Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 4/30/2013 6:28:43 AM   
n01487477


Posts: 4779
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline 		Sorry guys I've been a little busy. Actually I'm posting this while riding the Busan green line down to the uni where i work.
@paxmondo - I know but right now i have everything out of port. It will reduce once ive moved my troops to better locations.
@alfred - yeah i know my posts haven't been upbeat. When weak act strong, when strong act weak. I will post detailed thoughts point by point in the next day or two once I get over the lump of the work that was thrown at me 2 days ago.

I was going to detail the 21st but its just too annoying on the matrix forum from a smart phone. Post after my class.

_____________________________

-Damian-
EconDoc
TrackerAE
Tutes&Java

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 61
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 4/30/2013 5:10:21 PM   
n01487477


Posts: 4779
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline 		As I said, I'm damn stupid when it comes to land combat. Please offer any advice in regard to the first map. Am also willing to have an adviser look at the save pertaining to this.

Note: on the 1/9 we move to map stacking limits.(which I need to learn too)




Figure 2: I brought some decoys in hoping to get some BB's to react from Geralton. I got a SCTF but my Kates didn't all fly and those that did were fairly ineffective.

Figure 3: Air battles in the Kuriles before I recommence the bombing campaign.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by n01487477 -- 4/30/2013 5:12:41 PM >

_____________________________

-Damian-
EconDoc
TrackerAE
Tutes&Java

(in reply to n01487477)
Post #: 62
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/1/2013 3:46:48 PM   
n01487477


Posts: 4779
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline 		22 Aug '42

Looks like I'm about to get schooled in Tetris stacking. Fionn has 7 days to make a break through and break my lines before we move to the stacking limits pwhex. I have no reserves and I have no idea where I've sent all my PP's Probably on Sub/Transport/LCU commanders, buying out air groups and upgrading off the normal line.

He's playing to my weakness - land combat.

In Burma - My armor unit was pushed out of Myitkyina. Sighted some more AP's heading for Calcutta / Dacca. Sent 2 Kate, 2 Val, 1 Helen and 3 Betty units to augment fighters. Available troops are being pulled in from Sumatra and more AF units to bases.

Australia - Got the 3 units Nth of Daly to retreat and heading Nth to Katherine. Units being pulled in from Rabaul / Sth Pacific. Not sure I have enough LCU's to fight the good fight but will try to delay the inevitable as best I can. Really, I'm hoping to stall his advance at Darwin which will give me enough time to fortify some of the Is. Nth of Darwin. Fionn loves using FT's / Parachute - Transport drops.

Kuriles - more sweeps and my LB goes in tomorrow.

Will have to wait till the weekend to respond to Alfred as I'm




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

-Damian-
EconDoc
TrackerAE
Tutes&Java

(in reply to n01487477)
Post #: 63
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/2/2013 3:23:39 AM   
n01487477


Posts: 4779
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline 		23 Aug '42

Things feel like they are heating up.. My Attu invasion is being assembled and ready to launch. Sweeps and bombing of Shimishuri Jima flew, but the results were less than satisfactory. I'm tasking more bombers to take out the airfields and then ports.

The big news is on the attached maps. Burma and China in play. I will post a map of AV / area when I get to it on the weekend. Can't wait for the stacking limits to kick in...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

-Damian-
EconDoc
TrackerAE
Tutes&Java

(in reply to n01487477)
Post #: 64
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/2/2013 8:34:51 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		Those Chinese units in the open are bad for him. Get your air force to work them over. They have no AA and you can easily cause more than a thousand casualties per day. Also bring in whatever armor you have! Chinese units have virtually no AT capabilities. A Chinese unit in the open is a dead Chinese unit. You need to start pounding his stack with your bombers. He will take massive casualties.

Don´t know what has happened in China but you are doing something wrong.

(in reply to n01487477)
Post #: 65
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/2/2013 8:49:24 AM   
n01487477


Posts: 4779
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

Those Chinese units in the open are bad for him. Get your air force to work them over. They have no AA and you can easily cause more than a thousand casualties per day. Also bring in whatever armor you have! Chinese units have virtually no AT capabilities. A Chinese unit in the open is a dead Chinese unit. You need to start pounding his stack with your bombers. He will take massive casualties.

Don´t know what has happened in China but you are doing something wrong.


Thanks, I'm already doing some bombing, although not as much as I would like ... this is scenario 1. Not enough air groups, not enough LCU's. Most of my armor is there, more on the way.

Floyd and I basically had a detente ... and I freely admit to having glazed over eyes as soon as I gaze upon China.

I'd be happy for you to look at the next save if you want ...

