Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: B-52 Loadouts

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: B-52 Loadouts Page: <<   < prev  140 141 [142] 143 144   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: B-52 Loadouts - 10/21/2018 9:33:30 AM   
KC45


Posts: 240
Joined: 11/23/2017
From: JPN
Status: offline
JGSDF's part! is not that huge

Chu-SAM kai information
https://www.army.mil/article/158283/Japanese_Test_Engages_Supersonic_Target_on_WSMR


Type-11 Tan-SAM kaiⅡ
https://defence-blog.com/army/japan-ground-self-defense-force-acquires-more-type-11-air-defence-systems.html

Type-16 MCV
https://defence-blog.com/army/japan-shows-new-type-16-mcv-during-fuji-firepower.html

Type 96 Multi-Purpose Missile System
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_96_Multi-Purpose_Missile_System
https://www.onwar.com/weapons/rocket/missiles/Type-96-Multi-Purpose-Missile-System.html

< Message edited by KC45 -- 11/4/2018 10:26:08 PM >


_____________________________

Steam CMANO Japanese Community(unofficial).

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4231
RE: B-52 Loadouts - 10/21/2018 9:54:17 AM   
KC45


Posts: 240
Joined: 11/23/2017
From: JPN
Status: offline
One more for JGSDF
Middle range Multi-Purpose missile
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_range_Multi-Purpose_missile

< Message edited by KC45 -- 10/21/2018 5:06:35 PM >


_____________________________

Steam CMANO Japanese Community(unofficial).

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4232
RE: B-52 Loadouts - 10/21/2018 9:55:01 AM   
KC45


Posts: 240
Joined: 11/23/2017
From: JPN
Status: offline
And for this is for JGSDF infantry
Type01 LMAT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_01_LMAT
http://weaponsystems.net/weaponsystem/BB06%20-%20Type%2001%20LMAT.html





< Message edited by KC45 -- 10/21/2018 5:45:35 PM >


_____________________________

Steam CMANO Japanese Community(unofficial).

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4233
RE: B-52 Loadouts - 10/21/2018 5:49:41 PM   
KC45


Posts: 240
Joined: 11/23/2017
From: JPN
Status: offline
some more JGSDF Forces
Type 87 Chu-MAT
http://weaponsystems.net/weaponsystem/BB06%20-%20Type%2087%20Chu-MAT.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_87_Chu-MAT

Type-87 ARV
https://www.army-technology.com/projects/type-87-reconnaissance-and-patrol-vehicle/
http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/coldwar/japan/type-87-wheeled-afv.php
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_87_ARV

Type 75 130 mm Multiple Rocket Launcher
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_75_130_mm_Multiple_Rocket_Launcher

Type 60 Armoured Personnel Carrier
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_60_Armoured_Personnel_Carrier

Type 73 Armored Personnel Carrier
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_73_Armored_Personnel_Carrier

Type 96 120 mm self-propelled mortar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_96_120_mm_self-propelled_mortar

Komatsu LAV (As you can see above. it can Launch Type-01 MAT)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komatsu_LAV

Scan Eagle for JGSDF
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/insitu-pacific-delivers-scaneagle-uas-for-the-japanese-ground-self-defense-force-207318911.html

Type87 Mine-Dispenser (This has Anti-tank and personnel variant/Japan remove Anti-paesonnel variant at 2003 due to Ottawa Treaty)
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/87%E5%BC%8F%E5%9C%B0%E9%9B%B7%E6%95%A3%E5%B8%83%E8%A3%85%E7%BD%AE



_____________________________

Steam CMANO Japanese Community(unofficial).

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4234
Japan Coast Guards Patrol boat for intercept DPRK boats - 10/21/2018 6:07:14 PM   
KC45


Posts: 240
Joined: 11/23/2017
From: JPN
Status: offline
JCG units for Intercept DPRK Spy boat, to deal with very fast boats, They all have 30+knots speed (so around 35~37 because Spyboat's max speed is 35 knots). Thay are important for Japan vs DPRK at sea.


