Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Arty question

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> Scenario Design >> Arty question Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Arty question - 1/16/2014 3:34:47 AM   
Grognard


Posts: 216
Joined: 6/24/2004
From: Madison, Wisconsin
Status: offline
Guten Abend/Buenos Tardes:

Just remembered I've been wondering about this for a while.

A ranged artillery unit (artillery icon) firing at an airfield hex is given the option of making an airfield attack.

A HQ with (ranged) artillery is not.

I assume this is a result of the respective and inherent icon properties. Yes?
And also I assume there is no workaround which is too bad because it does make a difference.
Was this addressed earlier (wish list) or can it be added (wish list) post 3.5 ?

Trying to stay warm......

_____________________________

Find 'em, Fix 'em, & Kill 'em
Post #: 1
RE: Arty question - 1/16/2014 6:55:25 AM   
Telumar


Posts: 2236
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: niflheim
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Grognard

Guten Abend/Buenos Tardes:

Just remembered I've been wondering about this for a while.

A ranged artillery unit (artillery icon) firing at an airfield hex is given the option of making an airfield attack.

A HQ with (ranged) artillery is not.

I assume this is a result of the respective and inherent icon properties. Yes?
And also I assume there is no workaround which is too bad because it does make a difference.
Was this addressed earlier (wish list) or can it be added (wish list) post 3.5 ?

Trying to stay warm......


Yes, it's a characteristic of the unit icon. And there is no workaround that i'm aware of.

Don't know if there was ever a proposal in the wishlist. 3.5 doesn't implement it, but will offer a workaround.

_____________________________


(in reply to Grognard)
Post #: 2
RE: Arty question - 1/16/2014 6:17:59 PM   
Grognard


Posts: 216
Joined: 6/24/2004
From: Madison, Wisconsin
Status: offline
quote:

Yes, it's a characteristic of the unit icon. And there is no workaround that i'm aware of.

Don't know if there was ever a proposal in the wishlist.


Thanks for the confirmation. Probably won't matter after much after 3.5 since the unit # cap will be raised and this was pretty much the only reason to cram tubes into HQ's. Will have to edit (mostly east front) scenarios where this is the case. Fun drudgery...

quote:

3.5 doesn't implement it, but will offer a workaround.


???? How ?

_____________________________

Find 'em, Fix 'em, & Kill 'em

(in reply to Telumar)
Post #: 3
RE: Arty question - 1/16/2014 8:01:31 PM   
Telumar


Posts: 2236
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: niflheim
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Grognard

quote:

3.5 doesn't implement it, but will offer a workaround.


???? How ?


Secondary unit icon.


_____________________________


(in reply to Grognard)
Post #: 4
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> Scenario Design >> Arty question Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.719