Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Intelligence Report

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> Intelligence Report Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Intelligence Report - 8/16/2014 6:50:00 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Here's the losses to date from the Intelligence Report as of 22 March 1942.





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 181
March 22/42 - 8/16/2014 7:20:34 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Timor:

Well, that was a bust. Andre pulled everything back from Koepang into Betty/Nell range. The two British CL's engaged one of the two destroyers attacked by CV Formidable from the day before in an inconclusive night battle. CL Glasgow takes two non-penetrating 12.7cm hits while the Japanese DD suffers no damage.

Daylight air search spots two Japanese DD's at Koepang, including the one just engaged during the night. SBD's from one of the American CV's sinks both enemy ships. AAR follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Koepang at 68,116

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Allied aircraft
F2A-3 Buffalo x 7
F4F-3 Wildcat x 30
SBD-3 Dauntless x 32

Allied aircraft losses
SBD-3 Dauntless: 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
DD Yudachi, Bomb hits 4, and is sunk
DD Samidare, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 4000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
7 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 2000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
4 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 2000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
5 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 4000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
9 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 10000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
4 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 3000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb

Massive explosion on DD Samidare
Heavy smoke from fires obscuring DD Samidare

Thoughts:

Detection levels of the British and American CV TF's are at 4/4 and 5/5 respectively. It's time to get out of Dodge.

I'm bummed. Thinking back on my Japanese PBEM's, I often had poor combat results whenever my CV's were committed after surprising my opponent. The trend continues. Despite sinking two Japanese DD's, the big fish all got away thanks to bad luck with the previous days movement. I can only speculate what might have happened had all three CV's been in position to launch against massed surface and transport TF's unloading at Koepang.

Andre indicated in his e-mail that only one American CV was present in addition to the British carrier. I can only hope that Andre interprets the numbers from the combat report indicating only one American CV. However, with a 5/5 DL I'm thinking he might glean there could be a total of two CV's in the American TF. Regardless, my forces are withdrawing southwest to skirt the coastline and rendezvous with the other British CV to the west. Supporting oilers will refuel the TF's and they will return to Cape Town for replenishment and upgrades. I can only hope this serves notice that I'm out there, not conducting a total 'Sir Robin' and cause Andre some concern. My spidey sense is tingling though. I believe Andre will try to intercept my withdrawing forces with CV Kaga and friends. There is a distinct possibility, now that I have done the math, that interception of my force by enemy carriers off the northwest coast of Australia is a real threat. Initially I thought I'd be able to make a speed run with both TF's, but the short legged British DD's make that impossible. Will four Allied CV's be enough to handle an attack by one Japanese Fleet CV and all the CVL's and CVE's, if caught? This could turn ugly in a hurry.

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 8/16/2014 8:21:59 AM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 182
RE: March 22/42 - 8/16/2014 11:15:10 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Japanese CVE and CVL at this stage are fragile and have poor AA.
I think your four CVs would take some survivable damage but deal a lot more.
Beware the accompanying BB/CA SCTFs though!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 183
RE: March 22/42 - 8/16/2014 3:59:45 PM   
Richard III


Posts: 710
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
Thanks for the losses update. Looks like your trading him 2:3 in airframe losses, and likely he`s losing many of the bomber Squadrons pre war elite aircrews.

I`ve avoided Andre`s AAR completely from the start, so I might drop a comment here sometime, if OK ?

I`m an admitted nervous old lady so all I will say is that getting the big US CV`s pinned against OZ`s North coast strikes as High Risk.


Thanks for a great AAR and luck with the painting, wish I had a booth when I was doing the old resin 1/700 dreadnoughts years back.

< Message edited by Richard III -- 8/16/2014 5:10:31 PM >


_____________________________

“History would be a wonderful thing – if it were only true.”

¯ Leo Tolstoy

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 184
March 24/42 - 8/18/2014 3:38:08 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
A large number of Japanese ships are spotted near the Andaman Islands heading northwest. Is it Ceylon or Madras? I know Andre loves taking Ceylon.

