Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/23/2012 5:11:31 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
2/26/42 and 2/27/42

North America: The KB retired to the NW, probably going to an Alaskan port to refuel. York and Sara are about 18 hexes SW of San Diego, watiting while my picket destroyers refuel and reestablish a solid picket line off the West Coast.

Australia: SigInt that 18th Division is aboard a Maru bound for Townsville. This would be a rather substantial leap forward since PM is still in Allied hands, but it's not impossible. 27th/B Division safely arrived at Melbourne aboard Queen Elizabeth. Due to high SYS damage, I may go ahead and withdraw the QE even though she has time to make one more high-speed run.

DEI: An Aussie brigade should begin landing at Cocos tomorrow. If she comes ashore in good shape, the island's AV will increase to about 200. Still no sign of imminent enemy move on Singers.

Burma: We'll know in a day or two whether the Allied army here will be trapped in a pocket. I don't think so, but we'll see. To be honest, I don't think it matters either way.

China: The Japanese are still working on both wings plus trying to make some progress in the center, both near Kweilin and near Ankang. I still don't think Steve has enough to threaten unless he brings in substantial reinforcements in the form of divisions from Luzon, but I think that's excactly what he'll do. If Japan commits enough to China, the Chinese can be overwhelmed. I can't stop that, but I think I can slow it to the point that it really doesn't make a huge difference in the game. China falling at the end of 1942 would be a very different proposition from China falling in early 1942.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 691
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/23/2012 5:28:44 PM   
jeffk3510


Posts: 4132
Joined: 12/3/2007
From: Kansas
Status: offline
Dan-
He very well could be going for Townsville. He could also be going for somewhere else, but have the destination set for Towsnville at present to throw you off. This is a trick I have heard some of the Jap players mention to mess with the Allies SigInt..

_____________________________

Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.

Currently chasing three kids around the Midwest.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 692
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/23/2012 5:32:21 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I'm used to that trick. Q-Ball is good at it and I've played Q-Ball. So I always take that into consideration when I get intel like this. It's an important piece of information, but it's just one piece of a complicated puzzle.

(in reply to jeffk3510)
Post #: 693
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/23/2012 5:49:17 PM   
jeffk3510


Posts: 4132
Joined: 12/3/2007
From: Kansas
Status: offline
Agreed.

.. just thought I would poke my head in..

_____________________________

Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.

Currently chasing three kids around the Midwest.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 694
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/23/2012 6:07:03 PM   
Andav

 

Posts: 474
Joined: 5/8/2007
Status: offline

I can't imagine a Japanese player actually trying to manipulate the Allied intel. Nope not me. Not a chance. Would never happen ...

Wa

(in reply to jeffk3510)
Post #: 695
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/23/2012 7:19:36 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andav


I can't imagine a Japanese player actually trying to manipulate the Allied intel. Nope not me. Not a chance. Would never happen ...

Wa


So now we get disinformation about the disinformation.
As Alice said, this WITP-AE just gets curiouser and curiouser!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Andav)
Post #: 696
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/23/2012 10:50:09 PM   
Ingtar

 

Posts: 194
Joined: 8/1/2004
Status: offline
Isn't that cruiserier and cruiserier?

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 697
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/24/2012 3:16:07 PM   
Lomri

 

Posts: 232
Joined: 2/6/2009
Status: offline

Mind posting a screen shot of China and his flanking maneuvers?

(in reply to Ingtar)
Post #: 698
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/24/2012 3:38:14 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Here's a map of the situation in the northern sector of Japan. More info to follow in the daily update.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 7/24/2012 3:39:31 PM >

(in reply to Lomri)
Post #: 699
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/24/2012 4:06:10 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
2/28/42

China Northwest: Big developments here (as reflected on map in preceding post). Cursor indicates Chinese stack of 30 units north of Lanchow. I know this includes at least two divisions. I've known for weeks that something on the order of two divisions was coming this way, so I've moved in enought roops to counter a threat of that size...but just how much more "oomph" is there? I have roughly 1800 AV in the sector with more on the way. Japan tried a para assault against the dot hex, but it failed. :) I'm using Chinese bombers to try to slow the Japanese advance. This is a worrisome sector, but how effectively can Japan fight this far from a supply source? And how effectively can China defend in the mountains? With interior lines and good defensive terrain I might have an opportunity to stymie Japan's offensive and nip at its long supply line.

