Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

No Invasion of the US Please

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Panzer Corps >> No Invasion of the US Please Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
No Invasion of the US Please - 11/6/2011 3:36:22 AM   
GaryChildress

 

Posts: 6830
Joined: 7/17/2005
From: The Divided Nations of Earth
Status: offline 		When we get to the 1944 & 45 DLCs, I hope we don't have Germany invading Wichita, Kansas or anything like it. A cross Atlantic invasion of the US by Germany is so unrealistic, it would really ruin it for me. I'd much rather see a campaign based more closely on historic events. Even if it means losing the war it would be more interesting to me in the end.

One thing that could be done is in the last DLCs maybe 1944 onward, is to set up the scenarios so that you are losing purchase points in the aggregate. So in other words you start out 1939 building up your core army and then 1944-1945 slowly getting your aremy whittled down. Maybe set it up so that toward the end of the DLCs you are spending most of your purchase points just keeping your core army alive and upgraded with the latest equipment. Perhaps make units disbandable for extra PPs. So for instance in order to upgrade a tiger to a king tiger I might need to disband a unit to get the extra PPs. The final battle could be in the streets of Berlin with whatever is left of your army. You save Fritz's meat market from falling into Russian hands and you get a victory screen saying that Fritz is so grateful that he treats you to a free pot roast.

That would be far more interesting to me than Germany invading the US or launching an invasion space fleet to Alpha Centauri (which are probably about equally realistic).

_____________________________
Post #: 1
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/6/2011 3:46:39 AM   
Razz1


Posts: 2560
Joined: 10/21/2007
From: CaLiForNia
Status: offline 		Agreed.

(in reply to GaryChildress)
Post #: 2
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/6/2011 7:48:42 AM   
HansHafen

 

Posts: 258
Joined: 2/3/2008
Status: offline 		Well, history could have been different, that's one of the reasons we study it and replay it. So I would like to see it be possible because I think it would be fun to play.

Also, if Germany did defeat UK and Russia, who is to say they don't take those resources and begin to build subs and ships out the wazoo? And offer much support to the Japanese?

Looks like it is 2 votes against, one vote for.

(in reply to Razz1)
Post #: 3
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/6/2011 8:07:12 AM   
KerenskyLI


Posts: 113
Joined: 7/30/2011
Status: offline 		The plan for the initial DLCs is a purely historical path with only a few individual bonus and optional scenarios being fictional.

Key word on initial.  ;) 

If there's enough demand, I'm certain we'll have Allied Campaigns and Fictional Campaigns along the same lines.


_____________________________


(in reply to HansHafen)
Post #: 4
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/6/2011 8:44:44 AM   
GaryChildress

 

Posts: 6830
Joined: 7/17/2005
From: The Divided Nations of Earth
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HansHafen

Well, history could have been different, that's one of the reasons we study it and replay it. So I would like to see it be possible because I think it would be fun to play.

Also, if Germany did defeat UK and Russia, who is to say they don't take those resources and begin to build subs and ships out the wazoo? And offer much support to the Japanese?

Looks like it is 2 votes against, one vote for.


Germany and Japan together just didn't have the manpower nor resources to win against the USSR, The Commonwealth AND the US. It's a complete non-starter. Had Germany taken Moscow it probably wouldn't have ended the war in Russia. The US dropped the atomic bombs because invading the relatively small island of Japan would have cost millions of lives. Just think how many lives it would have cost Germany to invade the whole continent of N. America? If Germany crossed the Atlantic to invade the US where would they even begin? It would have been impossible to supply such an invasion. Secondly, why would Germany want to put itself through such a fiasco? What possible gain would there be? Even Hitler wasn't quite that crazy. It's complete pie in the sky. Panzers in Atlanta? Hitler would have been better advised to invade the moon.

< Message edited by Gary Childress -- 11/6/2011 8:53:56 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to HansHafen)
Post #: 5
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/6/2011 8:56:07 AM   
Hanal

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: 11/1/2003
Status: offline 		We might as go travel down the Turtledove road and have a bunch of Alien Lizards attack the Axis and Aliies!