Great timing on Andre's part. With my CV's out of position it's going to be really hard to make an impact on this latest move. However, Andre will finally be bringing Japanese forces to my doorstep where I can finally use the Allied air forces. I've got 6-8 4E bomber groups in India so I definitely have some punch.

Bring it on!

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 185
RE: March 24/42 - 8/18/2014 9:54:11 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Quick supplemental update.

With the Japanese moving on Ceylon or Madras the risk of my CV's being intercepted is low, unless Andre has re-deployed KB west. CV's Saratoga and Yorktown are nearing Exmouth, but the threat of Japanese submarine attack will be high as these waters are routinely patrolled. If I can avoid attack, I will head WNW towards Diego Garcia. CV Hornet is arriving at Cape Town tomorrow and will await escort DD's to become available and will join the fleet in the IO. I will look to defend an invasion of Diego Garcia.

Andre in an earlier e-mail let slip that he attacked his other PBEM opponent in the IO with a full KB, so I'm starting to think he'll try to repeat that success. I'm going to have to be extremely cautious moving forward.

If I can locate KB within the next few weeks, there may be a window of opportunity to retake Christmas Island in the Pacific with CV's Enterprise and Lexingington in support with much of the battleship force. I will land a Marine Division and as much support and supply as I can to make re-conquest extremely difficult for the Japanese.

I have to admit, I'm rather looking forward to trying to get to the Japanese now. I realize now I pulled back prematurely and in too much strength, which has allowed an easy advance for Andre. However, we'll see if conserving my forces to date will pay dividends over the next few months.

I am looking forward to the next few weeks/months where I attempt to slow the Japanese advance and increase the butcher's bill.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 186
March 25/42 - 8/19/2014 4:22:39 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Bad turn.

CV Saratoga is torpedoed off the coast of Exmouth. I tried to get too cute in my movement to avoid submarines and got burnt. The CV is in trouble as a fuel storage explosion caused severe damage and at cruise speed she can only make 6kts. I'm also reminded of the brutal AI routine that only assigns one escort to support a stricken ship. If she's torpedoed again, which is likely since she's been assigned only one DD, she's a goner.

Another adverse side affect is the original TF with the undamaged ships has had it's movement orders overridden by the AI. Instead of rendezvousing with the oilers and other British CV, the TF has headed towards Perth, completely in the wrong direction. Now it too is at risk and in a location I am not happy about. I've formed an ASW TF of four DD's to try and meet up with CV Saratoga to render some form of help, while my remaining ships try and get away. I'm not optimistic.

I'm reminded this turn of why I hate this game sometimes. I can handle being torpedoed, but why do I always suffer such catastrophic damage in all my games whenever my CV's get torpedoed and the AI does me no favours with its decision making process. Simply bad luck.

I've already scratched Saratoga from the Allied OOB.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 187
RE: March 25/42 - 8/19/2014 1:16:55 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Tough luck as you say about Saratoga.
Re: the remainder of the TF changing orders, I always set mine to "absolute" threat
tolerance when it is critical that they do exactly as I want. The game seems to treat lack of fuel as a threat and will override
orders if you don't set absolute tolerance.
Did you also have "Meet TF" set for meeting the oilers?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 188
RE: March 25/42 - 8/19/2014 2:31:17 PM   
Richard III


Posts: 710
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

Bad turn.

CV Saratoga is torpedoed off the coast of Exmouth. I'm reminded this turn of why I hate this game sometimes. I can handle being torpedoed, but why do I always suffer such catastrophic damage in all my games whenever my CV's get torpedoed and the AI does me no favours with its decision making process. Simply bad luck.

I've already scratched Saratoga from the Allied OOB.



Bummer, not you tho..just Bad Luck and Sara was always a Torpedo Magnet in game.

