trujillocorreo
Posts: 44
Joined: 3/15/2014 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Blast33 quote:
ORIGINAL: trujillocorreo Hello friends. I propose the modification in the DB of the SAM S-300V family. Let's see the following graph: -S-300V1 / SA12A (entry into service 1983) "The development of the S-300V system was carried out in two stages. In the first stage, the system was created to combat aerodynamic targets, cruise and tactical ballistic missiles". Источник: http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/ ВТС «БАСТИОН» A.V.Karpenko Use of TELAR 9A83 and TEL 9A85 vehicles and 9M83 "Gladiator" missile with a range of 75 km. -S-300V2 / SA12B (Entry into service 1988) "In the second stage of work, the system was refined to ensure the fight against Pershing-1 type ballistic missiles, aeroballistic missiles and patrol jammers". Источник: http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/ ВТС «БАСТИОН» A.V.Karpenko Introduction of the 9M82 "Giant" missile with a 100 km range, TELAR 9A82, TEL 9A84 vehicles and 9S19 "High Screen" radar. -S-300V3 (Entry into service 1998) S-300V17V2 upgrade block. "An updated S-300V system for the RF Armed Forces. NIEMI, without issuing special decrees of the Government of the Russian Federation, on its own initiative and in agreement with the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, modernized the S- system. 300V ". Источник: http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/ ВТС «БАСТИОН» A.V.Karpenko "Block upgrade with extended engagement range missiles, with a claimed doubling of range performance against aerial targets". http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Giant-Gladiator.html Introduction of the 9M83M missiles with 150 km of range and 9M82M with 200 km of range. -S-300VM. Proposal for a new system or deep modernization from the mid-1990s. Not adopted by the Russian Federation. "On the basis of the S-300V air defense system, an air defense system was developed, which provides the ability to intercept ballistic missiles with a range of up to 2500 km, and the maximum range of destruction of aerodynamic targets was increased to 250 km ". Источник: http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/ ВТС «БАСТИОН» A.V.Karpenko It offered deep digitization, LCD screens, better response times and simplification in the number and types of vehicles. -S-300VM ANTEY 2500. SA-23. Early 2000 export version based on the S-300VM proposal. It only uses TELAR 9A83ME vehicles with four 9M83ME missiles and TEL 9A84ME with two 9M82ME missiles. Replacement of the FCR 9S32 radar by the 9S32ME with a greater range of 400 km. The range of the 9M82M missile is increased from 200 km to 250 km with the 9M82ME and that of the 9M83M is decreased from 150 km to 130 km in the 9M83ME. -S-300VMD. Modernization block of the S-300VM that introduces the Giant missile with extended range 9M82MD (For domestic use) with a range of 400 km and the 9M82MDE (For export) with a range of 350 km. S-300V4. (Entry into service 2015) Deep modernization, based on VM and VMD versions. "Modernized S-300V system. This upgrade made it possible to double the range of improved systems compared to the basic ones. Modernization was carried out in accordance with TZ GRAU both at the expense of the state and at the expense of its own funds received from the sale of military equipment through military-technical cooperation in the implementation of contracts from OJSC "PK Concern" Antey "for the supply of" Tor "and S-300V systems. The performance characteristics of the S-300V are between 1.5 and 2.3 times higher than the capacities of the S-300V3 ". Источник: http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/ ВТС «БАСТИОН» A.V.Karpenko Same structure and vehicles as the ANTEY 2500, but replacing the 9M82M missile with the 9M82MD with a range of 400 km and the 9M83ME with a range of 130 km, by the 9M83M with a 150 km range. ANTEY 4000. Export version of the S-300V4 offered at ARMY 2020. "It is reported, in particular, that the range of destruction of aerodynamic targets by the 9M83ME missiles has increased from 130 to 150 km, and 9M82MDE, from 350 to 380 km. The altitude of destruction of aerodynamic targets by the 9M82MDE missiles increased from 30 to 33 km. "The ability to hit ballistic targets has been significantly expanded. The maximum velocity of warheads hitting ballistic targets has