RE: Week 105

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Week 105

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Week 105

Page: << < prev 8 9 10 11 [12]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Week 105 - 3/19/2012 4:13:38 PM

76mm

Posts: 4688
Joined: 5/2/2004
From: Washington, DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
Hey 76mm. There were three sapper regiments attached to the corps units that did not participate in the battle and according to the manual, they should have all been engaged. Why weren't they? That is my point. I shouldn't have had to assigned extras according to the manual as I read it.

Yeah, that doesn't sound right. So the sapper regiments attached directly to the corps did not participate, but the regiments attached to the army did? Weird...

(in reply to M60A3TTS)

Post #: 331

RE: Week 105 - 3/19/2012 4:55:13 PM

Flaviusx

Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

I suspect this is just a reporting error in the battle report.

_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to Scook_99)

Post #: 332

RE: Week 105 - 3/19/2012 8:11:50 PM

gingerbread

Posts: 2994
Joined: 1/4/2007
From: Sweden
Status: offline

Check if it was (un)ready - unready SU will not participate in battles.

(in reply to Flaviusx)

Post #: 333

RE: Week 105 - 3/19/2012 8:49:07 PM

M60A3TTS

Posts: 4014
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline

I don't see that support units have a ready or unready state but 14th Gds Sapper Regt from 20th GRC was at 98% TO&E. It is not showing up in the combat results table.

(in reply to gingerbread)

Post #: 334