1946 WW3 Mod?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

1946 WW3 Mod?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Panzer Corps >> Mods and Scenarios >> 1946 WW3 Mod?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

1946 WW3 Mod? - 9/26/2011 1:24:40 AM

Rokkorfan

Posts: 14
Joined: 9/15/2011
Status: offline

Hi Guys, I figured that it would be relatively easy (in comparison to some of the mods) for some of you to create a Russia vs. Western Allies WW3 campaign set in 1946 or 1947. It strikes me that it would be a really fun campaign, with some interesting alternatives. It should also be relatively easy, with all of the maps and most of the units already created. We could have the potential for nuke usage, lots of advanced armour and air, it would be fun!

Is anyone planning to do this? Please say yes!

Post #: 1

RE: 1946 WW3 Mod? - 10/1/2011 1:33:12 AM

Rokkorfan

Posts: 14
Joined: 9/15/2011
Status: offline

Seriously? Is no-one interested in this?

(in reply to Rokkorfan)

Post #: 2

RE: 1946 WW3 Mod? - 10/1/2011 1:38:41 AM

VPaulus

Posts: 3630
Joined: 6/23/2011
From: Portugal
Status: offline

Well, I'm interested, but so far the closest thing is the H.Balck WW3 mod:
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2874991

(in reply to Rokkorfan)

Post #: 3

RE: 1946 WW3 Mod? - 10/28/2011 11:07:54 PM

El Condoro

Posts: 202
Joined: 4/2/2008
Status: offline

I have created a hypothetical campaign set in 1945. Red Dawn

The Russians didn't get nukes until 1949 so historically nukes wouldn't be an issue until after then. In Red Dawn I change history to have the Japanese surrender after Hiroshima, which frees the Nagasaki a-bomb to use as threat against Russia - a plot device, since nukes can't be used in Panzer Corps.

Anyway, I don't think Red Dawn is what you're after but it may be a start.

(in reply to VPaulus)

Post #: 4