Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 1942 May 28

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1942 May 28 Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 1942 May 28 - 6/5/2012 3:55:29 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		Victory at Liuchow? A bit of a stretch since it's a pyrrhic one. He lost more squads destroyed than the allies but the proportion of lost/remaining is in his favour since he has double the number of troops. Still, when one is getting kicked around turn after turn, a glimmer of success anywhere is good for the morale!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 271
RE: 1942 May 28 - 6/5/2012 4:39:57 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		Yes, I WILL take any victory I can get just now! It wasn't really so bad there as we got better than a 3 to 1 ratio on disabled and destroyed squads. The troop count was different, but I take that to mean that each Chinese squad has more men than Japanese squad.

The 18th is lagging behind running to escape in Burma, air is targeting them, Imperial ground forces are coming on fast and they smell blood. They will likely get lots of it. The battle near Liuchow was important for morale!

The massive extent of those radio messages at Singapore has me wondering what is up there? Lots of ships showed up in port (on a mouse-over), as expected, but what else?

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 272
RE: 1942 May 28 - 6/6/2012 12:10:30 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		Maybe Tokyo Rose moved her base of operations to Singapore ...

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 273
1942 May 29 - 6/6/2012 12:28:03 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 May 29

The Empire captured:
Waingapoe

The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:


There were Allied amphibious operations at:


There were two nighttime naval bombardments of our troops at Cox's Bazar, one by battleships and heavy cruiser, the other by light cruisers. Our troops were sitting tight (no attack orders) and now show 66% disruption. Will there be anyone else to bombard tonight?





Attachment (1)

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 274
RE: 1942 May 29 - 6/6/2012 12:32:15 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		I read in another post that putting the troops in Reserve Mode helps reduce casualties. I guess that means they are not sitting in the front line foxholes so the bombardment misses most of them. If there are no enemy troops in the hex I would try it.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 275
RE: 1942 May 29 - 6/6/2012 4:49:14 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		They are facing a brigade and as they are the only infantry force in the hex I can't risk it. Let's see if a Dutch or British sub - they have working torpedoes! - can nail a big ship during these shuttle runs.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 276
1942 May 30 - 6/6/2012 9:05:00 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 May 30

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:


There were Allied amphibious operations at:


It seems that the results south of Liuchow were a bit backward from yesterday's:
quote:


Ground combat at 74,56 (near Liuchow)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 31052 troops, 240 guns, 86 vehicles, Assault Value = 870

Defending force 17035 troops, 85 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 380

Japanese adjusted assault: 405

Allied adjusted defense: 735

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1718 casualties reported
Squads: 8 destroyed, 64 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled


Allied ground losses:
468 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 98 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Guns lost 11 (2 destroyed, 9 disabled)


Assaulting units:
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
9th Division
24th Infantry Regiment
30th Infantry Regiment
21st Infantry Regiment
6th Tank Regiment

Defending units:
60th Chinese Corps
64th Chinese Corps

Our guys performed well, but a lot of squads went off line. Reinforcements are on the way. A large radio source is headed south from Japan in the direction of Truk. The USA 32nd ID and 5 arty units are 3 or 4 days out from Sydney. Various aircraft and base personnel are 4 or 5 days out from Melbourne. No gin of the KB, and no sign of bombardment forces in the Bay of Bengal. Here is a look at the Australian 7th Division.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 277
1942 May 31 - 6/7/2012 5:15:14 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 May 31

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:


There were Allied amphibious operations at:


Lots of aerial bombing today but no ground combat. No sign of KB, unless that radio contact - which is now SE Bonin Islands - is it. 7th Australian Division is down to 18% disruption. Here is a look at the maneuvering in Central China.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 278
RE: 1942 May 31 - 6/7/2012 8:02:57 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		Don't Japanese CVs upgrade in June 42? Could be KB going off-line for a month? I think Mini-KB is not in for refit though.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 279
RE: 1942 May 31 - 6/7/2012 8:37:02 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		Well that particular target has been in contact for 3 days heading south, away from Japan. That, of course, presumes that all 3 radio contacts were the same target. It could just be a big tanker, supply, or troop convoy.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 280
1942 June 01 - 6/8/2012 10:49:04 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 June 01