At 6K it probably has enough floatation to get away. Is Perth Lv 4 port no good because Jap CV`s are around it ? Is that why you don`t want to send the Sara TF CA escorts there with her as well ?
The CA float planes set on ASW arcs ahead might help, as would her TBF`s and SBD`s set on ASW. ( IF there are no Jap CV`s near !! ) any LBA should be flying Search/ASW with reduced arcs near her.

Don`t Give Up The Ship !


_____________________________

“History would be a wonderful thing – if it were only true.”

¯ Leo Tolstoy

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 189
RE: March 25/42 - 8/19/2014 3:36:20 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Tough luck as you say about Saratoga.
Re: the remainder of the TF changing orders, I always set mine to "absolute" threat
tolerance when it is critical that they do exactly as I want. The game seems to treat lack of fuel as a threat and will override
orders if you don't set absolute tolerance.
Did you also have "Meet TF" set for meeting the oilers?


Fuel was good, but I only use "absolute" threat level when in combat, which this situation was not. I may have to start though if it eliminates the AI imposing orders on my TF's.

My TF's were moving by patrol points and the destination hex was where the oilers were located. Instead of being able to refuel this turn as intended, I'm now forced with a two day delay before I can coordinate the refueling again. This is what drives me crazy.

Anyway, tomorrow is another day and I'll try and salvage the situation and get back on track.


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 190
RE: March 25/42 - 8/19/2014 3:40:17 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard III

Don`t Give Up The Ship !


I may get frustrated on occasion, but I never give up.

The TF's were all set to naval search with DB's while all the patrol planes and TB's were set to ASW search. CV Saratoga still has 13% fires raging so can't conduct flight Ops. With only one DD of ASW value 2 she is essentially a sitting duck. I can only hope she survives the next turn so the ASW TF can meet up with her and provide some protection. These are British DD's so should provide the best ASW available.


< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 8/19/2014 4:40:38 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to Richard III)
Post #: 191
Kiss her goodbye - 8/22/2014 10:55:44 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Well, the vaunted Allied damage control does not apply in my case. This will be the second game I've lost a fleet CV to a single torpedo. Just no luck when it comes to having CV's torpedoed.

Fires never went out and from a low of 13% they are now in the 40's. Worse yet, system and float damage skyrocketed to 85% and 74% respectively from previously less than 40%. She's a goner. What a burn.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 192
RE: Kiss her goodbye - 8/22/2014 11:17:28 PM   
Richard III


Posts: 710
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

Well, the vaunted Allied damage control does not apply in my case. This will be the second game I've lost a fleet CV to a single torpedo. Just no luck when it comes to having CV's torpedoed.

Fires never went out and from a low of 13% they are now in the 40's. Worse yet, system and float damage skyrocketed to 85% and 74% respectively from previously less than 40%. She's a goner. What a burn.


Bummmmerrrrr..!

I`m convinced that in WITP AE luck is as important as skill...

I will now go and sacrifice a frozen chicken to the PBEM Game Gods...

_____________________________

“History would be a wonderful thing – if it were only true.”

¯ Leo Tolstoy

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 193
March 28, 42. - 8/22/2014 11:53:41 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
I expect CV Saratoga to sink tomorrow with all hands and the loss of all air groups. In hindsight, I never should have struck at Koepang after the failed movement. That one day delay directly led to the torpedoing of the carrier off the Australian coast. Every time I've torpedoed an American CV as Japan the damage has been negligible, yet here I am about to lose one due to a critical hit and a failure of Allied damage control. This isn't sitting well and just adds insult to injury.

India:

Simultaneous landings at Jaffna on Ceylon, and Cocanada and Vizagapatnam on the Indian coast. I must counter here. The American air units I've been able to reinforce India with are going to play a crucial role.

Thoughts:

I've made recent tactical errors which will have long term strategic consequences and risk AV. In hindsight, the Allied CV's should have been committed to the defence of Ceylon. I knew it was coming and is a favourite tactic of Andre's. With the support of LBA, four Allied CV's could have sprung a nasty surprise on CV Kaga and friends. Instead, I've thrown away any chance of influencing events in the foreseeable future. Losing CV Saratoga stings that much more right now.

