RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Page: << < prev 151 152 [153] 154 155 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 5/4/2019 11:31:23 PM

gennyo

Posts: 68
Joined: 4/3/2019
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CV60

Possible error in the SA-8 /SA-N-4 GECKO series. (Weapon_850; Weapon_574; Weapon_1422; Weapon_1829; Weapon_1828; Weapon_2043). These are listed in the database as using SARH homing. In fact, they use command guidance with the POPGROUP (SA-N-4 series) or the LAND ROLL-series FC system (SA-8 series) The following citations confirm the command guidance

I found the same problem as far as I used old soviet SAMs for the first time.

Even the SA-2 Guidelines, textbook example of command guidance, are SARH guided.

With the new program updates about target fire control information acquisition, I think the reason for these changes before is to prevent any idiots (like me) using an AN/SPY-3 on Zumwalts providing FC, and swat all F-35s from the sky with these flying telephone poles.

It's super unreal, like AEGIS equipped Iowas (which I'd done before... I love these freaky ideas).

But with recent updates on simulation mechanics, maybe we can hope for a more authentic behaviour for those veterans?

...and I will stick an AN/SPY-X on Fan Song and swat everything from the sky

< Message edited by gennyo -- 5/4/2019 11:32:21 PM >

(in reply to CV60)

Post #: 4561

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 5/5/2019 1:06:16 PM

Pancor

Posts: 71
Joined: 6/18/2015
From: Indonesia
Status: offline

I dont know if this is relevant or not
but the Type 26 Frigate in DBID respectively #2795, #2514 has a new sonar name Type 2150
Source:
https://www.ultra-css.com/media/ultra-electronics-command-sonar-systems-awarded-contract-to-supply-sonar-type-2150-to-the-first-three-of-eight-planned-uk-royal-navy-type-26-frigates
http://www.deagel.com/Sensor-Systems/Sonar-2150_a002391002.aspx
https://defpost.com/ultra-electronics-sonar-systems-type-26-global-combat-ship-canada-csc-program/

Thanks for bringing this awesome game, Cheers

_____________________________

(in reply to gennyo)

Post #: 4562

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 5/6/2019 12:15:59 AM

lumiere

Posts: 99
Joined: 3/19/2019
From: Japan
Status: offline

(v1.15 Build 1009.27.14/DB3000 Build 477)
One of my never-come true scenarios is WWIII-Battle of the Atlantic scenario and
I came up with carrying Harrier on marchant vessel (modern MAC!), as an interceptor for fussy Bear.

Luckily, DB3000 database has Atlantic Conveyor, British RO/RO vessel which was used as actual "Harrier Carrier" in Falklands War.
However, Atlantic Conveyor couldn't carry Harrier (I tried Marines AV-8A/#2399 and Harrier GR.3/#787), showing "Out of space!" message
(I was able to add Helicopters though).

I checked Aircraft size of Harrier and Parking Spot Capacity of Atlantic Convayor, the former is "Medium Aircraft (12.1-18m Long)"
and the latter is "Large Aircraft (18.1-26m Long)" so there seems to be no problem (at least physically) to carry Harrier.

Moreover, I noticed any destoyer/cruiser could not carry Harrier even if they had Medium Aircraft-capability Helipad, while
US LHA or Japanese Hyuga or Izumo-class DDH could carry Harrier or F-35B on their the same Medium Aircraft-capability Parking Spot.

My hypothethesis is, whether a ship could carry fixed wing aircraft is determined by ship's category (Surface Combatant, Carrier (Aviation Carrier)...)

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by lumiere -- 5/6/2019 12:16:14 AM >

_____________________________

"War claims its bitter, useless, sacrifice."

(in reply to Pancor)

Post #: 4563

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 5/6/2019 6:59:15 AM

Rory Noonan

Posts: 2816
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lumiere
My hypothethesis is, whether a ship could carry fixed wing aircraft is determined by ship's category (Surface Combatant, Carrier (Aviation Carrier)...)

That's correct.