China North: The Japanese are also advancing up the road towadrs Ankang. I have a decent army protecting that base and much more around Nanyang. I think I can threaten the rear of the Japanese column so that this vector won't prove promising for Japan. I think.

China Center: Both sides are stretched out on each side of the river between Hengyang and Kweilin. I don't want this railroad interdicted, Stopping such a move is fairly tough. My current thinking is that this is mainly a diversion, but I'm not positive. I wouldn't be shocked to find a bunch of those Luzon divsiions here sometime in the not-too-distant future. :)

China South: Three small IJ militia units are moving on Kunming. I think I have enough to counter the threat.

Burma: The Allies reclaimed Schewbo, thus opening the route out of Burma, in an important little assault. I may try to defend, or I may pull back slowly towards the fronteir between Burma and India.

Indian Ocean: An Aussie brigade lands at Cocos Island, which now has 225 AV and some engineers to start dealing with infrastructure. An American engineering unit is enroute from Capetown. Steve will now need a division, or at least a prolonged campaign, to take this island. With my carriers there, he can't have it unless he really commits...and if he really commits here that means he's not committed elsewhere. So this is an important little redoubt.

Oz: Quiet today.

North America: A USN picket DD found and got hammered by the KB, west of San Francisco. The DD may not make it back to port, but she did her job well. To my way of thinking, Prince Rupert is not a viable vector of attack for Japan, leaving only two options on the West Coast. Here's how I see things:

a) Prince Rupert: A major landing here might offer Japan a viable way of getting inland and into the interior of the USA, or at least to destroy some Canadian industry by occupation. However, such a move would pretty much require taking interior cities by para asault in order to utilize strategic transprot inland. Since that's no longer possible for Japan, any major invasion would be faced with big American infantry units in the mountain terrain on the very long march inland. It would take a huge commitment and a great deal of time. Such a commitment would have to be so huge that it would free up lots of Allied units to come north to counter the move. IMO, therefore, Prince Rupert is no go for Japan.

b) Strategic Bombing: This is still a viable way to score alot of strat bombing points for Japan. However, Japan cannot do this via LBA from its current bases - distances are too far and it's too easy to max defensive CAP over the available targets. Japan either has to use the KB on raids to the south to split CAP (as Steve just did) and/or seize big airfields (Coal Harbor, etc.) closer to the USA. The former means the KB is tethered to the West Coast, which means the Allies are petty safe in Oz, the Indian Ocean and India, leaving them to act more aggressively. The latter will require alot of resources, some risk (invasions close to mased Allied LBA) plus alot of time to build up the airfields. Time is not Steve's friend and he's already running pretty late. The Allied airforce grows considerably stronger by summer and autumn of 1942.

c) Invasion: Very unlikely, but it is remotely possible that Steve might try to invade a couple of USA bases to destroy industry. San Diego and Los Angelse are probably the most vulnerable. This would be nearly impossible, but I can't complety discount it.

Evaluation of Play: Thus far I don't think either side has scored anything like knockout punches in the game. This has mainly been a game of maneuver. Neither side has taken big risks. Both sides have scored only a few telling blows. The Allies have lost two major ships post Pearl Harbor - CA Exeter at Oosthaven (my bad in not recalling her) and BB New Mexico off Vancouver Island (I fed her to the lions in a move I'm not particularly proud of). Japan has lost only CA Chokai (in the South China Sea at the start of the war) and a few CLs (New Mexico did claim Oi, which had been giving me fits). The Allies have made a few stands here and there - Cocos Island, Sabang, Port Blair, Koepang and Burma. Most of these haven't been contested yet. Steve has big things in mind for China, but he may be taking too long and trying to be too Shermanesque instead of massing and blowing through early. The Allies meekly surrendered Alaska and coastal Canada, thoguh some of the garrisons performed heroically. I'm still thinking Steve has his eyes on Oz and China, but it's still just a bit too early to know for certain or to declare myself certain.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 700
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/24/2012 4:24:57 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
I don't know Steve's plans, but I agree on Prince Rupert: A landing there is just not feasible. You should have ample restricted units railed from elsewhere, and the terrain is not favorable to the attacker. I also can't see a sustained bombing campaign, due to distances, and to the presence in his rear of Prince Rupert, which once you get some decent air units should be a major thorn in his side.

