Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  372 373 [374] 375 376   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 6:09:23 AM   
palioboy2

 

Posts: 190
Joined: 12/16/2009
From: Canada
Status: offline
Is that true foe the whole war Lowpe? Or just after a certain point?

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 11191
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 8:08:19 AM   
Reg


Posts: 2787
Joined: 5/26/2000
From: NSW, Australia
Status: offline

Its because the allies enter their orders after Japan.

JFBs are always moaning about it.



_____________________________

Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!

(in reply to palioboy2)
Post #: 11192
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 10:01:06 AM   
Itdepends

 

Posts: 937
Joined: 12/12/2005
Status: offline
It is my suspiscion that the free movement you are referring to is now useable by both sides. I would have expected it to have been fixed at the same time that the bug that allowed the allied player to spot planes relocated to empty base hexes immediately after the japanese order phaes was fixed.

(in reply to Reg)
Post #: 11193
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 2:48:13 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline


Would not movement detection depend on DL or is it a bug as Itdepends mentions?

(in reply to Itdepends)
Post #: 11194
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 2:54:30 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn



Would not movement detection depend on DL or is it a bug as Itdepends mentions?

LCU movement can be detected without the normal recon or bombing that is required to raise D/L. It is somewhat random, but I think it simulates scouts or informants from the local population providing info on what they have seen.
You can definitely raise the probability of good info on movement direction by having recon, bombing or LCU contact with the enemy.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 11195
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 2:55:54 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
Remember how hard it is for Chinese units to detect Japanese units movement arrows as well

_____________________________


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 11196
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 3:48:09 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled

Remember how hard it is for Chinese units to detect Japanese units movement arrows as well


Troop quality and leadership are factors as well. Terrain too. Also, I think if you have surplus recon and set them to patrol with no target there is a chance that they will spot random units. The Chinese have to just assume that there is a Japanese unit moving at all time. Sucks but there you have it...

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 11197
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 4:04:12 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
John's gone missing.

Yesterday morning, he sent an email that included this note: "Your turn will come back sometime today.  No idea as to exactly when but it will come."

No turn came. He was on the forum a few times during the day, but didn't send the turn nor an update.

I emailed him late last night to let him know a turn hadn't come, in case he'd tried to send it or thought he'd sent it. No reply.

I don't know what's become of the lad.

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 11198
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 4:20:14 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
He's probably declared independence.

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 11199
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 4:31:06 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
He knows I don't celebrate Independence Day. Today is the 164th anniversary of the fall of Vicksburg and the commencement of the Confederate withdrawal from Gettysburg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvxyNmOK4ck

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 11200
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 6:13:33 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
When Johnny Comes Marching Home...by the Andrew Sisters. Not a very southern version...but has an upbeat tempo to take your mind off no turns.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r38Tatijd4o

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 7/4/2017 6:14:34 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 11201
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 7:38:21 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
9/10/44

The Japanese are jockeying for position in Indochina and China. The Allies are two days away from attacking at Takao.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 11202
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 7:39:16 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Oops, duplicate post. So I'll use this for something exciting later.

Edited several days later to add: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xmfLHXiAhA

Jean Shepherd in that role? Paulette Goddard???? Lana Turner?





< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 7/5/2017 10:26:46 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 11203
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 8:45:19 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Intelligence Screen




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 11204
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 10:02:32 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
An aside on VPs. If you're short of troops all you have to do to reduce his VPs in a big way is bombard away his supply on this or that island. Given his situation I doubt he can resupply them. You don't need BB bombardments to hit supply dumps. It's tedious, but it's a fair bit of VPs on the table.

From the Victory Conditions:

Control of Base - Each base has a basic VP level for Allied ownership and one for Japanese
ownership. The final victory point value that is awarded to the controlling player at the end of
the game is figured by the following formula:
»» Basic VP# x [ ( current size of port ) + ( current size of airfield x 2) ]
The basic VP and final VP numbers for each side are displayed for each base when the mouse
cursor is placed over a base (the basic VP number value is in parenthesis).

This full amount of the final VP value is only scored at the end of the game if the base has
supplies at least equal to its needed supplies. If supplies are lower than the required amount,
the VP’s scored will be less than this maximum, (the lower the supplies the lower the scored
VP’s). Bases with 0 supplies would score 25% of the full final points.


Example: Rabaul has a Basic Japanese VP level of 3. Assuming the size of the airfield is 8, and
the size of the port is 7, the Final VP level for Japanese ownership of Rabaul is 3 x [ (7) + (8 x
2) ] or 69. As long as Rabaul had more than its supplies needed, the Japanese player would
score 69. If Rabaul’s supplies were only equal to 30% of its needs, the Japanese player would
score only 33 VP’s.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 11205
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 10:24:03 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

An aside on VPs. If you're short of troops all you have to do to reduce his VPs in a big way is bombard away his supply on this or that island. Given his situation I doubt he can resupply them. You don't need BB bombardments to hit supply dumps. It's tedious, but it's a fair bit of VPs on the table.

