Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Indian fightings

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Indian fightings Page: <<   < prev  28 29 [30] 31 32   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Indian fightings - 9/22/2014 3:05:15 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy

In Sept 1942 something different for me will happen.
The KI-61a will enter into production.
I admit, with shame, that I've never seen this plane fighting. Never.


I have a couple of Sentai of the Ki-61a up and running in my game. For me, it was the first armored fighter (IJAAF) I got (and this in a pdu on, realistic r&d off game).

You are correct about its use...spot defense of big bases. But with a rail line I wouldn't feel bad about flying them in to defend Hyderbad either -- I think you will like what they can do there if only for a day or two.



The only problem I see in this plane is that it basically has the same armament of the KI-43 IIb, which is bad. 2 heavy MGs in CL are really too little to bring down anything tougher than a Blenheim.
However these two sentais will be a usefull addition. With PDU OFF you really struggle to have decent planes on the front line.
Considering the Ha-60 will not arrive before mid September, these two sentais will probably be operative by mid October, not before.

For the next few months I will be fighting with what I have now, so basically A6Ms (various models: 2, 3, 3a and 5), less than 80 KI-44 IIa,lots of KI-43 IIb, and KI-45a

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 871
RE: Indian fightings - 9/22/2014 3:30:13 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy

In Sept 1942 something different for me will happen.
The KI-61a will enter into production.
I admit, with shame, that I've never seen this plane fighting. Never.
Only have 2 sentais that can be equipped with this bird.
With Symon's latest modifications, I consider this plane slightly worse than the Oscar IIb, which is by now my major IJA fighter. Only in speed and durability the Ki-61a is superior, but I won't regret it, cause the two fighter sentais that can upgrade are presently equipped with Nates, so everything is better than a Nate
Then we'll have one more sentai arriving in 80 days that will be upgrading to KI-61b.

The KI-61 line will be used for point defence of big bases, like Calcutta or Madras (backed up by the KI-45a), so to let the SR=1 fighters to be based entirely in front line bases.







I personally think that speed it the most important virtue in game terms. This fighter (tony) can fly with the P40k so it is not a bad one. Plus it is more durable and has better armament than the Oscar. It is the service rating that nerfs this one. The difference between service rating of 1 and 3 is big. I prefer fighting Japanese fighters with the 3 service rating-even if they are better. It is just too easy to kill them with B17s while they are on the ground awaiting repair.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 872
RE: Indian fightings - 9/22/2014 3:55:35 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton


quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy

In Sept 1942 something different for me will happen.
The KI-61a will enter into production.
I admit, with shame, that I've never seen this plane fighting. Never.
Only have 2 sentais that can be equipped with this bird.
With Symon's latest modifications, I consider this plane slightly worse than the Oscar IIb, which is by now my major IJA fighter. Only in speed and durability the Ki-61a is superior, but I won't regret it, cause the two fighter sentais that can upgrade are presently equipped with Nates, so everything is better than a Nate
Then we'll have one more sentai arriving in 80 days that will be upgrading to KI-61b.

The KI-61 line will be used for point defence of big bases, like Calcutta or Madras (backed up by the KI-45a), so to let the SR=1 fighters to be based entirely in front line bases.






I personally think that speed it the most important virtue in game terms. This fighter (tony) can fly with the P40k so it is not a bad one. Plus it is more durable and has better armament than the Oscar. It is the service rating that nerfs this one. The difference between service rating of 1 and 3 is big. I prefer fighting Japanese fighters with the 3 service rating-even if they are better. It is just too easy to kill them with B17s while they are on the ground awaiting repair.



I agree. The best way, however, to deal with the SR=3 fighters is, IMHO, to keep the plane fatigue as low as possible. To do that you need to keep the % of CAP pretty low and so you need to have other models to be readier at the target base.
My plan is to use these guys in rear area bases (but still reachable for the P-38/4Es combo), along with KI-45s, with the latters at 40% CAP and the Tonies at 10/20% at best. Usually, with these long ranged missions, the allies can't sustained prolongued efforts anyway, so a couple of days of fighting should be enough...and in this brief time the SR3 planes can still do their job

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 873
RE: Indian fightings - 9/23/2014 9:03:04 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
August 30-31, 1942

So the month ends with the allies retreating from Hyderabad. The siege is lifted and the 21st and 36th IDs are safely returning to RnR at Hyderabad.
The allied units are moving back to Sholapur. I can now redeploy the 25th Army from Hyderabad. Will leave 2 full Divisions there, while 2 will be moved to Madras as reserve. 2 more will head to Calcutta, where the 1st Division just arrived from Tokyo.