Tsurugi-class patrol vessel (this can go with 50+knots)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsurugi-class_patrol_vessel

Aso-class patrol vessel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aso-class_patrol_vessel

Hida-class patrol vessel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hida-class_patrol_vessel

_____________________________

Steam CMANO Japanese Community(unofficial).

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4235
RE: Japan Coast Guards Patrol boat for intercept DPRK b... - 10/21/2018 9:01:22 PM   
LORDPrometheus

 

Posts: 131
Joined: 1/8/2018
Status: offline
As of Db3000 V.475 the MiG-35 and MiG-35D 2020 hypothetical units use the R-73 instead of the R-73M. I have no documentation that says they should be using the modern missile but considering every other modern Russian jet including the non-hypothetical versions of the same plane use it I think it is a fair bet that they are supposed to use it too.

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4236
RE: Japan Coast Guards Patrol boat for intercept DPRK b... - 10/22/2018 12:01:46 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
Another update on the upgraded Type-051B Luhai-class DDG; according to visitors who asked the sailors onboard the ship during open day and judging from the mounting points ontop the missile cannisters, as well as the official model of the ship, the option for sixteen YJ-12A AShMs still exists. Probably a rare loadout-option only reserved for wartime operations, but still.

https://lt.cjdby.net/thread-2505509-1-1.html



(in reply to LORDPrometheus)
Post #: 4237
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/22/2018 7:17:36 AM   
TyphoonFr

 

Posts: 138
Joined: 11/23/2017
From: FRA
Status: offline
France: Added SA532 UL Cougar to the French Army,and remove the SA.532SC from the French Navy (offer them to Brazil)

The AS.332 Super Puma is civilian version of the AS532 Cougar, the military version)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurocopter_AS532_Cougar
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%C3%A9rospatiale_AS532_Cougar


The French Navy has never owned the SA.532SC Cougar helicopter (ASW) but the French Army has SA.532 UL (Transport).

https://www.aviationsmilitaires.net/v2/base/view/Model/206.html

quote:

"France received 27 Cougar, ordered in 1987. 24 AS532 UL were paid to the ALAT (there are 18 left) and 3 to the Air Force (based in Evreux). of a contract in 2008 "


I think the SA.532SC Cougar (ASW) belongs to Brazil (UH14):

quote:

"The AS332 F, AS332 M naval derivative designed for anti-ship and anti-submarine warfare, is equipped with 2 Exocet missiles and an ORB-32 Omera radar. UH-14, since 1987. It has been sold to the Chilean Navy (5), Gabon (1), to the Indonesian Navy (5), and the AS332 F1, derived from it, became AS532 SC during the foundation of Eurocopter. "



The French Army (ALAT) still has 26 AS532 Cougar under renovation (AS532 Cougar renovated)
The modernization is focused on the integration of a new avionics suite and an improved autopilot, similar to that of the EC725 Caracal (Sensor/EW, Mounts/Stores/Weapons).
http://www.helicopters.airbus.com/website/en/ref/Upgrading-Cougars-for-the-French-Army_237.html
https://www.helicopassion.com/fr/01/14J14-02.htm



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by TyphoonFr -- 10/22/2018 7:36:19 AM >


_____________________________

Christophe

To all English teachers of the forum, sorry if English is not my mother language.

(in reply to Temple)
Post #: 4238
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/22/2018 6:40:39 PM   
CrazyIvan101

 

Posts: 37
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
Now that the INF is scrapped could a conventional "Pershing 3" be added as a hypothetical weapon that could be used against ground targets and and surface ships?

(in reply to TyphoonFr)
Post #: 4239
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/23/2018 2:37:55 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CrazyIvan101

Now that the INF is scrapped could a conventional "Pershing 3" be added as a hypothetical weapon that could be used against ground targets and and surface ships?

As well as some other ground-based AShMs that exceeded 500km range (like LRASM and NSM), too.

_____________________________


(in reply to CrazyIvan101)
Post #: 4240
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/23/2018 3:55:51 AM   
Whicker

 

Posts: 664
Joined: 6/20/2018
Status: offline
#1763 - strb 90HS sweden - 2000 LCP can't hold cargo but it is supposed to be a small personnel landing craft, 18 men according to WP.