(in reply to GaryChildress)
Post #: 6
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/6/2011 10:11:49 AM   
gerg71

 

Posts: 11
Joined: 7/20/2011
Status: offline 		I agree that BOTH types of campaigns would be fun to play.....If we wanted a game that was totally realistic I doubt so many wouldn't care that the way airpower works (compared to other units) makes no sense (planes stay in the air for days at a time without refueling).......Anyway, I get it that even with early major victorys it would have been very dificult for Germany to invade the USA. But it's fun to have the chance to write new history. Although defending Germany would also be a fun test.


(in reply to GaryChildress)
Post #: 7
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/7/2011 2:27:44 PM   
Tac2i


Posts: 2001
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: WV USA
Status: offline 		+1 -- The key to gaming fun for me is this very thing. I don't want to just replay historical events with game rules/mechanics that force me down a certain path. I want a chance to make history. I've purchased both DLCs and I'm enjoying them so far. Would be nice if Panzer Corps had a random game generator like Advanced Tactics Gold (my all time favorite wargame).

quote:

ORIGINAL: gerg71
it's fun to have the chance to write new history.



_____________________________

Tac2i (formerly webizen)

(in reply to gerg71)
Post #: 8
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/7/2011 4:33:36 PM   
Dragoon.


Posts: 175
Joined: 3/2/2003
From: Rio Grande do Sul
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KerenskyLI

The plan for the initial DLCs is a purely historical path with only a few individual bonus and optional scenarios being fictional.

Key word on initial. ;)

If there's enough demand, I'm certain we'll have Allied Campaigns and Fictional Campaigns along the same lines.




Well, if you consider doing a allied campaign I would like to see a Russian campaign first.

From a gaming point of view a Russian campaign would be optimal. Because like the Germans their army experienced an significant evolution during the war, offering a great variety in equipment especially tanks, TD, SPG's and planes(with lend lease). Constantly upgrading to better equipment is for me part of the fun.
Also the campaign could be rich in variety and full of exciting twists.
Starting easy with invading Poland, followed by the tough Winter War against Finland, your fight for survival against the Germans, a last stand, counter offensive, just to be rooted again an other last stand and the final push back. And it all ends with a battle against Japan. A symphony of violence, who wouldn't enjoy that? ;)

Unfortunately a well made Russian campaign would be anything than newbie friendly and very hard in difficulty.
You may have the invasion of Poland as an easy entry in the campaign but already the Winter War has to be very hard nut to crack.

< Message edited by Dragoon -- 11/7/2011 4:34:01 PM >

(in reply to GaryChildress)
Post #: 9
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/7/2011 8:30:48 PM   
AbeSimpson


Posts: 151
Joined: 6/23/2008
Status: offline 		Full scale invasion of US!!!

_____________________________

I think I understand what military fame is; to be killed on the field of battle and have your name misspelled in the newspapers.
William Tecumseh Sherman

(in reply to Dragoon.)
Post #: 10
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/8/2011 2:28:29 AM   
GaryChildress

 

Posts: 6830
Joined: 7/17/2005
From: The Divided Nations of Earth
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AbeSimpson

Full scale invasion of US!!!



I thought this was Panzer Corps not Fantasy Corps.

_____________________________


(in reply to AbeSimpson)
Post #: 11
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/8/2011 3:29:39 AM   
Razz1


Posts: 2560
Joined: 10/21/2007
From: CaLiForNia
Status: offline 		What do you expect from Homer?

(in reply to GaryChildress)
Post #: 12
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/8/2011 3:53:21 AM   
jomni


Posts: 2827
Joined: 11/19/2007
Status: offline 		Just don't buy the DLC if it ever comes out.  The good thing about DLC is choice.  I still a haven't bought a single one. :)

_____________________________

My Blog
Random Wargame Name Generator

(in reply to Razz1)
Post #: 13
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/8/2011 8:23:28 AM   
AbeSimpson


Posts: 151
Joined: 6/23/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress


quote:

ORIGINAL: AbeSimpson

Full scale invasion of US!!!



I thought this was Panzer Corps not Fantasy Corps.