In China we're ready to attack west of Kweyang. Can't do more than that. I will find 6 enemy corps, well dug in. I know it will be bloody... finger crossed!

South of Chikkiang we're almost ready for another series of attacks... now the 1st Tank ID has been brought in. Let's see how it performs...



(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 874
RE: Indian fightings - 9/25/2014 2:18:40 PM   
leehunt27@bloomberg.net


Posts: 533
Joined: 9/6/2004
Status: offline
Very exciting work at Hyderabad. Anything to stall and delay him in india is fantastic. What is the situation in the central/south Pacific? How many CV's does he have?

_____________________________

John 21:25

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 875
RE: Indian fightings - 9/25/2014 4:52:12 PM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
South of Chikkiang we're almost ready for another series of attacks... now the 1st Tank ID has been brought in. Let's see how it performs...

I'm surprised you don't have the 1st Tank Division in India instead. The Allies have better AT of course but I would think the operational mobility factor in India would be trump over the tactical superiority in China. But perhaps I simply have unrealistic visions of a Rommel-esque mobile defensive campaign in India against the British.

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 876
RE: Indian fightings - 9/26/2014 10:37:49 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
Sorry for the lack of updates guys. Been really busy this week at work. I am fighting in a prolonged trial with the city Hall and I am just few feet from reaching the final goal:get the Court Order to force the City - and the City Major himself- to pay 700k euros... been working on this since 2011 and now I am seeing, after 4 trials and several appeals, the light at the end of the tunnel.

Hope to get back with a comprehensive resumé this week end

< Message edited by GreyJoy -- 9/26/2014 11:45:31 AM >

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 877
RE: Indian fightings - 9/29/2014 9:05:14 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
Aug 31 - Sept 16, 1942

more than 15 days have passed and the allied pressure gets higher almost everywhere.

INDIA: The allies started to plaster the bases between Calcutta and Madras areas. Viz is one target. Sweeps, 4Es and 2Es have attacked everything that moved on that railroad, causing lots of damages.
Lately a para drop has conquered Mangalore on the western Coast of India... scary because it means Obvert wants to flank the whole Madras-Hyderabad area.
Reinforcements and supplies keep on pouring in India, but it just never enough. I am too exposed there. Period.

CHINA: 15 more days of heavy fightings south of Chikkiang. The Chinese held every single assault, causing my forces many casualities. Finally, on the 15th, the Chinese moved back to Chikkiang! HURRAH!!! The hex is finally ours... now we need to rivercross into Chikkiang...another bloody step!
On the NW of China, the tanks got another bloody nose on the road that leads to Kweyang. Too few supplies to proceed... we are stuck there

CENTPAC: A marine Para rgt conquers Tarawa after some heavy bombardments that destroyed the Naval garrison present there... hundreds of allied ships keep on pouring in the Gilberts...

SOPAC: SNEAKY Obvert! Suddenly several dot-bases appeared to be occupied by tiny allied forces. The first two were close to Milne Bay... the Nells from Rabaul got rid of them. Then I spotted enemy troops at Rekata Bay (Between Munda and Lunga). Tried to attack with Nells and Vals, but there are already AA guns and more than 1000 men there! OUCH! They must have been brought there by Catalinas...right under my nose... need to do something ASAP!
A big convoy with 3 SNLF units, 2 Brigades and 3 base forces is reaching Rabaul... these units will be used to counter this threat. The carriers are on the move in case he wants to lure me into an ambush here...


(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 878
RE: Indian fightings - 9/29/2014 9:05:49 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: leehunt27@bloomberg.net

Very exciting work at Hyderabad. Anything to stall and delay him in india is fantastic. What is the situation in the central/south Pacific? How many CV's does he have?



he should have 6 American CVs by now and a couple of small British platforms...

(in reply to leehunt27@bloomberg.net)
Post #: 879
RE: Indian fightings - 9/29/2014 9:07:31 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sangeli

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
South of Chikkiang we're almost ready for another series of attacks... now the 1st Tank ID has been brought in. Let's see how it performs...

I'm surprised you don't have the 1st Tank Division in India instead. The Allies have better AT of course but I would think the operational mobility factor in India would be trump over the tactical superiority in China. But perhaps I simply have unrealistic visions of a Rommel-esque mobile defensive campaign in India against the British.