Also #1762 which is an strb 90H.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CB90-class_fast_assault_craft

On a side note I wish all ships that have the ability to carry helicopters with a cargo load out could carry some cargo, even if it is just recon/inf in small qty.

< Message edited by Whicker -- 10/23/2018 5:43:48 AM >

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 4241
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/23/2018 4:16:28 AM   
jgsp84

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 12/11/2017
From: Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
Status: offline
Guys, how the update database works?
There are some months I've uploaded some updates for the Brazilian Armed Forces, but the only update processed was the A-140 Atlantico.
What is needed to process the other information?
Thanks.

_____________________________


(in reply to Whicker)
Post #: 4242
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/23/2018 7:01:32 AM   
Rory Noonan

 

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jgsp84

Guys, how the update database works?
There are some months I've uploaded some updates for the Brazilian Armed Forces, but the only update processed was the A-140 Atlantico.
What is needed to process the other information?
Thanks.


I am currently responsible for updating the DB3k; it's a big task and it's only one of my assigned roles. I prioriitise (generally) like this:

1. Needed platforms with easily available or well presented information
2. Needed platforms with difficult to obtain or scarce information
3. Corrections to existing platforms/weapons etc with easily verified sources
4. Wanted platforms presented with lots of data and easily verified sources
5. Wanted platforms with scarce, unverifiable or missing data

It's a bit more fluid than that but the general idea is that a major new platform with lots of available information is a much better investment of time than a esoteric platform with conlficting, vague or missing data.

The process of adding a new platform can take many hours, so it's not just a matter of plug in info and away we go. Each datapoint has to be verified and then implemented

_____________________________


(in reply to jgsp84)
Post #: 4243
RE: Japan Coast Guards Patrol boat for intercept DPRK b... - 10/23/2018 6:01:41 PM   
LORDPrometheus

 

Posts: 131
Joined: 1/8/2018
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

Another update on the upgraded Type-051B Luhai-class DDG; according to visitors who asked the sailors onboard the ship during open day and judging from the mounting points ontop the missile cannisters, as well as the official model of the ship, the option for sixteen YJ-12A AShMs still exists. Probably a rare loadout-option only reserved for wartime operations, but still.



The mount does look like you could put a second box on it but notice there are no connections for the electrical and communications links. The outer part of each bracket is clearly a lifting point and the bracket is not identical to the bracket on the launcher frame. I suspect it is not meant to mount a second container on top but rather has the pegs so they can be stacked while in storage. If you look at the Tomahawk box launcher it has the same thing but that was clearly never meant to be stacked

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 4244
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/23/2018 6:07:21 PM   
LORDPrometheus

 

Posts: 131
Joined: 1/8/2018
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: apache85


quote:

ORIGINAL: jgsp84

Guys, how the update database works?
There are some months I've uploaded some updates for the Brazilian Armed Forces, but the only update processed was the A-140 Atlantico.
What is needed to process the other information?
Thanks.


I am currently responsible for updating the DB3k; it's a big task and it's only one of my assigned roles. I prioriitise (generally) like this:

1. Needed platforms with easily available or well presented information
2. Needed platforms with difficult to obtain or scarce information
3. Corrections to existing platforms/weapons etc with easily verified sources
4. Wanted platforms presented with lots of data and easily verified sources
5. Wanted platforms with scarce, unverifiable or missing data

It's a bit more fluid than that but the general idea is that a major new platform with lots of available information is a much better investment of time than a esoteric platform with conlficting, vague or missing data.

The process of adding a new platform can take many hours, so it's not just a matter of plug in info and away we go. Each datapoint has to be verified and then implemented



So general rules for suggesting database additions go like this then?

1: Suggest real platforms either already in service or with finalized and available technical specifications

2: Suggest platforms that are significantly different from existing platforms and can expand gameplay.

3: Suggest database changes and point out corrections with supporting data.

