Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) Page: <<   < prev  111 112 [113] 114 115   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 3/24/2018 7:01:27 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
quote:

You need:

Several divisions, easily concentrated, with support troops and shipping to act as reserves.

Fire Brigades...mobile fast troops to plug gaps to buy a few days.

Air mobile reserves...infantry and AT guns and ART that can be flown to a hotspot in a moments notice.

Pick x2 and x3 and river crossings to defend. Each defense needs 15cm+ artillery, forts, AA guns, radar, and preferably IJA 43 infantry (you only have a dozen or so these heavy divisions - make sure they aren't in Manchuko or China). If you mass several AA rgts you can even defend in clear terrain if you have enough troops to absorb the bombing.

Type 1 Medium Tanks are simply great. In June of 44 they upgrade to Type 3 Medium Tanks which are even better...make sure you can upgrade to Type 3 ASAP.


I'm constantly attempting to set the above up. Good to hear I'm not wasting my time.

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to rustysi)
Post #: 3361
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 3/24/2018 7:09:07 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
quote:

What would you do if the Allies landed 5 divisions at Tavoy for example?


Couldn't handle 5 divisions, but I've already started placing troops there to fortify the base. I think that having bases in these 'rear' areas with amounts of AS would be a good idea too. How much AS I can't say, but I'd like it to be around 150-200 as much as possible. Its one of the reasons I like the M3a zero, range = 8. Can help to cover more ground.

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to rustysi)
Post #: 3362
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 3/30/2018 12:39:52 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Lots of excellent advice and details. Love it. Right now my reserves in Burma are 2x tank and 2x infantry divisions. I'm still going to push the Chindits out of Warazup, then move those guys back to a central location.

Been out of town with the wife for a few days but got the next turn back to Ted.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to rustysi)
Post #: 3363
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 3/30/2018 1:36:12 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
15 Aug 43

Sub War

The Jack caught a convoy of xAKs hauling resources and a little oil and put 2 torpedoes into one. Later in the day, she put another torpedo into her sinking her.

The rest of the action was at Vaitupu. I have 3 subs in the hex. I usually don't like putting subs in shallow hexes, but it was too tempting. The I-5 was caught by the DD Aaron Ward and put down. Too bad. But the I-6 made up for it. She put 2 torpedoes into CVE Corregidor leaving her burning and heavily damaged. No sign of her sinking, but she's definitely out of the fight.

Later in the day, the I-6 caught a BIG tanker and put a torpedo into her, leaving her doing a nice impression of a pyre. No confirmation that she sank either.

5 Fleet

Nothing to report.

4 Fleet

I have a small surface TF of a CA, 2 CL and 3 DD headed to Vaitupu hoping to catch some of those juicy ships and kill them. They're still a couple of days out though.

I detached 2 DDs from that TF to head to another destination. Details below.

SE Fleet

There are a couple of TFs sitting at Namatani (the hex due east of Rabaul, still a dot hex). One is APAs and the other is AKAs. Those two DDs mentioned above are heading here. They'll be in range to attack tomorrow. See map below.

The typical Allied bombing occurred today.

There's a carrier TF tooling around south of Rabaul. I think it may be CVEs because of the number and type of planes. Or maybe the remaining CVs are low on planes. Not sure.

I am sending out a CV TF composed of Akagi, Kaga and Zuikaku with extra fighters totaling 136 Zeros, 28 Judies, 36 Jills and 18 Kates. It has 2, possibly 3 missions. I hope to hit the APA/AKAs and sink a bunch. Also, I'm sending a convoy with 18k supply to Rabaul. They'll cover it. Finally, if I get lucky, I'd like to hit the enemy carrier TF. Yeah, that's a lot of missions, but we'll see what happens. I suspect once Ted gets a whiff of my carriers he'll head for the hills. My primary goal is to get supply to Rabaul. Currently, Rabaul has no port damage so the supply should be off loaded pretty quickly.

You'll see that there are a couple of surface fleets in the NE corner of the map. That's the 2 small fleets that are going to raid the two bases mentioned above.

SRA
Burma
China


Nothing to report.

Other Stuff

The N1K2-J George R&D advanced to 11/43. It'll become operational on 9/43. There currently are 6x30 factories working with 27(3), 23(7) and 21(9) repairing.