The tank divisions are usefull, obviously. And in India they would be priceless... but in China they can make the difference much more and I need to get on Kweyang before 1943 rolls in... IN india I'm opting for a static defence for the moment, but I plan to move there at least 2 Tank Divisions by the end of the year...

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 880
RE: Indian fightings - 9/29/2014 10:46:54 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
Those small SNLF Co. are great for taking all those 'supposedly' empty dot bases.

Good luck in your long court case, counselor!

_____________________________


(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 881
RE: Indian fightings - 9/29/2014 4:48:29 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Those small SNLF Co. are great for taking all those 'supposedly' empty dot bases.

Good luck in your long court case, counselor!



Yup, but I have used them all already for garrisoning... not enough small companies around to cover all those bases...

Thanks Micheal!

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 882
RE: Indian fightings - 10/1/2014 12:36:16 AM   
pontiouspilot


Posts: 1127
Joined: 7/27/2012
Status: offline
May you be on a nice fat US style contingency fee!!....make sure you hold out for Euros not Lira!!

Good work in India. I'm surprised your opponent isn't playing a larger manuever game on that front. Also, I think your tanks are better used in China. Even the 42-43 Brit tanks and AT guns are more than a match for the IJA tanks...remember you are not planning on staying in India forever....the more hardware committed there the harder to extricate one's self.

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 883
RE: Indian fightings - 10/7/2014 5:26:32 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
Sorry again for th lack of updates. I am really busy lately and am finding difficulties in dealing with both the game and the AAR, and between the two i'm chosing the game

However, the game has continued.

Sept 17, October 1, 1942


Well, not a good month indeed.

The allis have turned the tables everywhere and the Empire is really struggling now. Need to do something smart, but for the moment, i can't seem to find anything smart enough to boost the overall situation

CENTPAC: The allies bombard Nauru Island and Ocean Is. Ocean is conquered by paras after the Nav Garrison present there was trashed by B-25s constant bombing...
At least 2 groups of allied heavy cruisers are operating in this area...

SOPAC: what seemed to be nothing more than a nuiance is becoming a REAL threat! Erik is using subs to deliver troops to all those bases i haven't conquered (stupid me!) and now they are building fast everywhere!
We managed to deal with Vanau, green Island and Emirau, but we've been stopped cold at Rekata Bay where a Cav regiment is being dropped! Neverthought the allied subs could get so much in place so fast! I have no reserves and i don't really know if i'll ever be able to push him out of there... ouch! Too close!!!
Also several Brooklin Class CLs, DDs and not less than 5 CAs are operating south of Lunga, with the possible presence of the allied CVs.... it's getting risky.

OZ: we started to reinforce the area around Port Hedland and Derby-Broome...

CHINA: We rivercrossed at Chikkiang... and we got smashed. The 116th ID was completely annihilated, remaining with 1 (ONE!) AV from the 440 starting ones.... 1-5 and the forts aren't touched. After one week we tried again with fresh troops... no joy. 1-2 and forts up to 3. Bombings are worthless here.... Near Kweyiang we're making some progresses, but they are slow due to the slow movement of supplies. We can attack or bombard only for a couple of turns, then we need to wait for one week to recover supplies (which, however, remain well below the optimum, with the obvious results on the final AV).

INDIA: Problems. The allies are now marching on the coastal Road from Mangalore... i can't cover everything... i knew it... i need to fall back... my positions are too exposed. It was a mistake to get this further. This campaign has been a failure so far. Costed me so much for so little gain in terms of supplies and fuel...oh well, live and learn.

SUBS!: Frack!!!! I had positioned KB1 in the Indian Ocean, west of Sumatra with lights off,with not a single A/C flying in order not to be indirectly spotted by the enemy's subs... result? Kaga has been torpedoed 2 times by a british subs... Will need to spend some long time in the yards if i will ever be able to reach them... so now i'm short of one CV and also the postion of the KB1 has been spotted. The surprise is gone. I was there because i needed to cover the retreat from India and from Western Oz...Good Idea GreyJoy, Bravo!

(in reply to pontiouspilot)
Post #: 884
RE: Indian fightings - 10/7/2014 5:58:05 AM   
Yaab


Posts: 4552
Joined: 11/8/2011
From: Poland
Status: offline
Are you 100% prepped for Chinkiang with your command HQ/army HQ and units? That could boost your AV provided leaders pass their Leadership checks.

