Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/8/2013 4:26:18 AM   
SLAAKMAN


Posts: 2725
Joined: 7/24/2002
Status: offline
What a beautiful sub she was and what a tragic loss for such a great work of art!

quote:

French cruiser sub Surcouf. A cross between a surface cruiser, and a submarine!

Surcouf was sunk on 18 February 1942 about 80 mi (70 nmi; 130 km) north of Cristóbal, Colón, while en route for Tahiti via the Panama Canal. The American freighter Thompson Lykes, steaming alone from Guantanamo Bay on what was a very dark night, reported hitting and running down a partially submerged object which scraped along her side and keel. Her lookouts heard people in the water but the freighter carried on its course without stopping, as they thought that they had struck a German U-boat, though cries for help were heard in English. A signal was sent to Panama describing the incident. The loss of Surcouf was announced by the Free French Headquarters in London on 18 April 1942.

Inquiries into the incident were haphazard and late, while a later French inquiry supported the idea that the sinking had been due to "friendly fire"; this conclusion was supported by Rear Admiral Auphan in his book The French Navy in World War II in which he states: "for reasons which appear to have been primarily political, she was rammed at night in the Caribbean by an American freighter." Charles de Gaulle stated in his memoirs that Surcouf "had sunk with all hands".
The wreck lies 3,000 m (9,800 ft) deep at 10°40′N 79°32′WCoordinates: 10°40′N 79°32′W.
There is a memorial to Surcouf in Cherbourg harbor.


Name: Surcouf
Namesake: Robert Surcouf
Ordered: December 1927
Launched: 18 October 1929
Commissioned: May 1934
Struck: 6 December 1943
Identification: Pennant number: N N 3
Fate: Sunk, 18 February 1942

General characteristics
Type: Cruiser/Submarine
Displacement:
3,250 long tons (3,300 t) (surfaced)
4,304 long tons (4,373 t) (submerged)
2,880 long tons (2,930 t) (dead)

Length:
110 m (361 ft)

Beam:
9 m (29 ft 6 in)

Draft:
7.25 m (23 ft 9 in)

Installed power:
7,600 hp (5,700 kW) (surfaced)
3,400 hp (2,500 kW) (submerged)

Propulsion:
2 × Sulzer diesel engines (surfaced)
2 × electric motors (submerged)
2 × screws

Speed:
18.5 knots (34.3 km/h; 21.3 mph) (surfaced)
10 kn (19 km/h; 12 mph) (submerged)

Range:
Surfaced:
18,500 km (10,000 nmi; 11,500 mi) at 10 kn (19 km/h; 12 mph)
12,600 km (6,800 nmi; 7,800 mi) at 13.5 kn (25.0 km/h; 15.5 mph)
Submerged:
130 km (70 nmi; 81 mi) at 4.5 kn (8.3 km/h; 5.2 mph)
110 km (59 nmi; 68 mi) at 5 kn (9.3 km/h; 5.8 mph)

Endurance: 90 days

Test depth: 80 m (260 ft)

Boats & landing craft carried:
1 × motorboat in watertight deck well

Capacity: 280 long tons (280 t)

Complement: 8 officers and 110 men

Armament:
2 × 203 mm (8 in) guns (1x2)
2 × 37 mm (1.46 in) anti-aircraft guns (2x1)
4 × 13.2 mm (0.52 in) anti-aircraft machine guns (2x2)
8 × 550 mm (22 in) torpedo tubes (14 torpedoes)
4 × 400 mm (16 in) torpedo tubes (8 torpedoes)

Aircraft carried:
1 × Besson MB.411 floatplane



_____________________________

Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill
Post #: 1
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/8/2013 2:43:58 PM   
Josh

 

Posts: 2576
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Leeuwarden, Netherlands
Status: offline
An extra ordinairy ship for sure, the French always had great looking ships IMHO.

(in reply to SLAAKMAN)
Post #: 2
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/8/2013 7:56:35 PM   
Jeffrey H.


