Raindog101
Posts: 1209
Joined: 11/17/2002 From: Hole-in-the-Wall Status: offline
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Stefdragon [B]I will certainly read the book if you feel that strongly about it. As far as the movie goes, I haven't seen it in a while, but I'm a little confused as to some of the extreme negative reactions I have seen posted here about it. It is my recollection that the movie was brooding, introspective, with the rawness of battle at times, pastorally beautiful at other times. Do you not like it because it doesn't follow the book faithfully? The direction, cinematography, or script? The actors!! You don't like Sean or Yonny?(Trabolta!! He's an ace commercial pilot by the way. Flies his own jet I believe.) Just curious about that. I'll have to rent it again, or see on the telly if it ever does come around again. :) [/B][/QUOTE] First I’ll give where due. Beautiful Photography, solid cast and impressive combat scenes. The movie started off with a bang. The battle for the hill was stirring and extremely well done. The second part is where it lost me. The director’s self indulgent atheistic wet dreams and Private Witt’s disembodied voice sprouting psuedo-poetic leftist drivel and 50’s Venice Beach beatnik poetry. I felt like I was in a coffee house listening to Maynard G. Krebs blather enviro non-sense, instead of a theater watching a war movie. Something else has made me suspicious. My wife liked it. She does not like war movies, but she liked this one. Hmmm… I am going to give it a second shot, because so many other people I respect have said how good it was. As usual it was nothing like the book. The same characters and that’s about it.
_____________________________
|