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 885
RE: Indian fightings - 10/7/2014 9:09:45 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline
Are you saying "you can fight city hall?" Good luck! Stick it to 'em.

Cheers,
CC

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to Yaab)
Post #: 886
RE: Indian fightings - 10/7/2014 2:30:14 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy



SUBS!: Frack!!!! I had positioned KB1 in the Indian Ocean, west of Sumatra with lights off,with not a single A/C flying in order not to be indirectly spotted by the enemy's subs... result? Kaga has been torpedoed 2 times by a british subs... Will need to spend some long time in the yards if i will ever be able to reach them... so now i'm short of one CV and also the postion of the KB1 has been spotted. The surprise is gone. I was there because i needed to cover the retreat from India and from Western Oz...Good Idea GreyJoy, Bravo!


Tactical mistake. By flying no missions, you limited the chance of getting spotted but a sub that does find you attacks with no detection level on it at all. This greatly increases the odds that the sub will succeed. You should have some ASW up at all times even if it is limited to one or zero hexes.

< Message edited by crsutton -- 10/7/2014 3:33:03 PM >


_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 887
RE: Indian fightings - 10/7/2014 2:39:03 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yaab

Are you 100% prepped for Chinkiang with your command HQ/army HQ and units? That could boost your AV provided leaders pass their Leadership checks.



Yup.
Command HQ (100%Prepped)
Army HQ (100% prepped)
All LCUs (100% prepped)

No joy.

I've just tried another DL... 1-2 (more Chinese corps flew in this turn) but finally forts down to 2.
However 2 more IDs need to be called off and rotated back... with half of their squads disabled...ouch


(in reply to Yaab)
Post #: 888
RE: Indian fightings - 10/7/2014 2:40:10 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy



SUBS!: Frack!!!! I had positioned KB1 in the Indian Ocean, west of Sumatra with lights off,with not a single A/C flying in order not to be indirectly spotted by the enemy's subs... result? Kaga has been torpedoed 2 times by a british subs... Will need to spend some long time in the yards if i will ever be able to reach them... so now i'm short of one CV and also the postion of the KB1 has been spotted. The surprise is gone. I was there because i needed to cover the retreat from India and from Western Oz...Good Idea GreyJoy, Bravo!


Tactical mistake. By flying no missions, you limited the chance of getting spotted but a sub that does find you attacks with no detection level on it at all. This greatly increases the odds that the sub will succeed. You should have some ASW up at all times even if it is limited to one or zero hexes.



True. My mistake. I just thought that, in the middle of nowhere, without a single movement...completely silent...with not a single plane flying... I could remain hidden...
Stupid me. lesson learnt

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 889
RE: Indian fightings - 10/7/2014 3:08:58 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
Don't forget Allied Intel..."Heavy radio traffic at XX, YY" means check it out with an Allied sub or two.

_____________________________


(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 890
RE: Indian fightings - 10/7/2014 7:01:48 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy


quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy



SUBS!: Frack!!!! I had positioned KB1 in the Indian Ocean, west of Sumatra with lights off,with not a single A/C flying in order not to be indirectly spotted by the enemy's subs... result? Kaga has been torpedoed 2 times by a british subs... Will need to spend some long time in the yards if i will ever be able to reach them... so now i'm short of one CV and also the postion of the KB1 has been spotted. The surprise is gone. I was there because i needed to cover the retreat from India and from Western Oz...Good Idea GreyJoy, Bravo!


Tactical mistake. By flying no missions, you limited the chance of getting spotted but a sub that does find you attacks with no detection level on it at all. This greatly increases the odds that the sub will succeed. You should have some ASW up at all times even if it is limited to one or zero hexes.



True. My mistake. I just thought that, in the middle of nowhere, without a single movement...completely silent...with not a single plane flying... I could remain hidden...
Stupid me. lesson learnt



I deal in real estate and I always tell my clients to "hope for the best but plan for the worst."

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 891
RE: Indian fightings - 10/7/2014 7:11:29 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton


quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy


quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy



SUBS!: Frack!!!! I had positioned KB1 in the Indian Ocean, west of Sumatra with lights off,with not a single A/C flying in order not to be indirectly spotted by the enemy's subs... result? Kaga has been torpedoed 2 times by a british subs... Will need to spend some long time in the yards if i will ever be able to reach them... so now i'm short of one CV and also the postion of the KB1 has been spotted. The surprise is gone. I was there because i needed to cover the retreat from India and from Western Oz...Good Idea GreyJoy, Bravo!