The Atlantic Conveyor transported Harriers to the Falklands AO where they then transferred to the carriers to commence ops. I don't think they were routinely landing and taking off from the Atlantic Conveyor...

quote:

Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Atlantic_Conveyor

One Chinook of B flight No. 18 Squadron RAF left Atlantic Conveyor to support operations on Ascension. With the aircraft stored she then set sail for the South Atlantic. On arrival off the Falklands in mid-May, all of the Harriers were off-loaded to the carriers; the GR.3s going to HMS Hermes while the Sea Harriers were divided amongst the existing squadrons on Hermes and HMS Invincible. With the additional aircraft on Hermes a Lynx HAS.2 helicopter was flown and parked on Atlantic Conveyor on 20 May 1982.

However I suppose they did obviously have the capability to do so, so I'll update the vessel type to allow fixed wing ops.

< Message edited by apache85 -- 5/6/2019 7:05:30 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to lumiere)

Post #: 4564

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 5/6/2019 7:21:48 AM

lumiere

Posts: 99
Joined: 3/19/2019
From: Japan
Status: offline

Thanks!!

_____________________________

"War claims its bitter, useless, sacrifice."

(in reply to Rory Noonan)

Post #: 4565

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 5/6/2019 1:29:39 PM

Broncepulido

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline

In fact at the Atlantic Conveyor deck was in "Deck Alert 20" an uncocooned Sea Harrier with 2xSidewinder (the other 6xHarrier GR.3 and 7xSea Harrier were cocooned as protection against the sea action):
Between many sources:
https://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2012/04/the-atlantic-conveyor-falklands30/ (with photo)
https://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/air-war-in-the-falklands-32214512/
https://books.google.es/books?id=fs6PAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA265&lpg=PA265&dq=sea+harrier+atlantic+conveyor+deck+alert&source=bl&ots=kM-q7oiHGy&sig=ACfU3U2qOqSzsB81948IfmHcw9zenPJP1A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiO-IOLg4fiAhX9DGMBHS0BC6QQ6AEwCXoECAYQAQ#v=onepage&q=sea%20harrier%20atlantic%20conveyor%20deck%20alert&f=false

< Message edited by Broncepulido -- 5/6/2019 1:43:30 PM >

(in reply to lumiere)

Post #: 4566

RE: DB Requests - 5/8/2019 2:31:07 PM

orca

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline

News about �Block 2 Growler�

Proposed Upgrades include
-enhancements to Northrop Grumman�s ALQ-218 sensor system
-low-drag conformal fuel tanks

https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/navy-league/2019/05/07/the-ea-18g-growler-electronic-attack-plane-is-about-to-get-even-more-lethal/

quote:

ORIGINAL: orca

Any chance F/A-18 Super Hornet block 3 (advanced super hornet) can be added? Also growler variant? Maybe as hypothetical for now?

Conformal fuel tanks with 3500lb fuel
50% reduced frontal rcs
Enclosed weapons bay
Internal IRST
Enhanced engines with increased thrust and fuel efficiency

https://www.dodbuzz.com/2017/02/17/trump-order-fa-18xt-super-hornets/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_F/A-18E/F_Super_Hornet#Advanced_Super_Hornet
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/f-35c-vs-fa-18-advanced-super-hornet-carrier-aircraft-2017-2
http://www.defenseone.com/business/2017/03/boeing-launches-info-war-navys-f-35/136614/

(in reply to orca)

Post #: 4567

RE: DB Requests - 5/11/2019 4:17:09 PM

Joelsi

Posts: 113
Joined: 10/17/2018
From: Finland
Status: offline

The MALD and MALD-J are too slow.

According to these sources, the speed should be increased to around 600kts (~Mach 0.9) for the ADM-160B MALD and ADM-160C MALD-J

Sources:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110901125641/http://www.vectorsite.net/twuav_06.html#m4
https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/miniature-air-launched-decoy-mald-flight-vehicle/
(note: MALAD is just a typo)

(in reply to orca)

Post #: 4568

RE: DB Requests - 5/16/2019 1:23:42 PM

Dysta

Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline

Four Type 051 Destroyers are decommissioned, it�s time to put (-2019) in the asset name:

https://twitter.com/dafengcao/status/1128878991379582976

(in reply to Joelsi)

Post #: 4569

RE: DB Requests - 5/16/2019 6:18:22 PM

stilesw

Posts: 1497
Joined: 6/26/2014
From: Hansville, WA, USA
Status: offline

Noted, thanks.

