Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Foreign powers

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [American Civil War] >> Civil War II >> Foreign powers Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Foreign powers - 2/5/2014 7:08:49 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
I think, there should be option for separate peace between USA and intervening countries.


It seems a bit unrealistic to me, that Britain continues war after suffering such casualties.

It is Early August '64.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Kamil -- 2/5/2014 8:11:43 PM >
Post #: 1
RE: Foreign powers - 2/5/2014 10:56:15 PM   
TulliusDetritus


Posts: 5521
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: The Zone™
Status: offline
Is this a PBEM? What did you do to encourage foreign intervention?



_____________________________

a nu cheeki breeki iv damke

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 2
RE: Foreign powers - 2/6/2014 4:08:53 PM   
Dorb


Posts: 371
Joined: 10/8/2013
From: Ohio
Status: offline
Something not right with this picture. We need the Paul Harvey - Rest of the Story!

(in reply to TulliusDetritus)
Post #: 3
RE: Foreign powers - 2/6/2014 4:58:56 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
It is PBEM

My opponent got +35 from Trent Affair, played all the diplomatic options and I have refused to use territorial concesions.

(in reply to Dorb)
Post #: 4
RE: Foreign powers - 2/6/2014 5:33:59 PM   
TulliusDetritus


Posts: 5521
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: The Zone™
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kamil

It is PBEM

My opponent got +35 from Trent Affair, played all the diplomatic options and I have refused to use territorial concesions.


Oh, I too refuse to use the territorial concessions thing. And er, perhaps Marquo played those diplomatic options... now if you excuse me, please

_____________________________

a nu cheeki breeki iv damke

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 5
RE: Foreign powers - 2/6/2014 8:20:49 PM   
Toro12

 

Posts: 162
Joined: 4/6/2000
From: Covington, KY, USA
Status: offline
I have NEVER seen foreign powers enter the scene. This is awesome. Are you two doing an AAR? I'd love to see numbers, how they're being used, where, etc.

(in reply to TulliusDetritus)
Post #: 6
RE: Foreign powers - 2/6/2014 8:34:13 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
Hmm, I will try to make overview of Brits campaign during the weekend if I find some time.

(btw in my other game as USA, there is already +84 foreign entry and it is Dec '61 - again +35 from Trent Affair, but I haven't played my diplomatic cards. To be honest I find it a bit ridiculous, that CSA can gain 80 foreign entry in half a year without any significant success in war)

< Message edited by Kamil -- 2/6/2014 10:53:52 PM >

(in reply to Toro12)
Post #: 7
RE: Foreign powers - 2/7/2014 6:42:16 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
This is absolute joke.

Early Jan '62. I captured Manassas and Island 10. Inflicted more casualties that suffered, yet Foreign Entry equals 100 (2 out of 3 diplomatic options were played by me).

I am annoyed, because it is not strategy it is roulette.


I played 4 PBEM as Union, in 3 games we managed to get to '62 and in two of them opponents managed to get 100 FI without actually capturing important northern cities or winning major battles.

Setting was historic, so I ask how historic is that?



Well, I am annoyed customer who expected game being dependant on adopting correct strategy not on some random rolls.

< Message edited by Kamil -- 2/7/2014 8:03:58 PM >

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 8
RE: Foreign powers - 2/7/2014 7:38:20 PM   
Ace1_slith

 

Posts: 340
Joined: 9/24/2013
Status: offline
The game has 10% chance for the Trent affair to give unhistoric results. The percentage is debatable, but there has to be a chance for the Affair to escalate. If Lincoln were a hothead and refused to apologize + if the British prime minister were a hothead as well, everything could escalate. After that, there was no real chance of intervention.

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 9
RE: Foreign powers - 2/7/2014 7:47:14 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
I don't dispute possibility of foreign intervention, but what I find very wrong is lack on influence of sequence of events - you can play them or not and that is it, there is no finesse to it just luck and possible impact of this random options is huge.

In last case foreign intervention will probably waste my and my opponents time. I see no point in playing in which game where outcome is determined by throws of dices.

< Message edited by Kamil -- 2/7/2014 8:47:43 PM >

(in reply to Ace1_slith)
Post #: 10
RE: Foreign powers - 2/7/2014 8:05:07 PM   
Ace1_slith

 

Posts: 340
Joined: 9/24/2013
Status: offline
Winning battles influence NM and VP.

NM and VP influence Foreign intervention - simple as that.

About the random roll for blockade decisions: did the US knew will the Brits be angered by the total blockade policy or not. They did not. In life, chance influences more things than we are willing to admit.

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 11
RE: Foreign powers - 2/7/2014 8:49:13 PM   
KamilS

 

Posts: 1827
Joined: 2/5/2011
Status: offline
In both games CSA didn't win more battles than USA, didn't acquire any VP locations, but due to initial set-up have higher VP/turn and morale so south edge in case of FI increase.


Second of all. It was obviously so simple in life - Brits get angered or not, no other way to influence it, no middle ground, no negotiations and game reflects it perfectly. Each side have 3 options plus there is random event, absolutely like in real life.


Moreover, once FI reaches 100 it can't be changed.

< Message edited by Kamil -- 2/7/2014 11:22:23 PM >

(in reply to Ace1_slith)
Post #: 12
RE: Foreign powers - 2/8/2014 12:16:45 AM   
Rosseau

 

Posts: 2757
Joined: 9/13/2009
Status: offline
That can be modded out in a few keystrokes. I don't have the game (yet). Maybe a kind soul on Ageod forum will do it for you.

(in reply to KamilS)
Post #: 13
RE: Foreign powers - 2/8/2014 6:35:49 PM   
Cavalier99

 

Posts: 11
Joined: 5/20/2010
Status: offline
The intervention options are not realistic. Britain was more dependant on Union grain supplies than it was on Confederate cotton. There was as much chance of Britain entering the war on the side of the Confederacy as there was of the Confederacy winning an outright victory.
.

(in reply to Rosseau)
Post #: 14
RE: Foreign powers - 2/8/2014 8:18:02 PM   
Ol Choctaw

 

Posts: 75
Joined: 9/12/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cavalier99

The intervention options are not realistic. Britain was more dependant on Union grain supplies than it was on Confederate cotton. There was as much chance of Britain entering the war on the side of the Confederacy as there was of the Confederacy winning an outright victory.
.


It was Palmerston and Russell that kept GB out of the war. They were fighting their own party keeping them out of the war. Both had screwed up with wars in the past and were not to eager to repeat the mistakes.

Most of the ruling class wanted the war and would have welcomed stopping grain imports.

Their main reason for not going to war was that it would interrupt British trade. Not their trade with the Union.

They would have loved nothing better than to put Lincoln in his place but it was bad for business.

But Pam was a hothead and events like the Trent Affair or Union ultimatums could have set him off as easily as not.

(in reply to Cavalier99)
Post #: 15
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [American Civil War] >> Civil War II >> Foreign powers Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

6.156