Tomorrow's another day. I'll learn how extensive Andre's commitment to his Indian adventure is within days. I'm going to have to play without fault over the next few weeks to avoid digging my hole deeper than it already is. On a side note, Japanese forces have already landed on Pago Pago so it's going to be nothing but bad news for the next few months.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to Richard III)
Post #: 194
RE: Kiss her goodbye - 8/23/2014 5:05:24 PM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

Well, the vaunted Allied damage control does not apply in my case. This will be the second game I've lost a fleet CV to a single torpedo. Just no luck when it comes to having CV's torpedoed.

Fires never went out and from a low of 13% they are now in the 40's. Worse yet, system and float damage skyrocketed to 85% and 74% respectively from previously less than 40%.


Not that it makes any difference, but USN damage control didn't get really good until after the debacle of Savo Island in August. And IRL, Saratoga's sister ship Lexington was lost partly due to poor fire-fighting. Still, my sympathies -- murder most fowl indeed.

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 195
RE: Kiss her goodbye - 8/23/2014 5:17:54 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock

quote:

Well, the vaunted Allied damage control does not apply in my case. This will be the second game I've lost a fleet CV to a single torpedo. Just no luck when it comes to having CV's torpedoed.

Fires never went out and from a low of 13% they are now in the 40's. Worse yet, system and float damage skyrocketed to 85% and 74% respectively from previously less than 40%.


Not that it makes any difference, but USN damage control didn't get really good until after the debacle of Savo Island in August. And IRL, Saratoga's sister ship Lexington was lost partly due to poor fire-fighting. Still, my sympathies -- murder most fowl indeed.

It was improved right after Lexington at Coral Sea with Yorktown at Midway. AFAIK it did continue to improve after that.

_____________________________


(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 196
RE: Kiss her goodbye - 8/24/2014 12:07:35 PM   
wegman58

 

Posts: 460
Joined: 12/28/2013
From: Edina, MN (FROM the Bronx)
Status: offline
As bad things happened, the USN learned. Lexington was lost due to AV GAS fumes. We (USN Vet here) started filling AV GAS lines with CO2 after that. Savo showed the negative impacts of lots of flammables, after than battle we started removing those. Survivors reported what went wrong and we tried to eliminate/mitigate that cause of damage.

And I think if I'm in my 90's in a nursing home I'd still know what a Class ALFA/BRAVO/CHARLIE fire is and how to fight it with 1980's technology.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 197
The AI can kiss my ... - 8/24/2014 8:46:55 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
CV Saratoga sinks with all air groups. I failed to save the pilots doing the previous turn in a pissed off mood. I hope this is the only freebie. I really hate losing assets in this way.

Appreciate the comments, but anecdotal examples tend to mean nothing to me when trying to explain something that has happened in game. As far as I'm concerned, I got burnt by the AI. In my own game experience I've never seen this kind of damage, nor this kind of damage control whenever I've torpedoed an Allied CV in any of my Japanese games. They've always been lightly damaged and able to make port for repairs.

Anyway, that's the least of my problems. I just hope the AI will lighten up and not neuter me here.

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 8/24/2014 9:47:53 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to wegman58)
Post #: 198
March 29/42 Update - 8/25/2014 1:16:42 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Here's what I'm dealing with in India so far. Jaffna on Ceylon, undefended, fell to 21 enemy units. On the continent, Cocanada and Vizagapatnam are captured while an amphibious landing occurs at Cox's Bazar. AAR reports follow showing Japanese dispositions on India proper:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Cocanada (41,37)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 300 troops, 0 guns, 47 vehicles, Assault Value = 693

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 7

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 7 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Cocanada !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker:

Assaulting units:
2nd Division
2nd Raiding Regiment
16th Guards Regiment
5th Guards Cav Regiment
12th Base Force