(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 4245
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/23/2018 8:47:05 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline
CORRECTION REQUEST PLEASE:
Please add capable AGAINST SURFACE TARGETS for:
SA-26 [9M96D] (9M96E2 Export)
SA-25 [9M96] (9M96E Export)
SA-N-21c Growler [9M96] (2016, 9M96E Export)
SA-N-21d Growler [9M96D] (9M96E2 Export)
Aka 9M96-1
9M96
Also consider change to effective range of 9M96-1/9M96D as RG article and release from Northern Fleet states 150km maximum range not 120km.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2018/october-2018-navy-naval-defense-news/6579-admiral-gorshkov-frigate-qualifies-poliment-redut-sam-against-air-surface-targets.html
https://rg.ru/2018/10/23/reg-szfo/raketnye-strelby-fregata-admiral-gorshkov-sniali-na-video.html

Thanks for considering,
K

(in reply to LORDPrometheus)
Post #: 4246
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/23/2018 9:23:15 PM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline
I believe the F XX Glasgow [Type 26] class should have the tomahawk command datalink. It has Mk41 VLS with tomahawk missiles.

Thanks

(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 4247
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/23/2018 11:10:39 PM   
jgsp84

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 12/11/2017
From: Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: apache85


I am currently responsible for updating the DB3k; it's a big task and it's only one of my assigned roles. I prioriitise (generally) like this:

1. Needed platforms with easily available or well presented information
2. Needed platforms with difficult to obtain or scarce information
3. Corrections to existing platforms/weapons etc with easily verified sources
4. Wanted platforms presented with lots of data and easily verified sources
5. Wanted platforms with scarce, unverifiable or missing data

It's a bit more fluid than that but the general idea is that a major new platform with lots of available information is a much better investment of time than a esoteric platform with conlficting, vague or missing data.

The process of adding a new platform can take many hours, so it's not just a matter of plug in info and away we go. Each datapoint has to be verified and then implemented


Apache85, thanks for the reply.
The updates I've made was basically corrections to existing platforms and their loadout. If there is something I can make to facilitate your work, please let me know.
Only for the record, my original post was #3949 and #3954

One last question: what about hypothetical units, how I should proceed?




_____________________________


(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 4248
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/23/2018 11:24:15 PM   
Ancalagon451

 

Posts: 330
Joined: 1/4/2018
Status: offline
quote:

CORRECTION REQUEST PLEASE:
Please add capable AGAINST SURFACE TARGETS for


Wouldn't that be covered by the "Use SAM in ASuW mode" doctrine option?

Ancalagon

(in reply to jgsp84)
Post #: 4249
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/23/2018 11:41:00 PM   
Rory Noonan

 

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LORDPrometheus

So general rules for suggesting database additions go like this then?

1: Suggest real platforms either already in service or with finalized and available technical specifications

2: Suggest platforms that are significantly different from existing platforms and can expand gameplay.

3: Suggest database changes and point out corrections with supporting data.

Looks pretty good to me!

_____________________________


(in reply to LORDPrometheus)
Post #: 4250
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/23/2018 11:46:45 PM   
Rory Noonan

 

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jgsp84


quote:

ORIGINAL: apache85


I am currently responsible for updating the DB3k; it's a big task and it's only one of my assigned roles. I prioriitise (generally) like this:

1. Needed platforms with easily available or well presented information
2. Needed platforms with difficult to obtain or scarce information
3. Corrections to existing platforms/weapons etc with easily verified sources
4. Wanted platforms presented with lots of data and easily verified sources
5. Wanted platforms with scarce, unverifiable or missing data

It's a bit more fluid than that but the general idea is that a major new platform with lots of available information is a much better investment of time than a esoteric platform with conlficting, vague or missing data.

The process of adding a new platform can take many hours, so it's not just a matter of plug in info and away we go. Each datapoint has to be verified and then implemented


Apache85, thanks for the reply.
The updates I've made was basically corrections to existing platforms and their loadout. If there is something I can make to facilitate your work, please let me know.
Only for the record, my original post was #3949 and #3954

One last question: what about hypothetical units, how I should proceed?




Ask away! There's nothing to lose, the guidelines I set out above are just that. Just be aware that due to the number of requests (multiple per day) and the rate at which they can be filled--also some are simply not feasible for a variety of reasons--your request may take a long time to get filled or it may not happen at all.

