Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - No MM yet

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - No MM yet Page: <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 4:21:41 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Really great set of posts on the shipyard shuffle.

I do a little of that, but not nearly to the level you have taken it to.

You really should sanitize those posts and put them up in the war room.

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 721
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 4:35:30 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Really great set of posts on the shipyard shuffle.

I do a little of that, but not nearly to the level you have taken it to.

You really should sanitize those posts and put them up in the war room.


A couple of years ago I tried explaining it (http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3569831) and asking to make sure I understood what was happening properly, and that's when Symon called me a little kiddie looking for poop.

It's a bit harder to do with the IJN because their repair density seems to be significantly higher, and they tend not to have ports with 600 naval support scattered around the map.

In New Jersey's case, I expect it to cut a couple of months off of that 7-month repair estimate at the least. It's an ideal case: slight system damage, slight to moderate floatation, 5 or less engine damage. System damage at these levels repairs at a rate that's just about perfect for 1 day at pier side, 1 day in the shipyard, so you end up repairing the floatation damage at almost the rate of the system damage.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 722
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 5:26:05 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Really great set of posts on the shipyard shuffle.

I do a little of that, but not nearly to the level you have taken it to.

You really should sanitize those posts and put them up in the war room.


A couple of years ago I tried explaining it (http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3569831) and asking to make sure I understood what was happening properly, and that's when Symon called me a little kiddie looking for poop.

It's a bit harder to do with the IJN because their repair density seems to be significantly higher, and they tend not to have ports with 600 naval support scattered around the map.

In New Jersey's case, I expect it to cut a couple of months off of that 7-month repair estimate at the least. It's an ideal case: slight system damage, slight to moderate floatation, 5 or less engine damage. System damage at these levels repairs at a rate that's just about perfect for 1 day at pier side, 1 day in the shipyard, so you end up repairing the floatation damage at almost the rate of the system damage.


A fully repaired AR adds quite a lot of repair points, just like Naval Squads if I understand the concept correctly. It does take Japan quite a long time to make an AR, but I think they can be worth it at making a super repair facility.

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 723
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 5:54:36 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Really great set of posts on the shipyard shuffle.

I do a little of that, but not nearly to the level you have taken it to.

You really should sanitize those posts and put them up in the war room.


A couple of years ago I tried explaining it (http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3569831) and asking to make sure I understood what was happening properly, and that's when Symon called me a little kiddie looking for poop.

It's a bit harder to do with the IJN because their repair density seems to be significantly higher, and they tend not to have ports with 600 naval support scattered around the map.

In New Jersey's case, I expect it to cut a couple of months off of that 7-month repair estimate at the least. It's an ideal case: slight system damage, slight to moderate floatation, 5 or less engine damage. System damage at these levels repairs at a rate that's just about perfect for 1 day at pier side, 1 day in the shipyard, so you end up repairing the floatation damage at almost the rate of the system damage.


A fully repaired AR adds quite a lot of repair points, just like Naval Squads if I understand the concept correctly. It does take Japan quite a long time to make an AR, but I think they can be worth it at making a super repair facility.



Oh yeah. Good reminder. I just started a new Japan game, and in my other one I'm wishing I had converted a few (or actually, just converted about as many as possible to AV/AR and a few more AKE). I can always complete some more Std-A type xAKs from the queue later.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 724
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 6:25:57 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Lautem - August 1, 1944

This is a typical result. I try this again on August 10 or so to be sure that including more/bigger guns with the ships instead of just DDs would help with the casualties in the surf. I think FOW inflates this, as no unit was destroyed, but I was landing some artillery of my own.

I scaled up from LCTs to DDs as stuff I was landing via LCT was just dying on the beaches to 1000 "CD" shots - the organic artillery plus the artillery units. Note that there aren't any actual CD gun units there, or any "special base forces" with DP guns. It's all stuff that's only going to shoot at the beaches.

I tried again with CL Kenya and later with a couple of Clevelands and even more DDs in the landing TF, but it didn't make a difference. I'm trying to land the missing support from the units already ashore so that I can begin to think about combat ops. So I'll just have to burn up his supply, which I can do. He loses guns every time there's a bombardment, so hopefully that holds when I initiate the bombardment instead of it just being counter-battery fire.

