Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary.

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 9/21/2013 6:22:26 PM   
governato

 

Posts: 1079
Joined: 5/6/2011
From: Seattle, WA
Status: offline 		First things first: I am glad we have an AA patch. Given the fact that it has been developed by a fellow gamer, with limited resources and time, I think it's great and perhaps the rest is details.

But for the sake of details: high altitude bombers would fly most of their missions (to and from targets) and much lower altitude and so be exposed to all kinds of AA fire at least for part of their mission.


Here is an example:

http://ww2today.com/16th-september-1943-navigating-a-first-combat-mission-in-a-b-17-over-france

(in reply to Telumar)
Post #: 61
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 9/21/2013 9:45:27 PM   
Curtis Lemay


Posts: 12969
Joined: 9/17/2004
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Telumar


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster


quote:

ORIGINAL: SMK-at-work

quote:

ORIGINAL: Silvanski

I see it like this .. Some high altitude bombers may be flying lower, for whatever reason.. mechanical or navigational problems


Any stray damaged heavy bombers at low level are already casualties.

Ploesti and an alleged vido of B-52's droping napalm at low level are situations TOAW probably can't simulate and not a reason for low level flak killing heavy bombers as a matter of course.


Not every run anyway. Why would this be made part of the routine? Seems kinda arbitrary. "Hey, let's code low level AA into high level bombing runs too. Pass me another beer."


Norm - blessed he shall be - did this. For whatever reason.. wasn't he an airforce man?

That doesn't prevent this from change.. Plans have already been drafted to revise this completely. Which however doesn't mean anytime soon..


No, it was post Norm - TOAW III only. Maybe JAM or Heat? It was before I came onboard.

But when targeting ground forces, bombers would tend towards lower altitudes. And TOAW doesn't do strategic bombing. Bombers are used against ground forces. And, remember, it's only a fraction of low-level AAA - modeling only a fraction of the time that it would apply.

(in reply to Telumar)
Post #: 62
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 9/22/2013 1:23:38 AM   
SMK-at-work

 

Posts: 3396
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: New Zealand
Status: offline 		Curtis wrote:
But when targeting ground forces, bombers would tend towards lower altitudes.

Not in WW2 they don't

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)
Post #: 63
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 9/22/2013 1:25:37 AM   
SMK-at-work

 

Posts: 3396
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: New Zealand
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: governato

First things first: I am glad we have an AA patch. Given the fact that it has been developed by a fellow gamer, with limited resources and time, I think it's great and perhaps the rest is details.

But for the sake of details: high altitude bombers would fly most of their missions (to and from targets) and much lower altitude and so be exposed to all kinds of AA fire at least for part of their mission.


Here is an example:

http://ww2today.com/16th-september-1943-navigating-a-first-combat-mission-in-a-b-17-over-france



Not a real good example - they stated their climb over the sea off Bordeaux and bombed from 20,000 feet......

And if you've got time to research that you've got time to send me a turn :)

< Message edited by SMK-at-work -- 9/22/2013 1:27:29 AM >

(in reply to governato)
Post #: 64
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 9/22/2013 2:09:23 AM   
Lobster


Posts: 5104
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: offline 		A 20mm AA gun has an effective range of about 6k feet. 37mm about 9k. But, as was pointed out, no strategic bombing in TOAW. So, I guess it kind of makes sense when you think of it that way. Still, not going to find very many strategic bombers making ground attacks at light arms levels. Lancaster nap of the earth? Nuh uh. Only thing I can think of like that was Operation Chastise, the dam busters. 60 feet at 240mph. But over water with spot lights mounted fore and aft for precision height.

If I was to make a scenario I would simply not include heavy bombers.

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 65
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 9/22/2013 3:18:42 AM   
Curtis Lemay


Posts: 12969
Joined: 9/17/2004
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SMK-at-work

Curtis wrote:
But when targeting ground forces, bombers would tend towards lower altitudes.

Not in WW2 they don't


I think you must be thinking of heavy (4-engine) bombers. These were very rarely used in ground support mode. The vast majority of high-altitude bombers represented in TOAW are medium (2-engine) bombers. These did lower altitudes when the targets were ground forces. On D-Day, for example, the mediums bombed at 3500 feet.