From the Victory Conditions:

Control of Base - Each base has a basic VP level for Allied ownership and one for Japanese
ownership. The final victory point value that is awarded to the controlling player at the end of
the game is figured by the following formula:
»» Basic VP# x [ ( current size of port ) + ( current size of airfield x 2) ]
The basic VP and final VP numbers for each side are displayed for each base when the mouse
cursor is placed over a base (the basic VP number value is in parenthesis).

This full amount of the final VP value is only scored at the end of the game if the base has
supplies at least equal to its needed supplies. If supplies are lower than the required amount,
the VP’s scored will be less than this maximum, (the lower the supplies the lower the scored
VP’s). Bases with 0 supplies would score 25% of the full final points.


Example: Rabaul has a Basic Japanese VP level of 3. Assuming the size of the airfield is 8, and
the size of the port is 7, the Final VP level for Japanese ownership of Rabaul is 3 x [ (7) + (8 x
2) ] or 69. As long as Rabaul had more than its supplies needed, the Japanese player would
score 69. If Rabaul’s supplies were only equal to 30% of its needs, the Japanese player would
score only 33 VP’s.


I was able to extend my game by running supplies into large bases like Rabaul at the end of my game...made quite a few posts about how to do it as Japan in my AAR vs Tiemanj.

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 11206
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/4/2017 10:42:18 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I was able to extend my game by running supplies into large bases like Rabaul at the end of my game...made quite a few posts about how to do it as Japan in my AAR vs Tiemanj.


It depends if Japan has that fuel to spare. Ships to spare (xAKs are VPs too.) And if the Allies make it enough of a Whack a Mole game they can't keep up. This won't win, but it will bleed Japan.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 11207
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/5/2017 12:32:59 AM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline
For the Long Riders of the Pacific.....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQ8JIa98kAw

< Message edited by MakeeLearn -- 7/5/2017 1:12:39 AM >

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 11208
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/5/2017 4:54:40 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
9/11/44

Battle of Taihoku, Formosa: John opens the battle with a surprise deliberate attack that fails and likely opens the door to a quicker Allied victory here.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 11209
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/5/2017 5:06:25 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
9/11/44

Battle of Takao, Formosa: Will open tomorrow, with two of the four Allied divisions shock attacking.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 11210
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/5/2017 5:08:59 PM   
paullus99


Posts: 1985
Joined: 1/23/2002
Status: offline
As I suspected he would....he just can't not be killing something at all times.

_____________________________

Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 11211
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/5/2017 5:41:57 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline

Bad luck for the Japanese X2

(in reply to paullus99)
Post #: 11212
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/5/2017 5:49:10 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
9/11/44

Air Losses: These Tabby losses probably came over Formosa, but I don't know if they're inbound with supply or outbound with unit cadres.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 11213
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/5/2017 6:23:46 PM   
paullus99


Posts: 1985
Joined: 1/23/2002
Status: offline
Knowing John, it's probably a little of both.

_____________________________

Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 11214
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/5/2017 6:24:59 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
9/11/44

Peep Show II & SEAC: Tomorrow, with battles known and perhaps unknown (to me) will be an important day.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to paullus99)
Post #: 11215
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/5/2017 6:34:36 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
John had enough Intel from the prior battles on Formosa to know that a fairly quick outcome was assured. He took a shot at crushing an armored unit knowing he was only trading away a short amount of time holding that base. A decent gamble that lost little when it didn't pay off.

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 11216
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/5/2017 7:12:05 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
If John's out of supply (or very low) so that he has no hope of holding Taihoku, then the attack was a gamble worth taking. If he has supply, and if he has some forts, then he might hold against two divisions for awhile; in that case, the attack wasn't a gamble worth taking. Since I don't have that information, I don't know the answer and can't judge the providence of the attack.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 11217
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/5/2017 7:43:24 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline
Regarding China and the Japanese units approaching your bases, in open terrain, you mentioned a while back that you agreed to a house rule of no 4EB ground attacks at non-base hexes. What was the rationale for that restriction -- if there was one?

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 11218
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/5/2017 7:50:26 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
Strategic Bombers - Maybe there was a good Rita Haywood movie on last night!

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 11219
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 7/5/2017 8:14:07 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

If John's out of supply (or very low) so that he has no hope of holding Taihoku, then the attack was a gamble worth taking. If he has supply, and if he has some forts, then he might hold against two divisions for awhile; in that case, the attack wasn't a gamble worth taking. Since I don't have that information, I don't know the answer and can't judge the providence of the attack.

I see your calculus but how long could they have held even with some supply? Taihoku is on the coast and the terrain otherwise favors the attackers too. Most of the Allied forces from the rest of Formosa will be available sooner than previously expected because of the forward movement to Kagi, which left Takao severely weakened.

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 11220
Page:   <<   < prev  372 373 [374] 375 376   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  372 373 [374] 375 376   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.141