Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 1:23:05 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I had an unescorted AV out in harm's way and a Dutch sub found her. The damage is extensive as you can see so I'm going to have to
pull her back to a repair yard somewhere to fix the damage if I can get her back to safety somehow. The sub may chase her for all I
know. It would be just like Jim to do that just to guarantee a sinkage. I would too.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 751
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 1:32:44 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Even when they outnumber and AVG my Nates are no match. I wonder if I should stand down the Nates or hope for some Allied
losses. One more contest to get a gauge of the conflict might be in order. If no Allied losses then I'll stand down the Nates and try to
find some Oscar's to fly there instead.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 752
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 1:37:35 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		This raid is another example of the insignificant amount of damage being done by these raids. I'm thinking I'm going to need a bigger
gaggle of planes to really get to the level of shock and awe. I may need to give some thought to flying a lot more bombers into the AO
to give some juice to my Beat-Down program. Clark Field may be a tough nut to crack.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 753
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 1:44:31 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The air war near Singapore is still going on. I'm wondering if I'm hitting the correct target. I'm guessing that Singapore itself would be
more appropriate to hit but at least there were some Allied losses on this raid.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 754
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 1:53:31 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I'm guessing this raid on Dili occured before Dili was captured. Anyway, I've boosted the altitude of the Lilly's to 10K feet and maybe that
will prevent some of the damage that occured during the raid. I've moved a Mavis unit to Dili to give a much better view of the Darwin sea area.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 755
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 1:58:02 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the result of another expensive unescorted raid into Singapore. It's costly but I'm told it's necessary to keep the Allies from
building up their fort level. I hope that's true. I don't need a high-level fort to be there when and if I finally get there.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 756
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 2:01:13 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Another Allied raid on Hanoi. I'm wondering if I ought to move a Nate group into that hex to do some CAP at the very least.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 757
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 2:14:00 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		As a side note, this is the state of health of some of my air groups. Not too great but then they've been flying since the start of the war.
I'm infusing more pilots and upping the level of rest on some of the groups to try to boost the morale and lower the fatigue of them. We'll
see if it works in future turns.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 758
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 2:19:03 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And here's a carrier raid on Singapore that indeed WAS escorted and it STILL got shotup pretty well. This raid was expensive. And
not much Allied damage was done. I'm not sure this raid was worth doing. I'm not sure it's worth doing again.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 759
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 2:23:29 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		There aren't many places to stage some fighters so most of my long-range raids are going to be unescorted. But still, they tend to be
expensive raids because they tend to get shot up pretty badly.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 760
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 2:26:22 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		There was a small contest near Baker Island that hasn't ended yet. I expect them to tangle again in the near future.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 761
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 2:30:13 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		There was another small contest near Christmas Island. My sub is outnumbered but might be able to get a hit on the transport
nonetheless. I'll leave him there to try again.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 762
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 2:37:31 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		San Jose finally fell. There's only a couple of places left to grab and most of them are contested. D'oh.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 763
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 2:41:11 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Operation Beat-Down at Clark Field is proceeding very slowly. I think the infusion of more troops will speed up the process a lot. I'm
tempted to try a DA just to see what happens.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 764
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 2:47:56 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		My forces on Manila are outnumbered and outgunned but still Allied losses are mounting. I've got some troops headed that way to make
things better.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 765
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 2:50:06 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The situation at Kuantan is NOT excellent but I have some troops headed for Kuantan to help out.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 766
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 2:53:23 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The situaton at Koepang is in doubt. I need to land some more troops there to get things moving in the right direction.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 767
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 2:56:21 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		At Palembang the DA reduced the Allied fort level there to 0 so the rest of the attacks will be more condusive to good results.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 768
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/29/2012 6:32:35 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 14, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is at least the sixth different sub I've encountered along the West Coast... I do not have enough ASW to cover all the TF's right now

Sub attack near San Clemente Island at 223,80
Japanese Ships
SS I-19

Allied Ships
xAK Unicoi
DD Hughes
xAK Ewa
DD Walke
DD O'Brien
DD Russell
DD Mustin


ASW attack near Bella Bella at 202,48
Japanese Ships
SS I-15

Allied Ships
DD Gilmer
DD Hatfield


Sub attack near Bella Bella at 202,48
Japanese Ships
SS I-15

Allied Ships
DD Fox
DD Hatfield
DD Gilmer



The Bad news... +400 Casualties, a general A** kicking @ Kuantan...
The GOOD news...Both BTF's are VERY near his CVTF where I've sent ALL my Western subs...hehehe

