Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 4:10:01 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T44 south (German)


Wehrmacht's steady advance continues.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 361
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 4:17:30 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T44 south (Soviet)


Turn by turn I readjust positions of whole southern part of the front. Saper's advance forces me to give ground without fighting. I estimate, that by now I lost most of my blizzard gains in that area.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 362
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 4:22:43 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T45 south (German)


Finally no attacks were made in Moscow area, but in the south German juggernaut pushes relentlessly forward.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 363
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 4:29:31 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T45 south (Soviet)


Readjustments.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 364
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 4:38:51 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T46 south (German)


Quiet in the center a bit of action in the south.


Judging from number of panzers blow that Saper will land next turn will might be able to penetrated several lines of my defenses. Yet another turn of "readjustments" will be necessary.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kamil -- 7/31/2012 4:39:23 PM >

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 365
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 5:14:54 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T46 north (Soviet)


Last turn of mud, so repositioning is necessary.


Due to limited commitment of both sides not much can and have to be done here.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kamil -- 7/31/2012 5:15:03 PM >

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 366
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 5:16:47 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T46 center (Soviet)


Front line is strengthened considerably. I can't afford to lose more ground here.


There is still plenty of troops in Tula region. If Saper keeps his attention in the south I will move surplus there.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kamil -- 7/31/2012 5:20:59 PM >

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 367
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 5:18:41 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T46 center 2 (Soviet)


This is weak spot and I am afraid that it would only take 1 maybe 2 turns to crack this line.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kamil -- 7/31/2012 5:20:42 PM >

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 368
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 5:23:02 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T46 center/south (Soviet)


My positions look strong. I can always fall-back behind river and I created decent relieve force near Voronez. Just in case ...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 369
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 5:26:46 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T46 south (Soviet)


I think I have too many units here. I will try to remember about it in future.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 370
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 5:30:51 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T46 OOB (Soviet)


Red Army is stronger than month ago, but not as much as I hoped. To make things worse German army not only got more numerous but during the course of April boosted its combat efficiency by undertaking several successful attacks each turn.



Comparing to last month:

Germans: soldiers +47k, AFVs +495
Soviet: soldiers +297k, AFVs +1594




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 371
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 6:38:28 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T47 center (German)


First turn of clear weather in May and another prove of my stupidity.


I somehow didn't manage to employ reserve mode and I paid the price by loosing few valuable hexes in Moscow area. Some of this battles could have been won ...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kamil -- 7/31/2012 6:46:18 PM >

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 372
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 6:42:45 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T47 south (German)


Despite having half-decent fort belt I was not able to stop advancing panzers. It took no more than half (at most) of Saper's moblie forces to punch nice-sized whole in my lines. River Don saved me from disaster.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kamil -- 7/31/2012 6:43:10 PM >

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 373
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 6:54:03 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T47 all (Soviet)


I overwritten old save with new, so I am not able to present my actions during that turn.


Overall I attacked a lot, but German reserves were extremely successful, especially in in crucial south part of the front - leaving many non-committed panzers made the difference.

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 374
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 7:02:53 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T48 center (German)


Mud, so amount of action dropped significantly - only 1 hex lost.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 375
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 7:05:07 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T48 south (German)


No attacks here and clearly Saper is planning something different this time.

Part of mobile forces that weren't used during last clear turn were transferred to Kursk sector.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 376
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 7:11:30 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline
5.7 million for this time period is awfully thin on the ground, Kamil. Your margin for error here is not big.



_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 377
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 7:18:00 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
quote:

Flaviusx


5.7 million for this time period is awfully thin on the ground, Kamil. Your margin for error here is not big.




Totally agree. I still pay the price for 7 initial turns of this game, when my army almost ceased to exist.

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 378
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 7:21:45 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T48 center/south (Soviet)


To counter new threat I reinforced Kursk region using troops form Tula.


I didn't use reserve mode preferring to refit units in Voronezh region. I assume I am strong enough to do it.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 379
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 7:57:29 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T49 center (German)


Step by step I loose my safety cushion, soon Moscow will be withing striking distance.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 380
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 7/31/2012 8:05:27 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T49 center/south (German)


This could be my worst turn ever.

I badly underestimated Saper and paid terrible price. Whole Volkov front was nicely herded and now faces annihilation.

River Don that was saved me 2 turns ago will now protect Germans. I can't see the way of breaking this pocket.



Encircled units, overall 240k soldiers

4 Tanks and 2 Cavalry corps
20 Infantry and 2 Mt divisions



One more turn like that and war will be lost.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kamil -- 8/12/2012 1:45:50 PM >

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 381
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/12/2012 2:05:34 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T49 center (Soviet)


I managed to undertake few successful attacks here, but nothing really to be proud of.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 382
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/12/2012 2:08:03 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T49 center/south (Soviet)


Despite absolute commitment to the task of rescuing surrounded troops I failed miserably.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 383
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/12/2012 2:24:52 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T50 center/south (German)



Predictably apart from loosing few encircled divisions not much happened - 30k (3 infantry div, 1 airborne brig)




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kamil -- 8/12/2012 2:25:44 PM >

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 384
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/12/2012 2:47:30 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T50 center/south (Soviet)


Loosing almost quarter of million soldiers sent ripples across whole front. I was forced to fall back from exposed positions.


Unfortunately German divisions surrounded in Lipetsk fought well.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 385
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/12/2012 6:43:58 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T51 center/south (German)


Saper managed to reopen corridor to motorized divisions encircled in Lipetsk.

Destroyed units - 3 infantry divisions and 1 tank corps (29k).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 386
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/12/2012 7:01:40 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T51 center/south (Soviet)



Reorganization and adjustments continues.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 387
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/12/2012 7:25:14 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T52 far north (German)


I was really surprised by Finish attack.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 388
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/12/2012 7:26:31 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T52 center (German)


Steady advance of Saper's forces towards Moscow.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 389
RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) - 8/12/2012 7:30:44 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
T52 center/south (German)


Another unpleasant surprise here. 7 more divisions are doomed.

In the meanwhile remnants of big pockets were eliminated - 2 cavalry corps, 3 tank corps, 13 infantry divisions, 2 mountain divisions (162k)




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 390
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222) Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.492