Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 Page: <<   < prev  58 59 [60] 61 62   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 6:50:39 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Ha-3 was treated roughly by Depth Charges this morning but there's no skuttel button yet so I guess he stays there to keep an eye on
things generallly.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1771
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 6:55:08 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		My southern carrier group is down to about 58% sorties left so one more strike at Sydney and then we scoot up to Brisbane and fly the
rest of the sorties then head to Rabaul to refit.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1772
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 6:58:06 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I just got a brand new shiny CV and haven't even started the engine yet. It's laying to in port waiting for some escorts so she can join the
northern fleet.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1773
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 7:19:19 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I'm unloading the 8th AF dudes company on Soerabaja but I can't use the airfield right away because of the damage to the airfield there.
That means I'm going to need some construction engineers there as well as AF dudes. I'll look around and see if I can find some not
doing anything important somewhere else.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1774
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 7:26:20 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I had intended to unload the 42nd AF dudes at Kavieng but the ship is too large to dock so I may end up w/ a fragment of a unit that
can't unload at Kavieng and I may have to take it to a larger port ( Rabaul ) to unload.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1775
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 7:31:56 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I've got the middle carrier group headed for an Allied TF and it's going to take a couple of days to get into range so I hope the Allied TF
is still there when I get in range. Plus I've got two AO's headed this way as well.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1776
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 7:35:55 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		EdIT: double post I'll delete the offender.

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 2/24/2013 7:37:40 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1777
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 7:36:47 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I've got a CS whose float planes have the Allied TF zero'd in so I'm hoping we can track the Allied TF even if it moves. I'm hoping it
doesn't move but if it does I might have a chance to follow it. At least for a day or two.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1778
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 7:49:12 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I've got another CS keeping track of the Brisbane - Sydney corridor for me. It's come in pretty handy so far. I hope the Allies don't spot
it and try to sink her.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1779
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 8:08:53 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The 14th Division is still about two days from landing at Mersing. There's an Allied TF there already and I'm wondering if Jim has been
reading my mind or something. Maybe I can dispatch that Allied TF before the 14th Div arrives but I'm not sure.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1780
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 10:16:07 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Jim and I have exchanged files and I've watched the movie and here's some fresh combat results.........but first I just have to post this
thing about my resource history. It's the first time the fuel level has risen so all four categories have had an uptick now. Maybe I can
turn my logistics around and make it hum with efficiency and effectiveness. Fuel is headed for Truk and the fuel level is dropping at
Miri and I've found some new resources to harvest and things are starting to see light at the end of the tunnel.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1781
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 10:23:20 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I thought maybe three or four subs ought to concentrate on Colombo and surrounding because of the potential for high traffic in that area
and I'm guessing I was right.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1782
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 10:26:24 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I did a night naval bombardment of Port Moresby and the results were less than stellar.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1783
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 10:29:23 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I did a night naval bombardment somewhere else and the results were lots better.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1784
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 10:36:39 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I don't think Jim would attack a Jap TF when he has AK's in his TF and I know I didn't order an attack w/ my CS so I'm guessing this was
just a chance occurance and totally accidental that these two TF's should meet up. I'm impressed w/ the staying power of the CS.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1785
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 10:40:48 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		My BB took care of an Allied infection. Now to other things.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1786
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 10:43:07 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then the Japs pound Mersing from the air:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1787
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 10:44:51 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then the Japs clobber Darwin from the air several times:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1788
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 10:47:06 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The Manila remnants are still getting struck from the air:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1789
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 10:49:14 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Johore Bahru was struck several times by the Japs:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1790
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 10:51:10 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Pamekasan saw some air action:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1791
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 10:54:39 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And Jim is going w/ his PBY bombers again. And again he looses one:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1792
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 10:56:11 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then there is an Allied B-17 raid on Port Moresby:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1793
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 11:00:33 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the results of the first carrier strike on the Allied TF:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1794
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 11:03:23 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the results of the second carrier strike:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1795
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 11:05:18 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then the Japs do a raid on Port Moresby:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1796
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 11:07:26 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		This is the third carrier strike today:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1797
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 11:09:15 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then there's another, yet another, carrier strike:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1798
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 11:11:16 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's how it went on the ground at Mauban:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1799
RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 - 2/24/2013 11:12:52 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's how it went on the ground at Batavia:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 1800
Page:   <<   < prev  58 59 [60] 61 62   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Fulkerson vs Moore 23Apr42 Page: <<   < prev  58 59 [60] 61 62   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.578