_____________________________

-Damian-
EconDoc
TrackerAE
Tutes&Java

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 66
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/2/2013 8:59:49 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		I´m an allied player that have lost China twice in Scenario 1. While I´m no expert on the Japanese side I think its not much an allied player can do against a determined Japanese attack. From the AARs I follow I think CR is the only one that has been able to stand his ground in China. But its looks like his opponent isn´t making much of an effort either.

Check in with my opponents SqzMyLemon and obvert. Both have AARs ongoing against me. I´m sure they can give you good advice on China! Once you start applying pressure to the Chinese the supply will nose dive. In my first game I was down to under 5k supply in whole of China just before the collapse. Going on the offensive as the allies in China I think is a very big mistake. You should be able to exploit that.

(in reply to n01487477)
Post #: 67
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/2/2013 10:12:02 AM   
MAurelius


Posts: 152
Joined: 6/28/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

I´m an allied player that have lost China twice in Scenario 1. While I´m no expert on the Japanese side I think its not much an allied player can do against a determined Japanese attack. From the AARs I follow I think CR is the only one that has been able to stand his ground in China. But its looks like his opponent isn´t making much of an effort either.



yes... John 3rd really isn't making any effort in China :)


_____________________________

formerly known as SoliInvictus202

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 68
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/2/2013 10:47:33 AM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

I´m an allied player that have lost China twice in Scenario 1. While I´m no expert on the Japanese side I think its not much an allied player can do against a determined Japanese attack. From the AARs I follow I think CR is the only one that has been able to stand his ground in China. But its looks like his opponent isn´t making much of an effort either.

Check in with my opponents SqzMyLemon and obvert. Both have AARs ongoing against me. I´m sure they can give you good advice on China! Once you start applying pressure to the Chinese the supply will nose dive. In my first game I was down to under 5k supply in whole of China just before the collapse. Going on the offensive as the allies in China I think is a very big mistake. You should be able to exploit that.



my ongoing campaign against Cuttlefish sees 25,000 Chinese av blitzing through Southern China on their march to Shanghai and nothing can stop them. Babeslite version, so equivalent to scen 1 in LCU and air units. It much depends on the early 3-4 months, if the Japanese player can't take advantage of the setup in the game, then he will have an as hard life in China as the Japanese had in real life. Of course the Chinese need supply, so without Burma secured, they won't have supply. With supply, they are a steamroller as battles are decided by assault value in the game and if you've got Chinese stacks of 10,000av each, fully prepped, exp up to 55+ you'll see Chinese adjusted av of 15,000 and higher, kicking the Japanese out of pretty much all positions. I was long wondering why I was advancing all over the map until I realized the Japanese must be running out of ground units as they have lost 8000 pts for ground losses by 9/43.

All the Chinese need are a better positioning at start (not the historical positions that are nothing but a huge disadvantage in the game) and supply and you will end up having more than 30,000 Chinese av in late 43. And how much would the Japanese have by that time? 1/3? Probably not even that much and for sure not that much mobile as there are many bases that have high garisson requirements, Shanghai has nearly 1000 av requirement.

_____________________________


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 69
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/2/2013 12:50:30 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: n01487477

Thanks, I'm already doing some bombing, although not as much as I would like ... this is scenario 1. Not enough air groups, not enough LCU's. Most of my armor is there, more on the way.

Floyd and I basically had a detente ... and I freely admit to having glazed over eyes as soon as I gaze upon China.

I'd be happy for you to look at the next save if you want ...



Both my games are scenario 1, and I used virtually all of the IJAAF 2E groups in China, eventually getting 200+ plane raids. Really you have to commit some of the better large zero groups occasionally if he uses the AVG or other US or Brit groups to jump you there, plus some good Oscar groups. It'a big commitment, but worth it if you are in control in other areas DURING 42, or the Allies have a grand total of 1 CV left. I even used the Netty groups occasionally for intensive ground bombing missions due to their range and expert pilots. Most players wouldn't want to do this, but the Chinese have poor AA and if you gain air superiority not much will challenge a 45 plane Tainan Ku S-1 sweep. Toward the end of 42 you have to hustle things out and get them to Burma, DEI and So Pac to get ready there.

quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy

All the Chinese need are a better positioning at start (not the historical positions that are nothing but a huge disadvantage in the game) and supply and you will end up having more than 30,000 Chinese av in late 43. And how much would the Japanese have by that time? 1/3? Probably not even that much and for sure not that much mobile as there are many bases that have high garisson requirements, Shanghai has nearly 1000 av requirement.


Shanghai is only about 350AV requirement, and most of the garrisons can be augmented with relatively cheap garrison units from Manchuria, but the Japanese do indeed have significantly less AV total in China. Maybe around 12k-14k, depending on what is added in and which are given enough time and supply to build to full TOE. They must use the early positioning, the air force and higher quality troops to push an advantage early. Also it's important to get tanks bought from Manchuria to send in, as these are the most effective against Chinese troops that have poor anti-armor and virtually no anti-tank weapons.

