Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 Page: <<   < prev  56 57 [58] 59 60   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:23:36 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		One of my AK's gets hit at Patani:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1711
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:25:55 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I did this bombardment to get a list of the Allied LCU's there and there's no list. D'oh. Didn't hurt anything though.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1712
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:31:04 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I just now noticed that the Allied minefield icon dot is missing from Soerabaja so I guess that means the minefield is gone and the DMS
can now steam up to Manila and start working on the minefields at Manila and Bataan.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1713
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:35:44 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then the Japs attacked the Allied troops at Mersing:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1714
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:37:26 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then Darwin got hit by an air attack:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1715
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:39:30 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The Manila remnants are still getting the beat down. I'm guessing it's getting ripe for a DA and I'm moving more people into that hex to
do that.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1716
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:41:20 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then the Allies at Cagayan were treated w/ another Jap air strike. The beat down continues.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1717
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:42:50 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And Johore Bahru was hit by several air strikes:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1718
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:45:03 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then Jim did another one of his PBY attacks on Rangoon and looses another PBY.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1719
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:46:32 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then Port Moresby is hit by an Allied B-17 attack.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1720
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:51:39 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then Sydney is hit by a carrier-borne airstrike:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1721
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:53:19 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then Port Moresby is hit by a Japanese air strike:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1722
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:55:29 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then there's another carrier-borne strike near Sydney:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1723
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 2:57:31 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then there is some sub action near SFO:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1724
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 3:00:34 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's how it went on the ground at Mauban:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1725
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 3:03:42 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And there was a good thing that happened in China that I have to include here:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1726
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 3:05:59 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's how it went on the ground at Batavia:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1727
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 3:08:35 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		More evidence that the Allied group at Mersing is out of supply: They vastly outnumber my forces but they lose in the ground
bombardment more than I do. I wonder if I dare do a DA now?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1728
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 3:10:12 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then the Allies do their daily ground bombardment of Port Moresby:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1729
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 3:14:21 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then Jim has the Allied group at Johore Bahru do a shock attack and it didn't turn out like he intended I'm guessing.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1730
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 3:16:22 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's how it went on the ground at Mersing w/ an Allied ground attack:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1731
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 3:16:53 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And of course, here's the combat report:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1732
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 3:51:07 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I just now noticed that Jim has moved some ships into the hex with me at Mersing. He snuck past all my surface assets, and my carrier
to get to where he is now. And the hex has two separate 3-DD TF's in it and there was no surface contest. Huh. Anyway it's probably
no crisis and it'll work itself out shortly.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1733
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 4:07:21 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		TF 23 is my naval bombardment BB w/ her escorts and I've set the TF up to do a naval bombardment of Port Moresby and it's looking like
maybe she might be able to reach PM in one day this time. That's pretty cool. Maybe I can start getting more bombardments in per
week this way. Maybe.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1734
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 4:18:39 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		TF 27 was originally going to go to Bubble Drop w/ almost 9K of fuel but I've redirected it to go to Truk since Truk is seriously low on fuel.
But it's going to take about a week for this fuel to arrive. Whoa. I should have seen this coming before it happened. I'm going to have
to start doing a survey of the hubs before I end the turn to see how everybody is doing so I'll see things like this coming before hand.

EDIT: I've done a forensic analysis of the Truk fuel situation and I've come to the conclusion that it was the near simultaneous arrival and
refueling of about 4 (four) AO's that started the crisis. I should have thought of things like this and planned ahead better or something.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 2/23/2013 4:20:30 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1735
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 4:33:24 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the SE coast of Oz situation: I had originally thought I'd have the carrier patrol north and south between Brisbane and Sydney
but all the ships at Brisbane are docked at port and have fighters to protect them including Warhawks and so far there's been no planes
at Sydney and there are ships sortie-ing from Sydney and not at Brisbane so I'm thinking now that I should leave the carriers at station
Dixie to pound the ships at Sydney for a while, say until the sorties hits about 50% or so and then go north to station Yankee to see if I
can stir up some of that air-to-air action and maybe knock down some Warhawks and give the bombers a much needed break while I
sweep the skies and then after all the fighters are delt with THEN do some naval/port attacks.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1736
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 5:04:25 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I found some INF units available at Tokyo and I've started rounding up some AP's to start moving them out to the "field" somewhere.
They will be loading until tomorrow and then I'll ship them out toward Guam and redirect them as they get closer to their destination and
I know better where they can best be used, postponing their destination because the situatiion changes as they travel sometimes.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1737
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 5:10:05 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		TF 70 is carrying the II/81st Naval Guard unit to Singkep. I've decided to take them there out of all the places that an LCU is needed
because I need the resources Singkep might have ready. I'm hoping the hex is empty and that there won't be a fight for it. I don't want to
damage the facilities there if there are any.

EDIT: I checked on Singkep........it's got a Resources Center worth 21(0) so far.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1738
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 5:16:59 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the Wake situation: I'm finding that having too many troops on Wake's atoll is eating up supplies at a fanominal rate and I'm going
to have to correct that situation before to much more time passes. The problem is finding the shipping to do a troop movement that
isn't busy doing something else. There's troops leaving Tokyo too, you see.

EDIT: I've just had an idea......I can use a bunch of the smaller low-range AP's to move these guys....I just have to include an AO to go
with them. Cool.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 2/23/2013 5:19:49 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1739
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 - 2/23/2013 5:28:54 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Kendari needed supplies and just happens to have some resources to pickup after the supplies are downloaded. The one problem w/
this plan is that once the resources at Kendari are gone there aren't going to be any more at Kendari......I'll have to go somewhere else
to get all my resources.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1740
Page:   <<   < prev  56 57 [58] 59 60   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 22Apr42 Page: <<   < prev  56 57 [58] 59 60   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.734