third impressions

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

third impressions

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Ancients] >> QVADRIGA >> third impressions

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

third impressions - 3/11/2014 7:27:04 AM

Javolenus

Posts: 233
Joined: 8/13/2010
Status: offline

Since purchase I've been playing this game every day. I like the campaign structure. The music is also great. Seems to me this game could be a great educational tool for getting kids interested in Ancient History. Some of the races are very dramatic and, well, awesome.

I like the historical info, although much of the text I've seen (for example, the city info) is ungrammatical. This is a shame. I'd actually like to see more historical/background info, but I'd also like it to be in good English.

Seems to me that, on the race screen, there is a lot of space that could be used for giving info, perhaps as "mouse-over" text? For example, the "crowd" and "spina" are currently static, non-dynamic spaces. I really like the clean look of the game, so I wouldn't want to see it cluttered up. But maybe info could be accessed via "mouse-over" text hidden in the crowd/spina? Hmm, it's just a casual suggestion.

Race replays would be good, as previously mentioned.

Post #: 1

RE: third impressions - 3/11/2014 8:00:48 AM

76mm

Posts: 4688
Joined: 5/2/2004
From: Washington, DC
Status: offline

I've been playing every day as well, very addictive.

We really need more info about the aurigas however...I have one that wins almost every race he's in, I think, but I can't be sure because he doesn't have a race history.

Three comments about the epic campaign:
1) frankly I don't notice as big a quality difference as I would expect between the teams in the inferior arena and the level 4-5 arenas. I would think that level 4-5 should be the "big leagues" and that they'd be much more competitive than the Level 1-3.

2) For a victory in the epic campaign, I think you should consider requiring a victory or two in each regional capital, etc. Currently it is too easy to camp in arenas that are easy because they match your team's style. I totally dominate in the long wide Roman-style arenas so have stuck with those, and avoid shorter, narrower, or Greek style tracks.

3) It would be good to have a bit more info about how aurigas receive upgrades. I mentioned before that when I started I had three one-star aurigas. I rotate them evenly, and each of them has 9-10 wins, but one has now become a 2/2, one a 1/1, and one remains a 1/0. Also, I bought a two-star driver and within a few races, with no victories, he had become 2/2. Seems odd...

< Message edited by 76mm -- 3/11/2014 9:03:06 AM >

(in reply to Javolenus)

Post #: 2

RE: third impressions - 3/11/2014 9:49:39 AM

Frido1207

Posts: 456
Joined: 11/16/2006
From: Lower Saxony, Germany
Status: offline

re 1) biggest advantage of this is that it prevents players from spamming easy wins with a heavily upgraded team in the minor arenas. However, I agree, that it should be more difficult to win in the level 4+5 arenas.

re 2) totally agree.

re 3) my biggest concern. Just startet a new campaign with 2 0 Star aurigas. One of them received a skill upgrade after his first race, and one constitution upgrade after his 4th race. He never finished better than 2nd place. The other guy won already once, and earned more money, but didn�t received an upgrade.

_____________________________

(in reply to 76mm)

Post #: 3

RE: third impressions - 3/19/2014 1:21:07 AM

malthaussen

Posts: 112
Joined: 1/11/2006
Status: offline

3) Yes, that is interesting. My team leader has won both races he entered (I've just started), and received no upgrade, but one of his partners got a heart after his first race -- an 8 chariot race in Santonum in which he dogged it the whole time and finished dead last. He did get
bumped by another guy, though.

-- Mal

(in reply to Frido1207)

Post #: 4

RE: third impressions - 3/20/2014 12:51:09 AM

Manticore8

Posts: 41
Joined: 3/12/2014
Status: offline

Driver upgrades are based on a randomly drawn percentage factor, from what I was told. If I remember correctly, the chance for a driver getting an upgrade after his first race was a slim 14% chance, and the chances of an upgrade rises accordingly. Something I don't have a problem with. Chalk early upgrades to your drivers learning more than usual in his early career...he's a natural! For drivers that fail to upgrade in first 5 races or so...well that driver just needs a little more track experience, he'll get there. I had a driver with 12 races under his belt, and he didn't get an upgrade till his 13th race. I considered him just a slow learner.

I don't think a set formulae for x number of wins or races to equal a for sure upgrade is realistic. I like the random uncertainty of it all really.

(in reply to Frido1207)

Post #: 5

RE: third impressions - 3/20/2014 3:46:51 AM

76mm

Posts: 4688
Joined: 5/2/2004
From: Washington, DC
Status: offline

quote:

I don't think a set formulae for x number of wins or races to equal a for sure upgrade is realistic. I like the random uncertainty of it all really.

I dont' think anyone is asking for a set number of wins to upgrade, but currently the randomness is extreme. As previously described, I had three 1/0 aurigas from the beginning of a campaign and raced them about equally. Well into the campaign, one auriga was a 2/2, one was a 1/1, and one was still a 1/0. Also, I think that winning/placing should make it more likely to get an upgrade, and I've seen no indication that that's the case.

< Message edited by 76mm -- 3/20/2014 4:47:50 AM >

(in reply to Manticore8)

Post #: 6

RE: third impressions - 3/20/2014 8:12:40 AM

Kipper

Posts: 272
Joined: 3/5/2005
Status: offline

I prefer the randomness. If the game becomes to firmly on deterministic rails it will get old much more quickly.

(in reply to 76mm)

Post #: 7

RE: third impressions - 3/21/2014 1:07:52 AM

Temple

Posts: 529
Joined: 7/31/2002
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kipper

I prefer the randomness. If the game becomes to firmly on deterministic rails it will get old much more quickly.

Totally agree with Kipper. This shouldn't be chess, there should be risk and reward based on probability, just like the old board game.

(in reply to Kipper)

Post #: 8

RE: third impressions - 3/23/2014 11:57:20 PM

Manticore8

Posts: 41
Joined: 3/12/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Manticore8

I had a driver with 12 races under his belt, and he didn't get an upgrade till his 13th race. I considered him just a slow learner.

Talk about slow learners! I shattered my own record for number of races without a driver upgrade. My main driver starting out with with 1 star and 1 heart, raced in ten races in a row before he sat out for two races in a row. He then went back into action for the next seventeen consecutive races without even one promotion and so had raced in 27 races before he got his first upgrade. It's not a complaint, I nursed him to great fame and wealth before he died where he wanted; on the hot sands of the great Circus Maximus!