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Vizagapatnam (42,37)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 870 troops, 21 guns, 114 vehicles, Assault Value = 274

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 8

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 8 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Vizagapatnam !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker:

Assaulting units:
5th Tank Regiment
90th Infantry Regiment
5th Amphibious Brigade
3rd RF Gun Battalion
22nd Ind. Engineer Regiment
37th JAAF AF Bn

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphibious Assault at Cox's Bazar (54,43)

TF 89 troops unloading over beach at Cox's Bazar, 54,43

Japanese ground losses:
152 casualties reported
Squads: 9 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost in surf during unload of 21st Div /7
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost from landing craft during unload of 21st Div /7
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad accidentally lost during unload of 21st Div /9
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad accidentally lost during unload of 21st Div /10
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad accidentally lost during unload of 21st Div /10
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost from landing craft during unload of 21st Div /10
10 Support troops lost overboard during unload of 21st Div /10
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost in surf during unload of 21st Div /11
10 Support troops lost in surf during unload of 21st Div /11
10 Support troops lost from landing craft during unload of 21st Div /11
10 Support troops accidentally lost during unload of 21st Div /11





Southeast Pacific:

Pago Pago falls. AAR follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Pago Pago (148,161)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 3791 troops, 42 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 130

Defending force 1128 troops, 33 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 33

Japanese adjusted assault: 220

Allied adjusted defense: 23

Japanese assault odds: 9 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Pago Pago !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
70 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1184 casualties reported
Squads: 66 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 90 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 20 (20 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 2

Assaulting units:
144th Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
Samoan Marine Battalion
7th Marine Defense Battalion


Burma:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Lashio (62,46)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 16162 troops, 140 guns, 32 vehicles, Assault Value = 569

Defending force 3773 troops, 16 guns, 46 vehicles, Assault Value = 103

Japanese adjusted assault: 225

Allied adjusted defense: 49

Japanese assault odds: 4 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Lashio !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), preparation(-), morale(-)
experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
402 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 38 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
562 casualties reported
Squads: 40 destroyed, 41 disabled
Non Combat: 92 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 15 (15 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 22 (21 destroyed, 1 disabled)
Units retreated 2
Units destroyed 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
113th Infantry Regiment
33rd Division

Defending units:
BFF Brigade
Burma Corps
1st Burma Auxiliary AA Regiment


Thoughts:

Well, a pretty heavy Japanese commitment to India. The goal here will be to limit the damage to Commonwealth forces while contesting as best as possible. I simply can't lose here. There is absolutely nothing I can do against such a heavy Japanese presence on Ceylon so whatever troops remain on the island are as good as lost. I simply didn't have the PP's available to buy them out. This is where Scenario 2 makes it so easy to steamroll Allied positions early with all the extra combat LCU's.

It may be a knee jerk reaction, but American 4E's have been ordered to target the port at Cocanada and the airfield at Vizagapatnam. I expect Japanese fighters to CAP Vizagapatam. The bombers could be in trouble if Andre has assigned CV LRCAP. I have substantial Allied fighter units in India and have withdrawn AVG from China to support. The lack of a size 7 airbase is preventing me from upgrading the AVG to P-40E's.

No sign of KB. I don't dare make a move in the Pacific until I know where the Japanese CV's are. I've already lost one CV under dubious circumstances, there's no point following that up by gifting Andre a chance to sink additional CV's.



_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 199
RE: March 29/42 Update - 8/25/2014 1:39:23 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
FWIW, you probably didn't lose all the pilots on Saratoga. When I've lost CVs to damage control rolls, the pilots were put into the general reserve with many weeks of delay - I want to say an average of around 30-50 days of delay. Check yours and see if you got any. Not all will make it off the ship, of course, but it's better than 100% losses.

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 200
March 30/42 Update - 8/27/2014 7:16:30 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Well, I saw something I've never seen before from a Dutch submarine, heck any submarine for that matter. A little payback for CV Saratoga.