I also don't really see a way for him to get his troops off of Timor, at least Dili/Lautem, at this point. If he sends all the xAKs it's going to take to do it, I'll send so many DDs and subs (I have 20+ running supply from Darwin that I'd shift to torpedo duty) that it'll be extremely costly for him. I'm also keeping the airfields damaged regularly, so the only way he can lift out would be via Emily/Mavis. It may be a few months before I can wreck his LCUs here, but that's fine.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 725
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 6:30:05 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Burma Skies - August 1, 1944

A typical sweep for me. Results from 80-90% of our sweeps look like this. When I have a bad air day, it's because of strikes going bad.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 726
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 6:32:44 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Future USN LBA pilots here. Well, 90-plane TB units probably count as LBA.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 6/1/2016 6:35:00 PM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 727
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 6:48:35 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Burma battles - August 2, 1944

He makes that Chinese HQ scurry away outside Pisanuloke and then appears to be withdrawing towards Bangkok, leaving "speedbumps" around Rahaeng. That's fine, I'm waiting for supply anyway.

Outside Uttaradit, we make progress with an attack. Look at his raw AV! That's for 2 Tank Divisions and 1 full ID, plus a couple of tank regiments. I'm not sure why he sent his 3 tank divisions (remember, the 2nd is just outside Pisanuloke and looks roughed up to about 50% TOE) to this area. With the 4th Tank also outside Pisanuloke, it's as if all of his tanks are fighting in the theater with the extremely good anti-hard squads floating around in Indian/British divisions.

He should've kept some of those tanks further south, with what I'm about to do.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 728
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 7:04:33 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
More Burma - August 3, 1944

Daily developments here. I've got a lot of recon, using a lot of P-40N26's (or whatever) with the camera, plus Fulmars, and Mosquitos. Anything with a camera and enough range to keep eyes on Thailand from Pegu.

He's now at ~900 aircraft between just those 3 bases. I assume he's CAPping Uttaradit and Pisanuloke heavily, and I'm not eager to waste my P-47 pools so I'll only sweep around the edges or when I think he's set up LRCAP on some units.

Note the movement arrows, or lack thereof. I should have max detection on the hex SW of Pisanuloke. DL is 9/10 on Bangkok, Moulmein, Tavoy, Mergui, Pisanuloke, and Uttaradit in addition to those others shown here. I have max detection on the hex 2 hexes SW of Pisanuloke also - it's 2 tank regiments. There are 2 units that just crossed into the jungle on the road down from Rahaeng, but I'm not sure what they are. Unsure what the unit is just outside Ayuthia.

I assume he's trying like mad to build forts at Ayuthia now, but who knows. He's sitting still basically at Moulmein. I'm not crossing that river, so he can just keep sitting there as long as he wants. I redo the movement every day in case he does move out. The way I see it, that army of about 3000 IJA AV at/outside of Moulmein can only just barely get down to Bangkok for extraction right now. The longer he sits, the harder that's going to be with what's coming.

I forgot about something I thought about doing months ago, once the Chinese finally arrived from NE Indochina, and so I'm not getting things into position as quickly as I would like. I could have made the move at any point from August 1 onwards.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 729
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 7:29:19 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Timor airfield suppression - August 2, 1944

A nice strike here, although a little costly in terms of escorts. But this should start keeping him from being able to use Koepang regularly, which would mean it's only a matter of time before I can overpower this particular battlement in his mile-high fortress perimeter.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 730
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 7:37:11 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
The importance of hex-side control - August 3, 1944

I keep daily 9/10 recon on Paoshan and Tsuyung. I don't see movement indicators after today. My little HQ unit moves in from the NE today, cutting his supply road.

