RE: A Question for JFBs - Now Open to EHansen

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: A Question for JFBs - Now Open to EHansen

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: A Question for JFBs - Now Open to EHansen

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: A Question for JFBs - Now Open to EHansen - 3/19/2014 4:29:26 AM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pws1225

I'm in a PBEM as Japan and it's April 2, 1942.

At this date, I would consider any troops in place completely ok. I would have expected at least one Aussie brigade. Very, very lucky.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to pws1225)

Post #: 31

RE: A Question for JFBs - Now Open to EHansen - 3/19/2014 10:29:47 AM

pws1225

Posts: 1166
Joined: 8/9/2010
From: Tate's Hell, Florida
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

quote:

ORIGINAL: pws1225

I'm in a PBEM as Japan and it's April 2, 1942.

At this date, I would consider any troops in place completely ok. I would have expected at least one Aussie brigade. Very, very lucky.

Agreed. Lucky with respect to the troops present and the relatively light damage to the facilities. I was expecting much worse.

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 32

RE: A Question for JFBs - Now Open to EHansen - 3/20/2014 12:09:50 AM

EHansen

Posts: 360
Joined: 12/6/2013
Status: offline

I never intended to make any kind of Fortress Palembang. I just wanted to make it so it could not be taken easily and I wanted it to cost some. I think
I easily achieved that goal. I used exactly 0 PPs and still kept it for quite a while and Paul's payment was fairly high. Much higher than if he had
taken it in the first week like he tried.