AAR follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Trincomalee at 34,47

Japanese Ships
CV Kaga, Torpedo hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
DD Amatsukaze
DD Tatsuyuke

Allied Ships
SS KXIII

SS KXIII launches 4 torpedoes at CV Kaga

No sinking sounds or Japanese carrier aircraft Ops losses. I'll remain somewhat skeptical on whether she'll sink. Until I get confirmation, I'm thinking the four hits might be FOW.

Thoughts:

I'll update India soon. SIGINT indicates Japanese 15th Army HQ is planning for an attack on Madras. I have not decided to defend Madras yet. Indian units are so inexperienced they'll most likely perform like Chinese units at best. The last thing I want to do is provide easy VP's to Andre, but I also don't want to trash what forces I currently have delaying my eventual counter-offensive. This is new territory for me and I need to see how things develop.

Allied morale remains low despite the possibility of sinking a Japanese CV. I'm going to have to look at creative ways to garner VP's and stay out of further trouble.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 201
RE: March 29/42 Update - 8/27/2014 7:19:14 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Check yours and see if you got any. Not all will make it off the ship, of course, but it's better than 100% losses.


I forgot to check this last turn. I'm kicking myself for not getting those pilots into my pools before she sank. Thanks for letting me know the possibility of some being saved.


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 202
RE: March 29/42 Update - 8/27/2014 7:22:54 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Check yours and see if you got any. Not all will make it off the ship, of course, but it's better than 100% losses.


I forgot to check this last turn. I'm kicking myself for not getting those pilots into my pools before she sank. Thanks for letting me know the possibility of some being saved.



It should be a fair portion. Going from memory here, and I never actually counted, but I think about half the pilots made it off Kaga and all my CVLs, for example... same with the couple of USN CVs I've lost.

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 203
RE: March 29/42 Update - 8/27/2014 7:50:22 AM   
koniu


Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Check yours and see if you got any. Not all will make it off the ship, of course, but it's better than 100% losses.


I forgot to check this last turn. I'm kicking myself for not getting those pilots into my pools before she sank. Thanks for letting me know the possibility of some being saved.



It should be a fair portion. Going from memory here, and I never actually counted, but I think about half the pilots made it off Kaga and all my CVLs, for example... same with the couple of USN CVs I've lost.



After You re buy destroyed unit open tracker and find that unit. Open unit pilot window. You should see all pilots that survive they should return with unit.

< Message edited by koniu -- 8/27/2014 8:51:29 AM >


_____________________________

"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 204
RE: March 29/42 Update - 8/27/2014 8:01:17 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: koniu

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Check yours and see if you got any. Not all will make it off the ship, of course, but it's better than 100% losses.


I forgot to check this last turn. I'm kicking myself for not getting those pilots into my pools before she sank. Thanks for letting me know the possibility of some being saved.



It should be a fair portion. Going from memory here, and I never actually counted, but I think about half the pilots made it off Kaga and all my CVLs, for example... same with the couple of USN CVs I've lost.



After You re buy destroyed unit open tracker and find that unit. Open unit pilot window. You should see all pilots that survive they should return with unit.


I've not noticed this, but perhaps it's because I wasn't looking closely enough. Or maybe because I reassigned them before the unit became available again. My bought back units came back completely empty of pilots.

< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 8/27/2014 9:01:43 AM >

(in reply to koniu)
Post #: 205
April 3/42 - The Indian Campaign - 8/30/2014 8:36:43 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
I thought I should finally update the situation in India with a screenshot and commentary.

First up is Ceylon. I've written off the island and all Commonwealth troops stationed there. Andre has landed substantial force, upwards of 25 units, and any idea of holding the island is folly. Andre will achieve his goal of destroying all Allied LCU's on Ceylon. I did not reinforce the island beyond what arrives via the OOB. I was able to evacuate an AA Bde., Eastern Fleet HQ and portions of a British RAF base force.