Attachment (1)

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 3364
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 3/31/2018 6:06:02 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
Something came to me the other day that I don't think anyone mentioned WRT Ted's damaged CV's. Mike if they haven't sunk, and they may not have, he could've disbanded them at a base in the area. You know to do some much needed repair so they have a chance of getting home. May be why you haven't found 'em. Are you reconing his bases? You should have a number of good recon aircraft by now. Irving's and Dinah's come to mind.

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 3365
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 3/31/2018 6:14:44 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
Here's another little tidbit on something I just tried. I said before to fly your CV planes off to a base for fatigue reduction. Well it came to me I had never bothered to offload them once disbanded. Well as expected all go to damaged. The good news is they have a delay of one day for return, looks like 2-3 days in reality, but when repaired all have zero fatigue. So that's probably faster than CB's method (are you listening dude?) and no supply cost to swap planes either.

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to rustysi)
Post #: 3366
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/6/2018 2:20:18 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Still no turn from Ted. Time to give him a holler. Either he's really busy or he's discouraged with the game. I hope the former. If it is the latter, then that means he probably took a beating with his carriers. Anyway, here's the most recent turn:

16 Aug 43

Sub War
5 Fleet


Nothing to report.

4 Fleet

The Allied ships sitting at Vaitupu finally vacated the area. My two subs are sitting there looking at each other through their periscopes. My little surface fleet of 1 CA, 2 CL and 3 DD that was headed there for a visit is now headed toward SE Fleet area where there are a couple of Allied TFs that are begging to be victims of Long Lances.

SE Fleet

The 2 DD that were detached from the TF above are within striking distance of the APA TF sitting at Namatani (the dot base 1 hex east of Rabaul). Full speed!

An Allied TF composed of 7 CA, 6 CL and 5 DD bombarded Rabaul today (oh joy) trashing the place. The CA Minneapolis ate a mine on the way out. I’m determined to give away nothing cheaply.

The Allied bombers spread themselves around bombing everything in sight destroying a couple dozen planes on the ground in the process. Current damage is pretty bad:

Manus: 81-59-59
Kavieng: 83-73-95
Rabaul: 49-100-98
Talasea: 0-97-71

KB1 (Akagi, Kaga and Zuikaku) will be within 5 hexes of Namatani (the APA TF) and 7 hexes of the Allied carrier TF. I think the carriers are the 3 surviving CVEs. They have 50+ fighters and 20 bombers. If that’s the case, my carriers could do a number on them tomorrow. I have 136 fighters, 28 Judies, 36 Jills and 18 Kates. There aren’t a lot of bombers, but it should be enough to wreck them. I’m hoping to kill or drive off the carriers tomorrow so I can safely (relative term here) drop off some much needed supply at Rabaul (~18k) protecting my cargo ships with my carrier fighters.

This won’t stop the Allied bombers from wreaking havoc but with the Allied fleet out of the way, I’ll be able to control the seas more easily. The goal is to ship more supply to my beleaguered bases in the area.

SRA

Timoeka finally repaired all the damage (I caused) and completed level 1 forts. A couple more levels and that base should be good to go.

Burma

Four fighters showed up over Warazup (LRCAP and not a lot of supply) and shot down 4 bombers. The other 135 bombers sorties did no real damage to the tank regiment sitting there staring at the Chindits. I am going ahead with the operation to oust the Chindits. The 1 and 2 Tank Divisions and 5 Division (along with 18 Army HQ) are de-training in the base to the south and will move there in a few days. I can’t pass up on an opportunity to execute an operation where the odds are stacked in my favor. Every squad I kill delays the Brits that much more.

Just so you guys don't flip out, I'm beginning to pull back some of my frontline units to road hexes so they can more easily move about. It takes forever to move units out of jungle hexes and I really don't want them to get cut off.

China

The Chungking force finally got some supply so the artillery will bombard tomorrow. In the mean-time, about 135 2E bombers continue with their daily bombing raid of Chungking.

Other Stuff

So, the month of August has been a pretty successful month for the IJN. We have finally met the Allied carrier force and soundly defeated them for relatively small cost to ourselves.

Three days of carrier battles started on 8/1/43 with an Allied CV TF of CVs Hornet and Gettysburg (cool name for a CV ) and CVLs Independence and Princeton catching the Junyo, Hiyo, Shoho and Zuiho sinking the Junyo and Zuiho and trashing Hiyo and Shoho for basically no damage to the Allied carriers. Total Allied cost was 19 aircraft. Not a good start. KB was to the west out of range. I recall spending a lot of time trying to decide whether to continue the battle or head for the hills. I knew there were more Allied carriers TFs out there in addition to this one too.