Damn, and I thought this was a game were you have the choice to alter history. If you can´t stand the heat, keep out of the kitchen. :)

_____________________________

I think I understand what military fame is; to be killed on the field of battle and have your name misspelled in the newspapers.
William Tecumseh Sherman

(in reply to GaryChildress)
Post #: 14
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/8/2011 9:26:14 AM   
Dragoon.


Posts: 175
Joined: 3/2/2003
From: Rio Grande do Sul
Status: offline 		I thought it was a turn-based strategy game.

(in reply to AbeSimpson)
Post #: 15
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/8/2011 10:28:42 AM   
AbeSimpson


Posts: 151
Joined: 6/23/2008
Status: offline

_____________________________

I think I understand what military fame is; to be killed on the field of battle and have your name misspelled in the newspapers.
William Tecumseh Sherman

(in reply to Dragoon.)
Post #: 16
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/9/2011 7:57:55 PM   
GaryChildress

 

Posts: 6830
Joined: 7/17/2005
From: The Divided Nations of Earth
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AbeSimpson


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress


quote:

ORIGINAL: AbeSimpson

Full scale invasion of US!!!



I thought this was Panzer Corps not Fantasy Corps.


Damn, and I thought this was a game were you have the choice to alter history. If you can´t stand the heat, keep out of the kitchen. :)


Maybe we should have Germany invading Australia then. We can alter history and have Germany take over the entire world. Then the space lizards descend and all havoc breaks loose. There's "altered history" for you.

_____________________________


(in reply to AbeSimpson)
Post #: 17
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/9/2011 8:16:37 PM   
James Ward

 

Posts: 1183
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Status: offline 		There are two Sea Lion scenarios included. Both are pretty much 'fantasy'. They don't seem to ruin the game.

(in reply to GaryChildress)
Post #: 18
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/9/2011 8:17:14 PM   
vonRocko

 

Posts: 1447
Joined: 11/4/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress


quote:

ORIGINAL: AbeSimpson


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress


quote:

ORIGINAL: AbeSimpson

Full scale invasion of US!!!



I thought this was Panzer Corps not Fantasy Corps.


Damn, and I thought this was a game were you have the choice to alter history. If you can´t stand the heat, keep out of the kitchen. :)


Maybe we should have Germany invading Australia then. We can alter history and have Germany take over the entire world. Then the space lizards descend and all havoc breaks loose. There's "altered history" for you.

Now you're being ridiculous! Everyone knows the space lizards where already there.

(in reply to GaryChildress)
Post #: 19
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/9/2011 9:15:26 PM   
AbeSimpson


Posts: 151
Joined: 6/23/2008
Status: offline 		Hey, US Gov told us, there are no space lizards and never have been!! Lets keep things straight here! 

< Message edited by AbeSimpson -- 11/9/2011 9:26:05 PM >

_____________________________

I think I understand what military fame is; to be killed on the field of battle and have your name misspelled in the newspapers.
William Tecumseh Sherman

(in reply to vonRocko)
Post #: 20
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/10/2011 2:39:06 AM   
GaryChildress

 

Posts: 6830
Joined: 7/17/2005
From: The Divided Nations of Earth
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: James Ward

There are two Sea Lion scenarios included. Both are pretty much 'fantasy'. They don't seem to ruin the game.


I don't know to what degree a cross channel invasion of Britain would have been plausible or not but Germany sending transports across the Atlantic ranks up there with Buck Rogers and Red Dawn. Personally I'm not really in favor of a Sea Lion scenario either but I can at least find some small degree of plausibility in it. An invasion of the US is really pushing it though. Granted PC isn't much of a simulation of combat reality but there's a point where fantasy can get pushed too far and for me invading the US tips the scale. I mean, if that's what you guys want then knock yourselves out. I'll probably pass on the last couple installments if that's the case.

_____________________________


(in reply to James Ward)
Post #: 21
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/10/2011 5:55:19 AM   
HansHafen

 

Posts: 258
Joined: 2/3/2008
Status: offline 		ALL computer games are fantasy. There is no blood, pain, death, dirt, broken bones, severed limbs, decapitated rotting bodies, brain gore and bodily fluid sprayed all over you, no vomit inducing stench of death. No real morale, strategy, tactics, supply etc issues that are remotely the same as reality. No fog of war remotely approximating real life. No bonehead NCO yelling at you to do something that absolutely doesn't need to be done. So, go ahead with the scenario which is the same as the rest, fantasy.

