With the Old Breed at Peleliu and Okinawa" is an all-time classic. These are two of the favorite books in my home library. If you guys want to understand what happened in the PTO, then get these books.

I also think that the HBO series "The Pacific" is greatly underrated, but watching it without any prior knowledge does not help in appreciating it. It focuses upon the actions of the 1st Marine Division from 1942-45, with particular emphasis on the Battle of Peleliu in episodes 5-7.

(in reply to Prince of Eckmühl)
Post #: 38
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 1/1/2012 12:10:20 AM   
No New Messages
JudgeDredd
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 8573
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline
I have them - they are very good reads.

_____________________________

Alba gu' brath

(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 39
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 1/1/2012 12:13:43 AM   
No New Messages
Titanwarrior89
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 3283
Joined: 8/28/2003
From: arkansas
Status: offline
Yep I agree. The Pacific series is excellent as well.
quote:

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd

I have them - they are very good reads.



_____________________________

"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"

(in reply to JudgeDredd)
Post #: 40
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 1/1/2012 12:30:51 AM   
No New Messages
Titanwarrior89
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 3283
Joined: 8/28/2003
From: arkansas
Status: offline
Cpl. E.B. Sledge USMC. Look how young he looks.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Titanwarrior89 -- 1/1/2012 12:31:52 AM >


_____________________________

"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"

(in reply to Rosseau)
Post #: 41
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 1/7/2012 8:20:53 AM   
No New Messages
Jim D Burns
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 4013
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Salida, CA.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffrey H.
There was computer ambush I think that had a board and grease pencil. You typed in orders and plotted the results. It was kinda fun.


Great call Jeffrey, that is the game I remembered. Did a little search and found a screenshot of the game and contents. I’m amazed you remembered the name, my old grey matter no longer does well recalling facts past a few years lol.



Jim




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Jeffrey H.)
Post #: 42
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 1/7/2012 1:10:48 PM   
No New Messages
nicwb
Matrix Hero


 

Posts: 518
Joined: 4/26/2010
Status: offline
They're re-showing The Pacific on my local TV network.

I saw it first time around and must admit I had a great deal of difficulty enjoying it. For me I think the problem was a lack of cohesion - they were trying to encapsulate the Pacific Theatre of Operation in the experiences of just a few individuals. The companion piece Band of Brothers had an easier task of it simply because it was the same men and faces all the way through. But to try and do the same justice Pacific has to jump about the place - one episode you're watching Sledge struggle with the savagery of Peleliu, the next its a different issue of Basilone's restlessness as a War Bond poster boy. All important but a bit disjointed to follow easily.

I've found it better the second time about though. I got the HBO companion book - it had a lot of good background inforrmation that never made it into the series.

Interestingly enough the original plan for the series was to feature the accounts of two other men, a Lt Shofner, who was a marine captured at Corrigedor, escaped and joined Filipino guerillas and Ens Michael who flew diver bombers off the USS Enterprise and with the "Cactus Airforce" - pity they lost those stories but I guess keeping them would have thrown cohesion totally out the door.

(in reply to Jim D Burns)
Post #: 43
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 1/7/2012 7:54:16 PM   
No New Messages
KG Erwin
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 8981
Joined: 7/25/2000
From: Cross Lanes WV USA
Status: offline
I bought the Pacific DVD set and it's an excellent companion piece to Band of Brothers. I won't get into the argument about "which is better". They are both good, but I'm predisposed to liking anything that involves the USMC in WWII. The Pacific's extra features DVD is very good, and for the regular episodes, one can choose whether or not to show the brief historical introductory sequences.

(in reply to nicwb)
Post #: 44
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 1/7/2012 11:36:55 PM   
No New Messages
nicwb
Matrix Hero


 

Posts: 518
Joined: 4/26/2010
Status: offline
Sorry KG Erwin - I wasn't intending a "one is better than the other" debate. (I think that's been endlessly vented elsewhere) - its more of an observation about the difficulty I had following the accounts in the Pacific as opposed to the only other point of comparison I had.

I found the companion book good as it was by the author and followed the same order as the series - the extra info made everything more coherent.

