Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 31Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 31Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson Page: <<   < prev  41 42 [43] 44 45   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 31Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/17/2012 2:31:42 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
A little mop-up action in North Borneo. Only a couple more remnants to chase down and destroy.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1261
RE: 31Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/17/2012 2:36:32 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
It seems as though I landed at Loemadjang with a tad too few troops. A second installment of troops might be in order here.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1262
RE: 31Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/17/2012 2:41:07 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Another attack like this one and the Allies will probably drive the Japs out of Port Moresby. D'oh.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1263
RE: 31Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/17/2012 2:50:41 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 31, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SOMEWHERE there is a SCTF supposedly going to "aid" my AP's...

Night Time Surface Combat, near Canton Island at 153,143, Range 10,000 Yards
Japanese Ships
DD Shigure
DD Ikazuchi

Allied Ships
AP Henry T. Allen, Shell hits 7, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
AP President Jackson, Shell hits 8, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
AP President Monroe, Shell hits 1


Yeah I left her in the oven a bit too long...

ASW attack near Palembang at 48,91
Japanese Ships
xAKL Saiho Maru
PB Muro Maru

Allied Ships
SS O19, hits 5


6 YP and 2 PB's all within reaction range of the Kansan, yet she goes down...

Submarine attack near San Francisco at 218,72
Japanese Ships
SS I-26

Allied Ships
xAK Kansan, Shell hits 2, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage


Soon as I clear out these pesky LYB's, its time to move some more P-40's back to PM!

Morning Air attack on 53rd Australian Battalion, at 98,130 (Port Moresby)
Weather in hex: Overcast
Raid detected at 105 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 36 minutes

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 16



Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 1 damaged


Allied ground losses:
6 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


I really thought Larry would try sweeping first at Singers???

Morning Air attack on Singapore , at 50,84
Weather in hex: Clear sky
Raid detected at 31 NM, estimated altitude 4,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 10 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 9
G4M1 Betty x 3

Allied aircraft
Blenheim IF x 4
Buffalo I x 21
Hurricane IIb Trop x 8

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
G4M1 Betty: 1 destroyed
G4M1 Betty: 1 destroyed by flak

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 1 destroyed
Hurricane IIb Trop: 1 damaged


The AVG hasnt hit a thing, but if Larry's reacting to it - it must be good!

Morning Air attack on 14th Tank Regiment, at 55,55 (Moulmein)
Weather in hex: Light rain
Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 15,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Allied aircraft
H81-A3 x 19

Allied aircraft losses
H81-A3: 1 damaged

Aircraft Attacking:
19 x H81-A3 bombing from 100 feet

Also attacking 15th Army ...
Also attacking 14th Tank Regiment ...


That Zero pilot must be good, and my B-17 gunners must be bad!

Morning Air attack on 144th Infantry Regiment, at 98,130 (Port Moresby)
Weather in hex: Overcast
Raid spotted at 16 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 1

Allied aircraft
B-17D Fortress x 6

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
B-17D Fortress: 5 damaged

Meanwhile next door in Salamaua, angry Zeroes down thier second B-17.

Morning Air attack on 45th AA Battalion, at 98,127 (Salamaua)
Weather in hex: Heavy rain
Raid spotted at 15 NM, estimated altitude 19,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 6

Allied aircraft
B-17D Fortress x 3

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
B-17D Fortress: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged


Need one more day to get my P-40's in the air again at Clark Field...

Afternoon Air attack on 31st Infantry Regiment, at 79,76 (Clark Field)
Weather in hex: Moderate rain
Raid detected at 109 NM, estimated altitude 19,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 34 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-48-Ib Lily x 21

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-48-Ib Lily: 2 damaged


Must...get...CAP...to...higher...altitude... AND doesn't Larry know 1E bombers generally don't do well bombing above 5K???

Afternoon Air attack on Liuchow , at 74,55
Weather in hex: Thunderstorms
Raid spotted at 39 NM, estimated altitude 23,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 13 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 5
Ki-51 Sonia x 3

Allied aircraft
H81-A3 x 9

No Japanese losses

No Allied losses

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x Ki-51 Sonia bombing from 20000 feet *
Airfield Attack: 2 x 50 kg GP Bomb


And for tonight's Warcenter broadcast, "Can you BELIEVE this?"

Afternoon Air attack on Singkawang , at 56,88
Weather in hex: Moderate rain
Raid spotted at 17 NM, estimated altitude 7,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Allied aircraft
Do-24K-1 x 3

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
AKE Kiyozumi Maru, Bomb hits 1, on fire

I figured it was my all or nothing shot, now just chase them out and bring in the P-40's...