So if the Chinese can last through 42 with most of their army intact by getting to an MLR and staying put NO MATTER WHAT, not engaging in ANY offensive activities, they might have a chance to hold agains the early IJA advantages and be ready for the supply to roll in during late 43-44. If the Chinese engage offensively it's nearly always counter productive in the early going, both wasting supply and giving the Japanese a chance to use better experience and the air force to crush a bunch of units that are fighting in potentially less than +2-3 territory.

Every Japanese move can eventually be countered by the Allied war machine, but the real goal is to make it take longer and stretch the war out.

PS - That Chinese 22 unit stack in the plains is exactly what you hope and dream of in the beginning as the IJ player. Bomb the crap out of it with anything available, keep the tanks in there and add a few divisions. If he keeps piling on he'll eventually bludgeon himself to a 1:2 attack and you'll see massive Chinese casualties.

< Message edited by obvert -- 5/2/2013 12:55:34 PM >

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 70
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/2/2013 2:18:45 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline 		Shanghai is only 350 for the Japanese? It's not the 1000 as I had in mind but showing 720 for me as the Allied player. Are garisson requirements different for the IJ/allied?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 71
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/2/2013 2:34:40 PM   
n01487477


Posts: 4779
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy

Shanghai is only 350 for the Japanese? It's not the 1000 as I had in mind but showing 720 for me as the Allied player. Are garisson requirements different for the IJ/allied?




Can be whatever the mod dev sets it to. Can be diff for Allied or IJ. 720 for both in scen1 ...

_____________________________

-Damian-
EconDoc
TrackerAE
Tutes&Java

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 72
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/2/2013 3:10:50 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy

Shanghai is only 350 for the Japanese? It's not the 1000 as I had in mind but showing 720 for me as the Allied player. Are garisson requirements different for the IJ/allied?



Split the difference then!

I must be off, and I don't have the game here to reference. Shanghai is probably 720 in my game as well, but it's not really a problem to garrison as it's full-up with units to start, and most of them grow into their TOE so some can be removed to other spots. It's a pain to continually organize garrisons for China, trying to be as efficient as possible, but it's worth it if it frees up a few brigades or even a division.

EDIT - Got home and counted up the garrison requirements for China. In the game against Jocke I have all of it but the central plains around Chungking (four bases). I counted 5450 AV to garrison the rest! Shanghai is indeed the highest garrison at 720 AV.

That is a lot more than I'd thought. Wow.

< Message edited by obvert -- 5/2/2013 7:04:12 PM >

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 73
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/3/2013 12:22:02 AM   
floydg

 

Posts: 2052
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Middletown, NJ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: n01487477

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

Those Chinese units in the open are bad for him. Get your air force to work them over. They have no AA and you can easily cause more than a thousand casualties per day. Also bring in whatever armor you have! Chinese units have virtually no AT capabilities. A Chinese unit in the open is a dead Chinese unit. You need to start pounding his stack with your bombers. He will take massive casualties.

Don´t know what has happened in China but you are doing something wrong.


Thanks, I'm already doing some bombing, although not as much as I would like ... this is scenario 1. Not enough air groups, not enough LCU's. Most of my armor is there, more on the way.

Floyd and I basically had a detente ... and I freely admit to having glazed over eyes as soon as I gaze upon China.

I'd be happy for you to look at the next save if you want ...


Maybe you thought it was a detente in China -- I was maneuvering. I had things set up for some thrusts back, and Nemo is taking advantage of that.

You had two good opportunities to break through and wreak havoc.

First was outside Nanyang, but you stopped and then let me beat back your armor. I had nothing behind my thin line, so a breakthrough would have been devastating.

Second was at Wuchow. You took that base when I was toying around Amoy, and then again, stopped. You stalled when you should have advanced.

(in reply to n01487477)
Post #: 74
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/3/2013 3:33:58 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline 		Damian,

You can't afford as the IJ to sit back in China. The game balance is such that as the IJ you need to really prosecute china early or suffer staggering consequences when those gigantic china units gain morale and exp. If you don't turn the tide quickly in china, Fionn will own Fusan in mid-43.

Put into context, Burma is side-show. No matter what the allies do there, its almost impossible to walk overland to Shanghai in time to make any difference. But a stack starting near Sian can be at the wrong end of the Korean penninsula in 9 months.

Get your bombers in gear. Its how I finish training my bomber pilots. I get them to 60-ish skill (40 exp), then put them into a china bomber unit to get their skill up to 70's and exp up to 60's. Then they are ready for my pool. They can gain that 20 exp in 30 - 40 days.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to floydg)
Post #: 75
RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/3/2013 1:53:42 PM   
n01487477


Posts: 4779
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: floydg
quote:

ORIGINAL: n01487477
quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

Those Chinese units in the open are bad for him. Get your air force to work them over. They have no AA and you can easily cause more than a thousand casualties per day. Also bring in whatever armor you have! Chinese units have virtually no AT capabilities. A Chinese unit in the open is a dead Chinese unit. You need to start pounding his stack with your bombers. He will take massive casualties.