(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 45
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 1/8/2012 12:05:47 AM   
No New Messages
KG Erwin
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 8981
Joined: 7/25/2000
From: Cross Lanes WV USA
Status: offline
No need for you to apologize, but thanks anyway. The fact remains that the PTO was a huge theater of war, which started in 1931, but it is not yet completely understood, as it was arguably a second war which needs to be separated from the war in Europe. The simple vastness of the theater is somewhat overwhelming, and many nations were involved. This is why I focused on one element of the whole in my original post.

(in reply to nicwb)
Post #: 46
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/11/2012 3:50:01 AM   
No New Messages
wg335910
Matrix Trooper



Posts: 86
Joined: 1/14/2008
Status: offline
HPS has a company level game for all the USMC battles in the Pacific. I think it's called "the Proud and the Few". For myself, I'm just looking for a game that deals with only Gudalcanal ground campaign.

(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 47
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/11/2012 3:31:00 PM   
No New Messages
Gunhawk
Matrix Veteran


 

Posts: 254
Joined: 11/30/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KG Erwin

To set the record straight, the US Army had more amphibious landings than the USMC in the Pacific. However, the toughest assaults, such as Iwo Jima and Peleliu, were undertaken by the USMC, with some support by the army on both landings. In the case of Iwo Jima, the USMC was supported by flame tanks of the US Army. No USA infantry took part. I have no intention of denigrating the Army's part in winning the Pacific War, OK? However, the Marines had six divisions fighting in the PTO, and their losses were the equivalent of one entire division.

Now, as far as launching the first US ground offensive of WWII, the 1st Marine Division holds that distinction, landing on Florida Island and Guadalcanal nine months to the day after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Army units landed on Guadalcanal in October 1942, two months after the Marines.


I have no particular agenda here as I my father and four uncles fought in WWII in three different branches, but I don't see why the USMC should be singled out as being in any way better or more interesting than the USN or USA. My father was wounded and MIA during the Battle of the Bulge. My uncle Andrew, who was in the US Army Signal Corp was killed in France. My uncle Paul, who was in the USMC, fought at Iwo Jima. My uncle Walter, who was in the USN on the Destroyer Ault, was at the naval battle of Okinawa. His DD was hit by a Kamikazi. You can read about that if you wiki the DD Ault. My uncle Earl lost his thumb on a carrier in the Pacific. If you're keeping count here that's one dead and two wounded out of five, and only one was a Marine, and he came through it without a wound. So the USMC certainly were not exclusive when it came to heavy fighting and casualties.

(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 48
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/11/2012 3:40:12 PM   
No New Messages
Gunhawk
Matrix Veteran


 

Posts: 254
Joined: 11/30/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KG Erwin

I've often wondered why the USMC campaigns in WWII receive such little attention from gamers. Their battles, arguably, were amongst the toughest of the war, and certainly were bloody affairs. In SPWaW, they are featured prominently, but there's little else to choose from in the tactical sense. One reason, I suppose, is that apart from Guadalcanal and New Britain, there was little room for grand strategic maneuvers. In most of the island invasions, it was simply a bloody slugfest, in which the Marines and Army literally had to kill every last Japanese defender. It turned into a medieval type war of hatred and total destruction using then-modern weapons. Does this factor turn off some gamers? Maybe.


There are many board wargames that cover the Pacific wars. Aside from the previously mentioned "Advanced Squad Leader - Gung Ho module", there is also "Combat Commander - Pacific", "Memoir 44", "Axis & Allies - Pacific", "Axis & Allies - Guadalcanal" and the soon to be released "Conflict of Heroes - Guadalcanal".

(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 49
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/11/2012 4:11:45 PM   
No New Messages
Prince of Eckmühl
Matrix Elite Guard



Posts: 2459
Joined: 6/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gunhawk

I have no particular agenda here as I my father and four uncles fought in WWII in three different branches, but I don't see why the USMC should be singled out as being in any way better or more interesting than the USN or USA.