Tactical mistake. By flying no missions, you limited the chance of getting spotted but a sub that does find you attacks with no detection level on it at all. This greatly increases the odds that the sub will succeed. You should have some ASW up at all times even if it is limited to one or zero hexes.



True. My mistake. I just thought that, in the middle of nowhere, without a single movement...completely silent...with not a single plane flying... I could remain hidden...
Stupid me. lesson learnt



I deal in real estate and I always tell my clients to "hope for the best but plan for the worst."


I am sure you have plenty of stories of deals that were torpedoed... Yuk Yuk Yuk !!

_____________________________


(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 892
RE: Indian fightings - 10/8/2014 5:21:32 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
Oct 3, 1942

INDIA: from the NE of India another allied army is marching south, towards Patna. 100K men are on the move...God...

SOPAC: not less than 3 enemy's TFs (including 2 CLAAs and 1 CVE) are spotted west of Ndeni. An attack is imminent and Rekata Bay is still in allied dirty hands... Nauru Island is now attracting lots of attentions by the allied recon...
More small units are spotted in the islands west of Mylne Bay... Erik is really concentrating his efforts here...

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 893
RE: Indian fightings - 10/9/2014 6:11:42 AM   
Yaab


Posts: 4552
Joined: 11/8/2011
From: Poland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yaab

Are you 100% prepped for Chinkiang with your command HQ/army HQ and units? That could boost your AV provided leaders pass their Leadership checks.



Yup.
Command HQ (100%Prepped)
Army HQ (100% prepped)
All LCUs (100% prepped)

No joy.

I've just tried another DL... 1-2 (more Chinese corps flew in this turn) but finally forts down to 2.
However 2 more IDs need to be called off and rotated back... with half of their squads disabled...ouch




So, why aren't you getting any HQ modifiers in your attacks? Command HQ must be no further than 18 hexes away from the battle, the Army HQ one hex away. They both should have leaders with the Leadership value of >70. I guess LCUs also should have leaders with >70 Leadership. The HQ bonuses, as far as I understand, are applied to units individually and not the whole stack.

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 894
RE: Indian fightings - 10/10/2014 5:34:40 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
Oct 4,5 and 6, 1942

Tense days.
Erik launches a massive offensive against eastern India, while in SOPAC things are on the edge

INDIA: the allies stack advances south of Benares towards Patna. The Empire sends his reserves out and risks to move on the open ground in front of Patna, in order to defend the rivercrossing. From Ranchi another divisions goes out and positions itself in the woods between Patna and Ranchi.
While the japanese reserves are called out, the sneaky Allied Dog uses his paras against the empty bases in the basin north of Dacca (Rapur and Djengler - sp!?). I was waiting for this move! Immediately pre-positioned units cross the RR line and cuts any possible RR movement, while the bombers pound merciless the USMC paras. Zeros and Oscars sweep the only conquered base with an AF and fights against 2 squadrons of P-39s moved there with decent results. Bad weather prevents the bombers to fly but the base is now isolated and the USMC paras can be annihilated.

SOPAC: the Empire risks it all, sending all the reserves against what has become a real PITA: rekata bay. Erik managed to move here more than 5000 men using subs...SMART!... a whole US CAV Rgt is present, along with AA and base force. One more week and these bastards could become a torn into my side. I know the allies have cruisers and possibly CVs in the area south of Lunga... so i was risking a lot...
Decided to make it all very fast. A big Amphib TF is sent to invade, covered by 2 TFs with a total of 3 BBs, 3 CAs, 5 CLs and 25 DDs. CVs are covering the whole operation.
The unloadings are bloody...more than 800 men disabled...half of my AVs is already gone on the beaches...
Bad weather prevents the bombers to fly...but when the day arrives.... a BANZAI charge is ordered...and the whole allied lot, pounded during the night by the IJN, surrenders... BANZAIIII!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CHINA: Eriks transfers 6 fighter squadrons to China (P-38 and P-48Ks, along with F3F)...the first engagement goes well, with 40 A6M3s sweeping through them near Kweyang. 2-1 inmy favour. Then we encounter them again over Changsha. Here the P-40K do well, killing 20 bombers of mine.
However, i love to see allied good fighters in China...more supplies burnt for the Chinese! Now two more training sentais are being trafsered here so to be able to fight them with superior numbers.

A good couple of days, but now in India the situation around Patna is becoming critical...