The Empire captured:
Lashio

The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:


There were Allied amphibious operations at:


While the fall of Lashio was expected, I had hoped for one more turn.
quote:


Ground combat at Lashio (62,46)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 20023 troops, 133 guns, 81 vehicles, Assault Value = 670

Defending force 4185 troops, 18 guns, 47 vehicles, Assault Value = 107

Japanese adjusted assault: 471

Allied adjusted defense: 97

Japanese assault odds: 4 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Lashio !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
632 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 57 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Allied ground losses:
2061 casualties reported
Squads: 97 destroyed, 11 disabled
Non Combat: 64 destroyed, 30 disabled
Engineers: 14 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 4 (4 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 42 (42 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 5


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
I./143rd Infantry Battalion
113th Infantry Regiment
47th Infantry Regiment
Tanaka
1st Formosa Inf. Regiment
1st Tank Regiment
16th Infantry Regiment
25th Army
21st Medium Field Artillery Battalion

Defending units:
12th Burma Rifles Battalion
13th Burma Rifles Battalion
45th Indian Brigade
Rangoon BAF Battalion
RM Viper Force

The force south of Liuchow was partially retreated.
quote:


Ground combat at 74,56 (near Liuchow)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 30118 troops, 240 guns, 86 vehicles, Assault Value = 783

Defending force 16257 troops, 83 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 295

Japanese adjusted assault: 533

Allied adjusted defense: 261

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1172 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 150 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)


Allied ground losses:
4086 casualties reported
Squads: 131 destroyed, 50 disabled
Non Combat: 124 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 5 destroyed, 8 disabled
Guns lost 13 (4 destroyed, 9 disabled)
Units retreated 1


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
24th Infantry Regiment
21st Infantry Regiment
30th Infantry Regiment
9th Division
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
6th Tank Regiment

Defending units:
60th Chinese Corps
64th Chinese Corps

The reinforcements need two days to reach the scene so if the Empire's troops attack tomorrow the position will fall. The Indian 46th Bde and the British 18th Div have been caught up by the first Imperial unit (strong forces are following that one), but they might make an escape before an attack can be delivered tomorrow. An additional enemy unit, presumed to be at least a regiment, has arrived at Cox's Bazar.

No sign of KB. That radio source was not apparent today. Here is a look at Burma.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 281
1942 June 02 - 6/9/2012 4:21:23 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 June 02

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:
Bima

There were Allied amphibious operations at:


Near Changteh the Chinese army was defeated even though they held. With more IJA forces on the way they will be forced back to Changteh.
quote:


Ground combat at 81,49 (near Changteh)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 32239 troops, 228 guns, 95 vehicles, Assault Value = 1050

Defending force 26464 troops, 143 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 549

Japanese adjusted assault: 698

Allied adjusted defense: 355

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), fatigue(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
2560 casualties reported
Squads: 41 destroyed, 153 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 26 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 22 (1 destroyed, 21 disabled)


Allied ground losses:
1254 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 171 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled


Assaulting units:
3rd Infantry Regiment
13th Tank Regiment
27th Division
61st Infantry Brigade
58th Infantry Brigade
58th Infantry Regiment
15th Ind.Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
2nd Chinese Corps
8th Chinese Corps

Near Liuchow the Empire decided not to wait for the decisive Chinese reinforcements that were almost in place.
quote:


Ground combat at 74,56 (near Liuchow)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 29182 troops, 240 guns, 86 vehicles, Assault Value = 692

Defending force 5175 troops, 42 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 101