Don´t know what has happened in China but you are doing something wrong.


Thanks, I'm already doing some bombing, although not as much as I would like ... this is scenario 1. Not enough air groups, not enough LCU's. Most of my armor is there, more on the way.

Floyd and I basically had a detente ... and I freely admit to having glazed over eyes as soon as I gaze upon China.

I'd be happy for you to look at the next save if you want ...

Maybe you thought it was a detente in China -- I was maneuvering. I had things set up for some thrusts back, and Nemo is taking advantage of that.

Thanks for making his job easier
quote:


You had two good opportunities to break through and wreak havoc.

First was outside Nanyang, but you stopped and then let me beat back your armor. I had nothing behind my thin line, so a breakthrough would have been devastating.

Second was at Wuchow. You took that base when I was toying around Amoy, and then again, stopped. You stalled when you should have advanced.

Yes, my bad.


quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

Damian,

You can't afford as the IJ to sit back in China. The game balance is such that as the IJ you need to really prosecute china early or suffer staggering consequences when those gigantic china units gain morale and exp. If you don't turn the tide quickly in china, Fionn will own Fusan in mid-43.

Put into context, Burma is side-show. No matter what the allies do there, its almost impossible to walk overland to Shanghai in time to make any difference. But a stack starting near Sian can be at the wrong end of the Korean penninsula in 9 months.

Get your bombers in gear. Its how I finish training my bomber pilots. I get them to 60-ish skill (40 exp), then put them into a china bomber unit to get their skill up to 70's and exp up to 60's. Then they are ready for my pool. They can gain that 20 exp in 30 - 40 days.

Good advice and I'll try to make things harder, but I really hate the fluidity in China. I need to play against the AI more.

24 Aug, '42

Well 5 Allied Amphib TF started unloading at Ramtree. The Allies got some 4K troops ashore before my SCTF arrived. I took a gamble that this was the port of entry (hell there is no other place to land) It wasn't the best SCTF, but the best I could muster given the time I had available.

1 CA and 10 DD's came across CL Hobart and DD Electra. Right at the beginning of the combat, DD Tachikaze hit another ship and was the only casualty on my side. Pity to lose a DD to bad luck. The Allied CL and DD were heavily damaged but so was my CA. After this encounter my SCTF decided not to go for the transports and headed home. I'm thinking that Tachikaze caused the TF to turn tail.

A Para drop on Ramtree was ineffective, but that was to be expected given that I only had a small Transport unit flying them in. Most of my transports had been at Ominato supplying Etorufu or at Port headland supplying my Div stuck at Carnarvon. Fast Transports have extracted some of the Div but I wish these ships were at Ramtree instead.

After the Para-drop came some aerial encounters, Fionn seems to have stacked Akyab with fighters and is flying LRCAP to Ramtree. My Oscars were doing the same from Rangoon and Magwe, so a nice little melee ensued. I lost about 12 Vals, 7 Oscars, 6 Nells for about 8 AK hits.

In other news:

  • Shimushiri was heavily bombed and the Allies are losing the ability to CAP the base.
  • The Allied stack near Chengchow was crushed. 67 casualties to 2527 at odds of 1:99




    Attachment (1)

    _____________________________

    -Damian-
    EconDoc
    TrackerAE
    Tutes&Java

    (in reply to floydg)
    • Post #: 76
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/5/2013 5:13:15 AM   
    n01487477


    Posts: 4779
    Joined: 2/21/2006
    Status: offline     		25-26 Aug, 42
    Burma: On the 25th, my CA STFC hit Ramtree with less than wonderful results. One DD was lost to a mine, so in 2 days I've lost 2 DD's (one to collision and the other to a mine). Fionn had pulled back his transports to Akyab and I decided to follow them to Akyab for the following turn. They obviously were ordered Nth and I've lost sight of them. My BB's are about 5 days away and when they arrive I'll see if I can sort it out.

    In the air on the 25th, I decided to LB Akyab, heavy losses to my bombers resulted with little help from sweeps. He must be heavily over stacked but I'll counter that in a few days - I hope. This action was all a bit of an IF anyway; If he had maintained his LRCAP of Ramtree TF's then it might have gone a bit better. As it was, I got hammered, oh well...

    China:     The chinese stack seemed to have re-emerged as a threat on the 25th, with heavy losses to both sides and rested on the 26th. I expect a shock attack tomorrow. We'll see if my lines hold. I'm throwing a bit more in there, but maybe I should just withdraw back to a base. Ground LB attacks continue on the Chinese and losses are 300+ for each day.