And why couldn't Beria assasinate Stalin and give Germany european russia and bide his time behind the urals? Didn't happen, but could have. What if the Germans got a little luckier in 41 and did take Moscow? Stalin sues for peace and bides his time behind the Urals?

Thus Germany has a huge increase in resources and a one active front war. Maybe also Hitler didn't mistreat the Balts and the Ukrainians? Thus more soldiers. What if Hitler died and someone more sensible took over?

I suggest that they label this scenario as "fantasy" so no one will be confused and think it actually happened.

(in reply to GaryChildress)
Post #: 22
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/10/2011 10:43:58 AM   
El Condoro

 

Posts: 202
Joined: 4/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress


quote:

ORIGINAL: AbeSimpson


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress


quote:

ORIGINAL: AbeSimpson

Full scale invasion of US!!!



I thought this was Panzer Corps not Fantasy Corps.


Damn, and I thought this was a game were you have the choice to alter history. If you can´t stand the heat, keep out of the kitchen. :)


Maybe we should have Germany invading Australia then. We can alter history and have Germany take over the entire world. Then the space lizards descend and all havoc breaks loose. There's "altered history" for you.

Already done! "Invasion Australia"

(in reply to GaryChildress)
Post #: 23
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/10/2011 11:21:22 AM   
GaryChildress

 

Posts: 6830
Joined: 7/17/2005
From: The Divided Nations of Earth
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HansHafen
ALL computer games are fantasy.


This is something I've stated before myself in relation to other games. Even War in the Pacific is Fantasy, though it purports itself to be a "simulation". It pretty much comes down to how much fantasy one is interested in playing. On the one side of the spectrum is a wargame which follows the historic course of the war. To the other extreme is invasion of the space lizards. Somewhere in between there is invasion of the US. Granted I might still play invasion of the space lizards if that was what Slitherine offered but I would be much happier personally with a game that followed the historic course of the war.

quote:

And why couldn't Beria assasinate Stalin and give Germany european russia and bide his time behind the urals? Didn't happen, but could have. What if the Germans got a little luckier in 41 and did take Moscow? Stalin sues for peace and bides his time behind the Urals?

Thus Germany has a huge increase in resources and a one active front war. Maybe also Hitler didn't mistreat the Balts and the Ukrainians? Thus more soldiers. What if Hitler died and someone more sensible took over?

I suggest that they label this scenario as "fantasy" so no one will be confused and think it actually happened.


There are a LOT of what ifs in the above. You basically come to a point where you are no longer playing a "World War II" game if you completely rewrite history. What if Slitherine decided to follow your alternate history above? Would you be as happy with PC if there were no Russian front? Since as you say "all computer games are fantasy" then I assume it makes no difference to you?

Anyway, here's an idea for a compromise. Since Matrix and Slitherine are selling these DLCs, why not make more than one for the last couple years of the war. For 1944 and 1945 create a standard "Panzer General" version where America is invaded AND a version where Germany fights out the historic war to the bitter end. I assume since these DLCs are being sold that Matrix and Slitherine would therefore profit more from creating two different installments instead of just one.

_____________________________


(in reply to HansHafen)
Post #: 24
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/10/2011 11:36:24 AM   
AbeSimpson


Posts: 151
Joined: 6/23/2008
Status: offline 		No two versions needed. Just lose some key battles or win them minor. This should be enough to go down the "historical" road.




_____________________________

I think I understand what military fame is; to be killed on the field of battle and have your name misspelled in the newspapers.
William Tecumseh Sherman

(in reply to GaryChildress)
Post #: 25
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/10/2011 12:58:33 PM   
Tac2i


Posts: 2001
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: WV USA
Status: offline 		If playing 'historical" means Germany wins because they last until June 1945 vice May 1945 (or the Soviets win because they defeat Germany in March 1945 vice May 1945),  no thank you. What fun is that? For me, not much. I really like playing wargames but the whole point is that a game puts you, the player, in control so that you might effect a different outcome. I suppose you could say I'm a "fantasy" wargamer within the WWII technology era.

