Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/1/2013 9:24:23 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline 		T13 Stalingrad (Soviet)


I evacuated industry from souther part of the city and northern should withstand possible assault, but if my opponent decides to cross Volga and isolate defenders then I will be in big troubles.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kamil -- 7/1/2013 9:26:29 PM >

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 271
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/1/2013 9:28:56 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline 		T13 south (Soviet)


Somehow I did it again. Valiant troops of southern front once again forced German units out of my side of Don river.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 272
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/1/2013 10:10:00 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline 		T14 north & Moscow (German)


3 more turn of summer left. Moscow should be safe.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 273
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/1/2013 10:14:47 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline 		T14 centre (German)


Michael goes for territory here.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 274
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/1/2013 10:17:42 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline 		T14 south (German)


It seems, that my opponent wants to take Rostov at all costs. I think he will succeed.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 275
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/2/2013 12:32:58 AM   
Peltonx


Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline 		Grats on holding Moscow. MT has posted a T16 north to south picture.

I fully expect MT to run like a girl during Blizzard. He has been a complete blow hard when other GHC players retreat during blizzard.

If he stands and fights vs your army I expect he will get his clock cleaned.

What is your best guess on your army size come May?

_____________________________

Beta Tester WitW & WitE

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 276
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/2/2013 1:20:09 AM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		I think Kamil is boned, myself. The losses in manpower and industry have been crippling for him. Nor is the Red Army itself in brilliant shape despite all the running. Kamil is going to be struggling to reach 6 million come May of 42.

Moscow could still fall, btw. MT can't hold it through winter, but that hardly matters, even a temporary occupation would be devastating at this point, especially if the factories are still there.

_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to Peltonx)
Post #: 277
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/2/2013 1:28:05 AM   
Peltonx


Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

I think Kamil is boned, myself. The losses in manpower and industry have been crippling for him. Nor is the Red Army itself in brilliant shape despite all the running. Kamil is going to be struggling to reach 6 million come May of 42.

Moscow could still fall, btw. MT can't hold it through winter, but that hardly matters, even a temporary occupation would be devastating at this point, especially if the factories are still there.


I see you guys boasting that Kamil will have less then 6 million by spring?

Pelton vs Hugh Hugh lost 2.5 million men

The manpower losses were close to the same as MT has now and Hugh had 7.2 million men on turn 50.

Sapper had taken more and LOST to M60.

This game is very very far from over, MT has no exp past March 42 he can easly screw up as sapper and Bomazz both did in there games.

_____________________________

Beta Tester WitW & WitE

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 278
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/2/2013 2:31:52 AM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		Kamil's replacement situation is terrible, Pelton. He's lost way too many manpower centers. I bet he's below 100k/turn past January. 7 million in may is a pipe dream. MT doesn't have to do anything brilliant during the blizzard, he has enormous room to fall back on, he's a hundred miles or more past the Don in the center and next to Stalingrad. He can easily fall back to Stalino down south from the upper caucuses. Up north he's at the Finnish stopline. This is as bad a situation in 1941 as I've seen short of a resignation.



< Message edited by Flaviusx -- 7/2/2013 2:33:35 AM >

_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to Peltonx)
Post #: 279
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/2/2013 9:37:25 AM   
Peltonx


Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

Kamil's replacement situation is terrible, Pelton. He's lost way too many manpower centers. I bet he's below 100k/turn past January. 7 million in may is a pipe dream. MT doesn't have to do anything brilliant during the blizzard, he has enormous room to fall back on, he's a hundred miles or more past the Don in the center and next to Stalingrad. He can easily fall back to Stalino down south from the upper caucuses. Up north he's at the Finnish stopline. This is as bad a situation in 1941 as I've seen short of a resignation.




This coming from the man that said Tarhunass would easly hold out for a minor German Victory?

Who was right about that? ME I said Tarhunnas would lose and he would have if not for 2by3 giving him a hot patch and as it was he got a DRAW.

Kamil has probably close to 5-5.25 million men now and will receive 100 divisions / equivilents (800,000 men) by turn 50. So he will easly have 6+ million by May.

_____________________________

Beta Tester WitW & WitE

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 280
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/2/2013 9:41:55 AM   
Walloc

 

Posts: 3141
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: Denmark
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pelton

Kamil has probably close to 5-5.25 million men now and will receive 100 divisions / equivilents (800,000 men) by turn 50. So he will easly have 6+ million by May.


According to MTs thread he had 4.365m at end of german turn 16.