Posts: 3154
Joined: 4/13/2007
From: San Diego, Ca.
Status: offline
How did it get through the water with the holes in the turret thing ?


_____________________________

History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.

Ron Swanson

(in reply to Josh)
Post #: 3
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/8/2013 11:41:32 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffrey H.

How did it get through the water with the holes in the turret thing ?

warspite1

It didn't - you spotted the fatal flaw in her design and the real reason why she sank.





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Jeffrey H.)
Post #: 4
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/9/2013 1:08:28 AM   
Aurelian

 

Posts: 3916
Joined: 2/26/2007
Status: offline
It was the illuminati.

_____________________________

If the Earth was flat, cats would of knocked everything off of it long ago.

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 5
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/9/2013 1:22:45 AM   
WYBaugh

 

Posts: 155
Joined: 7/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Surcouf was designed as an "underwater cruiser", intended to seek and engage in surface combat.[1] For reconnaissance, she carried a Besson MB.411 observation floatplane in a hangar built abaft of the conning tower; for combat, she was armed with eight 550 mm (22 in) and four 400 mm (16 in) torpedo tubes and twin 203 mm (8 in) guns in a pressure-tight turret forward of the conning tower. The guns were fed from a magazine holding 60 rounds and controlled by a director with a 5 m (16 ft) rangefinder, mounted high enough to view a 11 km (5.9 nmi; 6.8 mi) horizon, and able to fire within three minutes after surfacing.[2] Using her periscopes to direct the fire of her main guns, Surcouf could increase this range to 16 km (8.6 nmi; 9.9 mi); originally an elevating platform was supposed to lift lookouts 15 m (49 ft) high, but this design was abandoned quickly due to the effect of roll.[3] In theory, the Besson observation plane could be used to direct fire out to the guns' 24 mi (21 nmi; 39 km) maximum range. Anti-aircraft cannon and machine guns were mounted on the top of the hangar.

Surcouf also carried a 4.5 m (14 ft 9 in) motorboat, and contained a cargo compartment with fittings to restrain 40 prisoners. The submarine's fuel tanks were very large; enough fuel for a 10,000 nmi (19,000 km; 12,000 mi) range and supplies for 90-day patrols could be carried.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_submarine_Surcouf


< Message edited by WBaugh -- 10/9/2013 1:24:10 AM >

(in reply to Aurelian)
Post #: 6
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/9/2013 1:37:40 AM   
danlongman

 

Posts: 586
Joined: 3/27/2012
From: Over the hills and far away
Status: offline
I dunno about the Illuminati although they did control the USAAF which
historically has been pretty good at killing things be they friend or foe.

_____________________________

"Patriotism: Your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw

(in reply to WYBaugh)
Post #: 7
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/9/2013 10:44:01 AM   
SLAAKMAN


Posts: 2725
Joined: 7/24/2002
Status: offline


< Message edited by SLAAKMAN -- 10/9/2013 8:07:02 PM >


_____________________________

Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill

(in reply to danlongman)
Post #: 8
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/9/2013 7:17:32 PM   
Aurelian

 

Posts: 3916
Joined: 2/26/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: danlongman

I dunno about the Illuminati although they did control the USAAF which
historically has been pretty good at killing things be they friend or foe.


Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure they did.

_____________________________

If the Earth was flat, cats would of knocked everything off of it long ago.

(in reply to danlongman)
Post #: 9
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/9/2013 7:37:03 PM   
Qwixt


Posts: 902
Joined: 6/19/2006
Status: offline
The other flaw I see is that you have to point the ship at your target. The turret doesn't look like it can turn. Doesn't really seem worth the extra underwater drag and weight, or the added complexity.

(in reply to Aurelian)
Post #: 10
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/9/2013 8:44:59 PM   
Zap


Posts: 3639
Joined: 12/6/2004
From: LAS VEGAS TAKE A CHANCE
Status: offline
Just curious if attempt was made to raise her?