I don't have any agenda, either. Like yourself, my family contributed a lot of manhood to the war effort, eight in total, if I include my father. However, I really do believe that the USMC has a special place in American history. And their finest hour probably didn't come in WW2, but in Korea, while fighting their way out of Chinese encirclement at the Chosin Reservoir. In contrast to the USA divisions that essentially disintegrated, the Marines soldiered-on. And not only did they bring their wounded out, they brought the dead as well. The 1st Marine Division suffered 6,000 dead and 9,000 wounded in the battle. When the Marines were finally evacuated from Hungnam, they brought close to 90,000 Korean civilians with them. There's a moving documentary about the fighting that you might want to check out. But be advised, it's pretty raw stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qd8LDdbfIFY



< Message edited by Prince of Eckmühl -- 2/11/2012 4:14:31 PM >


_____________________________

Government is the opiate of the masses.

(in reply to Gunhawk)
Post #: 50
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/11/2012 4:16:52 PM   
No New Messages
doomtrader
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 5321
Joined: 7/22/2008
From: Poland
Status: offline
It would be great to make the Marine Corps Pacific game.

_____________________________


(in reply to Prince of Eckmühl)
Post #: 51
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/11/2012 5:28:55 PM   
No New Messages
berto
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 20708
Joined: 3/13/2002
From: metro Chicago, Illinois, USA
Status: offline

  • MacArthur's/The Army's Papua/New Guinea Campaign, 1942-1944.
  • MacArthur's/The Army's Return to the Philippines, 1944-1945 (including the Leyte landings, but also the Battle for Luzon, and the reconquest of Mindanao and the Visayas).
  • The Australian reconquest of the DEI (Dutch East Indies).
  • Australian "mopping up" operations in Papua/New Guinea and the Southwest Pacific.
  • The Burma Campaign, 1942, and 1944-45.
  • The Japanese conquest of Malaysia, 1942.
  • The Japanese conquest of Luzon, 1942.
  • The Sino-Japanese War, 1937-1945.
  • And others, already mentioned or not.

What any of these have to do with small-scale island invasions, lack of maneuver, "slugfest", "attrition warfare" etc. -- it escapes me.

In the Pacific War, there is plenty of larger-scale operational land warfare involving maneuver and quick, lightning strikes (e.g., invasions and paratroop drops and infiltrations behind enemy lines), etc. It is just sadly neglected.

I don't think there is too little attention paid to the Marines. Quite the opposite in fact.

Disclaimer: I am the proud father of a son 15 years into this Marine Corps service, now a staff sergeant, with three combat tours (2X Iraq, 1X Afghanistan) under his belt. Also, as a former U.S. Peace Corps Volunteer and thereafter as private citizen, I've lived and worked in the Philippines for 6+ years, my wife is a Filipina, etc., so I have a special interest in Southeast Asia.

_____________________________

Campaign Series Legion https://cslegion.com/
Campaign Series Lead Coder https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tt.asp?forumid=1515
Panzer Campaigns, Panzer Battles, Civil War Battles Lead Coder https://wargameds.com

(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 52
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/14/2012 12:37:16 AM   
No New Messages
IronDuke_slith
Matrix Elite Guard


 

Posts: 1595
Joined: 6/30/2002
From: Manchester, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gunhawk


quote:

ORIGINAL: KG Erwin

To set the record straight, the US Army had more amphibious landings than the USMC in the Pacific. However, the toughest assaults, such as Iwo Jima and Peleliu, were undertaken by the USMC, with some support by the army on both landings. In the case of Iwo Jima, the USMC was supported by flame tanks of the US Army. No USA infantry took part. I have no intention of denigrating the Army's part in winning the Pacific War, OK? However, the Marines had six divisions fighting in the PTO, and their losses were the equivalent of one entire division.

Now, as far as launching the first US ground offensive of WWII, the 1st Marine Division holds that distinction, landing on Florida Island and Guadalcanal nine months to the day after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Army units landed on Guadalcanal in October 1942, two months after the Marines.


I have no particular agenda here as I my father and four uncles fought in WWII in three different branches, but I don't see why the USMC should be singled out as being in any way better or more interesting than the USN or USA. My father was wounded and MIA during the Battle of the Bulge. My uncle Andrew, who was in the US Army Signal Corp was killed in France. My uncle Paul, who was in the USMC, fought at Iwo Jima. My uncle Walter, who was in the USN on the Destroyer Ault, was at the naval battle of Okinawa. His DD was hit by a Kamikazi. You can read about that if you wiki the DD Ault. My uncle Earl lost his thumb on a carrier in the Pacific. If you're keeping count here that's one dead and two wounded out of five, and only one was a Marine, and he came through it without a wound. So the USMC certainly were not exclusive when it came to heavy fighting and casualties.