    Sub action: My subs finally get some hits around Attu and off of Carvarvon, Perth & Sydney. Small AK's seem to be the order of the day, but also an AD attempting to get to Attu.

    Carnarvon: Seems like Fionn is trying to smuggle in some supplies. I really should have done the same, but I'm trying to save Darwin at present and his BB's are still lurking either at Geralton or Perth. I also expect at some point to see these off of Burma. My FT is inbound again to try to reclaim the 200AV (oh and the men) in the Div still there. My CVL's hit the small TF after a successful sub attack. But they need to go and replenish soon at Port Hedland.

    Daly Waters: The withdrawal to Katherine continues. Fionn seems to have stopped moving Nth and I bombed his forces with the one Helen unit I have available there. 100 ground losses.

    Sth Pacific: Most of the larger lcu's have been moved back to Rabaul, Japan or Darwin. CVL Shoho is on her way to Australia and then Burma. She will be joined by the slower CV Hiyo after she completes minor repairs.

    Shimishuri-Jima: Port and Airfield attacks continue. Very hard to close this base even with limited supplies, the Allies seem to have enough engineers here to keep it dangerous. I can't afford a few days of bad weather. Finally finished off DD Selfridge that had been lurking around here too. My Kates put two torp's into her.

    KB: re-provisioned with supplies and planes is about to depart Yokahama. She took on about 40 Zero's, 35 Vals and 45 Kates. Pilots are at a premium, a/c pools are now nil.

    More later tonight

    < Message edited by n01487477 -- 5/5/2013 5:14:30 AM >

    _____________________________

    -Damian-
    EconDoc
    TrackerAE
    Tutes&Java

    (in reply to n01487477)
    Post #: 77
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/8/2013 9:48:52 AM   
    n01487477


    Posts: 4779
    Joined: 2/21/2006
    Status: offline     		27 - 28 Aug '42
    Subs : More sub action than I've had for the last 250+ days again.
  • Hit a TK off Diamond Harbour (India)
  • Surfaced sub shells AKL off Ramtree; ammo expended.
  • ACM hit by 2 torps off Shemya Is.(Aleutians)
  • AK hit by torps and shells at Carnarvon.
    ----
  • ACM torpd off Buldit Is (Aleutians)
  • AKL shelled off Ramtree.

    Aleutians:
    My SS's are picking up large convoys and ship operations in the area.

    Kuriles:
    LB, TB & DB attacking ports and airfields again. Some of this is for training purposes too. My pilots come in at 24 exp.

    China:
  • Looks like Fionn has given up on taking the field outside Chengchow after an attack on the 27th which saw 6k to 1k losses for the chinese. It looks like he is moving the stack to Loyang. My forces are intact and are retreating back to base to cover other options.
  • Strat bombing of Ind in china has started.

    Carnarvon:
    FT picks up more of my cut-off Div and TB from mini-kb make nice work of his supply replenishment force. A SCTF finishes them off the next day.

    Ramtree Is.
    Not much going on in terms of TF V TF. But I lost a load of kates that flew to Akyab by mistake. Got a few hits on transports but I covert the planes and pilots.

    Fionn tells me he had 6k PP's to buy out units. CRAP! I can't deal with 4 divs ...




    Attachment (1)

    _____________________________

    -Damian-
    EconDoc
    TrackerAE
    Tutes&Java

    (in reply to n01487477)
    • Post #: 78
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/8/2013 1:17:02 PM   
    Bullwinkle58


    Posts: 11302
    Joined: 2/24/2009
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: n01487477

    Strat bombing of Ind in china has started.




    Alfred had some excellent thoughts on this in his long strategic analysis last week.

    _____________________________

    The Moose

    (in reply to n01487477)
    Post #: 79
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/8/2013 4:10:26 PM   
    n01487477


    Posts: 4779
    Joined: 2/21/2006
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: n01487477

    Strat bombing of Ind in china has started.


    Alfred had some excellent thoughts on this in his long strategic analysis last week.

    Yep, and I've still been remiss in not replying...

    Could have been so much better ...



    Attachment (1)

    < Message edited by n01487477 -- 5/8/2013 4:11:05 PM >

    _____________________________

    -Damian-
    EconDoc
    TrackerAE
    Tutes&Java

    (in reply to Bullwinkle58)
    Post #: 80
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/8/2013 4:33:13 PM   
    SqzMyLemon


    Posts: 4239
    Joined: 10/30/2009
    From: Alberta, Canada
    Status: offline     		Damian,

    I echo everyone's thoughts on the importance of not letting China get out of control. My advice is don't panic and try to do too much all at once. You have to concentrate on a few areas at first to prevent further problems developing.