It will be interesting to see how long he hangs around Canada; when the initiative changes, it could be a major trap for him.

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 701
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/24/2012 4:25:50 PM   
Andav

 

Posts: 474
Joined: 5/8/2007
Status: offline
It will be interesting to see how China plays out with a column that large coming from way around the north side. Supply will have to be an issue.

As Japan even in Scenario 2, I think US invasion/bombing is going to be very challenging. I think your analysis is spot on regarding his options.

This has been my OPOTD (Obligatory Post of the Day) to keep ahead of GJ's AAR.

Wa

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 702
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/24/2012 6:25:00 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andav


This has been my OPOTD (Obligatory Post of the Day) to keep ahead of GJ's AAR.

Wa



I'm gonna remember this....

(in reply to Andav)
Post #: 703
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/24/2012 7:27:31 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
3/1/42

North America: Air raid Calgary! (How weird is it to say that?) 18 Bettys from Alliford Bay sortie against this base and don't accomplish anything. (The base has a garrison of 54 AV - including a Marine raider battalion - behind three forts). The KB wasn't seen today. I'm thinking she retired further north, but I'm not positive.

Oz: More SigInt that 18th Div. is aboard a Maru bound for Townsville. I think this is misinformation (Steve would never give such orders from a distant point if he was really coming). I've also been getting periodic intel that units are prepping for Melbourne. That too is bogus. If Steve were really coming, he'd wait to begin prep until his units were ashore in Australia at which time the need for deception would be obviated.

India: Two Marine regiments are ashore at Karachi. This is what is referred to as "peace of mind" for any Allied player that has suffered a major invasion of India. Two Indian divisions arrive on map over the next few weeks. I think the window of opportunity for a wholesale IJ commitment to India is closing. It's not closed yet - if Steve pulled one whopper of a change of direction he might still do it - but it won't be too much longer before I can rest a bit easier here.

China: Nothing new as I continue to monitor the enemy moves outlined in the previous post.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 7/24/2012 7:28:27 PM >

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 704
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/24/2012 8:00:51 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
He has kept KB popping up in the Gulf of Alaska and WC since the beginning of the game - an extraordinary length of time! Along with several attempts to trap your CVs, I makes me think maybe the whole NORPAC gambit was an attempt to sucker you into reacting with your CVs early on, so he could crush them and secure his dominant naval position through mid-1943.
An air raid on Calgary? Not much to be gained there! Perhaps trying to bleed CAP away from Seattle/Tacoma/Vancouver?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 705
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/24/2012 8:31:00 PM   
Andav

 

Posts: 474
Joined: 5/8/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Andav


This has been my OPOTD (Obligatory Post of the Day) to keep ahead of GJ's AAR.

Wa



I'm gonna remember this....



CR is the one who put us on the payroll. He swears the first of many payments is in the mail!

Wa

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 706
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 3:58:42 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
3/2/42

North America: Another Betty raid against Calgary does some manpower damage and starts some fires, but all looks "repaired" now. I don't think this kind of damage is a problem. I think. More importantly, I get SigInt that 58th Div. is prepping for Coal Harbor. This is the most critical base on the map right now. I will fight hard, but I will try to fight smart. Coal Harbor is in proximity to Vancouver and Victoria (and Seattle), which will allow me to use my airfields to maximum benefit. Steve would commit the KB to provide LRCAP, so I'm not likely to use my ships, other than subs. I've stripped all aircraft from York and Sara. They are sitting at LA and San Fran and will move north. That gives me 72 SBD-3s, 30 Devastators (do they have range to carry torps from Vancouver to Coal Harbor? I need to check), plus two squadrons of F44-3 and one of Buffaloes. (The F4F-4 has just come into production, so I'll be swapping out the planes over the next month or so). Vancouver is a level eight airfield, Victoria level four and Coal Harbor level one. I have 210 AV at the base behind three forts. I'll try to send in more troops as time permits. A TF bringing four fighter squadrons from Hawaii to West Coast should arrive in four or five days. This TF carries about 60 fighters, all of which can upgrade to P-40E model.

