Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  289 290 [291] 292 293   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 1:31:04 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dirtnap86

I think there's a 1 day delay to simulate the ship being 'prepped and loaded' into an ARD. Things like the ARD being pumped out and the ship being shored up.


There is not, however since the ARD had Sys damage of 1 that had to be repaired first. ARDs will not do any repairs if they have any damage whatsoever.

(in reply to Dirtnap86)
Post #: 8701
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 3:24:15 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

What aerial recon tactics are you conducting?


You'll remember that, right before Fun House, I stood down recon for a week. Then, as the ships were nearing Talaud, about 12 recon squadrons at Morotai started targeting enemy bases ringing the Sulu Sea. That was an effort at misdirecton.

Since then, recon has been searching "a day ahead" of each landing. Now that the landings are complete, I'm using them to check major enemy airfields and to keep track of enemy units on Luzon.

I'm wearing them out using them so much, but these early days that are probably leading to a major engagement are the most important.

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 8702
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 4:43:54 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline
I think your ARD is working and you'll see Flt damage of 64 next turn. I'd send the CVE to Sydney as soon as possible (maybe Flt below 30?) as I think it'll repair a lot faster there (plus you won't be able to fix the engine except at a shipyard).

Cheers,
CC

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 8703
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 2:25:02 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

Notice that has an estimate of 120 days to repair the flotation damage, that is about 2 days per damage point.


Further, whatever formula is used, it's nonlinear. It takes a lot longer to repair point number 65 than it does for point 5, for example. Maybe Alfred has details on this. I did a "back of the envelope" calculation based on a badly damaged BB at Pearl and came up with a formula. Didn't speed up the repairs but at least I wasn't quite so frustrated at the glacially slow progress.

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 8704
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 2:48:23 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jwolf


quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

Notice that has an estimate of 120 days to repair the flotation damage, that is about 2 days per damage point.


Further, whatever formula is used, it's nonlinear. It takes a lot longer to repair point number 65 than it does for point 5, for example. Maybe Alfred has details on this. I did a "back of the envelope" calculation based on a badly damaged BB at Pearl and came up with a formula. Didn't speed up the repairs but at least I wasn't quite so frustrated at the glacially slow progress.


Yeah, this is what I was trying to get at earlier. Going from 65 to 64 seems to take longer than a lower damage point.

(in reply to jwolf)
Post #: 8705
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 3:15:02 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline
"Two weeks.... your ship will be ready in two weeks."

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 8706
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 3:21:14 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline
quote:

I'm wearing them out using them so much, but these early days that are probably leading to a major engagement are the most important



True, the importance of recon/search as a foundation for all other decisions can be overlooked.

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 8707
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 4:45:22 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Chickenboy commented (in a lighthearted haiku in the War Room) about me having a "million and one" ships in a single hex. I know he's reading and posting in John's AAR.

His comment follows on one made by one of you guys in this thread, perhaps a page back, something to similar effect.

I take it that John or his readers must have an issue with keeping ships tightly together. I've never encountered this complaint before. I won't mention it to John unless he mentions it first.

I suppose I can understand where he's coming from - hey, taking on the Allies in '44 isn't easy. And it shouldn't be easy.

But I conserved my carriers carefully - oh, so carefully - throughout the game, banking against the day when I'd need to strike deep. Now I'm reaping that benefit while John is suffering the consequences of his reckless JEB Stuart ride in the Marshalls in September.

I wouldn't have to keep the Herd so tightly packed if not for a variety of things John takes advantage of: 24-hour carrier and combat ship movement without my ability to respond (that's just part of the game, but it makes it necessary for me to keep my ships protected); the ability to move Netties all across the map and then still strike together in a single day; a cohesive Japanese navy and army cooperating on strikes; etc.

Our beloved AE has many abstractions. As a result, I keep my fleet tightly together. So I ain't playing dumb and spreading them out to make it easier for him to attack.

John wouldn't be having this issue if he hadn't ridden around the Union army prior to Gettysburg.