Japanese adjusted assault: 776

Allied adjusted defense: 19

Japanese assault odds: 40 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
124 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 26 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Allied ground losses:
2268 casualties reported
Squads: 71 destroyed, 30 disabled
Non Combat: 51 destroyed, 21 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 4 disabled
Guns lost 23 (10 destroyed, 13 disabled)
Units retreated 1


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
21st Infantry Regiment
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
24th Infantry Regiment
9th Division
30th Infantry Regiment
6th Tank Regiment

Defending units:
64th Chinese Corps

Near Hengyang the Chinese turned the tables on the Imperials.
quote:


Ground combat at 78,53 (near Hengyang)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 32689 troops, 153 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1153

Defending force 4169 troops, 34 guns, 7 vehicles, Assault Value = 117

Allied adjusted assault: 764

Japanese adjusted defense: 12

Allied assault odds: 63 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), fatigue(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
2501 casualties reported
Squads: 83 destroyed, 43 disabled
Non Combat: 30 destroyed, 17 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 24 (8 destroyed, 16 disabled)
Vehicles lost 2 (1 destroyed, 1 disabled)
Units retreated 1


Allied ground losses:
386 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 46 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
7th Chinese Corps
21st Chinese Corps
51st Chinese Corps
32nd Chinese Corps
99th Chinese Corps

Defending units:
104th/C Division

Now the victorious units are redeploying to expel the IJA unit near to Kweilin and to meet the new vector of the additional IJA unit that was underway to reinforce the now defunct river-crossing. That radio source target is back, more or less on course. Unfortunately the two subs patrolling in front of them are not currently on station. It was a good day in the air overall, 15 to 1 for us. Some of those were near Tennant Creek and some over Cox's Bazar. Near Tennant Creek the air attacks of both sides have been getting more and more effective.
quote:


Morning Air attack on 2/6th Armoured Regiment, at 76,135 , near Tennant Creek

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 14
G4M1 Betty x 20



No Japanese losses


Allied ground losses:
217 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 16 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 20 (1 destroyed, 19 disabled)


Aircraft Attacking:
20 x G4M1 Betty bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb

Also attacking 2/5th Armoured Regiment ...
Also attacking 2/6th Armoured Regiment ...
Also attacking 2/5th Armoured Regiment ...
Also attacking 2/6th Armoured Regiment ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 48th Recon Regiment, at 76,135 , near Tennant Creek

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 16 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 3



Allied aircraft
Kittyhawk IA x 16


Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed

No Allied losses



Aircraft Attacking:
15 x Kittyhawk IA sweeping at 15000 feet

CAP engaged:
Chitose Ku S-1 with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 2 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 9000
Raid is overhead
3rd Ku S-1 Det A with A6M2 Zero (1 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
1 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 9000
Raid is overhead



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 2nd Recon Regiment, at 76,135 , near Tennant Creek

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 5,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes


Allied aircraft
Blenheim I x 5
B-26 Marauder x 9


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
115 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 15 (1 destroyed, 14 disabled)



Aircraft Attacking:
5 x Blenheim I bombing from 3000 feet *
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 lb GP Bomb
9 x B-26 Marauder bombing from 5000 feet
Ground Attack: 6 x 500 lb GP Bomb



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 2nd Recon Regiment, at 76,135 , near Tennant Creek

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 8,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes


Allied aircraft
B-26 Marauder x 3


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
12 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled



Aircraft Attacking:
3 x B-26 Marauder bombing from 5000 feet
Ground Attack: 6 x 500 lb GP Bomb


The 2/5 and 2/6 Armoured Regiments are in tough shape from these attacks. The USA 192nd Tank Bn is about 3 days out and together they should be able to defeat the two recon Rgts they are facing. There are two infantry regiments on the road to Tennant Creek but they might only arrive at the battlefield when Imperial reinforcements arrive, so the goal is to push them back ASAP. Tomorrow No76 Sqn will provide LRCAP from Tennant Creek (two hexes distant), while the 80th FS will bring the P-38E into action for the first time by sweeping from Alice Springs.