For hypotheticals the more likely they are to have widespread utility and the better (realistic) information available the more likely I'll be able to add them in a shorter timeframe.

_____________________________


(in reply to jgsp84)
Post #: 4251
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/24/2018 12:58:12 AM   
jgsp84

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 12/11/2017
From: Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: apache85
Ask away! There's nothing to lose, the guidelines I set out above are just that. Just be aware that due to the number of requests (multiple per day) and the rate at which they can be filled--also some are simply not feasible for a variety of reasons--your request may take a long time to get filled or it may not happen at all.

For hypotheticals the more likely they are to have widespread utility and the better (realistic) information available the more likely I'll be able to add them in a shorter timeframe.


Ok, Apache85. Thanks for the reply, again.

_____________________________


(in reply to Rory Noonan)
Post #: 4252
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/24/2018 7:38:36 AM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline
Please update Sa'ar 6 corvette with these weapons:

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2018/february-2018-navy-naval-defense-news/5947-tkms-cut-1st-steel-of-first-israeli-navy-saar-6-corvette.html

The Saar 6 class was developed from the German MEKO A100 base (and variations for the German Navy K130 corvettes). The Saar 6 vessels will not just be "Patrol Vessels" as initially reported but rather powerful Corvettes with a displacement in excess of 2,000 tons and a length of 90 meters.The width of the class is 13.5 meters and its draft is more than 4 meters. Their maximum speed is 26 knots thanks to their diesel power plant and dual-shaft arrangement. The crew complement is about 70 sailors.

Saar 6 class corvettes will be heavily armed for their size: They are set to be fitted with:
- 32x VLS cells for Barak 8 surface to air missile system by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI)
- 2x C-DOME naval point defense system launchers by Rafael (20x Tamir missiles in each launcher for a total of 40x per ship)
- 16x anti-ship missiles (Boeing Harpoon Block 2 or Israel's IAI Gabriel Mk 5)
- 1x 76mm Oto Melara Super Rapid main gun
- 2x Typhoon 25mm remote weapon stations by Rafael (likely able to launch Spike-ER missiles as well)
- 2x 324mm torpedo launchers for MK54 Lightweight Torpedo by Raytheon

The main sensor system aboard the Saar 6 will be the MF-STAR multifunction AESA radar by IAI. Saar 6 corvettes will have hangar space and platform able to accommodate a medium class (SH-60 type) helicopter.

Also:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sa%27ar_6-class_corvette



_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to jgsp84)
Post #: 4253
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/24/2018 8:55:57 AM   
TAAAS

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 9/15/2018
From: ROK
Status: offline
http://gall.dcinside.com/mgallery/board/view/?id=war&no=516969&page=1

I post it for testing I can add link, sorry.

< Message edited by TAAAS -- 10/24/2018 8:56:59 AM >

(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 4254
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/24/2018 9:07:04 AM   
TAAAS

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 9/15/2018
From: ROK
Status: offline
Hi, I’ll talking about Database update of Republic of Korea Air Force. Thank you for read my post.

ADD NEW A/C on DB 3000

#???? F-16C Blk32 Falcon [F-16PBU], 2014
#???? F-16D Blk32 Falcon [F-16PBU], 2014

Sensors & Mounts are not change with F-16C/D Peace Bridge.

Weapon Store (Add these weapons to F-16C/D Blk32 Peace Bridge Store)
AIM-120B --- Strike Loadout
AIM-120C-5 --- Air Superiority Loadout
AIM-9M --- Replace AIM-9P-4
AGM-88B
GBU-31(V)1/B JDAM [Mk84]
GBU-31(V)3/B JDAM [BLU-109/B]

-> In 2013~2015, ROKAF upgraded their old F-16C/D Blk32 Fighters. AIM-120B/C AMRAAM, JDAM, AGM-88 HARM, AIM-9M integrated on these fighters. Also, LINK 16 added on them. (+ Radar upgraded for using AMRAAM)

http://defensetimes.kr/article/view.php?&ss=7&bbs_id=DefenceTimes_news&doc_num=380 (Defensetimes News, Korean)

http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/republic-korea-f-16-block-32-aircraft-upgrades (DSCA)

