Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1118 updated 03 October 2012

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1118 updated 03 October 2012 Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1118 updated 03... - 10/21/2012 9:00:09 AM   
Mac Linehan

 

Posts: 1484
Joined: 12/19/2004
From: Denver Colorado
Status: offline 		Michael -

I am absolutely impressed beyond words at the level of support and new work you have done for AE - Thank You.

Gents - I am really missing the boat with reference to using the aircraft filter settings - is this done ingame (with 9e installed) or through the editor? Have spent 30 minutes trying to figure it out; and feel less than capable...

Thank You in advance

Mac

_____________________________

LAV-25 2147

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 241
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1118 updated 03... - 10/21/2012 9:52:00 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline 		Mac,

There's a good thread in the Modder sub-Forum on this.  Take a read there. 

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Mac Linehan)
Post #: 242
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1118 updated 03... - 10/21/2012 5:32:13 PM   
Mac Linehan

 

Posts: 1484
Joined: 12/19/2004
From: Denver Colorado
Status: offline 		Pax -

Found the thread - an outstanding discussion!

Thank You, Sir!

Mac

_____________________________

LAV-25 2147

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 243
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/21/2012 5:45:58 PM   
Mac Linehan

 

Posts: 1484
Joined: 12/19/2004
From: Denver Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jmalter

well i was gonna say "t'ain't nothin' better than a new michaelm beta download posted in the tech-thread".

but there is something better - it's his ability to provide near-instantaneous solutions in response to bugh-reports.

yay michaelm!


jmalter -

Very well and accurately said. That thrill and expectation that comes when checking the forums is back again. I have been off on a tangent for a month or so, this is a very pleasant surprise.

Once again, Michael, we are so fortunate to have you and Andy Mac as a part of the AE Team. I recognize and respect your sacrifice and work ethic.

Mac

< Message edited by Mac Linehan -- 10/21/2012 6:15:15 PM >

_____________________________

LAV-25 2147

(in reply to jmalter)
Post #: 244
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/21/2012 6:23:06 PM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline 		It is ondeed quite outstanding dedication.

_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to Mac Linehan)
Post #: 245
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/21/2012 7:11:37 PM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline 		I can´t find the list of changes for these betas, but using the beta (1118e) i have problems to drop paras at dot bases using float transports.
Is this new or a bug ? Had that problem at various locations using two different para units. In my last game this worked.

It would be nice to provide the list of changes somewhere.

Then a question for the cracks here: When is the burma road definitely closed ?
Wasn´t this shown in Rangoon base screen ? I own everything in Burma except Myitkina and Bhamo. Isn´t this enough ?
Or am i wrong and the closed rpoad is not shown in Rangoon base info screen ?
Thanks in advance.

< Message edited by seille -- 10/21/2012 7:17:25 PM >

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 246
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/21/2012 11:58:53 PM   
kevin_hx


Posts: 156
Joined: 1/20/2008
From: China
Status: offline 		21/10/12: 1109d - missed a change in "Split groups ... overloaded AF check"
21/10/12: 1109e - Burma road not open if Rangoon in enemy hands

————————————————————————————————————————
why the version become 1109?

_____________________________

Welcome to visit my Naval blog

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 247
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/22/2012 6:02:37 AM   
jmalter

 

Posts: 1673
Joined: 10/12/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seille
Then a question for the cracks here: When is the burma road definitely closed ?
Wasn´t this shown in Rangoon base screen ? I own everything in Burma except Myitkina and Bhamo. Isn´t this enough ?
Or am i wrong and the closed rpoad is not shown in Rangoon base info screen ?
Thanks in advance.

look at lower left of either Rangoon or Tsuyung base screen, it will tell you if Burma Road is open/closed. if Bham/Myit are still occupied by IJ, there might be add'l undiscoved IJ LCUs still blocking the BurmaRoad, do you have air-recon in the area, or LCUs moving up from Rangoon, to look for blockading enemy LCUs?

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 248
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/22/2012 7:13:16 AM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline 		Sorry, i didn´t point that out clear enough. I´m the IJ army and captured all of Burma except Myitkina and Bhama.
Rangoon base screen doesn´t show any message that the road is closed. Maybe i need Myitkina ? Thought it is not needed.

That one i found for a older Patch, but i still look for the conditions:
243) Added message on base screen if Burma Road is open (on Ledo, Rangoon and Tsuyung)

That message is not there in Rangoon in my game. All these bases are under my (jap) control. Is Myitkina another one i need for closing the road
or is 1118e buggy here ?