Ground combat at Port Moresby (98,130)
Allied Shock attack
Attacking force 8464 troops, 69 guns, 9 vehicles, Assault Value = 260
Defending force 4432 troops, 43 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 148

Allied adjusted assault: 192
Japanese adjusted defense: 61

Allied assault odds: 3 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), fatigue(-), supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
944 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 79 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 10 (2 destroyed, 8 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
370 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 53 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Guns lost 14 (1 destroyed, 13 disabled)

Meanwhile Orphan Anne is warming up her pipes...Oh thats right we didnt lose any bases this turn!


_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1264
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 9:48:00 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Okie dokie.....it's Tuesday 18Sep2012 13:47 and I've received Jim's moves so here's the latest combat results:

Here's some Tracker alerts. Notice the sunk DMS ships.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 1265
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 9:52:52 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's the latest Tracker economics chart. The number of oil refineries producing is less this time because I've turned off the refineries
at Palembang, Balikpapan, and Miri because Palembang was getting into the fuel spoilage and the other two were getting close. Just as
soon as I can ship some of that fuel out of there I'm going to turn them back on again.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1266
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 9:58:19 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's a report on the spoilage places:






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 9/24/2012 10:49:57 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1267
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 10:11:30 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
DMS-10 is having a rough day. I'm not surprised that it sunk.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1268
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 10:15:15 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
My DD's hung around to finish off the stragglers from yesterday's ambush. I think that takes care of that Allied TF.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1269
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 10:20:42 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
This is the first of two night naval bombardments.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1270
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 10:23:47 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
This is the second of two night naval bombardments. This one puts the cap on the damage the first one did.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1271
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 10:27:56 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
This is surely a surprise. I had no idea that I could hit his sub hunters. NOT.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1272
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 10:36:05 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
There was a mis-communication somewhere. Those DMS ships weren't supposed to go in alone. I had some surface ships to go with
them. I thought. I guess I had a brain fart and the surface ships were given a different task entirely. Ooops.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1273
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 10:39:04 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
And here's an Allied sub finishing off the straggler. That about wraps it up for that TF.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1274
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 10:43:11 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's an action from Operation SKIDDING CAR Two where the goal is to eliminate the Allied squadron operating there. In this action
I managed to re-damage an already damaged SB-3. Hurray for our side.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 9/18/2012 10:44:11 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1275
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 10:46:29 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Operation BEAT DOWN continues at Manila. Only six more months of this and the Allies will surrender. Probably.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1276
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 10:49:39 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I predict that following this attack there will be a B-17 raid and a shock attack by the Allies.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1277
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 10:54:34 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I've got some ground units headed for Clark Field even as we speak. I expect some major resistance when they get there. It seems Jim
has moved the major proportion of his forces onto Clark Field and has left a skeleton force at Bataan. I'm toying with the idea of moving
on Bataan and clearing the mine field so as to allow the ships in to Manila harbour to do some ship-to-shore bombardment and leaving
Clark Field till last. It might work. Maybe.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1278
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 10:57:41 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Jim's AVG group is shooting down my Lilly's. I'll have to look into the possibility of moving some Oscar's in for escorts or something.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1279
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 11:00:05 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Jim is still treating the P-40's of the AVG as if they were bombers. And at 100' no less.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1280
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 11:03:03 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's the daily B-17 raid, again against Port Moresby. These raids are almost mandatory now.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1281
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 11:06:28 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I'm hoping to finish off the 22nd Indian Brigade before Jim can get it into Singapore, hence the daily air attacks to slow it down.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1282
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 11:09:27 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
It appears that Jim is trying to slow down my guys and probably for because he's hoping to get the 22nd Ind Bge into Singers.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1283
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 11:12:31 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Despite the two hits, I-18 is still good to go at Midway. So she will hang around some more.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1284
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 11:18:23 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here I've grouped all the Port Moresby actions into one picture. I'm predicting that the shock attacks will continue and that Jim will try
to move some more ground troops into the hex to help out. I'm putting a ground force together even as we speak. I just don't know if
I can get it there before HIS troops arrive.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1285
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 11:24:21 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Jim is counterattacking. He has moved some 114 tanks into Lingayen and has plans to re-take the base there. Probably.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1286
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 11:28:34 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I'm going to have to drop back from "bombard" to "defend" because I'm running outta supplies at Cebu.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1287
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/18/2012 11:32:19 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's one attack that I didn't expect. Jim continues to surprise me from time to time. He'll probably do this attack again sometime.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1288
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/19/2012 9:11:27 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Feb 01, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I can relate to Larry's frustration, The DMS by themselves are sitting ducks for CD guns.

TF 193 encounters mine field at Soerabaja (56,104) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
15 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
DMS W-10, Shell hits 7, heavy fires, heavy damage

Artilleriecommando Coastal Gun Battalion firing at DMS W-10
DMS W-10 firing at Artilleriecommando Coastal Gun Battalion
3 mines cleared

I'm assuming the mine hits are because the DMS are evading the CD guns... any thoughts?