-WS

(in reply to Dysta)

Post #: 4570

RE: DB Requests - 5/16/2019 11:13:29 PM

ARCNA442

Posts: 158
Joined: 4/7/2018
Status: offline

The 2016 and 2018 database entries for the British FGR.4 Typhoon and T.3 Typhoon (#4703, #1033, #4704, and #3625) currently have the CAPTOR-E AESA radar. In reality, all Typhoon variants still have the older CAPTOR mechanically scanned radars. The first CAPTOR-E is not scheduled for delivery until mid-2019, and the customer is Kuwait, not Britain. As far as I can tell, Britain currently has no formal plan to upgrade its fleet to CAPTOR-E, but a hypothetical mid-2020's upgrade might be worth including in the database.

Source; https://www.airforce-technology.com/news/hensoldt-antenna-leonardo-captor-e-radar/ (second to last paragraph)

(in reply to stilesw)

Post #: 4571

RE: DB Requests - 5/18/2019 9:16:30 AM

Filitch

Posts: 423
Joined: 6/25/2016
From: St. Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline

Please,
- Add for soviet aircraft carriers Pr.1143 - 1143.4 properties:
8107 Refuel from Starboard x 2 (In)
8006 Refuel to Starboard x 2 (Out)
9106 Replenish from Starboard x 2 (In)
9006 Replenish to Starboard x 2 (Out)

- Increase Hangar (ship aircraft facilities 120, 122, 123) capacity up to 36.
- Decrease Open Parking (ship aircraft facilities 120) capacity to 10.
- Increase aviation fuel (477) for 148 TAKR Admiral Gorshkov up to 1500 tones
- Increase aviation fuel for others up to 1200 tones

Carriers:
148 TAKR Admiral Gorshkov [Pr.1143.4 Krechyet]
149 TAKR Novorossiysk [Pr.1143.3 Krechyet]
150 TAKR Kiev [Pr.1143 Krechyet]
1532 TAKR Novorossiysk [Pr.1143.3 Krechyet]
1533 TAKR Kiev [Pr.1143 Krechyet]
1979 TAKR Minsk [Pr.1143 Krechyet]
1980 TAKR Minsk [Pr.1143 Krechyet]
2154 TAKR Kiev [Pr.1143 Krechyet]
2282 TAKR Minsk [Pr.1143 Krechyet]

Sources:
Pr. 1143 Kiev http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-366.html
Pr. 11434 Modified Kiev http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-368.html
Zabolotskiy V.P. Heavy aircraft carrying cruiser "Kiev" http://wunderwaffe.narod.ru/Magazine/MK/2004_04/
Zabolotskiy V.P. Heavy aircraft carrying cruisers "Minsk", "Novorossiysk", "Baku" http://wunderwaffe.narod.ru/Magazine/MK/2003_07/index.htm
Apalkov Y.V. Battleships ISBN 978-903080-40-3

Photo:

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Filitch -- 5/18/2019 9:18:12 AM >

(in reply to ARCNA442)

Post #: 4572

RE: DB Requests - 5/18/2019 3:53:59 PM

stilesw

Posts: 1497
Joined: 6/26/2014
From: Hansville, WA, USA
Status: offline

Roman,

Logged. Thanks for the references. This request is in the (relatively long) list of DB3K data base modifications.
Please be patient - changes are not done immediately - each change is prioritized, some will require further research and some will not result in a change. As appropriate, changes will be included in the next data base update.

-Wayne

(in reply to Filitch)

Post #: 4573

RE: DB Requests - 5/18/2019 5:18:57 PM

stilesw

Posts: 1497
Joined: 6/26/2014
From: Hansville, WA, USA
Status: offline

For log. Translated documents attached.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to stilesw)

Post #: 4574

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/20/2019 4:11:06 AM

Dragon029

Posts: 76
Joined: 10/31/2015
Status: offline

I've found that F-35s (at least the 2025 USAF F-35A in DB3000 #477) are incapable of detecting P-18s passively. I went and checked the database and it appears that the ASQ-239 only detects frequencies between 1GHz and 40GHz (while the P-18 operates in Band A).