I'm really enjoying Panzer Corps and have purchased both DLCs. Its a quick 'beer and pretzel' game for me yet has some depth to it. The best example of what I like in a wargame, however, is a random generated game of Advanced Tactics Gold. I've been playing this game, first AT and now ATG, since 2007.


_____________________________

Tac2i (formerly webizen)

(in reply to AbeSimpson)
Post #: 26
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/10/2011 2:30:57 PM   
James Ward

 

Posts: 1183
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress


quote:

ORIGINAL: James Ward

There are two Sea Lion scenarios included. Both are pretty much 'fantasy'. They don't seem to ruin the game.


I don't know to what degree a cross channel invasion of Britain would have been plausible or not but Germany sending transports across the Atlantic ranks up there with Buck Rogers and Red Dawn. Personally I'm not really in favor of a Sea Lion scenario either but I can at least find some small degree of plausibility in it. An invasion of the US is really pushing it though. Granted PC isn't much of a simulation of combat reality but there's a point where fantasy can get pushed too far and for me invading the US tips the scale. I mean, if that's what you guys want then knock yourselves out. I'll probably pass on the last couple installments if that's the case.


I agree that crossing the Atlantic is different than crossing the Channel but both are 'what if's'. If you're going to have what if's then why not have a bunch?

(in reply to GaryChildress)
Post #: 27
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/10/2011 2:31:55 PM   
blastpop


Posts: 395
Joined: 11/27/2005
From: Connecticut
Status: offline 		Invading the US was not plausible. An extreme number of things would have had to go right for the Germans as well as a lot of luck. There was a chance of Sealion as the Germans were preparing for the eventuality in an operational way.

I'm not really interested in Alt history. No Texas Tea, Tomorrow the World or Nato Nukes and Nazis...

That said why not:

Why not accommodate both camps. Some sort of setup option to allow or not the Germans to proceed past England as an example in the West...

(in reply to Tac2i)
Post #: 28
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/10/2011 2:40:22 PM   
AbeSimpson


Posts: 151
Joined: 6/23/2008
Status: offline 		PG had those choices, you could choose between Balkans and North Africa or opt for Gibraltar...
but once you´ve chosen a certain path you had to conquer the States in 45 (Major in Moscow 42, Major in UK 43 and then US 45).

< Message edited by AbeSimpson -- 11/10/2011 2:42:32 PM >

_____________________________

I think I understand what military fame is; to be killed on the field of battle and have your name misspelled in the newspapers.
William Tecumseh Sherman

(in reply to blastpop)
Post #: 29
RE: No Invasion of the US Please - 11/10/2011 2:44:16 PM   
GaryChildress

 

Posts: 6830
Joined: 7/17/2005
From: The Divided Nations of Earth
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Webizen

If playing 'historical" means Germany wins because they last until June 1945 vice May 1945 (or the Soviets win because they defeat Germany in March 1945 vice May 1945),  no thank you. What fun is that? For me, not much. I really like playing wargames but the whole point is that a game puts you, the player, in control so that you might effect a different outcome. I suppose you could say I'm a "fantasy" wargamer within the WWII technology era.



The fun is in playing the game, not in some percieved "reward" screen at the end which says, "you've conquered the world". Code Name Panzers is one of my favorite games of all time. The German campaign ends in Stalingrad with the German player winning a tactical victory for the day but it still doesn't have any effect on the overall outcome of the war, you know the Germans are still going to lose Stalingrad. General Paulus simply hands you a box of cigars in the victory cut scene. Not much of a reward but I really don't care what the victory screen says once I've finished all the scenarios. I still had the most fun I've ever had in a game playing it.

In gaming there is only 1 tangible reward that counts and that is the opportunity to play another level after winning the previous one. Whether or not your final victory screen says, "you conqured the world" or "you lost the war but you played a good game" is irrelevant. Just about every game and it's sequel has a "you conquered the world" victory at the end. Wouldn't something different be nice for a change?

Anyway looks like the votes are in favor of Fantasy Corps. Enjoy your fantasy. Say hello to Tattoo for me.

_____________________________


(in reply to Tac2i)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Panzer Corps >> No Invasion of the US Please Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.641