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Oct 06, 42


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Panggoe at 112,133

Japanese Ships
CL Kashima, Torpedo hits 2, on fire
PB Tama Maru #8
SC Ch 12
SC Ch 9
AMC Kiyosumi Maru
AK Nako Maru
AK Tosan Maru
AK Kinka Maru
AK Sasako Maru
AK Sakura Maru
xAK Oridono Maru
xAK San Francisco Maru
xAK Nozima Maru
xAK Akiura Maru
PB Takunan Maru #5
PB Takunan Maru #2
PB Shuko Maru #5
PB Sonan Maru #5

Allied Ships
SS O24



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Rekata Bay at 113,134

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2-N Rufe x 6
A6M3a Zero x 19

Allied aircraft
B-17D Fortress x 9

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
B-17D Fortress: 1 destroyed, 3 damaged
B-17D Fortress: 1 destroyed by flak

Japanese Ships
BB Yamato
DD Karii



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Invasion action off Rekata Bay (113,134)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

59 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
PB Takunan Maru #5
PB Takunan Maru #2
PB Shuko Maru #5
PB Sonan Maru #5
PB Tama Maru #8
PB Toshi Maru #3
PB Kyo Maru #7
PB Chiyo Maru #4
SC Ch 34
SC Ch 12
SC Ch 9
SC Ch 4
AMC Kiyosumi Maru
CL Kashima
xAK Kogyoku Maru

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphibious Assault at Rekata Bay (113,134)

TF 37 troops unloading over beach at Rekata Bay, 113,134

Japanese ground losses:
671 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 91 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 93 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 39 (0 destroyed, 39 disabled)
Vehicles lost 1 (0 destroyed, 1 disabled)

15 Support troops lost overboard during unload of Sasebo 6th SNLF
17 troops of a SNLF Inf Squad 41 accidentally lost during unload of Yokosuka 6th SNLF
17 troops of a IJA Inf Squad lost in surf during unload of 15th Garrison Unit


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Rekata Bay (113,134)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 1834 troops, 14 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 73

Defending force 8150 troops, 89 guns, 3 vehicles, Assault Value = 216

Japanese ground losses:
20 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
112th Cavalry Regiment
A Coy/NG Rifles
21st NZ Pioneer Coy
70th Cst AA Rgt /3
Horn Isl Base Force /1

Defending units:
Yokosuka 6th SNLF /1
Sasebo 6th SNLF
Maizuru 3rd SNLF
18th Garrison Unit
46th Naval Guard Unit
15th Garrison Unit /4


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Rangpur (58,34)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 540 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 21

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0

Allied adjusted assault: 18

Japanese adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 18 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Rangpur !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(+), leaders(-)

Assaulting units:
2nd USMC Parachute Bn /1


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Darjeeling (59,32)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 654 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 28

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0

Allied adjusted assault: 22

Japanese adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 22 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Darjeeling !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(-)

Assaulting units:
1st USMC Parachute Bn /1





AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Oct 07, 42


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Rekata Bay at 113,134

Japanese Ships
BB Yamato
CA Kako
CA Kinugasa
CA Aoba
DD Kosugiri
DD Uruyuke
DD Yuzuki
DD Kikuzuki
DD Oboro
DD Murakumo
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Isonami
DD Shirakumo
DD Shinonome
DD Fubuki

Allied ground losses:
127 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Guns lost 3 (1 destroyed, 2 disabled)

Port hits 10
Port supply hits 4

F1M2 Pete acting as spotter for BB Yamato
BB Yamato firing at Rekata Bay
CA Kako firing at Rekata Bay
CA Kinugasa firing at Rekata Bay
CA Aoba firing at 112th Cavalry Regiment
DD Kosugiri firing at Rekata Bay
DD Uruyuke firing at Rekata Bay
DD Yuzuki firing at 112th Cavalry Regiment
DD Kikuzuki firing at Rekata Bay
DD Oboro firing at Rekata Bay
DD Murakumo firing at Rekata Bay
DD Hatsuyuki firing at Horn Isl Base Force
DD Isonami firing at Rekata Bay
DD Shirakumo firing at Rekata Bay
DD Shinonome firing at Rekata Bay
DD Fubuki firing at Rekata Bay


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Rekata Bay at 113,134

Japanese Ships
BB Yamashiro
BB Fuso
CL Tama
CL Kuma
CL Abukuma
DD Yanagi
DD Karii
DD Kuretake
DD Uranami

Allied ground losses:
190 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 12 (5 destroyed, 7 disabled)

