Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/9/2012 3:41:47 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		By now some of you readers are probably wondering why in the world am I giving away all this valuable OPSEC to Jim? I'm thinking the policy might have to change when the Allies start pushing units out into my regions but for now, I figure I might be able to pull off alll these local real-time actions in spite of the leak(s). There's not a whole lot the Allies can do in the early war stages and Jim is just ( probably ) biding his time, taking the lumps, doing his best to roll with the punches and save what he can. Maybe we should ask him?

So um.....Jim, how's it going on the Alllied side.....If you'd care to say.

EDIT: I've saved the first 16 pages as separate off-line web pages and have put them into separate folders and have constructed an index.html file that you can use to get to the separate pages easily even when you don't have any internet service for some reason or other. I did this mostly to document for myself, the game as it unfolds so my son or whoever else might want to read it a decade from now or something. But you guys are welcome to it too. You can find the download page right here:

Published AAR pages 1-16

It's about 78Meg big so it'll take a minute to download but using the index page go get to the different pages is pretty easy.

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 7/11/2012 6:56:24 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 481
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/9/2012 7:23:06 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I've got this one ARD near Cam Rahn Bay and it's got a speed of 1 even though it's got no damage. I'd just as soon skuddle this bad boy. I don't have a use for it.....not one I'm aware of. I'm gonna park it at CRB and ignore it.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 482
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 2:40:45 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I sent my moves to Jim sometime Monday am and here it's 18:39 and I have some moves from Jim. Here's the combat results for 03Jan42.

This is the latest economic chart.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 483
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 2:47:32 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the latest production chart:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 484
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 2:52:11 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		This is me bumping up the output of Oscar aircraft by 20 so that it's now 32(20).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 485
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:00:47 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the latest losses:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 486
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:07:56 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I-10 was damaged so heavily that I've had to evacuate it to Rabaul for repairs. So now I know there's a minefield at Brisbane.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 487
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:12:15 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I was just about to run some surface ships into Soerabaja to get some hits and I thought about possible minefields and sent the sub instead....The RO-33 sank after this but at least no surface skimmers got entangled.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 488
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:14:37 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I ran into some of Jim's PT boats last night but nobody got hurt on either side.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 489
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:19:39 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Another inconclusive contest. It was raining and visibility was poor I'm guessing.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 490
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:22:26 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		78 coastal guns is nothing to sneeze at. I'm lucky no ships were hit this time.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 491
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:25:30 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I didn't get off so lightly at Ambon. The AK sank after this.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 492
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:27:43 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

78 coastal guns is nothing to sneeze at. I'm lucky no ships were hit this time.


78 shots, not coastal guns. Big difference! Prolly 4 - 6 guns.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 493
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:29:06 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

I didn't get off so lightly at Ambon. The AK sank after this.


Very accurate shooting ... again, 85 shots, but 18 hit. Wow. I wonder if she was damaged beforehand? Smoking ships are much easier hit.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 494
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:29:45 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The plumber's helper is back being a pest at Ominato. Lot's of PB's are nearby however so maybe he'll go away after a bit.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 495
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:31:42 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
78 coastal guns is nothing to sneeze at. I'm lucky no ships were hit this time.

78 shots, not coastal guns. Big difference! Prolly 4 - 6 guns.

You're absolutely correct. Thanks for pointing that out. I read that wrong all the time.

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 496
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:34:08 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The Nautilus isn't there now so I guess I persuaded him to submerge or something.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 497
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:36:46 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I've had a lot of torpedoes that miss here lately. Maybe I need different sub commanders? I'll look into that next time it docks.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 498
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:39:35 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		We're starting to whittle down the Warhawk's in the more southern islands in the PI. A bunch more like this will do the trick.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 499
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:45:09 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The war in China is heating up. Usually there's just some isolated bombing raids flown by the Japs and they don't usually hit
much but here's an Allied raid and as usual they didn't hit much.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 500
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:50:12 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The Zero CAP is working out just fine. This time another BB missed getting hit.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 501
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:52:46 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Jim is still doing his 4 B-17's daily raid. He never seems to hit anything so I'm not too worried about it yet.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 502
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:55:53 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Now that I've polished off Steel Worker I guess I need to sail down toward Canton to see if I can't get some more ships.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 503
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 3:59:35 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Again, a small Zero CAP saves the day. This CA had a close encounter of the aerial kind.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 504
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 4:01:55 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I guess Jim thought he might ought to sweep Davao with his P-40's. Two of them bit the dirt.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 505
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 4:04:32 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		A raid on the ship yard at Singers gets a hit.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 506
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 4:07:00 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Things didn't go all that well at Pago Pago.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 507
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 4:09:15 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Things are moving slowly at Iloilo. I'm going to have to ship some more troops into there to help out.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 508
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 4:12:00 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Also, Clark Field needs to be reinforced somehow. Maybe there's a Regiment on the Home Islands that I can move yet. Or something.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 509
RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 - 7/10/2012 4:14:48 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The Japs finally captured Samarindia. Now to repair the oil refineries in this area.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 510
Page:   <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Parry vs. Spar Reluctant Admiral 4.2 Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.313