Meanwhile, IJN subs are flowing down the eastern coast of Australia. The USA 32nd ID is currently 40nm out from Sydney trying to dodge one of them. The other convoy, mostly carrying aircraft, will make Melbourne tonight.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 282
1942 June 03 - 6/12/2012 4:48:25 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 June 03

The Empire captured:
Bima

The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:


There were Allied amphibious operations at:


Outside Changteh the Empire attacked and the results were mixed.
quote:


Ground combat at 81,49 (near Changteh)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 30243 troops, 228 guns, 95 vehicles, Assault Value = 872

Defending force 25529 troops, 143 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 431

Japanese adjusted assault: 608

Allied adjusted defense: 679

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
829 casualties reported
Squads: 32 destroyed, 63 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 18 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 25 (5 destroyed, 20 disabled)


Allied ground losses:
898 casualties reported
Squads: 8 destroyed, 119 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 17 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled


Assaulting units:
3rd Infantry Regiment
13th Tank Regiment
27th Division
61st Infantry Brigade
58th Infantry Brigade
58th Infantry Regiment
15th Ind.Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
2nd Chinese Corps
8th Chinese Corps

The two convoys have made Sydney and Melbourne without incident and have unloaded almost all troops, equipment, and planes already. Now there are two sizable radio contacts found. Admiral Murphy made certain that the subs patrolling those very areas are off to Pearl Harbor to replenish!





Attachment (1)

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 283
1942 June 04 - 6/12/2012 5:53:17 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 June 04

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:
Komodo

There were Allied amphibious operations at:


No ground combat today. P-38Es got their first kills over central Australia. two or three for no losses, but they had an ops loss for naught yesterday. Those large radio contacts are lost. A strong sighting on our small resupply convoy at Midway, far more than is typical for a sub-launched float plane. I wonder if something else is up?





Attachment (1)

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 284
RE: 1942 June 04 - 6/12/2012 9:45:45 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

1942 June 04
No ground combat today. P-38Es got their first kills over central Australia. two or three for no losses, but they had an ops loss for naught yesterday. Those large radio contacts are lost. A strong sighting on our small resupply convoy at Midway, far more than is typical for a sub-launched float plane. I wonder if something else is up?


Perhaps your own SIGINT guys at Midway picked up the transmissions and put it in their report! I have seen that in the Allied SIGINT report about 5% of the time!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 285
1942 June 05 - 6/12/2012 9:56:53 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 June 05

The Empire captured:
Komodo

The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:


There were Allied amphibious operations at:


The Imperials bearing down on Changteh are grinding down the two units opposing them across the river from that city.
quote:


Ground combat at 81,49 (near Changteh)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 29644 troops, 228 guns, 91 vehicles, Assault Value = 827

Defending force 24739 troops, 143 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 338

Japanese adjusted assault: 646

Allied adjusted defense: 353

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
713 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 74 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 8 (1 destroyed, 7 disabled)


Allied ground losses:
1463 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 125 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 18 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 5 disabled
Guns lost 14 (1 destroyed, 13 disabled)


Assaulting units:
13th Tank Regiment
58th Infantry Brigade
27th Division
61st Infantry Brigade
3rd Infantry Regiment
58th Infantry Regiment
15th Ind.Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
2nd Chinese Corps
8th Chinese Corps

For a while now Sallies and their escorts have been chewed up by CAP from Chittagong when attacking our troops at Cox's Bazar. Today again they were dealt a blow with 9 Sallies and 6 Oscars failing return or land safely. Near Lashio the haggard, fleeing rabble held off the IJA 1st Tank Regiment in its effort to run them down. They should all be able to leave the hex tomorrow before being attacked again, doubly important as an infantry regiment has shown up to press the matter.
quote:


Ground combat at 63,46 (near Lashio)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 384 troops, 0 guns, 71 vehicles, Assault Value = 167