    You've helped me so much in the past with suggestions for my economy, I'd certainly be willing to offer any help on China. I think I understand the theatre pretty well and might be able to give you a new perspective in a few areas. You mentioned sending a save to another poster, I'd be willing to take a look if you want any help.

    _____________________________

    Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

    Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

    (in reply to n01487477)
    Post #: 81
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/9/2013 3:29:48 AM   
    floydg

     

    Posts: 2052
    Joined: 6/27/2004
    From: Middletown, NJ
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: n01487477

    Fionn tells me he had 6k PP's to buy out units. CRAP! I can't deal with 4 divs ...



    Sorry 'bout that...

    Though I think this will only buy three complete divisions.

    (in reply to n01487477)
    Post #: 82
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/9/2013 4:02:05 AM   
    n01487477


    Posts: 4779
    Joined: 2/21/2006
    Status: offline     		30 Aug '42
    Major action for today was near Ramtree Is. SS-153 took out one CM and then a DD SCTF finished off the other CM. Then my bombers came in and mostly finished off a small transport TF.

    Sweeps of Ramtree were particularly bad. I lost about 30 Oscars from multiple units either sweeping or escorting the attack on the small transport group(above). I have 2 days before the Tojo becomes available. I'm going to produce 90/mth so I'm hoping that is will prove more difficult to bring down.

    Fionn has brought a single DD near to Darwin which was not hit by my Betty's at Darwin. He is probing and making sure that I keep my forward bases covered with SCTF's. It is a suicide run for those poor sailors but that is the nature of digital Vs reality.

    Near Ichang, I pushed back some Chinese Div's which opens the route to the soft underbelly, but with Fionn now looking to match each of my bases with a Chinese Div or two - I think I won't drive too hard into the interior.

    --------------------------------

    Took a long look at the map overnight and then had a restless sleep. Usually I don't have a problem making decisions that are likely to end in a pile of dung. But this is a case of a deer in the headlights.

    Logistics usually drive most of my decisions, although in this game I really dropped the ball in China and will pay the price for that in coming months.

    Here is my dilemma and options:
    I'm running lean on fuel and can't really afford a protracted naval blockade and supply-run situation. I know that strategically I should take Attu and the bases along the chain. I should do this by either a direct assault on Attu or taking Adak and blockading the Attu for a bit. I believe that I have enough muscle to take Umnak and maybe Dutch Harbor too once taking Adak.
    Why has it taken me so long to move on these Is.? Well, I had to buy out some units in Japan and move enough AP's and AK-t's in place to lift the force. As I was also withdrawing from NW Australia, Fiji and New Caledonia, as well as getting ready to move some forces in China from Canton to other Chinese area's ... I was getting stretched on transports. All this movement has cost a lot of fuel too (about 100K /30 days).
    I'm sure that Fionn has resupplied Attu, placed mines and probably a load of PT's (it's his M.O). I've seen TF's heading to Adak and other Is. So, I'm pretty sure they are garrisoned now. My advantage is that the airfields are still undeveloped and it will mean that he will have to use his fleet or just (my nemesis) PT's. Obviously, the downside is that I will have to develop those bases.

    OOB.
    Ships
    5 BB's
    5 CV's
    8 CA's
    6 CL's
    30 DD's
    8 DMS
    + transport (AP's, AK's)

    LCU's - yes, there are no Div's available.
    2 Armor Units (74 AV)
    62nd Inf Grp (250)
    102 Inf. Reg (81)
    61 st. Inf Grp (252)
    144th Inf. Reg. (135)
    Maizuru 3rd (63)
    303rd Ind Inf Batt (42)
    Sasebo 6th SNLF (61)
    Kure 5th SNLF (62)
    1st. Art Motar Rgt. - not enough.
    Ind Eng Unit () - not enough !
    21st Special Base (30)
    25th Air Flot.
    Total AV = 1050
    Reserve - These are being moved from the Sth Pac. and will not be in the first wave.
    4th Ind. Eng Reg.
    48th Eng Reg.
    Maizuru 2nd SNLF
    Ichiki Det.
    Maizuru 1st SNLF.
    Guards Mixed Bde.

    So here are the options:
    1. Move those troops into China to see if I can bolster my defenses. I have 4.5K troops waiting in Kwantang, but at the rate I use PP's it will take some time to
    2. Take back the Kuriles and raid the Aleutians. Then I can sit back until winter is over.(Nov-Feb)
    3. Frontal Assault on Attu.
    4. Take other bases and isolate Attu.




    Attachment (1)

    _____________________________

    -Damian-
    EconDoc
    TrackerAE
    Tutes&Java

    (in reply to SqzMyLemon)
    Post #: 83
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/9/2013 4:05:14 AM   
    n01487477


    Posts: 4779
    Joined: 2/21/2006
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: floydg
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: n01487477

    Fionn tells me he had 6k PP's to buy out units. CRAP! I can't deal with 4 divs ...