Japanese forces are fanning out along the coast as far as Cuttack in the east, and Cocanada in the west. A Japanese drive on Bezwada has stalled due to the arrival of 23rd Indian Division arriving by rail. The unit was actually deploying to Hyderabad from Madras via rail, but the move was interrupted by the arrival of the Japanese 5th Guards Cavalry Regiment which shocked across the river. A second river crossing by the Japanese 16th Guards Regiment was repulsed. AAR follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Bezwada (39,36)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 4360 troops, 48 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 175

Defending force 7193 troops, 108 guns, 98 vehicles, Assault Value = 301

Japanese adjusted assault: 43

Allied adjusted defense: 136

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 3 (fort level 3)

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), op mode(-), preparation(-)
Attacker: shock(+), fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
255 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 22 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled

Allied ground losses:
60 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
16th Guards Regiment
5th Guards Cav Regiment

Defending units:
23rd Indian Division

However, another Japanese unit, which I believe to be a full division, could arrive tomorrow. 23rd Indian Division won't hold. Reinforcements are rushing south from Hyderabad, including Australia 7th Division.

Allied air units are deploying to Hyderabad, Calcutta and Bombay. American B-17's hit Vizagapatnam's airfield in an effort to suppress the base and destroy supply. Recon indicates 18% damage to the airbase. AAR follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on Vizagapatnam , at 42,37

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid spotted at 30 NM, estimated altitude 15,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 21

No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
18 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Airbase hits 9
Airbase supply hits 3
Runway hits 25

The biggest problem to date has been weather. Recon indicates Japanese ships docked at Jaffna, which I believe to be the damaged CV Kaga. I've been trying to target the port and airbase, but weather has grounded flights for days. This is allowing the Japanese to consolidate the position and Jaffna's airbase has already expanded to level 3. My window to hit the base relatively undefended has passed as recon indicates 25 Japanese fighters at Jaffna. I won't risk flying my inexperienced 4E's into a heavy CAP as yet.

The Allied plan right now is to forget about Ceylon and contain the Japanese landings on India proper. I don't believe I can hold Bezwada until reinforcements arrive, but will look to recapture the base. In the east, British Blenheim's are tasked with hitting the Japanese unit at Cuttack. The Burma Division, safely recombined and redeployed from Burma, will move to stop any further advance. 18th British Division is currently located at Chittagong, but I won't hesitate to withdraw from the base and move to reinforce Calcutta. I think Andre is looking to bag as many Commonwealth troops as possible. I will simply withdraw to avoid the losses and form a solid defence from which I can mount a successful counter-offensive. I'm about to lose all the restricted units on Ceylon, I will not lose another LCU if I can avoid it.

Things are going to get really interesting. At least Andre has made it possible for me to confront him directly with restricted Allied LCU's and a large portion of Allied air power stationed in India. I have to be extremely careful with the Commonwealth LCU's though. Replacement rates and experience are low which will curtail my ability to fight back effectively in the short term. That being said, it's going to be a blast turning the raw Commonwealth forces into a future Japanese wrecking machine.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 8/30/2014 9:38:51 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 206
RE: April 3/42 - The Indian Campaign - 8/31/2014 2:02:48 PM   
Richard III


Posts: 710
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
Too bad about Ceylon. I start forts there on T 1 and send all of the Singers at sea Dec. reinforcements convoys there, including 18th. British Div. and the few Hurricanes, and maybe a few of the Rangoon LCU`s if I can get them out. But maybe it just can`t be held in early `42 if they bring enough CV`s and good LCU`s....which is bad news for AFB`s.

What`s really interesting is his landings on the south coast taking that thinly garrisoned West-East road/rail network, haven`t seen that in awhile. Will he go for Madras or Calcutta I wonder ?

Also, could you please list the date in your updates, huge help to us lurkers.. Thanks !

_____________________________

“History would be a wonderful thing – if it were only true.”