It looks like 1/3 of a division at Chengtu (recon levels poor this day in order to get Chungking pictures, or I would have included the numbers... it's 3-4 units and 10K or so troops). My troops on the road don't have anywhere near enough supplies to take the place, but after I get done doing some stuff in Thailand I'll be seeing about dropping them 5-6K supply to maybe do something neat.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 731
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 7:43:12 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
A data point on Lautem from August 2. So far as I know, the troops/guns/vehicles/raw AV numbers in the combat summary don't lie. As in they don't have any FOW involved, unlike the casualty numbers.

Comparing to the last one, he's down 3 guns. I like it and will begin my own bombards soon (although I expect him to use Reserve mode to save on his supplies).




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 6/1/2016 7:45:20 PM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 732
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 8:08:29 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
This is an example of a bad air day. I really need the P-51D, which comes in November. I don't have enough planes around that can perform long range LRCAP, since the P-38 is so unreliable with PDU On. I have Spit-VIII's and TBolts, but otherwise I'm trying to rely on the P-51B. It's a perfectly decent plane, but is a second-stringer. It can't match up with the George or Frank. This day here broke my pools for the P-51B - I need to switch some units around to have any kind of reserve. You don't get very many of the early P-51 models.

The A6M5b losses are from my 2 P-47 sweeps of Uttaradit. My P-47s didn't actually do that great there. My losses are combined from that sweep and from his sweeps outside of Uttaradit, over the big tank stack which he has been bombing periodically. I've been trying to net some fighters on escort plus the bombers, which works every now and again.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 733
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 8:15:27 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
New Guinea - August 3, 1944

Meanwhile, back in New Guinea... he seems anxious to get his trapped units killed off. He attacks when he remembers to, I think, or when they have any kind of AV. At Wewak, his last 3 units finally die to attrition (25st Special Base Force, 16th JAAF Base Force, and a JNAF Unit). This stack at Aitape is one of two larger stacks of his, with lots of useful utility units in them. The other is outside Sarmi. Probably a few hundred LCU VPs, but I'm not in a hurry to kill them. I can just keep a regiment at each of my bases and not have anything to worry about, while he has to wait to rebuild them. I do need to strike a balance, though - I want him to rebuild them to burn the supplies, but I also don't want them to have time to rest up and defend anywhere.

His routine is to rebuild units then send them to Manchuria, "unlocking" better units for use elsewhere. I guess this works, but the cost in supplies is not small. I got SIGINT a couple of turns prior that one of the Mixed Brigades that I killed at Port Blair was heading to Fukuoka by ship. Probably from there to Korea, is my guess.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 734
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 8:32:47 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
A "sloppy" op - August 4, 1944

OK, it isn't happening yet. But in the next couple of days it will. If I were doing this properly, I'd. Not that I need distractions to be sloppy, but I'm ready to do the main thing about now, and if he doesn't react then sloppy will work. If he does, then it won't matter if it's not sloppy. I at least have surface cover, and bases have supply to run LRCAP. I wish I had the supply around for drop tanks, or the airfield levels to also bring in a couple hundred DBs or attack bombers, but that would take a few more weeks.

I got into Thailand a little too fast, which has forced things forward a bit. I was pseudo-planning for September.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 735
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 8:48:41 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Outside Uttaradit: hulking out some tanks - August 4, 1944

See ya next year, 1st and 3rd Tank Divisions.





Our stack will do the long walk west and then southwest into Rahaeng. I don't want to move quickly right now, and I'm not eager to shock across to Uttaradit. I would rather consolidate my forces at Rahaeng and shock across to Pisanuloke, if anything, where the terrain is clear and when I can use my full stack instead of half of it.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 6/1/2016 8:54:30 PM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 736
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 9:06:12 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
A good air day. Bombing Timor and the Sorong area, almost daily or every other day these days. Will post a screenshot of the good sweep from this turn next, but the Helens shot down were kamikazes running out of Dili. I figured he would bring in planes periodically as the runway damage went down (since we know the airfield damaged reported on the map is just service damage), and I have CAP set up 99% of the time.