Defending force 2601 troops, 15 guns, 17 vehicles, Assault Value = 53

Japanese adjusted assault: 15

Allied adjusted defense: 55

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 3

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
Vehicles lost 2 (1 destroyed, 1 disabled)


Allied ground losses:
124 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Assaulting units:
1st Tank Regiment
1st Formosa Inf. Regiment

Defending units:
12th Burma Rifles Battalion
45th Indian Brigade
Rangoon BAF Battalion
RM Viper Force
13th Burma Rifles Battalion

There are now 10 enemy units astride Katha, but their direction of movement is unobserved. Back in China, I forget to mention in yesterday's entry that Nanning is being abandoned. The undermining of the position outside of Liuchow makes that the best move as those same Imperial units are moving to block the road between the two cities.

In Australia the Empire's reinforcements to the small tank battle 92mi from Tennant Creek have been sighted, although their size and composition remain a mystery. The USA 192nd Tank Bn has joined with the Aussies and they will attack together tomorrow. Blenheims and B-17s will assist, while B-26s interdict movement of the closest reinforcement in hopes of keeping it from arriving at the most inopportune time.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 286
RE: 1942 June 04 - 6/12/2012 9:58:54 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

1942 June 04
No ground combat today. P-38Es got their first kills over central Australia. two or three for no losses, but they had an ops loss for naught yesterday. Those large radio contacts are lost. A strong sighting on our small resupply convoy at Midway, far more than is typical for a sub-launched float plane. I wonder if something else is up?


Perhaps your own SIGINT guys at Midway picked up the transmissions and put it in their report! I have seen that in the Allied SIGINT report about 5% of the time!

Hmmm, I'm not sure the game code does that. I was wondering if maybe there was a more capable sighting by long range recon out of Wake Island. Hopefully of course it is not an invasion force sneaking up through or around search coverage!

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 287
RE: 1942 June 04 - 6/12/2012 10:09:32 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

1942 June 04
No ground combat today. P-38Es got their first kills over central Australia. two or three for no losses, but they had an ops loss for naught yesterday. Those large radio contacts are lost. A strong sighting on our small resupply convoy at Midway, far more than is typical for a sub-launched float plane. I wonder if something else is up?


Perhaps your own SIGINT guys at Midway picked up the transmissions and put it in their report! I have seen that in the Allied SIGINT report about 5% of the time!

Hmmm, I'm not sure the game code does that. I was wondering if maybe there was a more capable sighting by long range recon out of Wake Island. Hopefully of course it is not an invasion force sneaking up through or around search coverage!

Yeah, I'm not really sure the SIGINT on an allied unit would change the DL, I just find it very strange that the SIGINT report includes detections of allied units [including major bases like San Francisco] at all. Doesn't anyone vett these things before they are presented to us admirable admirals?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 288
RE: 1942 June 04 - 6/12/2012 10:17:10 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		I've never seen one for my own bases.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 289
RE: 1942 June 04 - 6/13/2012 2:02:17 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		It usually just gives a hex reference and when you check it out, it's on top of an allied base [or TF]. Caveat - I haven't checked SIGINT that closely since the big upgrade a short time ago so it may have been fixed and I am just not aware. Prior to that I had just gotten the game was studying every detail to try and understand how to use it in a campaign. That's when I saw the occasional SIGINT on own bases and TFs.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 290
1942 June 06 - 6/13/2012 4:05:51 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 June 06

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:
Memboro

There were Allied amphibious operations at:


The bad news is that the 18th and the three brigades NW of Katha have been caught up by the first Imperial unit. The good news is that there is one or more additional units moving from Akyab toward Cox's Bazar. Perhaps we can draw them into a larger fight, or maybe they just want to hold a retreat route open. Even better, in Australia the attack went well.
quote:


Ground combat at 76,135 (near Tennant Creek)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 1425 troops, 6 guns, 151 vehicles, Assault Value = 89