------------------------------------------

# ???? F-16CJ Blk 52 Falcon [KF-16C, F-16V Upgraded], 2019
# ???? F-16DJ Blk 52 Falcon [KF-16D, F-16V Upgraded], 2019

Sensor – AN/APG-83 SABR, ASPJ, AN/ALR-56M Upgraded, AN/ALQ-213 MAWS
Mount – Same as KF-16C/D (ver.2011)

Weapon Store
- AAM : AIM-120C-5, AIM-9X-2
- AGM : AGM-88B, AGM-65G2, AGM-84L Harpoon II
- Unguided Bomb : Mk84, Mk82, Mk20 Rockeye
- Guided Bomb : GBU-31(V)1/B, GBU-31(V)3/B, GBU-10E/B, GBU-12D/B, GBU-39 SDB, GBU-54 LJDAM, GBU-105 WCMD
- Fuel Tank : 300/370 USG
- Pod : AN/AAQ-33 SNIPER XR, AAQ-13/14 LANTIRN, K/ALQ-200K DECM

-> S.Korea Government cancelled KF-16 Upgrade with BAE systems in 2014. And, Start upgrade with Lockheed Martin. Upgraded KF-16 will have these things.

a) AN/APG-83 SABR radar and AN/ALQ-213 MAWS (BAE suggested RACR and LM suggested SABR)
b) JHMCS II with Night Vision, can use AIM-9X blk2
c) Harpoon Block II, WCMD, SDB intergrated
d) LINK 16 MIDS-LVT Upgrade

https://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/the-wonders-of-link-16-for-less-midslvts-updated-02471/ (About LINK-16)
http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/republic-korea-rok-kf-16-upgrade-program (DSCA)

-------------------------------------------

#???? Falcon 2000S [701 Project, ELINT/SAR]

Sensor
- NexSAR (Same Spec with Global Hawk Sensor Package[ISAR])
- IRST
- Generic ESM (Advanced)
- Generic Comms Moniter (Advanced)

-> Project 701 is Surveillance Aircraft Project preceded Baekdu/Geumgang Aircraft. (I wanted to suggest these two, but I don’t have refer about them. Let’s see them later with refer.)

Before Project 701, Baekdu (ELINT) / Geumgang (SAR) divided Electronic Recon Mission. Project 701 combined these two fuction in one platform. Because Falcon 2000S is bigger than Hawker 800(Aircraft for Baekdu/Geumgang System).

On Photo Link, We can see Large Pod (IRST & SAR) under front fuselage, small pod under rear fuselage (ELINT & COMMINT).

SAR of Project 701 guessed LG electronics NexSAR. 30cm resolution yield is similar to Global Hawk Sensor Package.

https://academic.naver.com/article.naver?doc_id=17611717&dir_id=0&page=0&query=nexsar&ndsCategoryId=10512 (refer about NexSAR)

https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&oid=214&aid=0000766768&sid1=001 (News, Korean)

https://defense-update.com/20120106_south-korea-buy-two-dassault-surveillance-jets.html

https://m.blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=kismet71&logNo=220865130824&proxyReferer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.co.kr%2F (Photo)

https://www.dassaultfalcon.com/en/Aircraft/Models/2000S/Pages/overview.aspx (Falcon 2000S aircraft spec)

-----------------------------------

#???? F-15K Eagle, 2013, AIM-120C-7

Same as F-15K Eagle 2010 ver. / Replace AIM-120C-5 to AIM-120C-7.

-> South Korea Bought many AIM-120C-7 AAMs.

https://www.airforce-technology.com/news/newssouth-korea-requests-aim-120c-7-amraam-sale-from-us/ (2013)

https://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/South-Korea-Buying-Weapons-for-its-new-F-15Ks-04942/ (2008)


(in reply to TAAAS)
Post #: 4255
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/24/2018 9:28:24 AM   
TAAAS

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 9/15/2018
From: ROK
Status: offline
Next Post about retrofit roadouts of Korean Fighter fleet.