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 8708
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 4:50:04 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Death Star is a mighty force, but I have nearly 30 carriers involved in other missions far away.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 8709
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 5:09:58 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
4/8/44

It was a mostly quiet, really good day across the map. Not perfect - too many combatants are in close proximity to the enemy for things to go perfectly - but this was the kind of day that can result in winning wars. I'll post maps and details later, but to summarize:

Fun House: In the only blemish for the day, CA Chikuma TF hit Legaspi, sinking 20 barges created to distribute supply. I hate losing the supply (assuming they got some loaded first), but it's interesting that John committed Chikuma in dangerous waters. I keep thinking his capital ships are too scarce for him to take chances with, so this reveals a lot about his mindset.

To balance the scales a bit, Allied subs sank an xAK (carrying troops, near Manila) and two xAKLs. My submarines have sunk a lot of enemy merchants since Fun House opened.

At Naga, the Allied Army knocked aside a modest enemy army that includes 51 AV of 21st Division. Tanks are in pursuit and will attack in the adjacent hex tomorrow. So the Allies now have Naga and it's level three airfield and port. Most importantly, Naga is only open to sea bombardment from the east (I believe), which is open sea and offers less concealment. Legaspi is open from both sides and is tougher to defend. Legaspi airfield jumpted from 2.05 to 2.89 today. So, by tomorrow, I'll have two level three airfields, plenty of supply, lots of aviation support, and lots of good fighter units - they're transferring in from the DEI and from Burma.

The LST resupply mission to Samar went well. The two Australian divisions on that island have enough supply to stand strong in the short term (a week or two). I can't see how John would invade jungle hexes occupied by a division each unless he has time to bombard with his BBs. And to do that, he has to expose them to attack.

No major action against Death Star and the Herd. The Allied army will probably move up the peninsula to take Atimonan, though I'm briefly considering whether that's a good move. John has a division in the hex east (or SE) of Manila. He's bringing in lots of reinforcements. He should, of course. But if I play this right, I think Luzon turns into efficient killing fields at some point, perhaps a month or two off. I need time to build those big bases...and I need to either defeat KB or maintain the current carrier ratio.

KB: No sign of it. John's probably doing the right thing here, keeping his carriers hidden until he finds the right opportunity to attack. But it's Rock. Papers. Scissors. Delay works in my favor.

DEI: 7th Australian Division is arriving in bits and pieces every day, after making the long journey from the Marshalls. This division didn't quite make it in time for Fun House. Its three RCT were prepped for bases at the southern end. Most of these are strongly defended. So I need to come up with a new prep target.

Pacific: A USN RCT assaults a weakly defended Tabituea, driving forts from six to two. This base will fall tomorrow. Ordinarily, I'd say there's no way an IJ player would worry about these little island-plucking operations given what's going on in the Philippines, but this is John III. I have to guard against enemy combat ships and even carriers. The objective is to begin shortening the LOC between Hawaii/West Coast and Oz.

Burma: A UK brigade knocked a small IJ base force out of the hex south of Prome, which is now cut off from Rangoon. So John's MLR has been flanked, but not in such a way as to be decisive yet.

Here and There: A lot of things going on everywhere, mainly in-sexy logistics. Eventually things will come together in ways that will benefit Fun House, directly or indirectly.





< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 1/20/2017 5:15:57 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 8710
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 5:14:42 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
I mentioned the "stacking limits for ships" notion as a sarcastic nudge at those who want to make rules every time something unusual happens. I agree completely with your tactics - to survive such a deep operation you need to keep your wagons circled. I hope the posts in the War Room did not reveal anything about your plans that are not already apparent!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 8711
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 5:17:21 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
The posts in the war room are fun Haikus written by a variety of folks about lighthearted things. I posted one about John III Mods. Inspired by that, Chickenboy wrote one about me cramming stuff in hexes. So there wasn't any discussion of strategy or details.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 8712
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 5:25:28 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Not to mention... we can reasonably assume that a hex's side is about 20 nautical miles (in a hexagon, the length of a side is the same as the radius, although the radius is measured from one of the vertices to the center while movement in AE goes from side to side; so the 20 miles is actually a slight underestimate). This is important because side length is how you calculate area of a hexagon. With a side length of 20 miles, the area of a hex is about 1,040 square nautical miles. Even if you had 1 ship per square mile (1700+ yards) in a grid pattern, you could have over 1000 ships there.

