Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Joint Command: Multiplayer idea

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Joint Command: Multiplayer idea Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Joint Command: Multiplayer idea - 5/6/2016 4:37:02 PM   
bertibott

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 6/19/2015
From: Germany
Status: offline 		hi... if one wanted to try this but one didn't have any friends (who play Command :P) how would one find people to play with? personally i would like to try some co-op missions...

(in reply to ETF)
Post #: 91
RE: Joint Command: Multiplayer idea - 5/10/2016 8:38:13 AM   
Noldofinwe

 

Posts: 37
Joined: 5/15/2015
Status: offline 		Is there a list with missions that are suited for multiplayer? Would be nice if we could compile a list of multiplayer scenario's

Competitive 1 vs 1
- ..

Competitive 2 vs 2
- Med Conflict (community pack)
- ...

Cooperative
- Shamal (2 vs 1 AI)
- Med Conflict (2 vs 2) (community pack)
- ...

Or something like that

(in reply to bertibott)
Post #: 92
RE: Joint Command: PBEM Style Command Multiplayer - 9/5/2016 3:43:28 AM   
DanielNL

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 9/5/2016
Status: offline 		Hey Baloogan, could you please explain (if you haven't yet) why there is no real-time multiplayer available for the game? (I mean like one player plays one faction, the other player the other faction)

(in reply to RoryAndersonCDT)
Post #: 93
RE: Joint Command: PBEM Style Command Multiplayer - 9/6/2016 12:13:47 AM   
Mini_Von


Posts: 134
Joined: 12/17/2013
Status: offline 		Hi DanielNL,

If you would like to see this feature implemented then go to the following link and vote for it.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3437496




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to DanielNL)
Post #: 94
RE: Joint Command: PBEM Style Command Multiplayer - 9/6/2016 12:48:28 AM   
ColonelMolerat

 

Posts: 479
Joined: 9/23/2015
Status: offline 		Yowzer! I've just read through this thread again - Geoscape looks fantastic (as does Joint Command, but I'd heard of that already)! I also didn't know Baloogan Campaign existed as a single-player campaign mod. Going to try that out when I get a chance in a couple of weeks! (Geoscape can wait until I feel competent enough to play with/against others...)

When it says "You set up a Geoscape game by importing 100s of Command scenarios..." does that mean that the campaign creator has to make hundreds of Command scenarios for it to read? I thought the conflicts were auto-generated based on the positions of each side's units?

Edit:
Aww, just realised Baloogan Campaign isn't available for public download.

< Message edited by ColonelMolerat -- 9/6/2016 12:52:10 AM >

(in reply to Mini_Von)
Post #: 95
RE: Joint Command: PBEM Style Command Multiplayer - 9/6/2016 2:25:57 AM   
thewood1

 

Posts: 6529
Joined: 11/27/2005
Status: offline 		This thread is a testament to why MP is not an official release from the devs. Not enough people interested in it. Some day as the priority list shrinks and the big ticket value/labor ratio items are done, may be we'll see MP. But I don't see the pull from the market.

Maybe some day the DoD will pay for it as an umpired training tool, but we won't see it for a while.

(in reply to ColonelMolerat)
Post #: 96
RE: Joint Command: PBEM Style Command Multiplayer - 9/10/2016 2:35:51 AM   
kevinkins


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		I do not have an opinion one way or the other on MP. Too new to even try playing another human. But here are my two cents based on years working with consumer research testing.

If you combine the two responses for MP it comes in a 4% which puts MP in 7th place out of over > 60 possible responses.
Not too bad if you were 7th in the Masters out of 60 pros (i.e. top 10). The survey is heavily weighted toward the strike planner which does provided concrete direction for the developers. And there are others that are > than 4% that deserve attention ahead of MP for sure. But there are too many possible answers to get a good read on how to prioritize the top 10 responses. For that, you can run a "play off" poll which would drill down better at what players want. It may sound crazy, but by not randomizing the order of the list of sixty possible responses, which is probably too many to begin with, there is a built in bias. Note the higher numbers are at the top of the list. (I am assuming the list order was not presented randomized to each respondent.) Net-Net: MP is a warm topic, not "hot". But running a playoff poll, which is easy to do, would provide a more precise read on player preferences within the top ~10 features this poll identified.


(in reply to thewood1)
Post #: 97
RE: Joint Command: PBEM Style Command Multiplayer - 9/10/2016 4:02:43 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kevinkin

I do not have an opinion one way or the other on MP. Too new to even try playing another human. But here are my two cents based on years working with consumer research testing.

If you combine the two responses for MP it comes in a 4% which puts MP in 7th place out of over > 60 possible responses.
Not too bad if you were 7th in the Masters out of 60 pros (i.e. top 10). The survey is heavily weighted toward the strike planner which does provided concrete direction for the developers. And there are others that are > than 4% that deserve attention ahead of MP for sure. But there are too many possible answers to get a good read on how to prioritize the top 10 responses. For that, you can run a "play off" poll which would drill down better at what players want. It may sound crazy, but by not randomizing the order of the list of sixty possible responses, which is probably too many to begin with, there is a built in bias. Note the higher numbers are at the top of the list. (I am assuming the list order was not presented randomized to each respondent.) Net-Net: MP is a warm topic, not "hot". But running a playoff poll, which is easy to do, would provide a more precise read on player preferences within the top ~10 features this poll identified.