    Sorry 'bout that...

    Though I think this will only buy three complete divisions.

    Sometimes I'm glass half full, sometimes not ... this is one of those ... can you pick my mood?

    Apart from Floyd ... anyone want to weigh in on the post above ?

    < Message edited by n01487477 -- 5/9/2013 4:06:34 AM >

    _____________________________

    -Damian-
    EconDoc
    TrackerAE
    Tutes&Java

    (in reply to floydg)
    Post #: 84
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/9/2013 4:16:19 AM   
    Cribtop


    Posts: 3890
    Joined: 8/10/2008
    From: Lone Star Nation
    Status: offline     		I'm reading both so I'll avoid substantive advice, but I will say this: play the game, not the man. Whatever you do, do it. Stay decisive as Alfred suggested.

    _____________________________


    (in reply to n01487477)
    Post #: 85
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/9/2013 10:17:34 AM   
    PaxMondo


    Posts: 9750
    Joined: 6/6/2008
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Cribtop

    I'm reading both so I'll avoid substantive advice, but I will say this: play the game, not the man. Whatever you do, do it. Stay decisive as Alfred suggested.

    +1

    Damian, you know what to do:
    1. Seize the initiative back in CHI, no matter the cost.
    2. Take Adak, seal the Kuriles, resecure them, no matter the cost.

    Failure on either of these two things will cost you the war in '43. Right?

    These are not big secrets. Fionn knows this, you know this, everyone knows this. We also all know that he will do everything he can to keep you from focusing on these two things. Don't get distracted. Fionn is a master at this. He's going to hit you from everywhere he can with everything that he can and he couldn't care less about his losses. That's why he is so dangerous as the allied player.

    Most allied players play like the allies: conserve forces, don't risk assets, conquer IJ with minimal losses. Fionn plays the allies like Ghenkis Khan: pillage the entire planet as fast as possible without a care about the losses as long as he is still standing at the end.

    _____________________________

    Pax

    (in reply to Cribtop)
    Post #: 86
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/9/2013 2:00:17 PM   
    floydg

     

    Posts: 2052
    Joined: 6/27/2004
    From: Middletown, NJ
    Status: offline     		Agree with Pax.

    But fortunately for Damian, I depleted Fionn's forces enough that he has only half a kitchen sink left to throw Damian...

    (in reply to PaxMondo)
    Post #: 87
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/10/2013 3:08:22 AM   
    PaxMondo


    Posts: 9750
    Joined: 6/6/2008
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: floydg

    I depleted Fionn's forces enough that he has only half a kitchen sink left to throw Damian...

    Only with respect to the starting USN forces. Allied air and LCU's are largely intact. And the CV's that you lost, Fionn will resurrect those air groups as LBA.

    _____________________________

    Pax

    (in reply to floydg)
    Post #: 88
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 5/15/2013 2:19:44 AM   
    n01487477


    Posts: 4779
    Joined: 2/21/2006
    Status: offline     		1 Sept - 5 Sept '42
    Been a very busy guy the last few days with work. I'll try to update quickly what has been happening..

    Most of the action focuses on Burma and the Aleutians.

    On the first, KB is spotted 8 hexes SW of Amchitka Is. I guess Fionn has plenty of search capability up in the Aleutians and it is my fault for not being sneaky in my approach. What follows is a bit of cat & mouse where I end up getting nothing for my trouble. On one crucial day, my planes didn't fly and that is the Aleutians in Autumn. I had planned to clear the baffles and take out Fionn's waiting SCTF's ready to prey on my transports. I also tried a crazy Ivan, by moving KB deliberately West and then coming back quickly... I guess he's played "What's the time, Mr. Wolf?"

    Anyway, I know I've given him a load of time to prepare the defense and I expect a bit of surface combat in the coming turns.

    I also realize too late that my planning for this operation is slapdash and not well thought out. If I could take it back right now, I would. Instead of having all my troops bundled into AP/AK's, I'd use some BB/CA/DD FT's to land a bunch of troops on Adak, then change these TF's to bombard Dutch Harbor and Adak and then bring in the AP's covered by KB. After that expand out to Amchitka and Attu. Take Umnak and bomb the crap out of Dutch ... Too late now, here goes nothing in the next few days...

    In Australia, I've almost FT my troops from Carnarvon and they have made their way to Darwin. I'm still not sure I can hold the line here and we'll see if I need to get out quickly soon as Fionn is about to take Katherine.

