Perturabo
Posts: 2614
Joined: 11/17/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake You will note I did stipulate "sentient adults", not the underachieving descendants of Neanderthal. So, according to you, all non-African people aren't sentient adults? That's racist. quote:
ORIGINAL: JW quote:
ORIGINAL: bairdlander The WTC terrorist attacks were clearly the fault of the Iraqi people.Even though all the hijackers were Saudi Arabians.Nevertheless the Iraqi people had to be punished for these attacks (which they had nothing to do with) based on the fact that they "might" do something to harm America they had to destroy them first.We will never know what the true intentions of the evil Iraqi's were.Remember they were part of an organization called "The Axis of Evil".Same goes for the laws enacted after 911 of holding people indefiantly without charges,tapping phones and spying on people in the US.Its for your own protection.Its to prevent something that "might" happen.Its called freedom.If you dont like it move to Russia. Nice bit of nonsense. Could you point the parts of his post that are false according to you? quote:
ORIGINAL: bairdlander quote:
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake The "establishment storyline" is accepted by about 99.7% of sentient adults west of the Bosporus...just so you know. A new opinion poll shows surprisingly high levels of doubt in the UK over the official story of the 9/11 attacks. The poll, conducted by ICM on behalf of BBC, found that more people agree than disagree that the official account of what happened on 9/11 might turn out to be wrong in important respects. Only 8% strongly agree that they have been told the full story of the 9/11 attacks. Of those who expressed an opinion 37% agreed that rogue elements in the American intelligence services may have made a decision prior to 9/11 to allow a terrorist attack to take place. Richard Clarke, White House anti-terror co-ordinator at the time, said recently that the 9/11 attacks could have been foiled but for an explicit agreement within the CIA to withhold vital information from him and the FBI. Clarke says he cannot explain this behaviour. At the time the CIA were prohibited by law from operating in the US. The results are mirrored by a HEC poll published today in France showing that 58% have doubts compared to 31% percent who accept the official story. Half suspect that US authorities deliberately allowed the attacks to take place while a third suspect they were implicated in the execution of 9/11. The amount of truthers is scary. They are basically manufactured by a few crazies/cynical manipulators that probably make a lot of money on selling their theories. And I love all the manipulative stuff stuff like "The designer of the building said that it should be able to withstand a hit of 100 Boeings 737s" (Yeah, it's not like he was exaggerating or actually didn't say it or something like that.) "This architect has mysteriously went missing on 9/11" (Except that the mystery is more about whenever he was crushed, burned or asphyxiated by the 9/11 attack, not about whenever he was thrown into a river with concrete shoes or is being kept in some CIA prison or whatever). Or completely ignorant statements like "The movie is a fake because there's no flash from fireball on the shaded part of the building." (Which conveniently ignores the fact that fire from burning fuel isn't a brighter source of light than daylight, even on the shaded part of the building.) quote:
ORIGINAL: NefariousKoel quote:
ORIGINAL: JW quote:
ORIGINAL: Perturabo Didn't they already kill over 10 Jihadists per every person killed in WTC and Osama Bin Laden? How much would be enough? 100 per every victim? 1000? 10000? All of them. They're at war with us, whether we care to admit it or not. Beer for JW. The only good Jihadi is a Dead Jihadi. The main problem with Jihadis is that they seem to share this philosophy. Still, how exactly would you kill all Jihadi? Wouldn't it require taking over whole Middle-East or something like that? Which in turn would require waging war against whole Middle-East? And would create greater instability that would give Jihadi a free reign to murder tens of thousands of innocent people like in Iraq? Not to mention that at least one of these countries possesses nuclear weapons. So, do you really think killing all the Jihadi is possible or is it just your wishful thinking? If yes, then how would it happen? If no, then what's the point of complaining that there wasn't enough of them killed? quote:
ORIGINAL: wodin The documnetary following the fireman that day is harrowing...hearing the bofies hit the roof in the lobby..and knowing many of those Firemen where going to their deaths...also the jumpers and those at the windows was \is heartbreaking. A day no one will forget. Yes. It's like the world got darker that day. quote:
ORIGINAL: wodin Oh JW being a Brit I agree 100%...but it's been going on now for years...we have no culture anymore...it's dead and gone... Sorry to hear about your country. Recently I've seen news that the Polish government wants to import Chinese and Indians because Poles aren't breeding enough. From one side it seems that they have thought through it pretty well (not importing Africans and Middle-easterners and not importing people from neighbouring countries), on the other hand I can't help an impression that maybe they should make sure that Polish people have enough money to be able to cloth, feed and educate more than one kid per pair first before engaging in this sort of dangerous social engineering.
< Message edited by Perturabo -- 9/12/2011 9:48:55 AM >
_____________________________
People shouldn't ask themselves why schools get shoot up. They should ask themselves why people who finish schools burned out due to mobbing aren't receiving high enough compensations to not seek vengeance.
|