# 4516 F-16CJ Blk52 Falcon [RKF-16C, Recon/SEAD], 2015

Weapon Store(Add these weapons to RKF-16C store before)
AIM-120C-5 ---- Replace AIM-120B
Condor-2, ARD-300K [TAC-ELINT], EL/M-2060P, AN/AAQ-33 SNIPER XR

Condor-2 is heavy recon pod, I think it can be same performance with DB-110.
ARD-300K pod is ELINT pod, I think it can be equal with‘Generic ESM [Advanced]'.
EL/M-2060P is SAR pod, I think it can be equal with‘Generic SAR/MTI’. (that sensor is in Patroller UAV)

Three Recon loadouts are similar. 1 Recon Pod on Centerline, 2 370USG tank, 2 AIM-120C-5, 2 AIM-9S.

-> There is no recon pod on RKF-16, in spite of 'Recon' wroted on DB

a. Condor-2 EO/IR reconnaissance pod : ROKAF purchased Condor-2 pod (Elbit Systems) through EO-X project.

https://twitter.com/netchan1129/status/998139412125925381 (Picture of korean F-16 have Condor-2 pod)
http://www.ytn.co.kr/_ln/0101_200602131014002304 (News that mean Elop[Elbit electro optics] win at EO-X)

b. EL/M-2060P SAR pod : RKF-16 Also have EL/M-2060P SAR pod.

http://www.israeldefense.co.il/en/content/iai-awarded-multi-million-contract-advanced-airborne-sargmti-system
https://milidom.net/freeboard/878648 (레이더 영상장비 사업” means “SAR POD project. Elbit Systems got this project, and EL/M-2060P is their suggestion.)

c. ARD-300K [Tac-ELINT] POD : EL/M-2060P and Condor-2 made in Israel, but ARD-300K is korean own made pod.

http://www.kjclub.com/kr/board/exc_board_53/view/id/176466/page/886?&sst=wr_count_like&sod=desc

--------------------------------------------

#160 F-16C Blk32 Falcon [Peace Bridge]
#3548 F-16D Blk32 Flacon [Peace Bridge]

+ AIM-9L missile for Air Superiority loadout

-> In DB3000, F-16C/D Blk32 Peace Bridge Fighters only can intergrated AIM-9P-4 missile for Air to Air Fight. But, F-16 Peace Bridge can use AIM-9L.

Now, Photo of Korean F-16 Peace Bridge armed with AIM-9 on above link.(5th Picture is F-16C Blk32) Fin of that sidewinder looks triangle shape of L version, not trapezoid shape of P version.

https://m.blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=orangeshirts&logNo=220798259427

------------------------------------------

#3457 F-16C Blk52 Falcon [KF-16C] --- 2011 ver.
#3544 F-16D Blk52 Falcon [KF-16D] --- 2011 ver.

Weapon Store (Add these weapons to KF-16C/D [2011 ver.] store)
AN/AAQ-33 SNIPER XR
AIM-120C-5 ----- Air Superiority loadout

&

#4514 F-15K Eagle (2017 ver.)
#3658 F-15K Eagle (2010 ver.)
(and my Suggestion F-15K 2013ver.)

+ AN/AAQ-33 SNIPER POD

-> a. SNIPER POD on KF-16 & F-15K : ROKAF got SNIPER pod at FX-2 project (with 21 F-15K). These pods are used on F-15K & KF-16.

http://www.d2b.go.kr/pcb/bid/bidAnnounceView.do?key=114 (Korean DAPA military support bidding announcement page. You can see “SNIPER POD field inspection equipment for (K)F-16“ on google translater.
https://youtu.be/GWxahGyqiZE (ROKAF exercise “Soaring Eagle 2016“ Video, You can watch sniper pod on F-15K and KF-16s.)

b. KF-16/F-16PBU for AMRAAM charlie : Here is a picture that ROKAF KF-16 armed with AIM-120C (maybe C-5). You can see charlie’s smaller pin than bravo.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by TAAAS -- 10/24/2018 9:41:38 AM >

(in reply to TAAAS)
Post #: 4256
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/24/2018 11:26:32 AM   
TAAAS

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 9/15/2018
From: ROK
Status: offline
Here is Korean Ballistic Missile update points.