Night Naval bombardment of Kuantan at 51,79

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
Hudson I: 2 damaged

Japanese Ships
BB Haruna
CA Aoba
CA Myoko
CA Chokai
CL Kitakami
CL Kiso
CL Abukuma

Allied ground losses:
142 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 6 destroyed, 29 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 13 (3 destroyed, 10 disabled)


Airbase hits 4
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 21
Port hits 19
Port supply hits 5

Night Naval bombardment of Kuantan at 51,79

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim I: 4 damaged
Hudson I: 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
BB Ise
CA Kinugasa
CA Kumano
CA Ashigara
CA Maya
CL Oi
CL Naka


Allied ground losses:
315 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 27 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 19 (5 destroyed, 14 disabled)
Vehicles lost 11 (1 destroyed, 10 disabled)


Airbase hits 5
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 20
Port hits 8
Port fuel hits 1
Port supply hits 1


I'm simply trying to get the Port Service detachment off XMas Is. - good thing those DD's were in the area...

ASW attack near Christmas Island at 174,141
Japanese Ships
SS I-24

Allied Ships
DD Farragut
xAP St. Mihel
DD Worden
DD Hull

_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 769
RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/30/2012 4:39:00 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		I got Larry's turn tonite and was just finishing my turn against TommyG, so the turn is back in Larry's hands... we're keeping up a pretty good pace so far.

FOW report. . . The Enterprise CVTF reported 2 separate SBD Dauntlesses hit the SS I-5, but nothing in the Combat report. Now I need to make haste out of there...


SBD-3 Dauntless reports submarine wake at 169, 98 near French Frigate Shoal
TBD-1 Devastator reports possible submarine at 169, 98 near French Frigate Shoal
SBD-2 Dauntless reports radio transmissions at 169, 98 near French Frigate Shoal
SBD-2 Dauntless from VS-6 attacking SS I-5 at 169,98
SS I-5 is reported HIT
SBD-2 Dauntless reports shadow in water at 169, 98 near French Frigate Shoal
SBD-2 Dauntless from VB-6 attacking SS I-5 at 169,98
SS I-5 is reported HIT
SBD-2 Dauntless reports suspected submarine at 169, 98 near French Frigate Shoal
TBD-1 Devastator reports submarine wake at 169, 98 near French Frigate Shoal

Larry has done an admirable job so far BUT P.I. and Singers seem to be the thorn in his side.

China is just...China-uggh!

_____________________________


(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 770
RE: 15Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/31/2012 6:08:20 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		As Jim said I received his moves Sunday pm and had to finish my moves for Rob before I could start working on Jim's game moves. So it's Monday pm now and the game has progressed to 16Jan42 and I have some combat results for 15Jan42 to display hereafter.

There was some bombardment of Koepang during the night and I got some unremarkable results. I'm going to have to do more and more bombardment of Koepang probably to soften it up a little for the ground troops.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 771
RE: 15Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/31/2012 6:12:38 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		DMS W-12 managed to clear some mines but the Allied mine indicator dot is still on the map so there may be more mines yet. I'm
hoping to see the fall of Palembang sometime soon so I can start moving resources and oil out of there to Hong Kong or somewhere.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 772
RE: 15Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/31/2012 6:18:21 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Jim has two or more subs hanging around Singkawang making a nusciance of themselves. I'm going to have to fly some ASW assets
into that area to help out.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 773
RE: 15Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/31/2012 6:22:52 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I seem to have lost a transport out near Tarawa to one of Jim's subs. D'oh.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 774
RE: 15Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/31/2012 6:25:51 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		One of my subs got hit near Baker Island: 16 Sys and 13 Flt damage so far. I'll probably have to retire that sub to a repair yard soon.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 775
RE: 15Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/31/2012 7:04:54 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Six of my Betty's did a raid on Manila that produced unremarkable results:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 776
RE: 15Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/31/2012 7:10:36 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the results of a raid on Kuantan. Not much to write home about.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 777
RE: 15Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/31/2012 7:14:00 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's another expensive raid on Johore Bahru.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 778
RE: 15Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/31/2012 7:19:07 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I have no idea why this raid happened. Maybe the "ground" mission doesn't need to specify the target in all cases.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 779
RE: 15Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 7/31/2012 7:24:11 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's what happened at Buna:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 780
Page:   <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 14Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.875