I chose to charge forward, mainly to try and save Hiyo and Shoho. On 8/6/43, my combined KB caught a CVE TF. The final tally was CVEs Anzio and Santee along with BB New Mexico and two DEs sunk. In addition, 10 other ships were damaged to varying degrees, a few severely. Total Japanese cost was 20 planes.

The other Allied CV TFs were still moving around. It seemed like a chess match. On 8/7/43, KB (2 full CV TFs) caught a single US CV TF heavily damaging the Saratoga and Wasp and lightly damaging Yorktown. The US retaliation was unsuccessful, with heavy losses on their part. My afternoon raid put more holes in the three US carriers. There were small raids on both sides that did little, but I did get a few more licks in on the remnants of the CVE TF. I have gotten confirmation of the sinking of Saratoga only. I don’t know the fate of the other 2 Allied CVs but they’re out of the fight for a long time if they survived. Total losses to the Japanese were about 65 aircraft, but only about half that number of pilots.

Here's what I know of the Allied carriers:

CV:
Hornet, 3x5” on 8/5/43, last spotted on 8/5/43, operational.
Gettysburg, last spotted 8/5/43, operational.
Wolverine (in honor of Michigan Wolverines, Ohio State’s nemesis ), not spotted, operational.

Lexington, 1 sub torpedo, 1x500kg on 4/27/43, fuel storage explosion, last spotted on 4/27/43, should be repaired?
Enterprise, 1 aerial torpedo on 6/22/43, last spotted on 6/22/43, expected return end of August 43.
Essex, 1 sub torpedo on 6/26/43, expected return end of August 43.
Yorktown, 2x500, 1x250 on 8/7/43, fuel storage explosion, last spotted on 8/7/43, sunk or badly damaged.
Wasp, 2 aerial torpedoes, 2x500, 1x250 on 8/7/43, fuel storage explosion, sunk or badly damaged.

CVL:
Independence, last spotted 8/5/43, operational.
Princeton, 1x5” on 8/5/43, last spotted 8/5/43, operational.
Belleau Wood, not spotted, operational.

CVE:
Sangamon, not spotted, operational, part of the TF currently south of Rabaul?
Suwannee, not spotted, operational, part of the TF currently south of Rabaul?
Barnes, not spotted, operational, part of the TF currently south of Rabaul?

Corregidor, 2 sub torpedoes on 8/15/43, last spotted 8/15/43, sunk or badly damaged.

CVE-R:
Copahee, not spotted, operational.
Nassau, not spotted, operational.
Prince William, not spotted, operational.
Altamaha, not spotted, operational.
Breton, not spotted, operational.
Casablanca, not spotted, operational.

So, I see 3 CV, 3 CVL and 3 CVE (not counting the CVE-Rs) currently known to be operational with a potential 3 additional CV repaired soon. By the end of the year, another 2 CV, 4 CVL and 6 CVE are arriving.

Still long odds.

I have the following:
KB:
Akagi, operational.
Kaga, operational.
Soryu, operational.
Ryujo, operational.
Shokaku, operational.
Zuikaku, operational.

MKB:
Ryuho, operational.
Hosho, operational.
Chuyo, operational.
Unyo, operational.

Shoho, operational in Sep 43.
Taiyo, operational in Sep 43.
Hiyo, operational in Jan 44.

Plus, a few brand spanking new carriers…

By the end of Aug 43:
CVL Chitose, KB?
CVL Chiyoda, KB?

By the end of Sep 43:
CV Katsuragi, KB
CV Amagi, KB
CV Unryu, KB
CVL Mizuho, KB?
CVL Nisshin, MKB

That should be a surprise to Ted.

So, with no losses to either side, carrier capacity on 1/1/44 will be about 1173 Allied air capacity to 870 Japanese air capacity. Ouch. Hopefully, the losses and damage has made Ted a little guy shy.


_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to rustysi)
Post #: 3367
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/6/2018 4:08:13 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli
"a little guy shy".


Is this a technical term?



_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 3368
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/6/2018 11:57:17 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Absolutely, Pax!