In my experience, this is a minefield of a subject, since the USMC evokes particular attachment and fondness from its veterans and/or "Fanboys" (in the nicest possible sense of the word).

However, I would concur with your point of view. The USMC has been somewhat lionised post war, but I've never seen the experiences of men on Guadalcanal as being worse than those of the men in the Hurtgen. I've never seen Pelieu as intrinsically worse than conditions around Bastogne or parts of Italy.

Tarawa was carnage, but was it really worse than sections of Omaha beach? Marine units often performed well when hit hard, but was their performance any better than the airborne units who fought a thousand ad hoc actions in small groups all over Normandy in 1944 after a series of mis drops?

The Japanese were tough and generally fought to the last man. However, they were not nearly as tactically skilled or well armed as the Wehrmacht and outside of a handful of men who reached Okinawa, and the reinforcements that reached Guadalcanal, Japanese forces assaulted by Marines hardly ever received reinforcements or possessed the strength to launch divisional sized counter strokes.

Jungle terrain was ideal for defence, but then so was the Bocage and the mountains of Italy, and the Japanese didn't have MG42s, large artillery parks or much in the way of automatic weaponry or tanks.

The reason the Pacific seems ill served for land warfare games is that it was largely a martime theatre, where land operations were generally subordinate to Naval or air operations. It was the opposite in the west.

I'd argue it's also because there's only so much fun to be had blowing up bunkers and killing all the inhabitants. The small size of the battlefields together with the huge amounts of ordnance the Americans generally employed meant it simply wouldn't be as much fun tactically as a western meeting engagement, and no fun at all operationally (from a land perspective).

None of this is designed to detract from the bravery of those who served against the Japanese, but merely restore to its rightful place, the bravery of those who faced the Wehrmacht.

Regards,
ID

_____________________________


(in reply to Gunhawk)
Post #: 53
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/14/2012 4:55:35 AM   
No New Messages
Gunhawk
Matrix Veteran


 

Posts: 254
Joined: 11/30/2006
Status: offline
IronDuke

I couldn't have said it better myself. Very well thought out and very true.

Thanks.

(in reply to IronDuke_slith)
Post #: 54
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/14/2012 6:24:22 AM   
No New Messages
warspite1
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
Yes, I agree. A very good post Iron Duke.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to IronDuke_slith)
Post #: 55
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/14/2012 6:47:02 AM   
No New Messages
berto
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 20708
Joined: 3/13/2002
From: metro Chicago, Illinois, USA
Status: offline

Read

Touched with Fire: The Land War in the South Pacific, by Eric Bergerud

on why land warfare in the Southwest Pacific was worse than in any other combat theater of WWII.



_____________________________

Campaign Series Legion https://cslegion.com/
Campaign Series Lead Coder https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tt.asp?forumid=1515
Panzer Campaigns, Panzer Battles, Civil War Battles Lead Coder https://wargameds.com

(in reply to Prince of Eckmühl)
Post #: 56
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/14/2012 6:50:43 AM   
No New Messages
warspite1
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: berto


Read

Touched with Fire: The Land War in the South Pacific, by Eric Bergerud

on why land warfare in the Southwest Pacific was worse than in any other combat theater of WWII.


Warspite1

What was the conclusion - what made it worse?

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to berto)
Post #: 57
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/14/2012 7:37:02 AM   
No New Messages
berto
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 20708
Joined: 3/13/2002
From: metro Chicago, Illinois, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: berto

Read

Touched with Fire: The Land War in the South Pacific, by Eric Bergerud

on why land warfare in the Southwest Pacific was worse than in any other combat theater of WWII.


Warspite1

What was the conclusion - what made it worse?