Again, when you consider that the effect is a fraction of low-altitude strength, it models affecting only a fraction of the cases. One day, we may be more sophisticated. But, until then, this averages out to close to correct.

< Message edited by Curtis Lemay -- 9/22/2013 9:55:53 PM >

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 66
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/3/2013 6:52:13 AM   
SMK-at-work

 

Posts: 3396
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: New Zealand
Status: offline 		Yes they bombed from lower than planned altitude to get under the cloud and actually see their targets on some beaches from 3500-7000 ft - whereas at Omaha the equivalent raids did not, blind bombed and completely missed!!

3500 ft was what the allies considered the maximum effective height of German 20mm FLAK - so at that height they were minimising their exposure although not totally eliminating it.

and sometimes Spitfires level bombed from 10,000 feet too using ground-based radar direction!

Still doesn't make it right :)



< Message edited by SMK-at-work -- 10/3/2013 6:53:10 AM >

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)
Post #: 67
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/3/2013 12:05:55 PM   
Oberst_Klink

 

Posts: 4778
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SMK-at-work

Yes they bombed from lower than planned altitude to get under the cloud and actually see their targets on some beaches from 3500-7000 ft - whereas at Omaha the equivalent raids did not, blind bombed and completely missed!!

3500 ft was what the allies considered the maximum effective height of German 20mm FLAK - so at that height they were minimising their exposure although not totally eliminating it.

and sometimes Spitfires level bombed from 10,000 feet too using ground-based radar direction!

Still doesn't make it right :)



Kamerad Kiwi,

what's simulating the real deal nowadays? Just real life. Anyway. Are you working on a project? Plenty of us do. So, let's all join and make things better, aye? Kharkov '43 e.g. is about to be completed thanks to the support of countless members from the community.

Klink, Oberst

_____________________________

My Blog & on Twitter.
Visit CS Legion on Twitter & Facebook for updates.

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 68
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/3/2013 4:22:59 PM   
Curtis Lemay


Posts: 12969
Joined: 9/17/2004
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SMK-at-work

Yes they bombed from lower than planned altitude to get under the cloud and actually see their targets on some beaches from 3500-7000 ft - whereas at Omaha the equivalent raids did not, blind bombed and completely missed!!


No. Actually it was the other way around:

"For a moment, it had seemed that low cloud might force the Eighth, better provided than were other forces for nonvisual bombing, to undertake the missions originally assigned to IX Bomber Command against targets in the UTAH area. However, Brig. Gen. Samuel E. Anderson sought, and received, authority to bomb visually under the 3,500-foot ceiling, and the project to divert the heavies from Caen was abandoned. Accordingly, the mediums took off between the hours of 0343 and 0500, flying in boxes of eighteen planes each. Because of continuing overcast the attacks went in at levels ranging from 3,500 to 7,000 feet."

So, they were ordered to bomb below 3500 feet, but conditions didn't permit bombing below 3500.

I would also point out that there were versions of such bombers equipped primarily for strafing mode (lots of MGs in the nose), not to mention ones equipped with torpedoes (gotta be on the deck to drop torpedoes).

quote:

3500 ft was what the allies considered the maximum effective height of German 20mm FLAK - so at that height they were minimising their exposure although not totally eliminating it.


Regardless of what they considered, that was not its maximum effective height - see post #65.

quote:

and sometimes Spitfires level bombed from 10,000 feet too using ground-based radar direction!

Still doesn't make it right :)


There are all sorts of tactical warfare aspects that TOAW must average out. This is just one more. High-altitude bombers were subject to low-altitude AAA some of the time.