Granted, sailing in such a formation for long distances is not really realistic, but so is a magical "cylinder" of CAP that ends exactly at the imaginary plane extending upwards from the border of the hex. But there's no question that you could fit over 1000 ships in such a space in real life.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 8713
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 7:02:26 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
4/8/44

Fun House.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 8714
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 7:16:18 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
You can plan for Legaspi at level 4 in 3 days: it will get to level 3 tomorrow, 3 plus a significant chunk the day after, and level 4 on the day after that.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 8715
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 9:17:37 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Looks like you had a unit or two pursuing the IJA you kicked out of Naga. What is the relative strength of your forces versus his?
Do you whack him once more before retiring or are you worried about troops from Atimonan reaching the hex next turn?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 8716
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 10:31:16 PM   
Bearcat2

 

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline
"Atimonan is weakly held at the moment But I am not sending my army up there"

Looks like Mark Clark is in charge

_____________________________

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 8717
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 10:46:52 PM   
Itdepends

 

Posts: 937
Joined: 12/12/2005
Status: offline
The only reason I can think you wouldn't move on Antimonan is that you want him to move forward in force and then use your carrier and naval superiority to land behind him and trap a sizeable army between Manila and Legaspi/Naga. The narrow nature of the southern section of the island does give quite a few opportunities to do this.

(in reply to Bearcat2)
Post #: 8718
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 11:12:02 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Well, you guys know me by now. I'm not a details guy and I like to play a very conservative game, taking no chances, advancing methodically.

(in reply to Itdepends)
Post #: 8719
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 11:24:23 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Looks like you had a unit or two pursuing the IJA you kicked out of Naga. What is the relative strength of your forces versus his?
Do you whack him once more before retiring or are you worried about troops from Atimonan reaching the hex next turn?


Last turn, I set a tank battalion and tank destroyer battalion to follow. They'll attack tomorrow, mainly because I want to rough up the 21st Div. contingent as much as possible. (Roughing up major enemy units is now a priority.)

At the time I set them to follow, I planned to send my army up to Atimonan. I've decided not to, but I still set the big infantry units to march, just in case I change my mind in the next turn or two.

One of the other gents posted about the possibility of landing behind John's army. Yes, that's something I'm considering (I mentioned it several posts back). In fact, while on another mountain hike today, I seriously mulled over designation 7th Australian Div. (and excellent unit just now arriving in the DEI) to prep for Altimonan on the possibility of a future amphibious op. But John will probably take steps to guard against such a move, so it may be better to prep somewhere much further up, like Aparri.

I'm trying to cycle through options so that I have notions of what to do when the picture clears, but nothing major is going to happen short term unless I win a big carrier battle. Short term, protecting Death Star and building bases is Job One.



(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 8720
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 11:26:03 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
The one thing I remember about Mark Clark is that he was a stamp collector. In the context of the comment above, I assume his was cautious in the extreme? Perhaps like John McClellan?

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 8721
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 11:28:56 PM   
Bearcat2

 

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline
Clark was at Anzio; sat when he should have moved.

_____________________________

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 8722
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 11:34:33 PM   
Bearcat2

 

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline
If I was to compare your overall style of play to a civil war general, I would pick Thomas.

_____________________________

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837

(in reply to Bearcat2)
Post #: 8723
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 11:50:14 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
The landing at Anzio, 22-31 Jan, 1944 was the US VI Corps under Lucas, not Clark. Lucas was relieved by Truscott after the debacle.

(in reply to Bearcat2)
Post #: 8724
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/20/2017 11:55:15 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Regarding the "truth but not the whole truth" aspect of Fun House, the operation was to originate from Pearl Harbor, steaming west, perhaps picking off Marcus and a dot hex or two for seaplanes, and then hitting Luzon, moving from north (Naga)to south (Surigao).

This morphed over time due to two things. I wanted to leave Death Star in the DEI to keep John honest, as a threat, and to keep his focus pinned here (like Celebes did), but I could not (could NOT) figure out how to merge Death Star and the Hawaiian component without elevated risk that KB would pounce on one or the other. Eventually, prodded by the scrubbed invasion of Marcus on February 1, I made the second biggest decision of the war: Fun House would originate entirely from the DEI.