  • Tropical diseases, including malaria, dengue fever, and a host of others (e.g., ~90+% combatants at Guadalcanal fought with chronic malarial fevers; soldiers were taken out of the line only if their fevers exceeded 101 degrees Fahrenheit, IIRC).
  • Intense heat & humidity; daily torrential rains, followed by insufferable dust; and the debilitating effects thereof (see the above; imagine fighting with 100+ degree fever in natural temps of 100 and above; dead bodies decomposing to a maggoty liquid "stew" within hours; etc.).
  • Insects (myriads of flies by day, mosquitoes by night, giant beetles & cockroaches, etc.), blood sucking leeches, land crabs (will try to nibble at your toes while you sleep), crocodiles (stories of troops accidentally falling into the swamp water and being eaten by crocs!), poisonous snakes, etc.
  • Bad water, bad food, even worse than elsewhere because often at the end of a very long and tenuous supply chain (e.g., literally having nothing but orange marmalade and Australian tinned "bully beef" to eat).
  • An especially ferocious enemy (the Japanese) who didn't "play by the usual rules of war" (preferred night attacks, so the front-line Allied troops had to keep awake all night, or try to; took no prisoners; banzai charges; beheadings; etc.).
  • Native head hunters!
  • Isolation and boredom; far, far from "culture" and the "civilized world", with no towns, much less cities, nearby for rear area R&R (for example: no cafes, no cinemas, no brothels (don't laugh!), etc.).
  • Low morale from being ignored and forgotten (operations in the European theater got much more attention and hoopla; no cheering crowds welcoming liberation; etc.).

It's been a while since I last read the book (have read it twice), but those are just some of things I recollect.

< Message edited by berto -- 2/14/2012 2:27:08 PM >


_____________________________

Campaign Series Legion https://cslegion.com/
Campaign Series Lead Coder https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tt.asp?forumid=1515
Panzer Campaigns, Panzer Battles, Civil War Battles Lead Coder https://wargameds.com

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 58
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/14/2012 4:42:11 PM   
No New Messages
Gunhawk
Matrix Veteran


 

Posts: 254
Joined: 11/30/2006
Status: offline
Berto

Being a Marine in the Pacific during WW II would have been damned uncomfortable. No doubt about it. But you know what might have been just as uncomfortable...maybe even more so? Living in a WW II submarine or flying daylight bombing missions over Germany knowing that the odds of completing 50 missions were terrible!

(in reply to berto)
Post #: 59
RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific - 2/14/2012 9:03:21 PM   
No New Messages
warspite1
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: berto

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: berto

Read

Touched with Fire: The Land War in the South Pacific, by Eric Bergerud

on why land warfare in the Southwest Pacific was worse than in any other combat theater of WWII.


Warspite1

What was the conclusion - what made it worse?

  • Tropical diseases, including malaria, dengue fever, and a host of others (e.g., ~90+% combatants at Guadalcanal fought with chronic malarial fevers; soldiers were taken out of the line only if their fevers exceeded 101 degrees Fahrenheit, IIRC).
  • Intense heat & humidity; daily torrential rains, followed by insufferable dust; and the
    debilitating effects thereof (see the above; imagine fighting with 100+ degree fever in natural temps of 100 and above; dead bodies decomposing to a maggoty liquid "stew" within hours; etc.).
  • Insects (myriads of flies by day, mosquitoes by night, giant beetles & cockroaches, etc.), blood sucking leeches, land crabs (will try to nibble at your toes while you sleep), crocodiles (stories of troops accidentally falling into the swamp water and being eaten by crocs!), poisonous snakes, etc.
  • Bad water, bad food, even worse than elsewhere because often at the end of a very long and tenuous supply chain (e.g., literally having nothing but orange marmalade and Australian tinned "bully beef" to eat).
  • An especially ferocious enemy (the Japanese) who didn't "play by the usual rules of war" (preferred night attacks, so the front-line Allied troops had to keep awake all night, or try to; took no prisoners; banzai charges; beheadings; etc.).
  • Native head hunters!
  • Isolation and boredom; far, far from "culture" and the "civilized world", with no towns, much less cities, nearby for rear area R&R (for example: no cafes, no cinemas, no
    brothels (don't laugh!), etc.).
  • Low morale from being ignored and forgotten (operations in the European theater got much more attention and hoopla; no cheering crowds welcoming liberation; etc.).

It's been a while since I last read the book (have read it twice), but those are just some of things I recollect.
Warspite1

Sounds like the 14th Army fighting in Burma too.


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to berto)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: The Marines' War in the Pacific Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

12.313