There isn't any public data on what specific bands or frequencies the F-35's ASQ-239 is meant to be able to detect, but the ASQ-239 (or at least the passive ESM aspect of it that we're talking about) has 2 primary duties; one being the operation as an RWR (which in itself would involve detecting a wide number of bands), and the other being a passive geolocation system for locating SAMs.

SAM fire control radars do pretty much exclusively operate at 1GHz+, but with the F-35 designed to combat threats like the S-300 and S-400 (with supporting VHF Nebo-M, etc radars), it seems illogical for these jets to not be capable of detecting VHF radars like the P-18 (especially when a P-18 specifically was fairly instrumental in the downing of an F-117 over Serbia).

To play devil's advocate, diagrams like the one below describe the ASQ-239 as having Band 2/3/4 coverage (there's also plans in Block 4 to expand Band 2 & add Band 5 coverage), which means it lacks Band 1, but Band 1/2/3/4/5 are classified internal Pentagon or JSF Program Office definitions, so for all we know, Band 2 may only start at something like 500MHz, or it might start at something like 50MHz.

(in reply to ExNusquam)

Post #: 4575

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/20/2019 1:34:57 PM

stilesw

Posts: 1497
Joined: 6/26/2014
From: Hansville, WA, USA
Status: offline

Logged. Added to the list of changes, fixes and update requests.

Thanks for the input.

-Wayne

(in reply to Dragon029)

Post #: 4576

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/22/2019 11:20:43 PM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

South Korean LPH 6112 ROKS Marado has slightly different configurations that first ship (#670 LPH-6111 Dokdo) so maybe new entry?

IOC 2020

Change Displayed nicely in this pictures below

https://www.reddit.com/r/WarshipPorn/comments/bruba7/improved_features_of_roks_marado_lph6112_over_her/

https://www.janes.com/article/88689/south-korea-s-second-dokdo-class-helicopter-carrier-begins-sea-trials

https://www.janes.com/article/80340/south-korea-to-deploy-k-saam-on-second-dokdo-class

https://navaltoday.com/2018/05/15/korean-navys-second-amphibious-assault-ship-roks-marado-hits-the-water/

(in reply to stilesw)

Post #: 4577

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/22/2019 11:30:11 PM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

Broad torpedo updates for Canadian Navy. Need update aircraft, ships, records, mounts

Canadians finally get MK 54 Torpedoes. Replace MK-46 Mod 5 on helicopters, MPA and frigates.

https://www.janes.com/article/88712/us-approves-mk-54-torpedo-sale-for-canada

Thank yous!

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 4578

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/22/2019 11:36:20 PM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

Ethiopia got standard Pantsyr-s1 systems. Same as others in db.

https://www.janes.com/article/87324/ethiopian-pantsyr-s1-revealed

Thank!

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 4579

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/22/2019 11:49:04 PM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

Please added Turkish Korkut SPAAG (2020)

IOC Announce:

https://www.janes.com/article/88242/korkut-spaag-soon-to-be-deployed

Tech datas

https://www.armyrecognition.com/turkey_army_artillery_vehicle_weapon_systems_uk/korkut_self-propelled_air_defense_35mm_gun_system_vehicle_technical_data_sheet_specifications_pictures_video_11903175.html

Haha movie. Lets boogie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm9fGe7ihns

Looks like 3 guns systems and 1 C3CM radar vehicle

https://www.aselsan.com.tr/en-us/capabilities/cpb14/Documents/SelfPropelledandAirBurstMunition/KORKUT_KKA_ENG.pdf

Radars infos here

https://www.aselsan.com.tr/en-us/capabilities/radar-systems/air-defense-radars/mobile-search-radar

Thank

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 4580

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/23/2019 12:12:10 AM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

South Korea get SM-2 IIIB for KDX ships. IOC 2020

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/202718/us-approves-%24314m-sale-of-sm_2-block-iiib-missiles-to-korea.html

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 4581

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/23/2019 12:16:17 AM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

Indian Kolkata destroyers have cooperative engagement flag (#2360)

https://www.janes.com/article/88673/indian-navy-demonstrates-co-operative-engagement-firing-capability

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/202723/indian-destroyer-fires-mrsam-in-first-cooperative-engagement.html

Mission, Weapons and sensors of Visakhapatnam-class destroyer (#2361) close so likely get to.