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 69
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/4/2013 4:10:59 PM   
Sensei.Tokugawa


Posts: 341
Joined: 4/6/2010
From: Wieluń, Poland
Status: offline 		I started Salamon's Iran - Iraq War 1980 - 88 and it seems to work well, at least that is my initial impression, we have been only through three turns so far at best, me & Maus Man, but I also decided to use it in my another PBEM game, the 1st Chechen War which has been going for some time - the Chechens started to down choppers, mainly Hinds at an insane rate, about a dozen or so during a turn which lasts a week or so as far as I can remember. The case is that their units and subunits that were involved in direct action combat operations and became as a result targeted by combat support missions flown by Russian gunships, do not seem to have any separate AA or AAA systems so I am assuming that they're great shots and shoot down the choppers mainly with their small arms fire.Is it correct?

_____________________________

"-What if one doesn't make it?
-Then we know he was no good for SpetsNaz. ..."
V. Suvorov, "Spetsnaz;the Story behind the Soviet SAS"

...No escape from Passchendaele .../ God Dethroned, "Passiondale"


(in reply to Telumar)
Post #: 70
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/6/2013 10:08:32 AM   
Lobster


Posts: 5104
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: offline 		Does anyone know if progress has been made with the work on the RFC/Ignore Losses patch? Thanks.

(in reply to Sensei.Tokugawa)
Post #: 71
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/6/2013 1:30:13 PM   
Oberst_Klink

 

Posts: 4778
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster

Does anyone know if progress has been made with the work on the RFC/Ignore Losses patch? Thanks.

Fabio and me are still testing. If you're interested, I can send you a sandbox scenario and the 'fix' that, according to Fabio, is the best one. It has the cryptic designator 3XCb or 3XDc.

Klink, Oberst

_____________________________

My Blog & on Twitter.
Visit CS Legion on Twitter & Facebook for updates.

(in reply to Lobster)
Post #: 72
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/7/2013 12:25:54 AM   
Lobster


Posts: 5104
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: offline 		I have not played much lately and it's been so long since I have played that I would not really know good from bad. In other words, I'm not reliable enough to judge what is right or wrong. Better left to the experts.

(in reply to Oberst_Klink)
Post #: 73
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/15/2013 9:45:15 PM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Oberst_Klink

Fabio and me are still testing. If you're interested, I can send you a sandbox scenario and the 'fix' that, according to Fabio, is the best one. It has the cryptic designator 3XCb or 3XDc.

Klink, Oberst


It's OT of this thread, but if I may made a suggestion. There exist different utilities as viewer,scenario converter, equipmenteditors. But what I like to see is Unit editor. I mean with this that you can edit capabilities of the units.
Example you can made mountain unit also airmobile.


_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to Oberst_Klink)
Post #: 74
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/15/2013 9:56:21 PM   
Telumar


Posts: 2236
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: niflheim
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym


quote:

ORIGINAL: Oberst_Klink

Fabio and me are still testing. If you're interested, I can send you a sandbox scenario and the 'fix' that, according to Fabio, is the best one. It has the cryptic designator 3XCb or 3XDc.

Klink, Oberst


It's OT of this thread, but if I may made a suggestion. There exist different utilities as viewer,scenario converter, equipmenteditors. But what I like to see is Unit editor. I mean with this that you can edit capabilities of the units.


This would require hacking the exe or a rewrite of code. The first being too difficult(?) along with other problems, the second being a part of the 3.5 patch (secondary unit icon).

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym

Example you can made mountain unit also airmobile.



Special Forces!

Manual, 8.2 Unit Special Capabilities (p. 20):

Special Forces: These units have large Reconnaissance capabilities
and a special capability to easily move near enemy units.
They also have all of the capabilities of Airborne, Airmobile, and
Mountain units.

All you would need to do is to edit the according unit graphics.

_____________________________

http://thetoawbeachhead.wordpress.com

(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 75
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/16/2013 5:36:35 AM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Telumar


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
But what I like to see is Unit editor. I mean with this that you can edit capabilities of the units.


This would require hacking the exe or a rewrite of code. The first being too difficult(?) along with other problems, the second being a part of the 3.5 patch (secondary unit icon).


Do you mean that in 3.5 patch a editor for units icon (capabilities) is included?


_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to Telumar)
Post #: 76
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/16/2013 8:47:38 AM   
Oberst_Klink

 

Posts: 4778
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym


quote:

ORIGINAL: Telumar


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
But what I like to see is Unit editor. I mean with this that you can edit capabilities of the units.