increased from 4,500 to 4,800 m / s. The destruction range of tactical missiles has increased from 30 to 45 km, and the altitude has increased from 25 to 27 km ". https://www.militarynews.ru/story.asp?rid=1&nid=536617&lang=RU Typical configuration of an ANTEY 2500 / S-300V4 / ANTEY 4000 battalion: http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Giant-Gladiator.html http://bastion-karpenko.ru/antey-4000-s-300v4/ http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/ http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300vm/ https://www.militarynews.ru/story.asp?rid=1&nid=536617&lang=RU https://en.topwar.ru/168997-zenitnaja-raketnaja-sistema-s-300v-protiv-samoletov-krylatyh-i-ballisticheskih-raket.html Modern Russian and Chinese Integrated Air Defence Systems The Nature of the Threat, Growth Trajectory and Western Options. Justin Bronk Good research and some additions: <type>UPDATE</type> <summary> The maximum range missile 9M82MDE is not operational yet.</summary> <detail> Article 9 April 2020 SAM 9M82MV (9М82МВ in Russian) after successful design and factory tests by our Ministry of Defense "is not noticed" and the S-300V4 air defense system was not introduced. But in the media there was information about the introduction of a similar missile defense system into the S-500 air defense system being developed. This is probably correct. But the reality is that the S-300V family of air defense systems, already deployed in the theater of operations (in the military districts), which include a specialized autonomous radar for detecting ballistic targets and ensuring their most effective defeat, as well as a successfully tested gas-dynamic missile, this missiles are not included. And in the developed S-500 air defense system, which has less capabilities for detecting ballistic targets, especially those separated in flight by the MRBM main unit, an air defense missile interception missile system is introduced, created, by the way, on the basis of technical solutions implemented in the C-300V4 air defense missile system. What is it - a lack of understanding of the current situation or lack of initiative and negligence? And where is military science and its opinion on this issue? The author is Alexander Luzan, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Laureate of the State Prize of the Russian Federation,retired lieutenant general, former chairman of the State Commission on tests of the S-300VM air defense system - the predecessor of the S-300V4,ex-deputy commander (chief) of the Air Defense Forces of the Land Armament Troops - Chief Engineer of the Air Defense Forces of the Ground Forces So intercepts above 35km of height is not possible and a max range of about 30 km againtst ballistic target, see picture from the same article. </detail> <evidence>https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=nl&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=https://www.vesvks.ru/vks/article/voennaya-nauka-realnost-mify-i-perspektivy-16552&usg=ALkJrhh1b16-SHPol0aJqdGxrtbbw1epfg </evidence> Hello Blast33 We are talking about different missiles, although all derived from 9M82. In your post you are mixing three different types of missiles: 9M82MDE = Export version of the 9M82MD, with a range of 350 km and 35-37 km of service ceiling. Offered with the ANTEY 4000 and ABM ABAKAN system featured at ARMY 2020. 9M82MD = Extended range domestic version of the 9M82M with a range of 400 km, 35-37 km of service ceiling and speed of mach 7.5. Introduced with the S-300V4 in 2015. 9M82MV = Proposed exoatmospheric ABM version of the 9M82MD for the S-300V4 with a range of 350 km and between 70-90 km of service ceiling with dynamic gas control to maneuver at these heights at mach 9 speeds. Possibly ARH. Successfully tested in 2006 , there is no data of its entry into service. Evidence: https://tass.com/russia/781138 https://tass.com/defense/898884 https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/novator.htm http://www.vko.ru/taktika/zadacha-trudnaya-no-reshaemaya https://hr.rbth.com/science/88105-s-300v4-foto https://medium.com/war-is-boring/surprise-russias-anti-aircraft-missiles-in-syria-are-not-as-capable-as-believed-a05fda744c92 https://twitter.com/VinodDX9/status/1049325744017498112?s=20 https://en.topwar.ru/124347-vozdushnyy-ohotnik-jnaam-stavit-pod-vopros-potencial-su-35s-i-mig-35-pervye-itogi-ot-zaderzhki-proekta-rvv-ae-pd.html
|