RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42

Page: << < prev 54 55 [56] 57 58 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/18/2013 4:20:21 AM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

TF 668 has left Tokyo w/ the 89th Naval Guard unit aboard and it's headed toward Guam because that's the generally right direction but
I haven't fully decided where to park this LCU yet. It's needed where I have some INF or ART LCU's that I could use elsewhere to provide
the garrison needed.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1651

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/18/2013 11:34:16 PM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

Here's some fresh combat results: And this one is a strange occurance.....the sub moves into attack position, gets hit once, and then
submerges. No attack. Huh.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1652

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/18/2013 11:37:12 PM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

I-29 gets lucky and gets a hit. There's lots of Allied traffic there, it was bound to happen sooner or later.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1653

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/18/2013 11:41:45 PM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

Lots of sub action today. Here's where my ASW dudes leap into action.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1654

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/18/2013 11:51:19 PM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

All that waiting finally paid off. A hit on an AK is worth waiting for.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1655

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/18/2013 11:53:23 PM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

And then there's an air strike on Darwin:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1656

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/18/2013 11:55:39 PM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

And then there was an air strike on Johore Bahru

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1657

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/18/2013 11:57:58 PM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

And then there was some air action in Java:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1658

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/19/2013 12:02:19 AM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

It's just a matter of time for the Lark Bn.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1659

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/19/2013 12:05:05 AM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

Bombing Singapore from 5K feet............what was I thinking? Look how many got damaged.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1660

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/19/2013 12:08:53 AM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

I can't seem to shoot down B-17's no matter how hard I try. Although I do remember getting one a couple of days ago.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1661

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/19/2013 12:10:43 AM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

And the Beat Down continues at Cagayan:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1662

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/19/2013 12:13:11 AM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

And another of my AK's gets picked off by an Allied sub:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1663

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/19/2013 12:16:09 AM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

And just then the Allies do their daily ground bombardment of my troops at Port Moresby:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1664

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/19/2013 12:16:32 AM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

And of course, here's the combat report:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1665

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/19/2013 9:02:38 AM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

Here's the situation at Mili.....the port is 34% on it's way to being level 1 and the fuel and supply situation is better than before.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1666

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/19/2013 10:11:11 AM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

TF 165 is a CS w/ escort that is carrying about 14 Float Planes and I'm using them to scan the ocean waters east and south in the
Tarawa area, plugging a large hole in my picket line. I'm through with about 48% of the picket line and there's some obvious holes but
I'm still rounding up ships to man the picket line. I'm thinking of using midget subs for some of it. After all they are to be used for early
warning only. Midget subs will do that.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1667

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/19/2013 10:21:35 AM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

TF 169 is bringing a much needed 25K or so of fuel ( if memory serves ) to Bubble Drop which is a really good thing because BD is really
low on fuel. I'd like to be able to run the hubs w/ a level of fuel in the 100K range and whatever BD is now ( about 37K I think ) it's not
nearly enough to be what I would consider to be a "safe" fuel level. As it is the Bubble Drop, Truk, Kwajalein, and Rabaul areas are just
starving for fuel. So I've implemented an emergency plan whereby all the TK's and AK's will make their way to Balikpapan and load up on
fuel and take it to where it needs to go. And Balik is at a fuel level of about 71K so there's enough to convey, and there will be for a while
yet since I've turned the Refinery back on to get the fuel flowing again.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1668

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/20/2013 4:44:53 AM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

Tracker alerted me to the fact that Miri has a lot of fuel spoilage or spillage or some bad thing is happening there. So needless to say I
turned off the refineries there at Miri so the fuel will stop being produced. I'm going to have to get a bunch of ships to start taking fuel
from Miri so it won't be wasted. I can carry it over to Cam Rahn Bay and or Hong Kong or somewhere.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)

Post #: 1669

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 18Apr42 - 2/20/2013 9:02:18 AM

larryfulkerson

Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline

Jim and I have exchanged files and I've watched the movie and here's some fresh combat results. This is a night surface combat that
probably shouldn't have happened. Unless Jim was sacrificing his ships for some reason. There's another surface group making their
way to the NW and it will probably get away.