This would require hacking the exe or a rewrite of code. The first being too difficult(?) along with other problems, the second being a part of the 3.5 patch (secondary unit icon).


Do you mean that in 3.5 patch a editor for units icon (capabilities) is included?


Hupp Holländer! You can flag the units being air mobile, to be precise, within the .EQP editor. Create equipment for your Dutch-Airborne-Mountain Troops and voilŕ!

Klink, Oberst

_____________________________

My Blog & on Twitter.
Visit CS Legion on Twitter & Facebook for updates.

(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 77
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/16/2013 9:13:14 AM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Oberst_Klink


Hupp Holländer! You can flag the units being air mobile, to be precise, within the .EQP editor. Create equipment for your Dutch-Airborne-Mountain Troops and voilŕ!

Klink, Oberst


Herrn Oberst

This is not what I mean. This flag is only for equipment. Most of the unit/symbol/icon has one of more capabilities. I know that you can change the icon or replace it position. But you can't change (add?)the capabilities or say reconstution with capabilities etc.

_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to Oberst_Klink)
Post #: 78
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/16/2013 9:46:39 AM   
Oberst_Klink

 

Posts: 4778
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym


quote:

ORIGINAL: Oberst_Klink


Hupp Holländer! You can flag the units being air mobile, to be precise, within the .EQP editor. Create equipment for your Dutch-Airborne-Mountain Troops and voilŕ!

Klink, Oberst


Herrn Oberst

This is not what I mean. This flag is only for equipment. Most of the unit/symbol/icon has one of more capabilities. I know that you can change the icon or replace it position. But you can't change (add?)the capabilities or say reconstution with capabilities etc.

Now I got you, yes. However, I am quite sure that, if the equipment is tagged as air mobile, being put into a Mountain icon, they both can be transported AND have the capability to fight-enter alpine regions. Only one way to find out I guess... a sandbox test.

Klink, Oberst

P.S. Any feedback on the article? ;)

_____________________________

My Blog & on Twitter.
Visit CS Legion on Twitter & Facebook for updates.

(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 79
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/16/2013 5:38:59 PM   
Telumar


Posts: 2236
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: niflheim
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Oberst_Klink


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym


quote:

ORIGINAL: Oberst_Klink


Hupp Holländer! You can flag the units being air mobile, to be precise, within the .EQP editor. Create equipment for your Dutch-Airborne-Mountain Troops and voilŕ!

Klink, Oberst


Herrn Oberst

This is not what I mean. This flag is only for equipment. Most of the unit/symbol/icon has one of more capabilities. I know that you can change the icon or replace it position. But you can't change (add?)the capabilities or say reconstution with capabilities etc.

Now I got you, yes. However, I am quite sure that, if the equipment is tagged as air mobile, being put into a Mountain icon, they both can be transported AND have the capability to fight-enter alpine regions. Only one way to find out I guess... a sandbox test.

Klink, Oberst

P.S. Any feedback on the article? ;)


Non, no, no.... a unit is only airmobile by its unit icon. Of course the unit needs equipment that is airmobile and most light equipment and most infantry squads are, but that alone won't suffice.


quote:

Do you mean that in 3.5 patch a editor for units icon (capabilities) is included?


It's in the editor. You can "assign" a second unit icon to any unit. The 'first' (normal) icon is displayed in the game, the second icon is only visible in the editor. A unit with a secondary icon 'inherits' all capabilities of this icon, no matter what the first icon is. I.e. first icon is mountain infantry. To make it airmobile, set parachute infantry as the second icon.

_____________________________

http://thetoawbeachhead.wordpress.com

(in reply to Oberst_Klink)
Post #: 80
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/16/2013 10:02:16 PM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Telumar

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
Do you mean that in 3.5 patch a editor for units icon (capabilities) is included?


It's in the editor. You can "assign" a second unit icon to any unit. The 'first' (normal) icon is displayed in the game, the second icon is only visible in the editor. A unit with a secondary icon 'inherits' all capabilities of this icon, no matter what the first icon is. I.e. first icon is mountain infantry. To make it airmobile, set parachute infantry as the second icon.