_____________________________


(in reply to Qwixt)
Post #: 11
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/9/2013 10:30:36 PM   
Twotribes


Posts: 6929
Joined: 2/15/2002
From: Jacksonville NC
Status: offline
At 3000 feet depth she would have been crushed.

(in reply to Zap)
Post #: 12
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/10/2013 12:31:33 AM   
t001001001

 

Posts: 322
Joined: 4/30/2009
Status: offline
Captain, I hate to wake you, but we've hit something

I FELT AND HEARD IT. CUSS. I'M ALREADY AWAKE. I'LL BE UP THERE IN A SECOND...

ALRIGHT. WHAT'S UP?

There, captain.

I SEE IT. WTF IS THAT THING?

I dunno, sir.

OK. WELL. WHATEVER IT IS, NOTE THAT WE HIT SOMETHING AND BUMP UP THE THROTTLE A FEW KNOTS.

< Message edited by t001001001 -- 10/10/2013 12:39:10 AM >

(in reply to Twotribes)
Post #: 13
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/10/2013 8:29:12 PM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

The other flaw I see is that you have to point the ship at your target. The turret doesn't look like it can turn. Doesn't really seem worth the extra underwater drag and weight, or the added complexity.


On the other hand, tank destroyers and other turretless armored vehicles seem to have found a useful place. My own $.02 is that the Surcouf would have done well in the shore bombardment role: pop up at night, deliver a number of heavy rounds to an airfield or harbor, and then be underwater and safe from air attack by daybreak.

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to Qwixt)
Post #: 14
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/11/2013 2:18:50 AM   
Jeffrey H.


Posts: 3154
Joined: 4/13/2007
From: San Diego, Ca.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WBaugh

quote:

Surcouf was designed as an "underwater cruiser", intended to seek and engage in surface combat.[1] For reconnaissance, she carried a Besson MB.411 observation floatplane in a hangar built abaft of the conning tower; for combat, she was armed with eight 550 mm (22 in) and four 400 mm (16 in) torpedo tubes and twin 203 mm (8 in) guns in a pressure-tight turret forward of the conning tower. The guns were fed from a magazine holding 60 rounds and controlled by a director with a 5 m (16 ft) rangefinder, mounted high enough to view a 11 km (5.9 nmi; 6.8 mi) horizon, and able to fire within three minutes after surfacing.[2] Using her periscopes to direct the fire of her main guns, Surcouf could increase this range to 16 km (8.6 nmi; 9.9 mi); originally an elevating platform was supposed to lift lookouts 15 m (49 ft) high, but this design was abandoned quickly due to the effect of roll.[3] In theory, the Besson observation plane could be used to direct fire out to the guns' 24 mi (21 nmi; 39 km) maximum range. Anti-aircraft cannon and machine guns were mounted on the top of the hangar.

Surcouf also carried a 4.5 m (14 ft 9 in) motorboat, and contained a cargo compartment with fittings to restrain 40 prisoners. The submarine's fuel tanks were very large; enough fuel for a 10,000 nmi (19,000 km; 12,000 mi) range and supplies for 90-day patrols could be carried.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_submarine_Surcouf




Of course but what a lot of drag and noise ! Pre sonar for sure.



_____________________________

History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.

Ron Swanson

(in reply to WYBaugh)
Post #: 15
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/11/2013 4:25:47 AM   
Neilster


Posts: 2890
Joined: 10/27/2003
From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

Pre sonar for sure.


But SONAR, in the form of ASDIC, and passive detectors were both in service before Surcouf. France had a prototype ASDIC system in 1918.

Cheers, Neilster

(in reply to Jeffrey H.)
Post #: 16
RE: The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 - 10/12/2013 5:34:11 AM   
t001001001

 

Posts: 322
Joined: 4/30/2009
Status: offline
She could surface at night, fire a few dozens shells and not hit a dambed thing unless she got really, really lucky.

She was a piece of junk; that's why they only built one of her.

(in reply to Neilster)
Post #: 17
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> The tragic fate of French Sub Surcouf 1942 Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.188