1) Hyunmoo-2A/B (2017.ver)
ROKA Upgraded Hyumnoo-2A/B Missiles.
On 2017 News, Hyunmoo-2A's warhead weight is increased to 1.5ton.
And on first link, we can see changement between first public test of Hyunmoo-2A and 2017 test.

So, I suggest Hyunmoo-2A/B 2017 ver. 's warhead can be increase to 1500kg/1000kg.
Also, Its CEP can be reduce.

http://gall.dcinside.com/mgallery/board/view?id=war&no=38274
http://news.mk.co.kr/newsRead.php?sc=&cm=&year=2017&no=595417
(Both are korean, Sorry.)

----------------------------------

2) KTSSM(Korean Tactical Surface to Surface Missile)

Hyunmoo-2 Missiles are too expensive for attack tactical targets. So, ROKA made KTSSM.
KTSSM is based on K-BATS(Korean-Ballistic Aerial Target System) Missile.
It has 180km(100NM) Range, 500kg Thermobaric Warhead, 10m CEP and launched in Quad Fixed Launcher.

http://www.add.re.kr/move.do?usr_menu_cd=0102050800 (Korean Agency for Defense Development Page)
http://www.janes.com/article/61443/k-bats-simulates-ballistic-missiles-es2016d4 (JANES)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWo8pljEX50 (Can watch Thermobaric Warhead detonation)
https://www.hanwhacorp.co.kr/defense/business/area1_1.jsp (Hanhwa Page, KTSSM is third product)

3) Hyunmoo-2C and ASBM capability
Hyunmoo-2C is 800km Range ballistic missile. Actually, It has too many different points with Hyunmoo-2A/B.

1) It uses 10x10 TEL. (A/B uses 8x8 TEL)
2) It is two stage missile. (More detail, It has seperating RV.)
3) Its RV have Canard for attitude control.

Also, Hyunmoo-2C guessed to become ASBM.
S.Korea completed ASBM application Technology of Multimode Seeker in 2017.
And, Hyunmoo-2C have enough ability for become ASBM (Canard for Attitude controls and good CEP)

https://youtu.be/fgpoTLpuFHg?t=30
https://news.joins.com/article/21702078
https://missilethreat.csis.org/missile/hyunmoo-2c/










Attachment (1)

< Message edited by TAAAS -- 10/24/2018 11:30:33 AM >

(in reply to TAAAS)
Post #: 4257
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/24/2018 4:43:29 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline
Ref capability against surface vessels, as I understand it.
The use SAM in ASuW role is a rule of engagement / doctrine setting, the weapon still has to be capable of hitting surface targets in its target sets in the Db. Otherwise all the older weapons which can't differentiate against ground clutter etc would be capable of being used against surface targets just by changing the ROE.
There are a number of modern SAM systems which are capable of hitting surface targets which aren't listed as such in Db3k. Sea Ceptor was case in point but I haven't checked 475 to see if it was amended. Sea Ceptor was designed to combat swarming small surface craft / USV and has been tested as such.
The ROE/Doctrine setting stops the expenditure of costly SAM's which are ASuW capable against surface targets when there are more suitable options available unless the player deems it appropriate/expedient .
Regards
K

(in reply to Ancalagon451)
Post #: 4258
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 10/24/2018 7:24:32 PM   
Ancalagon451

 

Posts: 330
Joined: 1/4/2018
Status: offline
I've just checked and you are correct, I thought it was the other way.

Live to learn about command

Ancalagon

(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 4259
RE: B-52 Loadouts - 10/25/2018 2:47:06 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
Please added Egyptian Wing Long. Look like.

Picture and Jane's announce

https://www.janes.com/article/83919/egypt-shows-wing-loong-uav

#4727 in DB look similar.

Want

Thank!

(in reply to KC45)
Post #: 4260
Page:   <<   < prev  140 141 [142] 143 144   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: B-52 Loadouts Page: <<   < prev  140 141 [142] 143 144   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.063