The Frank losses are from sweep attempts on Babar, where I have only a light CAP of Hellcats and Corsairs.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 737
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 9:07:05 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

A good air day. Bombing Timor and the Sorong area, almost daily or every other day these days. Will post a screenshot of the good sweep from this turn next, but the Helens shot down were kamikazes running out of Dili. I figured he would bring in planes periodically as the runway damage went down (since we know the airfield damaged reported on the map is just service damage), and I have CAP set up 99% of the time.

The Frank losses are from sweep attempts on Babar, where I have only a light CAP of Hellcats and Corsairs.


At Waigeo, just offshore from Sorong:


I know doing this with this unit costs me the ability to upgrade some of my Hurricanes in Burma to Thunderbolts, but having a 54-plane Thunderbolt sweep is just too good. This is a British unit, obviously.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 6/1/2016 9:09:54 PM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 738
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/1/2016 9:23:56 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Sansapor - August 6, 1944

The first day is sometimes easy. It's the second days that are hard and you are at luck's mercy. That's tomorrow.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 739
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/2/2016 4:38:50 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
I changed the Beaufighters to bombs. They're still "sweeping" - I think they're broken.

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 740
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/3/2016 8:48:39 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Banda Sea, Sansapor/Sorong - actions on August 6, 1944

Several posts in a row here, one to cover each piece of the larger action.

We have some spare P-47s, although I wonder now what would have happened if I had placed them on more LRCAP over Sorong and Sansapor. I set all of my available fighters (staying under stacking limits) at Kaimana, Biak, Noemfoor, and Manokwari on LRCAP over Sorong for this turn, leaving a couple of short ranged units behind on regular CAP with a small radius to protect from Frances/Netties on the ships at Biak-Manokwari.

I think we caught some mediocre pilots in these Jacks and Nicks, or else they just got completely dominated. My hunch is that, given the level of his aircraft losses, his pilot quality must be starting to deteriorate.

Note how the P-38s do worse, despite an already-weakened CAP. My pilots in P-38s are still "veteran" level - 70+ XP/Air, but the really top guys go into P-47s most of the time. Still... I really don't think the P-38 has proper data. I think the durability is rated as too low. It's only 37. For reference, the Hellcat is 32, the P-47 is 36, and the Corsair is 35. I know the P-47 was legendarily durable, but...

We bombed the crap out of the AFs at Dili and Lautem with B-24s and B-25s later. 100+ hits on each, plus airbase and supply hits, although not as many supply hits as I would like.

quote:


Morning Air attack on Ambon , at 76,109

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid detected at 41 NM, estimated altitude 44,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-45 KAIc Nick x 22

Allied aircraft
P-47D2 Thunderbolt x 22

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-45 KAIc Nick: 10 destroyed

No Allied losses

Aircraft Attacking:
19 x P-47D2 Thunderbolt sweeping at 42000 feet

CAP engaged:
21st Sentai with Ki-45 KAIc Nick (3 airborne, 15 on standby, 0 scrambling)
18 plane(s) intercepting now.
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 3 being recalled, 1 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 17000 , scrambling fighters between 17000 and 35200.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 44 minutes



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Ambon , at 76,109

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid detected at 17 NM, estimated altitude 44,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-45 KAIc Nick x 3

Allied aircraft
P-47D2 Thunderbolt x 22

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-45 KAIc Nick: 2 destroyed

No Allied losses

Aircraft Attacking:
22 x P-47D2 Thunderbolt sweeping at 42000 feet

CAP engaged:
21st Sentai with Ki-45 KAIc Nick (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
2 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 1 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 17000 , scrambling fighters between 35200 and 45000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 42 minutes



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Lautem , at 72,115

Weather in hex: Thunderstorms

Raid spotted at 41 NM, estimated altitude 48,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes

Japanese aircraft
J2M3 Jack x 16

Allied aircraft
P-47D2 Thunderbolt x 21

Japanese aircraft losses
J2M3 Jack: 9 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-47D2 Thunderbolt: 1 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
11 x P-47D2 Thunderbolt sweeping at 42000 feet

CAP engaged:
S-602 Hikotai with J2M3 Jack (2 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
(5 plane(s) diverted to support CAP in hex.)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 1 being recalled, 2 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 5000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 5000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 40 minutes
Sasebo Ku S-1 with J2M3 Jack (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
(3 plane(s) diverted to support CAP in hex.)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 11 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 20000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 2 minutes



