Scenarios

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Scenarios

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Empires in Arms the Napoleonic Wars of 1805 - 1815 >> Scenarios

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Scenarios - 1/24/2003 8:16:28 PM

Dagfinn

Posts: 110
Joined: 1/20/2003
From: Western Norway
Status: offline

Will you include the 1792 scenario?

IMHO more interesting to play than 1805... You dont all have to beat up France by default.

Post #: 1

- 1/24/2003 9:26:13 PM

Reknoy

Posts: 190
Joined: 11/26/2002
Status: offline

Hear hear! :)

Besides, gotta love Suvarov! :)

(in reply to Dagfinn)

Post #: 2

Re: Scenarios - 1/24/2003 10:12:03 PM

Le Tondu

Posts: 564
Joined: 10/2/2001
From: Seattle, WA
Status: offline

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dagfinn
[B]... You dont all have to beat up France by default. [/B][/QUOTE]

That's the beauty of this game. You don't ever have to, if you don't want to.

:)

_____________________________

Vive l'Empereur!

(in reply to Dagfinn)

Post #: 3

You gotta love Hoche - 1/24/2003 10:16:28 PM

Hoche

Posts: 491
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline

Suvarov (4.5.4*) has the higher tactical maxium than Hoche (4.5.3*) but the poor Russian corps structure requires the Russians to use more corps. Forcing Suvarov to lower his tatical rating in battle. The French corps I - III is 42i and 6c. The largest Russian army (with out lowering Suvarovs rating) is four corps of 40i. If you substitute the guard corps for an inf corps then it is 5g, 30i, 2c, still 11 factors smaller.

(in reply to Dagfinn)

Post #: 4

Re: Re: Scenarios - 1/24/2003 11:53:35 PM

Dagfinn

Posts: 110
Joined: 1/20/2003
From: Western Norway
Status: offline

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Le Tondu
[B]That's the beauty of this game. You don't ever have to, if you don't want to.

:) [/B][/QUOTE]

Eh, do you mean 1792 or 1805? Or both? :confused:

IMHO in 1805 the other players better gamg up, unless they whant the French player to win.

I know this is a major generalisation but anyways...

_____________________________

In our darkest hours all the shades are gray

(in reply to Dagfinn)

Post #: 5

- 2/8/2003 4:03:54 AM

Sir Neil

Posts: 14
Joined: 9/8/2002
From: Scotland
Status: offline

I hope so to :D

(in reply to Dagfinn)

Post #: 6