Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Banks vs Soundoff AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [American Civil War] >> Civil War II >> After Action Report >> Banks vs Soundoff AAR Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Banks vs Soundoff AAR - 1/2/2014 7:01:19 PM   
Ace1_slith

 

Posts: 340
Joined: 9/24/2013
Status: offline
Almost any player who has played CW1, has red famous Banks vs Soundoff AAR.

It was the most entertaining civil war AAR I have ever red. I am happy to say I noticed that they are doing a rematch, and are posting the new AAR on the AGEod forum in these threads:

http://www.ageod-forum.com/showthread.php?33999-Banks6060-%28USA%29-vs-Soundoff-%28CSA%29

http://www.ageod-forum.com/showthread.php?33955-Soundoff-%28CSA%29

Since both Banks and Soundoff wanted the readers to sustain from strategy comments in their AAR's, I took an oportunity to make a thread of my one, dedicated to strategic comments about their game.

Feel free to visit it here:

http://www.ageod-forum.com/showthread.php?34016-Banks-vs-Soundoff-strategy-discussion-thread&p=301256#post301256

Of course, if you do not have an AGEod forum registration, feel free to post your comments here.

I look forward to your comments!

Happy reading

< Message edited by Ace1 -- 1/2/2014 8:03:29 PM >
Post #: 1
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [American Civil War] >> Civil War II >> After Action Report >> Banks vs Soundoff AAR Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.609