Apparently Ted never got my last turn and has been frothing at the mouth waiting for it. That's good news. We should be back in business soon.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 3369
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/6/2018 12:28:18 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli
Apparently Ted never got my last turn and has been frothing at the mouth waiting for it. That's good news. We should be back in business soon.

Hooray!!!





_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 3370
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/6/2018 12:49:27 PM   
zuluhour


Posts: 5244
Joined: 1/20/2011
From: Maryland
Status: offline
an
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Absolutely, Pax!

Apparently Ted never got my last turn and has been frothing at the mouth waiting for it. That's good news. We should be back in business soon.

quote:

Apparently Ted never got my last turn

translation: "HE SUNK MY BATTLESHIP!"

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 3371
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/6/2018 1:19:22 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Apparently Ted never got my last turn and has been frothing at the mouth waiting for it. That's good news. We should be back in business soon.


Stuff like that happens. I have sent the wrong turn before too.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 3372
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/6/2018 1:49:42 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Just opened up a can of worms. Now he won't shut up. He's talking about B-24J production starting on 1 Sep and B-29 production starting next Spring.

Glad I'm getting that IJAAF fighter expansion in a few months. I suspect those Franks and Tonys are going to come in handy.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3373
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/6/2018 2:05:35 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Since you are playing without Symon's air mod, be careful with those Tonies...Franks much better, and the Frank R is really great with very high altitude capability.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 3374
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/6/2018 4:16:22 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
quote:

Since you are playing without Symon's air mod, be careful with those Tonies


Yeah, its finally sinking in with me. I think Loka loves these things so much because he's using the mod. In the mod its a 400+ mph aircraft. In stock its like 367mph. I'm beginning to get it.

BTW I don't have a problem with the mod speed rating, I have a book around somewhere that tells me the plane will hit 400+ mph.

Edit: Consentrate on the Franks.

< Message edited by rustysi -- 4/6/2018 4:19:26 PM >


_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3375
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/6/2018 4:17:47 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
quote:

Glad I'm getting that IJAAF fighter expansion in a few months.


Hate to rain on your parade, but there's also a corresponding loss of naval fighter air groups.

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to rustysi)
Post #: 3376
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/6/2018 4:33:38 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Yep, I am going to focus on the Franks. I just got the Frank a, maybe a week or so ago. Tony has been in production longer.

And yes, I'm aware of the IJNAF loss around the same time.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to rustysi)
Post #: 3377
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/7/2018 12:26:15 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
quote:

KB1 (Akagi, Kaga and Zuikaku) will be within 5 hexes of Namatani (the APA TF) and 7 hexes of the Allied carrier TF. I think the carriers are the 3 surviving CVEs. They have 50+ fighters and 20 bombers. If that’s the case, my carriers could do a number on them tomorrow. I have 136 fighters, 28 Judies, 36 Jills and 18 Kates. There aren’t a lot of bombers, but it should be enough to wreck them. I’m hoping to kill or drive off the carriers tomorrow so I can safely (relative term here) drop off some much needed supply at Rabaul (~18k) protecting my cargo ships with my carrier fighters.


Since your going after merchies, I would take off the Kates due to their slow speed and put on more Judy. You risk a fragmented strike of just Kates getting destroyed and losing precious pilots, In My Opinion (IMO). If the Kates do fly with main strike, they will fly with speed of slowest planes....Kates!

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 3378
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/8/2018 9:08:58 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants_MatrixForum

quote:

KB1 (Akagi, Kaga and Zuikaku) will be within 5 hexes of Namatani (the APA TF) and 7 hexes of the Allied carrier TF. I think the carriers are the 3 surviving CVEs. They have 50+ fighters and 20 bombers. If that’s the case, my carriers could do a number on them tomorrow. I have 136 fighters, 28 Judies, 36 Jills and 18 Kates. There aren’t a lot of bombers, but it should be enough to wreck them. I’m hoping to kill or drive off the carriers tomorrow so I can safely (relative term here) drop off some much needed supply at Rabaul (~18k) protecting my cargo ships with my carrier fighters.


Since your going after merchies, I would take off the Kates due to their slow speed and put on more Judy. You risk a fragmented strike of just Kates getting destroyed and losing precious pilots, In My Opinion (IMO). If the Kates do fly with main strike, they will fly with speed of slowest planes....Kates!


