Canoerebel
Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002 From: Northwestern Georgia, USA Status: offline
|
I mentioned a month or two back that I had compared the game map to the end-of-the-real-war map. The difference is striking. The Allies have taken vastly more ground - and vastly more "vital ground" - than in the real war. The differences are even more striking now. In the real war, the Allies didn't take Malaya, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Formosa, Hainan Island, half of Timor, Korea, or northern China. All of those have fallen - or largely fallen - in the game, and it's still relatively early compared to the "real war." In the real war, the Superforts were battering Japan from Saipan and Tinian mostly. In the game, they've been doing so from Luzon then Formosa then China then Korea. 2EB regularly hit Japan now from Korea. In the real war, as the end drew near, the Allies made a concerted effort to avoid unnecessary casualties. I'm doing the same thing. So I am seeking victory as "cheaply as possible," which is the sensible way of doing it, I think. Many/most players express a desire to compare their performance to the real war. By that measure, I'm doing pretty well. I don't feel bound to conquer every base on the map, and I think the AV system offers a realistic feel for defeat more than an arbitrary or subjective measure would. Looking at the map, and seeing the beatings Japan is taking in Korea and China, there's no doubt Japan would've been on the verge of surrender had it faced these circumstances.
< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 2/9/2018 12:07:43 PM >
|