< Message edited by BDukes -- 5/23/2019 12:38:48 AM >

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 4582

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/23/2019 12:27:45 AM

BDukes

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline

Indra LTR25 Radars for UK RAF, SPAIN AF, NATO

UK notice

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/202501/indra-to-supply-deployable-military-radar-to-uk.html

Spain data

https://www.indracompany.com/sites/default/files/lanza3d_radar_v19_0.pdf

NATO x2

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/165244/indra-wins-nato-contract-for-two-lanza-3d-deployable-radars.html

Datas on L-Band

http://www.dmitryshulgin.com/tag/long-tactical-range-25-ltr25/

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 4583

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/23/2019 8:44:50 AM

Filitch

Posts: 423
Joined: 6/25/2016
From: St. Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline

Please, estimate new ranges for Russian AA missiles
#273 AA-12 Adder A [R-77, RVV-AE]
#2056 AA-12 Adder B [R-77-1, RVV-SD]

All of them has in CMANO same seeker #656 "Active Radar Seeker" with maximal range 5 nm. IRL R-77, RVV-AE has RF seeker 9B1348E, generation: Late 1980, while R-77-1 - 9B-1103M, generation: Late 1990.
Sources:
http://nevskii-bastion.ru/9b-1103m-200/
http://www.russianarms.ru/forum/index.php?topic=11361.0
The XXI Centuri Encyclopedia. Russain's Arms and Technoligies. Volume 10. Aircraft armament and avionics.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 4584

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/23/2019 8:45:37 AM

Filitch

Posts: 423
Joined: 6/25/2016
From: St. Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline

seeker 9B1348E

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Filitch)

Post #: 4585

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/23/2019 1:20:52 PM

stilesw

Posts: 1497
Joined: 6/26/2014
From: Hansville, WA, USA
Status: offline

Hi Roman,

I sent you a PM for some translation help.

Thanks,

-Wayne

(in reply to Filitch)

Post #: 4586

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/23/2019 1:24:24 PM

stilesw

Posts: 1497
Joined: 6/26/2014
From: Hansville, WA, USA
Status: offline

Bill,

Your requests have been logged and are in the queue for evaluation. Thanks for the information.

-Wayne

(in reply to BDukes)

Post #: 4587

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/25/2019 11:59:35 AM

lumiere

Posts: 99
Joined: 3/19/2019
From: Japan
Status: offline

Requests about Japanese weaponry.
(sorry if someone already requested/my poor research)

1. No Torpedo Tube for Izumo-class DDH
While Hyuga-class DDH has 324mm TT (and Mk.41 VLS), Izumo-class (carrier?) has neither of them.
Some websites say that it�s because they are expended for air facilities.

Specifications:
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?view=article&id=1182
http://www.military-today.com/navy/izumo_class.htm
I should have checked Jane�s in the first place, but don�t you think latest editions are hopelessly expensive?

These websites states about reduced self-defence armament compared to Hyuga:
https://www.rina.org.uk/Izumo_class_far_from_carriers_in_the_fullest_sense.html
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-japans-newest-aircraft-carriers-stack-up-to-other-world-powers-flattops-2016-8

2. Maya-class DDG/Asahi-class DD
For the last years, new faces came to JMSDF.
Maya-class DDG (27 DDG-class) � 2020
Maya (DDG-179)/(not named) 28 DDG (DDG-180)
Features:
advanced CEC-capability with Baseline 9C/SM-6 and Aegis BMD 5.1/SM-3 Block IIA.
COGLAG propulsion system.
new AN/SPQ-9B SS radar.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya-class_destroyer
https://www.janes.com/article/82066/japan-launches-first-improved-atago-class-destroyer
https://www.janes.com/article/82721/japan-s-improved-atago-class-to-field-sm-6-air-defence-missiles
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/year-2015-news/july-2015-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/2925-japan-defense-ministry-unveiled-details-of-q27ddq-class-railgun-a-laser-armed-aegis-destroyer.html