Now I this read. I hope that soon a release is of the 3.5 (perhaps beta?) for the public.

_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to Telumar)
Post #: 81
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/18/2013 3:11:19 PM   
Alpha77

 

Posts: 2116
Joined: 9/24/2010
Status: offline 		AA patch works with Scen "Directive 21" just for your info.

See my post here: http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2594404&mpage=4

(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 82
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/22/2013 6:02:40 PM   
Tcao

 

Posts: 51
Joined: 10/10/2013
Status: offline 		Hi, I just find out that right now the defense unit will fire upon incoming aircraft, but the attacking units AA still can not damage the aircraft in CAS role. I am playing "Campaign for south Vietnam". Anybody noticed the same thing.

Thanks


(in reply to Alpha77)
Post #: 83
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/22/2013 6:29:42 PM   
Oberst_Klink

 

Posts: 4778
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chicom Redneck

Hi, I just find out that right now the defense unit will fire upon incoming aircraft, but the attacking units AA still can not damage the aircraft in CAS role. I am playing "Campaign for south Vietnam". Anybody noticed the same thing.

Thanks



Which one of the various 'unofficial' AAA-fixes? Could you provide a .SAL file perhaps? It would be also helpful if you flag the TOAW.log in order to have a look if the attacked unit didn't/did shoot back.

Klink, Oberst

_____________________________

My Blog & on Twitter.
Visit CS Legion on Twitter & Facebook for updates.

(in reply to Tcao)
Post #: 84
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/22/2013 10:51:21 PM   
Falcon1


Posts: 171
Joined: 4/30/2012
From: United States
Status: offline 		There are various versions of the unofficial patch? I only saw one link in this thread. Are there others?

_____________________________


(in reply to kmitahj)
Post #: 85
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/23/2013 7:42:23 AM   
Oberst_Klink

 

Posts: 4778
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline 		Indeed! Check your PM Inbox.

Klink, Oberst

_____________________________

My Blog & on Twitter.
Visit CS Legion on Twitter & Facebook for updates.

(in reply to Falcon1)
Post #: 86
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/23/2013 9:29:36 AM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Falcon1

There are various versions of the unofficial patch? I only saw one link in this thread. Are there others?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Oberst_Klink

Indeed! Check your PM Inbox.

Klink, Oberst


Herrn Oberst

Now I am currious. What the others?

_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to Oberst_Klink)
Post #: 87
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 10/23/2013 4:11:36 PM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 3211
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline 		I would like to have a copy as well please

(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 88
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 11/25/2013 8:45:00 AM   
bluermonkey

 

Posts: 28
Joined: 10/9/2005
Status: offline 		Hi chaps,

After resolving a .dll issue to get this new exe to work, I get a new error message which says "there is an error with your serial number as entered". I only ever get this message when trying to use the "Opart3XBb" exe, not with the regular game. Anyone encountered this before?

I suspect I'll just have to wait for the official patch, but is anyone could help, that'd be great.

(in reply to Telumar)
Post #: 89
RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. - 11/25/2013 10:59:50 AM   
Oberst_Klink

 

Posts: 4778
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bluermonkey

Hi chaps,

After resolving a .dll issue to get this new exe to work, I get a new error message which says "there is an error with your serial number as entered". I only ever get this message when trying to use the "Opart3XBb" exe, not with the regular game. Anyone encountered this before?

I suspect I'll just have to wait for the official patch, but is anyone could help, that'd be great.

What about the other alternative .EXE files, e.g. Opart3Windows98.exe, Opart3Slow.exe? The executables themselves don't check the registry or serial, the .DLL that came with the installer do. I'd suggest to re-install the vanilla in another folder, apply the 3.4.202 patch with the installer.

Klink, Oberst

_____________________________

My Blog & on Twitter.
Visit CS Legion on Twitter & Facebook for updates.

(in reply to bluermonkey)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> RE: AA Patch - unofficial and temporary. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.875