Kind regards,

Rasmus

< Message edited by Walloc -- 7/2/2013 9:45:23 AM >

(in reply to Peltonx)
Post #: 281
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/2/2013 9:47:54 AM   
Peltonx


Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Walloc

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pelton

Kamil has probably close to 5-5.25 million men now and will receive 100 divisions / equivilents (800,000 men) by turn 50. So he will easly have 6+ million by May.


According to MTs thread he had 4.365m at end of german turn 16.

Kind regards,

Rasmus


Between 17-24 SHC receives 60 divisions and the other 100 25-50. No combat during mud turns = 88k per turn for SHC and a loss in troops/morale for GHC as they are far past railheads=supplies.

Also the manpower grows back so there is an increase in manpower output yr after yr not a decrease.

As Kamil flips manpower centers he gets a small boost as the output from each center is held at each city until retaken.

When GHC falls apart it happens very quickly.

Smokendave lost a game and he was as far east as MT.

IF MT does not VP out in 42 Kamil can still get a draw. Allot depends on MT tactics in 42-43. We have seen allot of guys do far better then historical and lose out right. Generally because GHC players keep attacking and burn up their armys. aka 0 late war exp and not reading AAR's.

People are simply over looking the AAR's and assuming allot before the games played out into 44

< Message edited by Pelton -- 7/2/2013 9:56:36 AM >

_____________________________

Beta Tester WitW & WitE

(in reply to Walloc)
Post #: 282
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/2/2013 5:47:03 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		Pelton, the vast majority of those reinforcements are shells. If you haven't got the replacements to fill them up, they will stay as shells.

As Walloc indictates, Kamil is going into mud with 4.3 million or so. I'd say about 100k of that is stuff that's surrounded and will die.

Kamil I am guessing is getting about 120k replacements a turn. Attrition will knock that down to about 90k. So figure Kamil goes into snow with around 4.8 million. Micheal will probably kill at least some stuff during snow, so let's just call that a wash.

Over the course of the Blizzard, Kamil will start growing again. Slowly. From January on, the new replacement multiplier kicks in. That will drop him below 100k/turn. Probably closer to 90k/turn. Between combat operations and attrition it's doubtful he will net half that amount per turn in growth, if that. Let's say he picks up about 700,000 over the course of the blizzard. That puts him at 5.5 million going into snow. He won't grow during that period, MT will launch counterattacks. Kamil could even lose a lot of stuff during a period of March madness. Let's take back, conservatively speaking, 100k over March, dropping Kamil back to 5.4 million going into mud.

Mud will allow him to grow again, by about 60k/turn net after taking attrition losses. But it is difficult to see how he gets much over 6 million before it clears up again. The the 42 German summer offensive is launched from very advanced positions.

I assume his armament situation is fairly catastrophic, btw.



< Message edited by Flaviusx -- 7/2/2013 5:50:09 PM >

_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to Peltonx)
Post #: 283
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/2/2013 9:37:14 PM   
Walloc

 

Posts: 3141
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: Denmark
Status: offline 		Just to add. In reinforcements while most divs are indeed shells, the russian gets 600k in Manpower from there all included. (1/4) is HQs and such.

Rasmus

< Message edited by Walloc -- 7/2/2013 10:18:25 PM >

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 284
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/2/2013 9:49:02 PM   
Peltonx


Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline 		I be surpised if he doesn't have 5 million in December.

600k worth of shells? I was close 800k.

I am simply basing my info on my past 4 games. I am not really guessing.

4.2 + 600k = 4.8 million. Plus .5 during mud by Flaviusx math = 5.3 + .7 during blizzard = 6.0 million- 100k then plus another round of mud probably 350k = 6.25 million.

I am guessing over 6.5 million but we will see.

_____________________________

Beta Tester WitW & WitE

(in reply to Walloc)
Post #: 285
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/2/2013 10:16:25 PM   
Walloc

 

Posts: 3141
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: Denmark
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pelton
600k worth of shells? I was close 800k.

I am simply basing my info on my past 4 games. I am not really guessing.



I earlier today and added up all the reinforcements in men per the reinforcement schedule from turn 16 to 50, in rough numbers. I excluded the 20 man shells, I didnt bother with those. To much work. So unless my calculator let me down i would say around 600k, yes.

(in reply to Peltonx)
Post #: 286
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/2/2013 10:18:18 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		So not 7 million then or anywhere near that, yeah. 6 million and change at most. And a very poor replacement situation going into summer of 42. MT conceivably could begin the summer at or near the Don. He's already trashed a lot of stuff past that, all the way up to Saratov and Stalingrad practically.

If I were him I'd try very hard to hold on to Voronezh. Kamil is going to have a hell of a time taking all that real estate back there and getting his rail repaired.