The advantages were so many and obvious that I probably need not bore you, but among them: (1) John couldn't be sure where I was heading until very late; (2) my forces would be unified; (3) all ships would be fresh and refueled; (4) invasion troops unloaded at Sydney, then reloaded at Townsville, thus eliminating transit disruption; (5) distances were much less; (6) I could begin moving troops instanter from Hawaii to Oz, thus getting a big head start on the entire op; and many more.

There was just one disadvantage, and it was major: the transfer of men by ship to Oz would entail sailing through SoPac, where John might raid (and was showing evidences of that, if you'll recall). The thought of KB or a big CL/DD force tearing into a bunch of merchants carrying, say, a US Infantry division was daunting. So I spread out TFs and bolstered PBY search all across the Pacific. And I stationed two small carrier TFs (including CV Intrepid) along the route for security purposes. Even that was nerve-wracking. I had scores of TFs making that journey. They refueld - mostly at Pago Pago but some at Tahiti or Auckland - meaning my TFs had much better fuel levels (and they topped off again at Townsville). John's subs got real active for awhile in the Coral Sea...but they didn't pick up any of the TFs (they did pick up some heading east after Big Tent, which might've misled John as to what was happening). Anyhow, the sea-lift took seven weeks and was ongoing even as Fun House got underway (you've read about the units I left behind, including 7th Aus. Div. and Merrill's Marauders).

That's why Fun House originated entirely in the DEI.

But I didn't leave the cupboard bare in the Pacific. Not by any means....

(in reply to Bearcat2)
Post #: 8725
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2017 12:00:49 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termite2

If I was to compare your overall style of play to a civil war general, I would pick Thomas.


Thanks, Termite. That's a nice compliment. Thomas wasn't perfect but he was capable and tough and professional (not meaning that those were the characteristics you were attributing to my style). I've always admired him even as I'd marvel at some of the command mistakes he made.

(in reply to Bearcat2)
Post #: 8726
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2017 12:07:24 AM   
Bearcat2

 

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

The landing at Anzio, 22-31 Jan, 1944 was the US VI Corps under Lucas, not Clark. Lucas was relieved by Truscott after the debacle.



Clark was in charge, it was his responsibility to get the troops moving, never ordered or informed Lucas on the imperative to move quickly.

_____________________________

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 8727
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2017 12:17:44 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I don't know where KB is and haven't had a clue in weeks. The last sniff was a decent carrier TF in the Makassar Strait 15 to 20 days ago. John's doing a good job of using the fleet in being strategy. I'm assuming (I have to) that KB is very close the Death Star. Here are my speculations:

1. The South China Sea, west of Borneo or the Philippines (40%): His cruisers and destroyers seems to be concentrated around the Sulu Sea, so John may be concentrating his forces there too. He doesn't have to keep his carriers close to those combat ships, but that's my top guess.
2. Somewhere around Formosa or Okinawa (20%): This was my original top choice, because I figured he'd station KB between Death Star and the Home Islands.
3. Western Pacific (20%): He can pounce on Death Star from the east, like the Marianas or Palau. My subs don't show any detection levels, though.
4. Central Pacific: (10%): It would be crazy for John to post his carriers here in hopes of picking off little Allied TFs doing mop-up invasions, but it's possible; more likely, thought, that he might think I'm targeting Marcus, so he might've set up an ambush.
5. Elsewhere (10%): John is so aggressive that there's a small but measurable chance that he could try a counter-invasion in the Aleutians, Midway, or the DEI.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 1/21/2017 12:18:33 AM >

(in reply to Bearcat2)
Post #: 8728
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2017 12:41:59 AM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
Lucas was the Corps Commander and was to exploit the opportunity presented to him as the commmander on the ground. It was his decision to secure the beach head for 3 days before probing out. That's like blaming Nimitz for Halsey running into a Typhon. General George Henry Thomas is my favorite Union General and he got a cool nickname, the Rock of Chickamauga.

< Message edited by Bif1961 -- 1/21/2017 2:46:56 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 8729
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 1/21/2017 1:11:54 AM   
panzer cat

 

Posts: 165
Joined: 10/2/2011
From: occupied Virginia
Status: offline
Jeb Stuart was never reckless

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 8730
Page:   <<   < prev  289 290 [291] 292 293   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  289 290 [291] 292 293   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.939