Good advice, but I got it after the turn was sent. I got it back last night and ran it this morning. Those Kates played an important part of the action...

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 3379
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/8/2018 9:45:59 PM   
Zorch

 

Posts: 7087
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli


quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants_MatrixForum

quote:

KB1 (Akagi, Kaga and Zuikaku) will be within 5 hexes of Namatani (the APA TF) and 7 hexes of the Allied carrier TF. I think the carriers are the 3 surviving CVEs. They have 50+ fighters and 20 bombers. If that’s the case, my carriers could do a number on them tomorrow. I have 136 fighters, 28 Judies, 36 Jills and 18 Kates. There aren’t a lot of bombers, but it should be enough to wreck them. I’m hoping to kill or drive off the carriers tomorrow so I can safely (relative term here) drop off some much needed supply at Rabaul (~18k) protecting my cargo ships with my carrier fighters.


Since your going after merchies, I would take off the Kates due to their slow speed and put on more Judy. You risk a fragmented strike of just Kates getting destroyed and losing precious pilots, In My Opinion (IMO). If the Kates do fly with main strike, they will fly with speed of slowest planes....Kates!


Good advice, but I got it after the turn was sent. I got it back last night and ran it this morning. Those Kates played an important part of the action...

I smell SCLS (Sudden Carrier Loss Syndrome) for poor Ted.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 3380
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/8/2018 9:55:05 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
This turn was nothing like I envisioned...

17 Aug 43

Sub War

The I-6 was pummeled into oblivion near Vaitupu. Apparently, some DDs returned.

There seems to be a line of subs running east-west about 4 hexes north of Kavieng. I caught a Dutch sub over there, hitting her with a DC. I'm going to send some DDs to search the area. The Allied subs that been taking a pounding near Truk seem to have relocated to safer waters here. I'll bet Ted is trying to catch KB when it sorties south to tag some Allied ships.

5 Fleet
4 Fleet


Nothing to report.

SE Fleet

I had sent 2 DDs in to harass (and hopefully damage/sink) some of those APAs to make life easier for the bombers later in the day. Well, they steamed to Namatanai and found the US CV TF that is still functional. CVs Gettysburg and Hornet and CVLs Independence (smoking) and Princeton were escorted by 4 fast BBs, 3 CLAAs, 3 CLs and 10 DDs. They got out of there without a shot being fired by either side. They got to within 6k yards and didn't shoot a torpedo or fire a gun. Well, I have a feeling I know what's going to happen come sunrise.

Well, the seas south of Rabaul and Namatanai seemed to have exploded with Allied TFs today. Ted must have gotten a whiff of my carriers and I saw the APAs I was after fleeing to the SW. That CVE TF is still a few hexes SSW of Rabaul. Still sitting at Namatanai was the US CV TF. Assuming they had full loads of aircraft, they had 96 Hellcats, 72 Dauntlesses and 72 Avengers. I had 136 Zeros, 28 Judies, 36 Jills and 18 Kates. I got off the first (and only Japanese) attack, composed of 27 Judies, 27 Jills and 9 Kates, escorted by 79 Zeros. They ran into a buzz saw of Hellcats, 94 of them, along with 4 P-47s who wanted to join in the fun. Doing the math, you can see that the US carrier fighters were on some pretty darned high CAP! Bad for my attack, but not so bad for my CAP. Anyway, my Zeros shielded the bombers as well as they could. I lost 23 of 94 Zeros before the Hellcats broke through. The Hellcats didn't have a lot of time to ravage my bombers, shooting down 7 (of 27) Judies, 4 (of 27) Jills and 2 (of 9) Kates. Then my bombers went to work, mainly missing, with a few notable exceptions.

The BB South Carolina ate 2x 500kg bombs. One bounced but the other penetrated. She'll need some yard time. BB North Dakota took 2 torpedoes (from Kates! ) leaving her burning and heavily damaged. I suspect she'll survive. Finally, The CV Gettysburg took a single 500kg bomb, causing an ammo storage explosion. I doubt she sinks but unless it's FOW, she'll need a repair yard too.

Flak took 15 of my bombers.

Then, it was the Allied turn to attack KB. The first attack was 30 SBDs and 32 Avengers, no fighter escort, against 56 Zeros. One Avenger made it to my ships only to get shot down attempting to launch against Hiei.