A massive panzerball planted in the center of the map and with a bridgehead across the Don in summer of 42 can do more or less whatever it wants to do and divide the Red Army in half between Moscow and Stalingrad and threaten both, not to mention the rear area of Moscow near Gorky.



< Message edited by Flaviusx -- 7/2/2013 10:38:45 PM >

_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to Peltonx)
Post #: 287
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/3/2013 5:03:10 PM   
janh

 

Posts: 1216
Joined: 6/12/2007
Status: offline 		Unless Michael commits huge mistakes, and unless he wins by VP in 42, I think the best that Kamil can still reach is a draw? It remains amazing what Michael can get out of this engine. It looks like teaching the Wehrmacht that there never where any logistic shortages during Barbarossa...

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 288
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/3/2013 5:45:27 PM   
Balou


Posts: 841
Joined: 7/24/2009
Status: offline 		Sad truth is, we will probably never know as far as this game is concerned. Michael T quit yesterday (see his post).

(in reply to janh)
Post #: 289
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/3/2013 6:01:08 PM   
M60A3TTS


Posts: 4014
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline 		Sorry to see this one end, it would have been interesting to see how it played out. I'm not sure how far my own game with Mehring will go. Like MT, he's dealing with RL issues as well.

(in reply to Balou)
Post #: 290
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/3/2013 6:35:09 PM   
Balou


Posts: 841
Joined: 7/24/2009
Status: offline 		I found this GC remarkable for it's huge territorial gains ie. manpower, since recent discussions many times centered around the importance of manpower (centers). Going as far east as MT did would suggest a serious damage to any Red Army 2.0 build up before time is running out.

(in reply to M60A3TTS)
Post #: 291
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/3/2013 7:08:40 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline 		T17 north & Moscow (Soviet)


Unfortunately game has to be abandoned.

Situation at the end of summer.


In the north northing has happened for several turns.

At Moscow approaches situation has been stabilised.


I made several successful counter-attacks.

There are 6 encircled units - weak infantry divisions and 2 tank formations. Small loss.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Balou)
Post #: 292
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/3/2013 7:13:40 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline 		T17 centre & Stalingrad (Soviet)


South-eastern flank of Soviet's capital seems to be secure. I managed to reopen corridor to encircled troops.

1 divisions (weak) will be destroyed in Penza.


I unleashed horde of anaemic units to put some pressure on overly exposed German forces - most of them should be isolated due to distance from railhead.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 293
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/3/2013 7:17:36 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline 		T17 south (Soviet)

I failed to rescue encircled troops (4 units), but during the course of my counter-attacks I inflicted decent losses on German panzers.







Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 294
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/3/2013 7:19:02 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline 		T17 Crimea (Soviet)


Crimea still holds.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 295
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/3/2013 7:23:56 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline 		T17 OOB (Soviet)


There are 11 encircled units - approx 75-90k.



During the course of blizzard Red Army strength would have been very high, problems caused by destruction of industry and looses of manpower centres would have started to occur during the spring of '42.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kamil -- 7/3/2013 7:24:56 PM >

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 296
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/3/2013 7:58:27 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline 		Overall


Turn 1 - disaster. For several following turns I was not able to recreate cohesive defensive positions. I could not cope with mobility of German motorised units.

Turn 6 - Michael crossed Ugra river on 6th turn. He could have finished me then, fortunately next turn he exposed himself to my counter-attacks. Further advance has taken him away from capital what was key to my survival.


Turn 11 - Leningrad is lost. Withdrawn troops vital for stabilising Moscow defences.


Turn 14 - Michael start direct assault on Moscow, but his forces are inadequate now.




I believe game would end up either in major or minor German victory.

My opponent bested me, but I feel, that from turn 2 onwards I did quite all right and recovered a bit from initial disaster.

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 297
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/3/2013 8:07:01 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		Kamil, if you railed out all of South Front on turn 2, could the Romanian cheese be neutered?



_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 298
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/3/2013 8:37:18 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
quote:

Flaviusx

Kamil, if you railed out all of South Front on turn 2, could the Romanian cheese be neutered?



I wouldn't be able to. It is loose loose situation in the south.


If I didn't commit so many troops to suicide mission of extracting South West front Michael would have been able to pocket non-active units of Southern front without interference.

If I did run away straight away I would loose less units than I did, but still casualties would be higher than standard - few more units west of Zhitomir plus non-activated formations in the far south.

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 299
RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) - 7/3/2013 10:25:23 PM   
Michael T


Posts: 4443
Joined: 10/22/2006
From: Queensland, Australia.
Status: offline 		There has been some unexpected relief in my situation and I may just be able to keep playing at a much reduced turn rate. Kamil would you be willing to try this?


_____________________________


(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 300
Page:   <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Micheal T (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.781