Defending force 1606 troops, 7 guns, 83 vehicles, Assault Value = 68

Allied adjusted assault: 81

Japanese adjusted defense: 33

Allied assault odds: 2 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender:
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
402 casualties reported
Squads: 16 destroyed, 27 disabled
Non Combat: 13 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 21 (19 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Units retreated 2


Allied ground losses:
26 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 6 (2 destroyed, 4 disabled)


Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
192nd Tank Battalion
2/5th Armoured Regiment
2/6th Armoured Regiment

Defending units:
48th Recon Regiment
2nd Recon Regiment

Tomorrow the infiltrator near Kweilin will be attacked and hopefully expelled.
quote:


Ground combat at 76,53 (near Kweilin)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 6120 troops, 32 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 787

Defending force 4356 troops, 38 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 127



Assaulting units:
7th Chinese Corps
32nd Chinese Corps
38th New Chinese Division

Defending units:
66th Infantry Regiment

Here is a look at Burma.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 291
1942 June 07 - 6/14/2012 5:51:46 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 June 07

The Empire captured:
Memboro

The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:


There were Allied amphibious operations at:


Our attack near Kweilin yielded equivocal results. At least it didn't go poorly.
quote:


Ground combat at 76,53 (near Kweilin)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 20424 troops, 110 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 788

Defending force 4356 troops, 38 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 127

Allied adjusted assault: 360

Japanese adjusted defense: 679

Allied assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+)
Attacker: supply(-)

Japanese ground losses:
245 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 17 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Allied ground losses:
225 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 22 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Assaulting units:
7th Chinese Corps
32nd Chinese Corps
38th New Chinese Division

Defending units:
66th Infantry Regiment

The troops will rest a day and attack again, if supply is adequate. I wonder what is this?





Attachment (1)

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 292
RE: 1942 June 07 - 6/14/2012 6:34:53 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		Three detections seems awfully chatty for a military fleet - I would suspect transports. That's my way of saying I have no idea ...

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 293
RE: 1942 June 07 - 6/14/2012 6:58:45 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Three detections seems awfully chatty for a military fleet - I would suspect transports. That's my way of saying I have no idea ...



I'm thinking either a honking big transport of development/defensive troops, or an invasion armada heading somewhere. Of course, the USN carriers are on their way to the West Coast to upgrade...

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 294
1942 June 08 - 6/14/2012 10:34:49 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 June 08

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:


There were Allied amphibious operations at:


Our forces hunkered down NW of Katha held firm against an assault.
quote:


Ground combat at 61,42 (near Katha)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 7962 troops, 40 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 240

Defending force 14000 troops, 210 guns, 85 vehicles, Assault Value = 295

Japanese adjusted assault: 111

Allied adjusted defense: 333

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 3

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1364 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 108 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 10 (1 destroyed, 9 disabled)


Allied ground losses:
27 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Assaulting units:
40th Inf Group Brigade

Defending units:
46th Indian Brigade
13th Indian Brigade
18th British Division
1st Burma Brigade

Near Changteh the jig will soon be up.
quote:


Ground combat at 81,49 (near Changteh)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 29925 troops, 228 guns, 161 vehicles, Assault Value = 855

Defending force 23828 troops, 142 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 224

Japanese adjusted assault: 440

Allied adjusted defense: 271

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
967 casualties reported
Squads: 10 destroyed, 61 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Allied ground losses:
1314 casualties reported
Squads: 34 destroyed, 83 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Guns lost 23 (1 destroyed, 22 disabled)


Assaulting units:
58th Infantry Brigade
61st Infantry Brigade
3rd Infantry Regiment
15th Tank Regiment
13th Tank Regiment
27th Division
58th Infantry Regiment
15th Ind.Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
2nd Chinese Corps
8th Chinese Corps

Between Nanning and Liuchow, the Chinese 52nd Corps attacked a lone and weakened tank regiment. It turned into a meeting engagement with friends.
quote:


Ground combat at 73,55 (near Nanning)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 11679 troops, 33 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 233

Defending force 26722 troops, 214 guns, 85 vehicles, Assault Value = 727

Allied adjusted assault: 0

Japanese adjusted defense: 2883

Allied assault odds: 1 to 99

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), disruption(-), supply(-)

Japanese ground losses:
13 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Allied ground losses:
7345 casualties reported
Squads: 406 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 21 destroyed, 471 disabled
Engineers: 32 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 22 (18 destroyed, 4 disabled)


Assaulting units:
52nd Chinese Corps

Defending units:
9th Division
30th Infantry Regiment
21st Infantry Regiment
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
6th Tank Regiment

The 52nd is now a ghost and will certainly be destroyed tomorrow. Here is a look at nearby Burma.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 295
1942 June 09 - 6/15/2012 6:13:44 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 June 09

The Empire captured:
Nanning

The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:


There were Allied amphibious operations at:


12 Betties show up as lost against 2 P-40s after this row. The Betties had no escort on the way in, when all the damage was done.
quote:


Morning Air attack on 46th Indian Brigade, at 61,42 , near Katha

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 8
G4M1 Betty x 22
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 5



Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 5


Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 6 destroyed, 4 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
P-40E Warhawk: 1 destroyed



Aircraft Attacking:
13 x G4M1 Betty bombing from 12000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
23rd FG/75th FS with P-40E Warhawk (5 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
5 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 12000
Raid is overhead

Our boys fighting there way out of the trap from Lashio held on.
quote:


Ground combat at 62,45 (near Lashio)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 378 troops, 0 guns, 70 vehicles, Assault Value = 37

Defending force 2644 troops, 15 guns, 17 vehicles, Assault Value = 57

Japanese adjusted assault: 7

Allied adjusted defense: 139

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 19

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), fatigue(-), experience(-)
Attacker: leaders(-)


Allied ground losses:
17 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Assaulting units:
1st Tank Regiment

Defending units:
45th Indian Brigade
Rangoon BAF Battalion
RM Viper Force
13th Burma Rifles Battalion
12th Burma Rifles Battalion

In China the news was grim all over. The two corps outside Changteh were finally driven back and with heavy losses.
quote:


Ground combat at 81,49 (near Changteh)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 29282 troops, 228 guns, 161 vehicles, Assault Value = 1047

Defending force 22884 troops, 141 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 126

Japanese adjusted assault: 624

Allied adjusted defense: 229

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
323 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled


Allied ground losses:
7730 casualties reported
Squads: 313 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 279 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 11 destroyed, 4 disabled
Guns lost 13 (13 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 2


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
13th Tank Regiment
27th Division
61st Infantry Brigade
15th Tank Regiment
58th Infantry Brigade
13th/A Division
58th Infantry Regiment
13th/C Division
15th Ind.Medium Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
2nd Chinese Corps
8th Chinese Corps

The brave but unlucky 52nd still exists, sort of.
quote:


Ground combat at 73,55 (near Nanning)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 26898 troops, 214 guns, 85 vehicles, Assault Value = 744

Defending force 4313 troops, 14 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 1075

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 1075 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), disruption(-), fatigue(-)
Attacker: shock(+)


Allied ground losses:
2871 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 386 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 7 (7 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 1


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
30th Infantry Regiment
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
9th Division
21st Infantry Regiment
6th Tank Regiment

Defending units:
52nd Chinese Corps

The infiltrators near Kweilin continue to infiltrate.
quote:


Ground combat at 76,53 (near Kweilin)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 20255 troops, 110 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 769

Defending force 4214 troops, 38 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 114

Allied adjusted assault: 282

Japanese adjusted defense: 310

Allied assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker: leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
296 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Allied ground losses:
1177 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 137 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled


Assaulting units:
32nd Chinese Corps
7th Chinese Corps
38th New Chinese Division

Defending units:
66th Infantry Regiment






Attachment (1)