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Dili , at 71,115

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid detected at 20 NM, estimated altitude 48,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
J2M3 Jack x 51

Allied aircraft
P-47D2 Thunderbolt x 22

Japanese aircraft losses
J2M3 Jack: 12 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-47D2 Thunderbolt: 2 destroyed

CAP engaged:
S-602 Hikotai with J2M3 Jack (0 airborne, 12 on standby, 16 scrambling)
12 plane(s) intercepting now.
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 3 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 5000 , scrambling fighters between 5000 and 38380.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 18 minutes
Sasebo Ku S-1 with J2M3 Jack (0 airborne, 7 on standby, 13 scrambling)
7 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters between 35000 and 38380.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 20 minutes



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Dili , at 71,115

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid detected at 40 NM, estimated altitude 46,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes

Japanese aircraft
J2M3 Jack x 22

Allied aircraft
P-38J Lightning x 20

Japanese aircraft losses
J2M3 Jack: 5 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-38J Lightning: 3 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
11 x P-38J Lightning sweeping at 44000 feet *

CAP engaged:
S-602 Hikotai with J2M3 Jack (1 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
1 plane(s) intercepting now.
11 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 2 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 5000 , scrambling fighters between 5000 and 38380.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 53 minutes
Sasebo Ku S-1 with J2M3 Jack (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 1 scrambling)
2 plane(s) not yet engaged, 5 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters between 9000 and 40380.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 26 minutes


< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 6/3/2016 8:51:45 PM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 741
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/3/2016 8:56:20 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
So, this happened - possibly because I was silly when I set up my SCTFs, although they had to pass through the same hex as the IJN... I guess mine just passed through first, and his later. I did see these guys coming in.

A small secondary strike from KB during the day did enough damage to Cavalier and John Land to make them lost causes.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 742
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/3/2016 8:57:17 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
There's no guarantee that my guys would've caught his first, but not setting PZs definitely didn't help. I was concerned with the cruisers reacting out of CAP, but Fletchers can take care of themselves.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 743
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/3/2016 9:43:39 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
A wild KB appears!

I was wondering if he would boost them this way, hoping to sink a lot of ships. He sunk some, but I don't think he was coming after these. I think he thought that I would send fleet carriers for this, and maybe he thought the previous CVE TF I had here (sent away for something else several weeks ago), which he got some poor DL on with its 17 CVEs so lots of planes, was a group of CVs. I haven't shown him CVs in months.

In any case, there's wreckage, but it's not so bad. I counted up the air groups shown in the replay. I don't normally post walls of text from the replay text file, but here we go.

Present were the air groups from CVs: Hiryu, Akagi, Zuikaku, Kaga, Unryu, Taiho.

The total strike numbers (and fighters on map with DL 10/10 shown post-strike) match up with 8 CVs, so I either didn't "detect" 2 of them or he resized to favor bombers and sent all his fighters on escort (KB strike escorts were all from the CVs themselves, as no additional lines were shown to signify LBA escort or LRCAP). Given the number of fighters remaining and that I shot down 50-60 A6M's, I think he stayed somewhere close to the default sizing. The morning strikes consisted of 106 TBs and 141 DBs. 260 bombers (plus those spotted on search) plus 250 or so fighters tells me he has to have more than 6 CVs present. Akagi (81) + Zuikaku/Kaga/Taiho (72) + Unryu (63) + Hiryu (71) = 431. Even overstacking each CV by 10% or 15% that's only 460. So I'm thinking 8. The reason this is so important will become apparent when I get to posting about August 7-8.

Shokaku is sunk. Other than Unryu, he could have the other 5 built by now, but I think 2 others must have been with these at least. That leaves 3, plus Soryu, unaccounted for. Those could be the ones that tried to raid Rangoon a while back... that looked like a 4-CV grouping to me. Chitose/Chiyoda are unaccounted for, as are Ryujo/Zuiho/Shoho, but 4 of those are babies. Nisshin is still a CS, I'm pretty sure.