Port hits 15
Port supply hits 3

BB Yamashiro firing at Rekata Bay
BB Fuso firing at Rekata Bay
CL Tama firing at 112th Cavalry Regiment
CL Kuma firing at Rekata Bay
CL Abukuma firing at Rekata Bay
DD Yanagi firing at 112th Cavalry Regiment
DD Karii firing at 112th Cavalry Regiment
DD Kuretake firing at 112th Cavalry Regiment
DD Uranami firing at Rekata Bay




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Makin at 136,125

Allied Ships
CA Louisville
CA Northampton
DD Worden
DD Downes
DD Lang
DD Wilson
DD Henley

Japanese ground losses:
80 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Port hits 4
Port supply hits 3

SOC-1 Seagull acting as spotter for CA Louisville
CA Louisville firing at 52nd Naval Guard Unit
CA Northampton firing at Makin
DD Worden firing at Makin
DD Downes firing at 52nd Naval Guard Unit
DD Lang firing at Makin
DD Wilson firing at Makin
DD Henley firing at Makin



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Panggoe at 112,133

Japanese Ships
CL Kashima, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS S-41

SS S-41 launches 4 torpedoes at CL Kashima
S-41 bottoming out ....
Sub escapes detection


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Panggoe at 112,133

Allied Ships
SS S-41

SS S-41 is sighted by escort
S-41 bottoming out ....
Sub escapes detection




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Changsha , at 82,52

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid spotted at 39 NM, estimated altitude 25,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M3 Zero x 28
Ki-43-IIb Oscar x 24

Allied aircraft
P-40K Warhawk x 24

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M3 Zero: 4 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-40K Warhawk: 1 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
15 x A6M3 Zero sweeping at 20000 feet *

CAP engaged:
343rd FG/11th FS with P-40K Warhawk (0 airborne, 8 on standby, 12 scrambling)
4 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 33 minutes



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Darjeeling , at 59,32

Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid spotted at 42 NM, estimated altitude 24,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M3a Zero x 33

Allied aircraft
P-39D Airacobra x 36

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M3a Zero: 3 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-39D Airacobra: 5 destroyed

CAP engaged:
35th FG/40th FS with P-39D Airacobra (0 airborne, 10 on standby, 10 scrambling)
3 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 29 minutes
35th FG/41st FS with P-39D Airacobra (0 airborne, 10 on standby, 0 scrambling)
3 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 14 minutes



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Darjeeling , at 59,32

Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid spotted at 42 NM, estimated altitude 26,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 10 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-IIb Oscar x 22

Allied aircraft
P-39D Airacobra x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-IIb Oscar: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-39D Airacobra: 2 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x Ki-43-IIb Oscar sweeping at 20000 feet

CAP engaged:
35th FG/41st FS with P-39D Airacobra (3 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
3 plane(s) intercepting now.
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 4 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters to 29845.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 5 minutes
35th FG/40th FS with P-39D Airacobra (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
8 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters between 17000 and 23845.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 20 minutes



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Changsha , at 82,52

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid spotted at 17 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
G3M2 Nell x 41
G4M1 Betty x 29
Ki-43-IIb Oscar x 12

Allied aircraft
P-40K Warhawk x 13

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M2 Nell: 4 destroyed, 5 damaged
G4M1 Betty: 1 destroyed, 5 damaged

No Allied losses

Airbase hits 29
Airbase supply hits 9
Runway hits 85

Aircraft Attacking:
35 x G3M2 Nell bombing from 6000 feet
Airfield Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb
23 x G4M1 Betty bombing from 6000 feet
Airfield Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb
4 x G4M1 Betty bombing from 6000 feet
Airfield Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
343rd FG/11th FS with P-40K Warhawk (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
13 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters between 22000 and 26000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 135 minutes
3 planes vectored on to bombers



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Changsha , at 82,52

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 32
Ki-43-IIb Oscar x 24
Ki-48-Ib Lily x 5
Ki-51 Sonia x 3

Allied aircraft
P-40K Warhawk x 9

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-IIa Sally: 3 destroyed, 1 damaged
Ki-21-IIa Sally: 1 destroyed by flak
Ki-48-Ib Lily: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-40K Warhawk: 1 destroyed

Airbase hits 1
Runway hits 12

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x Ki-48-Ib Lily bombing from 6000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 100 kg GP Bomb
26 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 6000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
2 x Ki-48-Ib Lily bombing from 6000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 100 kg GP Bomb
3 x Ki-51 Sonia bombing from 6000 feet
Airfield Attack: 4 x 50 kg GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
343rd FG/11th FS with P-40K Warhawk (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 3 scrambling)
6 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters between 6000 and 25000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 82 minutes




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 2nd USMC Parachute Battalion, at 58,34 (Rangpur)

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 34

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
159 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 14 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
21 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
10 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
3 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Rekata Bay (113,134)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 9990 troops, 97 guns, 3 vehicles, Assault Value = 259

Defending force 2205 troops, 34 guns, 3 vehicles, Assault Value = 73

Japanese adjusted assault: 139

Allied adjusted defense: 37

Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Rekata Bay !!!