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 296
1942 June 10 - 6/19/2012 12:03:51 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 June 10

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:


There were Allied amphibious operations at:


More IJA units have arrived 1 hex NW Katha and presumably others are on the way. Likewise 3 more units have arrived outside of Lashio. Almost all our units need just tomorrow to link up with the armour at Bhamo. The exception is the 45th Indian Brigade, which will attempt to run in move mode to keep up. Air attacks thwarted that effort to catch up today. A CA/CL bombardment went in against our troops at Cox's Bazar, and the effects were minor. The other news concerning Burma is that at least 2 IJA units have moved into China toward Paoshan. At least 3 more units have yet to commit to either Paoshan or the pursuit of the Allies falling back on Bhamo.

While uncertain, it looks like there could be a division plus a regiment bearing down on Tennant Creek along with those two vanquished recon regiments. In defense we will field about the same aggregate combat power, but with more and better tanks.

Here is that Burma situation.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 297
RE: 1942 June 10 - 6/19/2012 12:52:50 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		More and better tanks - I like the sound of that.
Will you be able to get enough supply to sustain your defence at TC?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 298
1942 June 11 - 6/19/2012 6:29:54 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		1942 June 11

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious operations at:


There were Allied amphibious operations at:


Disaster in Burma. First the brigade trailing behind failed to make Bhamo and was forced into the jungle. Next the Allied position NW of Katha was overwhelmed and the defenders flung back into Katha with heavy losses.
quote:


Ground combat at 62,45 (near Lashio)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 9633 troops, 57 guns, 71 vehicles, Assault Value = 334

Defending force 1887 troops, 6 guns, 17 vehicles, Assault Value = 44

Japanese adjusted assault: 184

Allied adjusted defense: 40

Japanese assault odds: 4 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), leaders(+)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
135 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Allied ground losses:
483 casualties reported
Squads: 26 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 17 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 4 (2 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Units retreated 1


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
113th Infantry Regiment
1st Tank Regiment
I./143rd Infantry Battalion
16th Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
45th Indian Brigade


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at 61,42 (near Katha)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 63769 troops, 534 guns, 148 vehicles, Assault Value = 1872

Defending force 14173 troops, 213 guns, 87 vehicles, Assault Value = 310

Japanese adjusted assault: 1037

Allied adjusted defense: 215

Japanese assault odds: 4 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), fatigue(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1756 casualties reported
Squads: 20 destroyed, 193 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 32 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 16 disabled
Guns lost 15 (1 destroyed, 14 disabled)


Allied ground losses:
5802 casualties reported
Squads: 205 destroyed, 72 disabled
Non Combat: 124 destroyed, 30 disabled
Engineers: 17 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 55 (26 destroyed, 29 disabled)
Vehicles lost 23 (17 destroyed, 6 disabled)
Units retreated 4


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
38th Division
Imperial Guards Division
40th Inf Group Brigade
55th Infantry Regiment
14th Division
11th Infantry Regiment
33rd Division
5th Mortar Battalion

Defending units:
13th Indian Brigade
46th Indian Brigade
18th British Division
1st Burma Brigade

The decision is taken to flee the Cylon tyranny and herd the remaining rabble to Myitkynia. The only good news on the day is that the heavy cruiser bombardment against our troops at Cox's Bazar was no more effective than the day before.

I wonder who is this and what are they up to?





Attachment (1)

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 299
RE: 1942 June 10 - 6/19/2012 6:33:40 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

More and better tanks - I like the sound of that.
Will you be able to get enough supply to sustain your defence at TC?

Funny you should ask! That's the very question I was pondering this turn. Just started flying in supplies to supplement those over the roads. An airfield size was added just a couple of tuns ago, which added 100 to the daily cap. I think it's 600 now. Given that all other bases are too far for short range pull, that's pretty puny.

I just don't know.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 300
Page:   <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1942 May 28 Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.625