    In Burma, things have been fairly quiet, except I decided to cross the river and take Myitkyina. Some of you might find this strange to say ... but I only took the base to allow my forces to Strat quickly back to Rangoon.. I see Fionn has the Chinese amassing on the Lashio border. I think I said to him no Chinese in Burma ... but maybe my mind is foggy. Anyway, Burma is a sideshow. I also got lucky with a BB TF that destroyed about 150 fighters at Akyab. It is nice to catch Fionn on the hop. Unfortunately, my LB didn't fly the next day to follow up. But it probably would have cost too many Oscars in escorts.

    Finally, my Tojo's finally came online. I'll be producing 90/mth.

    _____________________________

    -Damian-
    EconDoc
    TrackerAE
    Tutes&Java

    (in reply to PaxMondo)
    Post #: 89
    RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 - 6/1/2013 6:25:02 AM   
    n01487477


    Posts: 4779
    Joined: 2/21/2006
    Status: offline     		6 Sept - 24 Sept '42
    Sorry, I've been too busy with work to properly update this. I've also been dabbling in Kerbal Space Program.

    Anyway, I'll try to give a little insight into what has happened and my thinking going forward.

    This month has seen the Allies stop the IJ advance and take back large swathes of land.

    Aleutians
    According to Fionn, I was about 6 days too late to launch the attack. This was due to a real lack of PP's and amphib's near Ominato. I really should have thought of this while still playing Floyd, but it is what it is.

    I dabbled with landing at Adak, but seeing the AF increase one point every 4 days, I missed the window there.

    Eventually I landed at Attu, but probably should have taken some of the smaller bases surrounding it. My troops had terrible disruption on landing, most likely because of their long voyages around the Archipelago and Attu was found to have a large amount of AV already present. Another error on my part for not enough recon and not being decisive.

    A large SCTF V SCTF ensued where I just came out on top, but the loss of CL Yubari and 2 DMS's smarts. Then, there was a large aerial duel over my CV's which saw a 3:1 in my favor. But my airwings took very big losses. Akagi was bombed but took little damage. As I said to Fionn at the time; I won the battle but have lost the Aleutian campaign.

    My SLOC's were too far and I moved some AKE's to Paramushiro & Etorofu. Paramushiro is now a transfer base for my CV airwings coming back to replenish and I've basically taken so many Val losses that I've taken them off the CV's and replaced them with more fighters.

    The D3A1 Val is still in production and I didn't upgrade to the A2 because of the range loss even though they are 27 km/h faster. I'm sort of regretting that decision now having lost valuable aircrew. The A6M2 is due to be replaced with the 3a next month.

    Right now, there has been a little lull in the action but I'm about to try an evac of Attu and I'm really worried that I rushed the orders and something wrong will happen.

    Kuriles
    I'm using a combination of DB, TB, LB to suppress the airfields. It is stupid that even without supplies these airfields still repair because there are engineers present. This IMHO is just B.S. Fionn even thinks it is ridiculous.

    Burma
    I took Myitkyna and then withdrew back to the Mandalay line. I would love to have fought for Swebo which just fell, but the lack of troops in stock and the lack of PP's is really killing me. Fionn seems to have had a nice nest egg to begin with and that is why we are seeing such sweeping changes on the map.

    Fionn is driving masses of troops into Ramtree with massive Naval support to help with the 1 day offload. I see that the British BB's are back and I'm ready to chuck every tug boat I have at it. Cause I need to stop the rot pretty soon or I'll be vulnerable further South. Fionn likes to hop down.

    Anyway, I've fortified the usual approaches but once Fionn gets past Ramtree and Mandalay and they join forces, Bangkok and Singapore will be vulnerable fairly quickly. It may seem bleating, but really the amount of troops that the Allies have at their disposal should mean every stock game should finish in mid-43.

    China
    I've halted his advance in 2 different directions, bombed the crap out of a lot of LCU's and LI/HI installations, but my mobile reinforcement force is now zero. I'm about to launch a counter attack on Wenchow, I'm hoping this will be an easy campaign.

    Australia
    Fighting a defensive withdrawal, I still think I can make a stand at Darwin. His AV matches mine at present - but his LB is becoming more of a threat and my Tojo's are not doing the business as much as I would like. Fionn has also taken to capturing the Southern part of Dutch New Guinea. I'm taking the bases back one by one, but once Darwin is untenable the rush of FT's will come.

    Moving forward
    ... more next time.

    Umm, I am willing to share each turn via a dropbox share for those interested. Fionn, is a good player. I think I'm pretty reasonable too ... but I'm open to advice ;-)

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/17642556/DamianVFionn/wpae083.pws
    PM - me for password.

    _____________________________

    -Damian-
    EconDoc
    TrackerAE
    Tutes&Java

    (in reply to n01487477)
    Post #: 90
    Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
    All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
    Jump to:





    New Messages No New Messages
    Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
    Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
     Post New Thread
     Reply to Message
     Post New Poll
     Submit Vote
     Delete My Own Post
     Delete My Own Thread
     Rate Posts


    Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

    1.781