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
OS2U-3 Kingfisher: 2 destroyed
Catalina I: 3 destroyed

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-), preparation(-), fatigue(-)
experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
571 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 45 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
2623 casualties reported
Squads: 109 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 138 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 12 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 39 (39 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 5

Assaulting units:
Maizuru 3rd SNLF
18th Garrison Unit
15th Garrison Unit
46th Naval Guard Unit
Yokosuka 6th SNLF
Sasebo 6th SNLF
4th Raiding Rgt /2

Defending units:
112th Cavalry Regiment
A Coy/NG Rifles
21st NZ Pioneer Coy
Horn Isl Base Force
70th Cst AA Rgt /3


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Rangpur (58,34)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 897 troops, 3 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 31

Defending force 291 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 7

Japanese adjusted assault: 22

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 22 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Rangpur !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(-), disruption(-), preparation(-)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(-)

Allied ground losses:
334 casualties reported
Squads: 24 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 25 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
3rd Raiding Rgt /1

Defending units:
2nd USMC Parachute Bn /1



(in reply to Yaab)
Post #: 895
RE: Indian fightings - 10/10/2014 5:36:27 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yaab


quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yaab

Are you 100% prepped for Chinkiang with your command HQ/army HQ and units? That could boost your AV provided leaders pass their Leadership checks.



Yup.
Command HQ (100%Prepped)
Army HQ (100% prepped)
All LCUs (100% prepped)

No joy.

I've just tried another DL... 1-2 (more Chinese corps flew in this turn) but finally forts down to 2.
However 2 more IDs need to be called off and rotated back... with half of their squads disabled...ouch




So, why aren't you getting any HQ modifiers in your attacks? Command HQ must be no further than 18 hexes away from the battle, the Army HQ one hex away. They both should have leaders with the Leadership value of >70. I guess LCUs also should have leaders with >70 Leadership. The HQ bonuses, as far as I understand, are applied to units individually and not the whole stack.



Yes, yes, i'm doing all of that.No HQ bonus since now. Will soon resume the attacks and see if Gary's dice&rolls will finally give me an help here

(in reply to Yaab)
Post #: 896
RE: Indian fightings - 10/10/2014 5:43:51 AM   
Yaab


Posts: 4552
Joined: 11/8/2011
From: Poland
Status: offline
Strange. With Stacking Limits in place, the HQ bonuses (especially the command HQ ones) would come handy in combat. Maybe they are just an urban legend?

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 897
RE: Indian fightings - 10/10/2014 5:49:03 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yaab

Strange. With Stacking Limits in place, the HQ bonuses (especially the command HQ ones) would come handy in combat. Maybe they are just an urban legend?


In all my games (3 full CG now under my belt) i've seen ONLY once the HQ bonus being reported. It was against QBall and the allies had that bonus during an attack against Hollandia if i remember correctly.
It can happen, just very very very seldom.
So you better not wait for it...just accept it with a HUGE smile when it pops it out

(in reply to Yaab)
Post #: 898
RE: Indian fightings - 10/10/2014 6:19:49 AM   
Yaab


Posts: 4552
Joined: 11/8/2011
From: Poland
Status: offline
It is sad. They devoted a whole page (p.178) in the manual to a game feature that is almost non-existent.

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 899
RE: Indian fightings - 10/10/2014 9:24:05 AM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
My first attack against Sian in my current game had a HQ bonus.

I had done a lot of bombing (but not excessive) and was facing more Chinese AV and level 2 forts.

I got a 4-1 and took it on the first attack. On the Combat report it just had "HQ bonus+"

When it kicks in, its a tremendous boost

_____________________________


(in reply to Yaab)
Post #: 900
Page:   <<   < prev  28 29 [30] 31 32   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Indian fightings Page: <<   < prev  28 29 [30] 31 32   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.797