Alaska: Yamashiro and Mutsu assist in a contested landing at Kodiak. The KB and a number of BBs are present and, as one reader pointed out yesterday, "big stuff" has been committed here since the start of the war. As Sergeant-Major Plumley said at LZ X-Ray, "Gentlemen, prepare to defend yourselves." The Japanese are coming. My bet is that Steve will land at Coal Harbor in strength and also try to take Prince Rupert (not to move inland, but to simply remove the airfield from the Allied arsenal).

American Carriers: York and Sara, stripped of aircraft, will loiter well to the south of San Diego. At this point, I plan to keep Ent and Lex in the Indian Ocean, both to help protect Cocos Island (and maybe Port Blair) and to assist in more aggressive activity should opportunities arise.

DEI: It looks like Koepang will fall on the next attack. Still no signs of an enemy move on Singers or Sabang.

China: Still lots of moving going on. I think the Chinese have enough to control the extreme ends of both wings (northwest and southeast). All the information I have still shows the same two IJA divisions moving on Lanchow, but the Cursor Intel that the stack is comprised of 30 units worries me. The Ankang/Sian sector I think I can handle.

Divisional "Reconciliation": I've been avoiding and putting off for a long time sitting down to tally all the information I have about the location of various IJA divisions. The time has come that I have to do that and then monitor it closely. I get the feeling that very soon I'll know exactly where the Japanese major vectors of attack will be. I've felt all along it would be China and Oz, but it might instead be China and Canada.

(in reply to Andav)
Post #: 707
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 6:01:49 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

2/28/42

China Northwest: Big developments here (as reflected on map in preceding post). Cursor indicates Chinese stack of 30 units north of Lanchow. I know this includes at least two divisions. I've known for weeks that something on the order of two divisions was coming this way, so I've moved in enought roops to counter a threat of that size...but just how much more "oomph" is there? I have roughly 1800 AV in the sector with more on the way. Japan tried a para assault against the dot hex, but it failed. :) I'm using Chinese bombers to try to slow the Japanese advance. This is a worrisome sector, but how effectively can Japan fight this far from a supply source? And how effectively can China defend in the mountains? With interior lines and good defensive terrain I might have an opportunity to stymie Japan's offensive and nip at its long supply line.

Evaluation of Play: Thus far I don't think either side has scored anything like knockout punches in the game. This has mainly been a game of maneuver. Neither side has taken big risks. Both sides have scored only a few telling blows. The Allies have lost two major ships post Pearl Harbor - CA Exeter at Oosthaven (my bad in not recalling her) and BB New Mexico off Vancouver Island (I fed her to the lions in a move I'm not particularly proud of). Japan has lost only CA Chokai (in the South China Sea at the start of the war) and a few CLs (New Mexico did claim Oi, which had been giving me fits). The Allies have made a few stands here and there - Cocos Island, Sabang, Port Blair, Koepang and Burma. Most of these haven't been contested yet. Steve has big things in mind for China, but he may be taking too long and trying to be too Shermanesque instead of massing and blowing through early. The Allies meekly surrendered Alaska and coastal Canada, thoguh some of the garrisons performed heroically. I'm still thinking Steve has his eyes on Oz and China, but it's still just a bit too early to know for certain or to declare myself certain.



Be wary in North China. Lanchow and area can hold out a long time but Viperpo was able to sweep through all of North China with relative ease. Even though he had a road supply line of over 1,000 miles at times it never seemed to stop him and his tankette were unstoppable. Unfortunately unlike Northern OZ, there seems to be no restriction to the flow of supply along this long route and the Japanese player can make the most of it. Truth is, I doubt there is much you can do to stop it as Japanese tanks just cannot be stopped in open terrain.