Naval Gun Fire at Soerabaja - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
22 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
DMS W-19, Shell hits 2, Mine hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
DMS W-18, Shell hits 9, heavy fires, heavy damage
DMS W-15, Shell hits 9, heavy fires, heavy damage
DMS W-11, Shell hits 2, Mine hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
DMS W-8, Shell hits 2, Mine hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
DMS W-4, Shell hits 2, Mine hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
DMS W-2, Shell hits 2, Mine hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
DMS W-1, Shell hits 2, Mine hits 2, on fire, heavy damage

Allied ground losses:
6 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

TF 537 encounters mine field at Soerabaja (56,104) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
14 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
DMS W-19, Shell hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
DMS W-18, Shell hits 9, heavy fires, heavy damage
DMS W-15, Shell hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
DMS W-11, Shell hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
DMS W-8, Shell hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
DMS W-4, Shell hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
DMS W-2, Shell hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
DMS W-1, Shell hits 2, on fire, heavy damage

I can't say I'm sorry to see them go... It will make Larry's job harder in the future!

Submarine attack near Soerabaja at 57,102
Japanese Ships
DMS W-8, heavy fires, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS KXV
SS KXV launches 2 torpedoes at DMS W-8

Submarine attack near Soerabaja at 56,103

Japanese Ships
DMS W-10, Torpedo hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS KXI
DMS W-10 is sighted by SS KXI
SS KXI launches 2 torpedoes


Kudo's to Larry for taking down over 1000 AV, before you think I'm a total idiot - there is a SCTF thats supposed to be covering them sitting three hexes away with a six hex reaction range!

Night Time Surface Combat, near Canton Island at 153,143, Range 11,000 Yards
Japanese Ships
DD Shigure
DD Ikazuchi

Allied Ships
AP President Monroe, Shell hits 20, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk

Allied ground losses:
936 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 95 destroyed, 125 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 6 (4 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Vehicles lost 47 (41 destroyed, 6 disabled)

Okay, I guess the YP designation somehow refers to these ships as torpedo magnets?

Sub attack near San Francisco at 217,72
Japanese Ships
SS I-26

Allied Ships
YP-414, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage
YP-131


These B-17's are starting to fall daily, the only saving grace is they are only here for a limited time, so losing them...

Morning Air attack on 144th Infantry Regiment, at 98,130 (Port Moresby)
Weather in hex: Thunderstorms
Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 3

Allied aircraft
B-17D Fortress x 4

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
B-17D Fortress: 1 destroyed, 3 damaged


Well I won't do that again at Cebu! Larry has done a nice job with the bombardments knocking my forces down - he will own this ground before long.

Ground combat at Cebu (80,86)
Allied Shock attack
Attacking force 6107 troops, 73 guns, 98 vehicles, Assault Value = 126

Defending force 8453 troops, 86 guns, 59 vehicles, Assault Value = 273

Allied adjusted assault: 42

Japanese adjusted defense: 237

Allied assault odds: 1 to 5

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), fatigue(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
41 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Allied ground losses:
618 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 83 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 24 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 5 disabled
Guns lost 12 (1 destroyed, 11 disabled)


Assaulting units:
81st PA Infantry Division
Cebu USN Base Force

Defending units:
9th Infantry Regiment
II./4th Infantry Battalion
I./4th Infantry Battalion
I./33rd Inf Regt
III./4th Infantry Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
17th Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Day 2 of Shock Attack, only 1-1 odds? I better reconsider my options!

Ground combat at Port Moresby (98,130)
Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 8137 troops, 68 guns, 9 vehicles, Assault Value = 217

Defending force 4154 troops, 79 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 89

Allied adjusted assault: 80

Japanese adjusted defense: 67

Allied assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), fatigue(-), supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
474 casualties reported
Squads: 11 destroyed, 28 disabled
Non Combat: 13 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Allied ground losses:
615 casualties reported
Squads: 24 destroyed, 60 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 20 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Assaulting units:
Torres Strait Battalion
Port Moresby Coastal Gun Battalion
D Coy/NG Rifles
49th Australian Battalion
39th Australian Battalion
53rd Australian Battalion
Port Moresby Brigade
14th RAAF Base Force
15th RAAF Base Force

Defending units:
144th Infantry Regiment
5th Indpt SNLF Coy
5th Mortar Battalion


And as far as my snide comment about Orphan Annie, looks like I'm singing the blues!
Japanese forces CAPTURE Salajar !!!
Japanese forces CAPTURE Donggala !!!


PS - a quick turnaround on Larry's part. I'm going to do the next turn now...

_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1289
RE: 01Feb42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 9/19/2012 8:05:02 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Okie dokie.......it's now Wed 19Sep2012 and I've received Jim's moves and here's the latest combat results:

Nothing like a fierce gunfight first thing in the morning to get your heart pumping properly.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 1290
Page:   <<   < prev  41 42 [43] 44 45   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 31Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson Page: <<   < prev  41 42 [43] 44 45   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.594