The next attack, the only one escorted, was 7 Avengers and 16 Hellcats vs. 39 Zeros. At a cost of 1 Zero, they shot down 7 Hellcats and all the Avengers. The next 3 attacks were 18 Dauntlesses, 8 Avengers and 8 Avengers. All were shot down. In the final attack 6 of 8 Avengers got through, but missed. Banzai!

Remember the small cargo convoy that was going to try for Rabaul? Well, 3 of the 4 ships were sunk from 3 attacks totaling 26 SBDs and 8 Avengers at the limit of their range. The remnants of that TF are headed back to Truk. That actually was a good thing. Many of those bombers would have probably made it through to my fleet. I'd much rather lose 3 xAKs than carriers.

Including planes written off, I lost a total of 55 planes and 53 pilots. KB has operational, 112 Zeros, 14 Judies, 27 Jills and 16 Kates. My estimate of the remaining Allied planes is 87 Hellcats, 23 Dauntlesses and 13 Avengers. Plus, a CV has a big hole in its deck and 1-2 BBs are out of the battle.

Initially, I was going to send KB back to Truk, but changed my mind. We both are relatively flush with fighters, but neither has enough bombers to break through the other's CAP. I'm moving my carriers to a point 8 hexes north of Namatanai, just to see what happens tomorrow. If the US CV TF heads south, I'll slide back down to see if there are any cripples I can clean up. If not, I'll wait it out for awhile.

The Allied bomber force trashed Kavieng, with a few going after Rabaul. None of my airfields are able to launch aircraft.

SRA
Burma


Nothing to report.

China

Arty bombardment of Chungking, killing 19 steps. Gonna be awhile.

Other Stuff

Nothing exciting here.

< Message edited by Mike Solli -- 4/8/2018 9:56:36 PM >


_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 3381
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/9/2018 5:13:39 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
quote:

Arty bombardment of Chungking, killing 19 steps. Gonna be awhile.


Ya think???

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 3382
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/9/2018 6:40:14 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
quote:

Remember the small cargo convoy that was going to try for Rabaul? Well, 3 of the 4 ships were sunk from 3 attacks totaling 26 SBDs and 8 Avengers at the limit of their range. The remnants of that TF are headed back to Truk. That actually was a good thing. Many of those bombers would have probably made it through to my fleet. I'd much rather lose 3 xAKs than carriers.


Yeah, you and every other JFB!!!!

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to rustysi)
Post #: 3383
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/9/2018 7:57:29 PM   
Zorch

 

Posts: 7087
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
The last battle make me think. How far could one take the fighters-heavy carrier strategy?

Suppose you do a fighters-only sweep over the enemy CVs, and follow that up with 20% fighters/80% strike planes? Would it be worthwhile?

(in reply to rustysi)
Post #: 3384
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/12/2018 7:18:33 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
quote:

Suppose you do a fighters-only sweep over the enemy CVs,


Don't think sweeps are allowed over TF's at sea. Anyone?

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to Zorch)
Post #: 3385
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/12/2018 7:25:14 PM   
Zorch

 

Posts: 7087
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rustysi

quote:

Suppose you do a fighters-only sweep over the enemy CVs,


Don't think sweeps are allowed over TF's at sea. Anyone?

If not, include 1 DB or FB.
I admit this sounds crazy.

(in reply to rustysi)
Post #: 3386
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/12/2018 8:51:19 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch


quote:

ORIGINAL: rustysi

quote:

Suppose you do a fighters-only sweep over the enemy CVs,


Don't think sweeps are allowed over TF's at sea. Anyone?

If not, include 1 DB or FB.
I admit this sounds crazy.

That would be escort, not sweep, with associated differences in odds ....

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Zorch)
Post #: 3387
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 5/2/2018 12:01:08 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
Where has Mike S gone to?

(in reply to rustysi)
Post #: 3388
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 5/3/2018 3:23:39 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
The Major gets busy betimes ...



_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 3389
RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 5/5/2018 7:25:56 PM   
rustysi


Posts: 7472
Joined: 2/21/2012
From: LI, NY
Status: offline
I understand.... but I'm Jonesin' here!!!!

At any rate, hope all is well and looking forward to whenever he may make it back.

If ever I should meet the man a dinner of his choice will definitely be offered.

_____________________________

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 3390
Page:   <<   < prev  111 112 [113] 114 115   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) Page: <<   < prev  111 112 [113] 114 115   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.766