As far as the game goes. If you can report that not much has happened in the early going of the war then I would say you are on the way to an Allied victory. Good Japanese play means keeping the Allied on their heels until mid 43. Very hard to do but even the best Japanese players must do this to have a chance in the end game.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 708
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 6:07:18 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
3/3/42

North America: The KB tried to sneak around and raid the channel far south of San Diego. My plane-less carriers are down there, but will slide off map and take refuge at Balboa. In harm's way is the TF carrying the figher squadrons from Pearl to West Coast. I think this TF can win the race to map's edge. I'm leaning towards moving her to Balboa, then sending the planes to East Coast,then back to West Coast.

Oz: Japan uses three small armored units to take Horn Island.

Indian Ocean: Permit, stationed just north of the Sunda Straights, stumbles across a massive TF including four BBs and several CAs and CS. This is "the real thing." I suspect it's heading for Cocos Island, where a Glen-equipped sub is posted, but it might be bound for Oz. I'm getting SigInt that a division is bound for Batavia and prepping for Melbourne plus Imperial Guards bound for Batavia. There's no reason to send troops of that strength to Java, so they're either going to Cocos or Oz (or, remotely possible, to Sabang or India). I think, but I'm not positive, that Steve either suspects I have carriers near Cocos or knows. So I think he'll bring a stout Mini KB if he's coming. I have Ent, Lex, Indomitable and Hermes. Not sure whether I'll duke it out. I have a PBY squadron at Cocos, so I should get some decent reports.

China: Steve's still trying to get the dot hex between Sian and Lanchow. He'll fail even if he succeeds (because even if he manages to overcome the garrison, I have big infantry units that will arrive in a day or two). Way out in the northwest, two Chinese units roughed up a small IJ unit. Five IJA divisions are east of Changsha - enough to keep the Chinese honest, but not enough to pose a threat to Changsha by themselves.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 709
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 6:13:28 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
The trickiest part of my China defense right now is handling the Sian-sector area. I have more than 4,000 AV spread between Ankang and Nanyang to the south and east of Sian. I have roughly 2,000 AV in or close to Lanchow far to the west of Sian. If Steve were to blow through Lanchow, I'd face the prospect of having my Sian-sector troops too far "out on a limb," so that their path of retirmenet to protect Chungking would be very iffy. Eventually, I may have to pull back from Nanyang to adequately protect Chungking, but not yet.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 7/25/2012 6:14:01 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 710
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 7:48:08 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

3/2/42

North America: Another Betty raid against Calgary does some manpower damage and starts some fires, but all looks "repaired" now. I don't think this kind of damage is a problem. I think. More importantly, I get SigInt that 58th Div. is prepping for Coal Harbor. This is the most critical base on the map right now. I will fight hard, but I will try to fight smart. Coal Harbor is in proximity to Vancouver and Victoria (and Seattle), which will allow me to use my airfields to maximum benefit. Steve would commit the KB to provide LRCAP, so I'm not likely to use my ships, other than subs. I've stripped all aircraft from York and Sara. They are sitting at LA and San Fran and will move north. That gives me 72 SBD-3s, 30 Devastators (do they have range to carry torps from Vancouver to Coal Harbor? I need to check), plus two squadrons of F44-3 and one of Buffaloes. (The F4F-4 has just come into production, so I'll be swapping out the planes over the next month or so). Vancouver is a level eight airfield, Victoria level four and Coal Harbor level one. I have 210 AV at the base behind three forts. I'll try to send in more troops as time permits. A TF bringing four fighter squadrons from Hawaii to West Coast should arrive in four or five days. This TF carries about 60 fighters, all of which can upgrade to P-40E model.


I think you will find the carrier air groups will not behave as aggressively or launch as cohesivley when they are ashore. You may have to reassign then to an Army or Navy or even Canadian (if there is such a beast) air HQ in the same base. You will also need an air HQ for the TBD's to carry torps. I had a bad expereince once trying to get carrier air groups to fly from Sydney with Jap carriers 4 hexes away. I have a suspicion the AI mission planning routine is different for land based aircraft (more cautious and sensitive to enemy CAP).