¯ Leo Tolstoy

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 207
RE: April 3/42 - The Indian Campaign - 8/31/2014 2:08:56 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard III

Too bad about Ceylon. I start forts there on T 1 and send all of the Singers at sea Dec. reinforcements convoys there, including 18th. British Div. and the few Hurricanes, and maybe a few of the Rangoon LCU`s if I can get them out. But maybe it just can`t be held in early `42 if they bring enough CV`s and good LCU`s....which is bad news for AFB`s.

What`s really interesting is his landings on the south coast taking that thinly garrisoned West-East road/rail network, haven`t seen that in awhile. Will he go for Madras or Calcutta I wonder ?

Also, could you please list the date in your updates, huge help to us lurkers.. Thanks !

It's hard to see, but the date is in the posting title - April 3/42.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Richard III)
Post #: 208
RE: April 3/42 - The Indian Campaign - 8/31/2014 4:57:51 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard III

Too bad about Ceylon. I start forts there on T 1 and send all of the Singers at sea Dec. reinforcements convoys there, including 18th. British Div. and the few Hurricanes, and maybe a few of the Rangoon LCU`s if I can get them out. But maybe it just can`t be held in early `42 if they bring enough CV`s and good LCU`s....which is bad news for AFB`s.

What`s really interesting is his landings on the south coast taking that thinly garrisoned West-East road/rail network, haven`t seen that in awhile. Will he go for Madras or Calcutta I wonder ?

Also, could you please list the date in your updates, huge help to us lurkers.. Thanks !


Hi Richard,

I didn't reinforce Ceylon for a reason. Andre likes to take it and doing so would have played right into his hand I think. Andre is all about destroying Allied LCU's for the VP's as he's playing for AV. I believe if I had substantially reinforced Ceylon, he'd simply isolate the island with more extensive landings on India proper and bring whatever would be necessary to eliminate the Allied position. Ceylon would have turned into a POW camp.

I know I will lose Ceylon and what units are there, but this way I still have freedom of movement. I think Ceylon is a potential trap for the Allies, especially if the Japanese player wants it in early 42, as Andre does.

As BBfanboy mentions, I put the date in the subject heading, but can add it to the post instead for easier reference.


< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 8/31/2014 6:26:00 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to Richard III)
Post #: 209
RE: April 3/42 - The Indian Campaign - 8/31/2014 5:22:37 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Here's what Andre has committed to India so far.

Vizagapatnam:

5th Tank Regiment
90th Infantry Regiment
5th Amphibious Brigade
3rd RF Gun Battalion
22nd Ind. Engineer Regiment
37th JAAF AF Bn

Cocanada:

2nd Division
2nd Raiding Regiment
16th Guards Regiment
5th Guards Cav Regiment
12th Base Force

Cox's Bazar:

21st Division

Ceylon:

5th Division
38th Division
7th Tank Rgt.
14th Guards Rgt.
143rd Inf. Rgt.
41st Inf. Rgt.
3rd Eng. Const. Bn.
20th Eng. Rgt.
34th Fld. AA Bn.
31st Special BF
4th Eng. Rgt.
15th Eng. Rgt.
23rd Eng. Rgt.

The number of units committed to India so far is telling, totalling six divisions to date. This is a major operation by Andre and where I believe his bid for AV will be decided. This is another reason I did not commit to defending Ceylon. Against these numbers there isn't much I could have done being isolated on Ceylon. That would have left as much of India as Andre was willing to take up for grabs. I believe India is where the game will be decided.

This is how I see things developing. Andre focuses on garnering as many VP's in India as possible. KB will be lurking in the Pacific for a chance to strike the main Allied naval forces conducting operations to recover lost bases and move forward. I think Andre is planning on a knee jerk reaction from me to do something desperate which he will then crush with KB. That's my theory anyway.

This is going to be quite a challenge...

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 8/31/2014 6:23:50 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 210
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> Intelligence Report Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.484