We don't use this like you think we do. Its just a tool to gauge interest.

Thanks for your input though!

Mike


_____________________________


(in reply to kevinkins)
Post #: 98
RE: Joint Command: PBEM Style Command Multiplayer - 9/16/2016 3:46:01 PM   
ETF


Posts: 1748
Joined: 9/16/2004
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline 		So looking forward to the MP options that might be in PRO the version. Wow. If implemented you would see ALOT more MP people around. Just think of the fun re. a coop game or even plain vanilla 1 vs.1.

_____________________________

My Top Matrix Games 1) CMO MP?? 2) WITP/AE 3) SOW 4) Combat Mission 5) Armor Brigade

Twitter
https://twitter.com/TacticWargamer

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 99
RE: MULTIPLAYER Joint Command RELEASED! - 9/16/2016 8:01:48 PM   
ETF


Posts: 1748
Joined: 9/16/2004
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Baloogan

Here are my stats:

Intel Core i5 760 @ 2.80 GHz
MSI P55A-G55(MS-7668)
2x2 gigs of DDR3, DRAM Freq 665.0 MHz, 9-9-9-24-74-1T made by Corsair
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 with 2 big monitors :)




Baloogan is Geoscape still a go or a work in progress. I love the idea of operational overlay and then fight out the tactical battles in CMANO.........thanks for all your support for the community.

_____________________________

My Top Matrix Games 1) CMO MP?? 2) WITP/AE 3) SOW 4) Combat Mission 5) Armor Brigade

Twitter
https://twitter.com/TacticWargamer

(in reply to RoryAndersonCDT)
Post #: 100
RE: Joint Command: Multiplayer idea - 9/16/2016 8:02:43 PM   
ETF


Posts: 1748
Joined: 9/16/2004
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: djoos5

quote:

ORIGINAL: Noldofinwe

Yes you can, unfortunately there are not many coop scenario's. What I sometimes do is in the editor, split one side into 2 and divide the assets so you can coop :)


My scenario, Med Conflict, is set up with four sides (five if you count the civilians) and should work for a multiplayer/coop game. Understand that the dominant forces are the US surface groups and Soviet Union, but NATO forces and Libya do have some firepower.

If anyone ever plays it in this manner, I would love to hear the results.


This was a great scenario! It was a blast thanks for recommending it.


< Message edited by ETF -- 9/17/2016 5:52:41 PM >

_____________________________

My Top Matrix Games 1) CMO MP?? 2) WITP/AE 3) SOW 4) Combat Mission 5) Armor Brigade

Twitter
https://twitter.com/TacticWargamer

(in reply to djoos5)
Post #: 101
RE: Joint Command: Multiplayer idea - 9/17/2016 12:42:06 AM   
djoos5


Posts: 382
Joined: 10/25/2013
From: Ohio
Status: offline 		Thanks, ETF!

I am actually re-tooling it. I want to put some of the new LUA scripting to play and see if I can make it even more interesting. I also updated the politics of it so it seems more logical.

_____________________________


(in reply to ETF)
Post #: 102
RE: Joint Command: Multiplayer idea - 9/17/2016 5:53:07 PM   
ETF


Posts: 1748
Joined: 9/16/2004
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: djoos5

Thanks, ETF!

I am actually re-tooling it. I want to put some of the new LUA scripting to play and see if I can make it even more interesting. I also updated the politics of it so it seems more logical.

Yummy!
Hardly wait for some sorta of MP options in the PRO. This would be ideal.

_____________________________

My Top Matrix Games 1) CMO MP?? 2) WITP/AE 3) SOW 4) Combat Mission 5) Armor Brigade

Twitter
https://twitter.com/TacticWargamer

(in reply to djoos5)
Post #: 103
RE: Joint Command: Multiplayer idea - 8/1/2017 12:14:40 PM   
Ilias

 

Posts: 43
Joined: 2/17/2017
Status: offline 		Is the program still working ?
(showing error on each attempt to register in program and on forum and chat room down)

< Message edited by Ilias -- 8/1/2017 12:21:29 PM >

(in reply to ETF)
Post #: 104
RE: Joint Command: Multiplayer idea - 8/1/2017 4:36:57 PM   
ETF


Posts: 1748
Joined: 9/16/2004
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline 		Ya hoping for a stand alone version with truly dedicated MP. Soon we are told.

Not sure on the status of Joint Command.

_____________________________

My Top Matrix Games 1) CMO MP?? 2) WITP/AE 3) SOW 4) Combat Mission 5) Armor Brigade

Twitter
https://twitter.com/TacticWargamer

(in reply to Ilias)
Post #: 105
RE: Joint Command: Multiplayer idea - 8/2/2017 7:53:19 AM   
Ilias

 

Posts: 43
Joined: 2/17/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ETF
Ya hoping for a stand alone version with truly dedicated MP. Soon we are told.

Not sure on the status of Joint Command.

Thanks for answer,
Copy that

< Message edited by Ilias -- 8/2/2017 7:58:48 AM >

(in reply to ETF)
Post #: 106
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Joint Command: Multiplayer idea Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.000