< Message edited by seille -- 10/22/2012 8:30:52 AM >

(in reply to jmalter)
Post #: 249
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/22/2012 9:57:24 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		Japanese player wont see any message as the open road is only applicable to Allied player.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 250
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/22/2012 11:13:51 AM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline 		Mhh, but for me as jap player it would be nice to know when i cut off the supply to China, or ?
I´m pretty sure that i saw this message during my last game as jap one year ago.

Can you at least give me the conditions when the road is definitely closed ?
Many thanks.

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 251
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/26/2012 5:45:54 AM   
Iridium


Posts: 932
Joined: 4/1/2005
From: Jersey
Status: offline 		It seems in the latest version, starting a PBEM, there are many buttons missing from the Intelligence screen. I did a fresh install, used the auto-updater, and then applied the unofficial public beta patch. Is this WAD or a new bug? While I'm at it, I would like to thank all involved in continuing to improve WitP: AE after so long.



- It's been a while, it's because the game is a PBEM isn't it?

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Iridium -- 10/26/2012 5:52:26 AM >

_____________________________

Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.

"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 252
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/26/2012 5:53:04 AM   
n01487477


Posts: 4779
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Iridium

It seems in the latest version, starting a PBEM, there are many buttons missing from the Intelligence screen. I did a fresh install, used the auto-updater, and then applied the unofficial public beta patch. Is this WAD or a new bug? While I'm at it, I would like to thank all involved in continuing to improve WitP: AE after so long.



- It's been a while, it's because the game is a PBEM isn't it?

Yep - First turn of PBEM doesn't have those buttons enabled

_____________________________

-Damian-
EconDoc
TrackerAE
Tutes&Java

(in reply to Iridium)
Post #: 253
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/27/2012 12:26:23 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kevin_hx

21/10/12: 1109d - missed a change in "Split groups ... overloaded AF check"
21/10/12: 1109e - Burma road not open if Rangoon in enemy hands

————————————————————————————————————————
why the version become 1109?


Typo should be 1119

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to kevin_hx)
Post #: 254
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/27/2012 12:32:37 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seille

Mhh, but for me as jap player it would be nice to know when i cut off the supply to China, or ?
I´m pretty sure that i saw this message during my last game as jap one year ago.

Can you at least give me the conditions when the road is definitely closed ?
Many thanks.

Burma Road is closed if
1. Rangoon or Tsuyung is Japanese occupied or
2. a road/rail path can't be traced from Rangoon to Tsuyung by Allied player

The Japanese player seeing the message (road is open) was a bug, which has since been fixed.

< Message edited by michaelm -- 10/27/2012 12:33:13 AM >

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 255
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/27/2012 12:35:13 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		Also, you never see a message saying "Burma road is closed" for either side.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 256
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1119e updated 2... - 10/27/2012 1:17:43 AM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 3211
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline 		Any chance to tweat the A2A routines to better reflect A2A combat rather than Altitude being the major effect?

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 257
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1119e updated 2... - 10/27/2012 1:55:18 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		No such thing as tweaking A2A combat.

Changing a2a would be a (large impact) task outside the scope of what I am suppose to be doing.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to Numdydar)
Post #: 258
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/27/2012 1:57:15 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seille

I can´t find the list of changes for these betas, but using the beta (1118e) i have problems to drop paras at dot bases using float transports.
Is this new or a bug ? Had that problem at various locations using two different para units. In my last game this worked.


Do you have a save that shows this? As far as I know, it is working.
[edit]
Found a combination that does not work - will fix for next build (today?)
I added a new unit Commando that was allowed to use seaplanes to invade enemy bases. This broke normal Parachute units that use to be allowed.

< Message edited by michaelm -- 10/27/2012 2:43:52 AM >

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 259
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/27/2012 2:28:10 AM   
n01487477


Posts: 4779
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline 		Hi Michael -
I tried to help Traskott with this but came up empty. The save is included and he is having trouble being able to reload the BB's in port in Tokyo. I've done a number of things

This is from JuanG's mod which has high effect


quote:

ORIGINAL: n01487477
quote:

ORIGINAL: traskott

Ehmmmmm...yes... 480mm, 48cms....

Acording to the editor: Effect: 3969, penetration: 840, load cost 9999, although if I remember correctly, the load cost was modified by me because the field was empty.