< Message edited by Cap Mandrake -- 7/25/2012 7:53:53 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 711
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 7:59:40 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
It will be very interesting indeed to see where that big TF is going.

I can't see any long term benefit about his NOPAC adventure at all

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 712
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 8:01:17 PM   
Cribtop


Posts: 3890
Joined: 8/10/2008
From: Lone Star Nation
Status: offline
This is getting (even more) interesting, Dan!

_____________________________


(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 713
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 8:17:09 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline
Another Betty raid against Calgary does some manpower damage and starts some fires, but all looks "repaired" now.

Hope these gals are OK. Elevator operators at the Eaton, 1942. Hope the fires weren't cows being barbecued on the hoof.


(in reply to Cribtop)
Post #: 714
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 8:39:37 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Thanks for the heads up, Cap. That's useful though unwelcome news.

As for torps, none of my AirHQs at Seattle and Vancouver are stocked with any. But isn't Vancouver (size 8 port, size 8 airfield) sufficient to supply them to my Devastator squadrons?

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 715
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 8:54:45 PM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline
Bases do not provide torpedoes to planes.

Alfred

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 716
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 10:35:40 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Well I'll be hanged. I somehow missed that little nugget, but it's not often I'm in a situation in which I want to fly torp bombers from a very big base.

As for naval aircraft flying, I thought more about this. I've never had any problems before getting them to fly from land bases. So I wonder if Cap's sitaution was more an air-superiority problem than an HQ problem?

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 717
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 10:38:59 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Thanks for the heads up, Cap. That's useful though unwelcome news.

As for torps, none of my AirHQs at Seattle and Vancouver are stocked with any. But isn't Vancouver (size 8 port, size 8 airfield) sufficient to supply them to my Devastator squadrons?


Right, after the latest patch you have to "requisition" torps to a HQ. There is a small pull-down menu to add by incrments of 20. Fortunately, the USAAF is also somehow able to order USN aerial torps. This also crosses international lines. A Canadian air HQ could do the same.

After some experimentation, I think the trick to get LBA to attack carriers with heavy CAP is you need a numerically superior escort of fighters. I think you will have to throw in Army or Marine fighters at the same base under the same air HQ. Not sure how many carriers he has up there but that might be 75+ fighters if he stacked the CAP heavily.

In contrast, carrier air groups at sea will attack in wholely inadequate packets...I think for realism and because it is still better than being destroyed with a carrier under attack.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 718
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 10:50:18 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I just figured out the "arming HQ with torps" methodology, so Seattle and Vancouver are covered now. Thanks, Cap and Alfred, for the information that got me straightened out on this point.

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 719
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/25/2012 10:56:03 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
3/4/42

North America: A big CD unit that was posted north of LA will report to Prince Rupert, where a combat engineering unit just arrived. I will fight for this base and for Coal Harbor. I think Steve will move on both in March to take advantage of the invasion bonus, but I hope fate will grant me a week or ten days to attend to things. The KB moved closer to Los Angeles and sank a damaged DD (the second of it's cruise, but that's what pickets are for). I'm committing my air transport TF to the safety of the Panama Canal channel. They'll arrive at Balboa in eight days. Hornet arrives in five days.

Indian Ocean: Lots of SigInt of large mass of ships at Batavia etc. My Cocos PBY patrol didn't report anything approaching. We'll keep an eye out for things here and over at Sabang.

China: A third IJ shock attack at the dot hex between Sian and Lanchow fails. Reinforcement come in tomorrow, so Steve's lost this little gambit. Chinese bombers continue to regularly hit the large stack of units north of Lanchow, hopefully slowing down their advance. I have confirmation that at least three IJA divisions are present. Steve has committed alot to this move, so I will do my best to frustrate him here. Having three (or perhaps even many more) divisions committted in the middle of nowhere would be a huge vicitory if I can stop them from pentrating the Chinese MLR.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 720
Page:   <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.094