Asahi-class DD (25 DD-class) - 2018
Asahi (DD-119)/Shiranui (DD-120)
Features:
ASW-variant of Akizuki-class DD with Type-07 VL-ASROCK (new ASROC, see below) and OQR-4 TASS.
COGLAG propulsion system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asahi-class_destroyer
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/japan/25dd.htm

3. about Type-97 Torpedoes
I�m sad that none of Japanese unit use newer Type-97 torpedo in game

SH-60K can equip Type-97 Light torpedo while older SH-60J could only Mk.46.
P-1 (and maybe, P-3C) also carries Type 97.
For torpedo tubes on surface ships, Hyuga, Izumo, Akizuki, and Asahi-class uses HOS-303 324mm TT which can launch Type 97.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_97_light_weight_torpedo_(G-RX4)
https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/430527-mitsubishi-sh-60k/
https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=lo0TDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT419&lpg=PT419&dq=SH-60K+Tyoe+97+torpedoes&source=bl&ots=7E6GX6bfFP&sig=ACfU3U1UjLh_ZP-B1zLFBwHqprEhXj8eQA&hl=ja&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwigyvOHx7biAhVpxYsBHaFiDrcQ6AEwCHoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=SH-60K%20Tyoe%2097%20torpedoes&f=false
http://www.military-today.com/aircraft/kawasaki_p1.htm

Type 07 VL-ASROC is newer SUM which uses Type-97 for its warhead.
from Teruzuki (second ship of Akizuki-class), DD installs Type 07 for their SUM.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_07_Vertical_Launch_Anti-submarine_rocket
https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=BY4TDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA115&lpg=PA115&dq=HOS+303+Torpedo+tubes&source=bl&ots=LGwUqxiOcp&sig=ACfU3U2hJ_4F-GhQN2rC-_EVEcbralRVzQ&hl=ja&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjx2qntzLbiAhWPHaYKHRv3CScQ6AEwD3oECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=HOS%20303%20Torpedo%20tubes&f=false

Thanks!

_____________________________

"War claims its bitter, useless, sacrifice."

(in reply to stilesw)

Post #: 4588

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/25/2019 3:22:48 PM

stilesw

Posts: 1497
Joined: 6/26/2014
From: Hansville, WA, USA
Status: offline

Recommendations logged for possible future inclusion. Thanks for the information.

-Wayne

(in reply to lumiere)

Post #: 4589

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 5/26/2019 6:54:12 AM

SakiNoE

Posts: 35
Joined: 11/15/2018
Status: offline

AT-6B Wolverine Request
General Data:
Category: Fixed Wing
Type: Attack/Multirole
Length: 33 ft 4 in (10.16 m)
Height: 10 ft 8 in (3.25 m)
Wingspan: 34 ft 3 in (10.4 m)
Crew: 2
Empty Weight: 5,890 lb (2,671 kg)
Max Weight: 10,000 lb (4,536 kg)
Max Payload [Internal Fuel Only]: 8,800lb [3,992 kg]
Total Hardpoints 7
NATO Standard Weapons Stations 6
Usable Weapons Stations when EO/IR Installed 6
# of MIL-STD-1760 Compatible Stations: 4

Sensors/EW:
MX-15D Sensor Pod, includes the following;
MX-15Di [CCD] LLTV [in DB]
MX-15Di Hi-Mag [FLIR] [in DB]
MX-15Di [Daylight TV] [in DB]
MX-15Di [Laser Designator] [in DB]
AN/AAR-47 MAWS [in DB]
AN/ALQ-213 MAWS [in DB]

Mounts/Stores:
AN-ALE-47 Chaff/Flares Ejector [in DB]

Comms/Datalinks:
2x AN/ARC-210 UHF radios

Properties:
Bombsight - Advanced Navigation [INS/GPS]
Night Navigation [Ferry, Air-to-Surface]

Propulsion/Aviation Fuel:
1x PT6A-68D, Turboprop, Max Speed - 340kts
Aviation Fuel [Internal Only] - 1,200 lb (544 kg)

Misc:
Assault Rifle resistant armour all-round

Attachment (1)

(in reply to stilesw)

Post #: 4590

Page: << < prev 151 152 [153] 154 155 next > >>

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?