So I see that, in the end, I would need a Port10 to reload plus naval support??

reArmCost = 3969 * 2 = 7938
So, Port 10 should do it. (p109)
quote:

NS = (int) Math.ceil((0.2*reArmCost)-(port_ReArmLevel[portSize-1]/5));

Size 9 + ((1587) - (6500/5))
= 287 NS
Size 8 + ((1587) - (6000/5))
= 387 NS


So should work ... but ...

quote:

ORIGINAL: n01487477

Okay traskott -
been playing around for a number of turns and there does indeed seem to be a problem. Even with an AKE and single BB TF at Tokyo and Fukuoka the op's limit comes into effect.
I'm not sure if this is a beta or mod problem. I would guess though that JuanG would have tested this and IF my calculations are correct; Port 10 should reload without a problem. And as you have 506 NS in Tokyo - I'm scratching my head



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by n01487477 -- 10/27/2012 2:29:01 AM >

_____________________________

-Damian-
EconDoc
TrackerAE
Tutes&Java

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 260
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/27/2012 3:11:09 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		Michael,

Running 1119e, USMC squadrons on board carriers are not able to take replacement planes (button is grayed out/absent). If they transfer to the base they are able to take replacements (same base the ship is at).

Is that WAD? I recall it being mentioned a while back on the forum but I've forgotten if it was a bug or WAD.

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to n01487477)
Post #: 261
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/27/2012 3:24:22 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		I think the problem is that it doesn't have enough Ops points to load ALL the needed ammo in one go. There is a partial load check but this is not kicking in because of the large ops point requirement to load 13 big shells per ship.
I have modified the partial load and it can now load up to the ops limit of the ship - about 11 shells per ship.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to n01487477)
Post #: 262
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/27/2012 4:15:27 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Michael,

Running 1119e, USMC squadrons on board carriers are not able to take replacement planes (button is grayed out/absent). If they transfer to the base they are able to take replacements (same base the ship is at).

Is that WAD? I recall it being mentioned a while back on the forum but I've forgotten if it was a bug or WAD.

Post a save and the CV in question.
I know I fixed one issue about replacements being taken on CV vs base.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 263
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/27/2012 6:24:09 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Michael,

Running 1119e, USMC squadrons on board carriers are not able to take replacement planes (button is grayed out/absent). If they transfer to the base they are able to take replacements (same base the ship is at).

Is that WAD? I recall it being mentioned a while back on the forum but I've forgotten if it was a bug or WAD.

Post a save and the CV in question.
I know I fixed one issue about replacements being taken on CV vs base.

Sent via email.

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 264
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/27/2012 2:05:29 PM   
Saros

 

Posts: 454
Joined: 12/18/2010
Status: offline 		There still seems to be some effect on air co-ordination. Seems like every bomber group now comes in separately and only 1-2 are escorted whereas previously There would only be 1-2 large strikes at the same target.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 265
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1119e updated 2... - 10/27/2012 4:26:40 PM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 3211
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

No such thing as tweaking A2A combat.

Changing a2a would be a (large impact) task outside the scope of what I am suppose to be doing.


Well as a project manager in RL, I would be happy to provide you with a Change Request to add this to your Scope of Work

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 266
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1119e updated 2... - 10/27/2012 5:48:46 PM   
bk19@mweb.co.za

 

Posts: 258
Joined: 7/26/2011
Status: offline 		HI Michaelm,

I wish to check a small difference in my experience of your beta installers.

I have just run the '1119e install which claims that a reboot is required to complete the install.

Is this true, or is this just an oversight in the build of the installer?


(in reply to Numdydar)
Post #: 267
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 10/27/2012 7:31:27 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Michael,

Running 1119e, USMC squadrons on board carriers are not able to take replacement planes (button is grayed out/absent). If they transfer to the base they are able to take replacements (same base the ship is at).

Is that WAD? I recall it being mentioned a while back on the forum but I've forgotten if it was a bug or WAD.

Post a save and the CV in question.
I know I fixed one issue about replacements being taken on CV vs base.

Sent via email.

Solved:

quote:

(from email)

Hi
yep. It only expects replacements on CV if group carrier-trained.

Removing that might cause unwanted affects.

Michael


As the USMC groups in question are carrier capable but not carrier trained, it's normal that they have to put ashore to get replacements.

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 268
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1119e updated 2... - 10/27/2012 9:10:50 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bk19@mweb.co.za

HI Michaelm,

I wish to check a small difference in my experience of your beta installers.

I have just run the '1119e install which claims that a reboot is required to complete the install.

Is this true, or is this just an oversight in the build of the installer?



Doesn't do that for my install.
Did something else install like Microsoft patches around same time?

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to bk19@mweb.co.za)
Post #: 269
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1119e updated 2... - 10/27/2012 9:37:14 PM   
LargeSlowTarget


Posts: 4443
Joined: 9/23/2000
From: Hessen, Germany - now living in France
Status: offline 		Have seen the reboot message twice with earlier beta patch versions. No other installs at same time. Ignored it and game worked fine.

_____________________________

AE Mod "Bottlenecks" UPDATED 01/2022

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 270
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1118 updated 03 October 2012 Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.891