If I had known he would react so strongly to Sorong (I suspected but not enough to do it), I could've sent all my CVs/CVEs here to have a good ol' battle. I think I would have annihilated KB as a fighting force for the next 6 months at least if I'd had 12 CVs, 8 CVLs, and 25 CVEs here. Maybe next time .

quote:


Morning Air attack on TF, near Sorong at 82,107

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 80 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 26 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zero x 8
A6M5b Zero x 92
B6N2 Jill x 38
B7A2 Grace x 33
D4Y3 Judy x 105

Allied aircraft
Corsair II x 4
Thunderbolt I x 2
Kittyhawk IV x 2
P-38J Lightning x 1
P-40K Warhawk x 3
FM-2 Wildcat x 126
F4U-1A Corsair x 8

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zero: 1 destroyed
A6M5b Zero: 1 destroyed
B6N2 Jill: 7 destroyed, 9 damaged
B6N2 Jill: 1 destroyed by flak
B7A2 Grace: 4 destroyed, 2 damaged
D4Y3 Judy: 21 destroyed, 22 damaged
D4Y3 Judy: 4 destroyed by flak

Allied aircraft losses
Kittyhawk IV: 1 destroyed
FM-2 Wildcat: 4 destroyed

Allied Ships
CVE Thetis Bay
CVE Sargent Bay, Bomb hits 5, heavy fires, heavy damage
CVE Steamer Bay, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
CVE Shipley Bay, Bomb hits 1, on fire
CVE Sitkoh Bay, Bomb hits 4, heavy fires, heavy damage
CL Mobile
DD Sigourney
DE Fair
DE LeHardy
DD Yarnall
CVE Petrof Bay, Bomb hits 1, on fire
CVE Shamrock Bay, Torpedo hits 4, and is sunk
DD Haggard
AKA Jupiter, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
AKA Almaack, Torpedo hits 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Manokwari at 85,109

Weather in hex: Thunderstorms

Raid detected at 79 NM, estimated altitude 33,000 feet. Attempted strato-telepor-does
Estimated time to target is 23 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5b Zero x 20
P1Y2 Frances x 22

Allied aircraft
Kittyhawk III x 13

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5b Zero: 5 destroyed

No Allied losses

Allied Ships
LCI-627
AKA Artemis
AP Gen. W.M.Mitchell
DE Gendreau

Aircraft Attacking:
22 x P1Y2 Frances bombing from 31000 feet *
Naval Attack: 2 x 250 kg SAP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Sorong at 82,107

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 73 NM, estimated altitude 5,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 24 minutes

Japanese aircraft
B6N2 Jill x 24

Allied aircraft
Corsair II x 3
Thunderbolt I x 2
Kittyhawk IV x 1
P-38J Lightning x 1
P-40K Warhawk x 2
FM-2 Wildcat x 99
F4U-1A Corsair x 5

Japanese aircraft losses
B6N2 Jill: 7 destroyed

No Allied losses

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Sorong at 82,107

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 80 NM, estimated altitude 19,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 26 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5b Zero x 17
B6N2 Jill x 15
B7A2 Grace x 13
D4Y3 Judy x 10

Allied aircraft
Corsair II x 1
Thunderbolt I x 1
Kittyhawk IV x 1
P-38J Lightning x 1
P-40K Warhawk x 2
FM-2 Wildcat x 96
F4U-1A Corsair x 5

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5b Zero: 2 destroyed
B6N2 Jill: 9 destroyed, 1 damaged
B6N2 Jill: 1 destroyed by flak
B7A2 Grace: 8 destroyed, 1 damaged
B7A2 Grace: 1 destroyed by flak
D4Y3 Judy: 5 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
FM-2 Wildcat: 4 destroyed

Allied Ships
CVE Petrof Bay, on fire
CVE Thetis Bay
CVE Sitkoh Bay, heavy fires, heavy damage

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Sorong at 82,107

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 79 NM, estimated altitude 32,000 feet. Oh yeah, strato-kamis
Estimated time to target is 24 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-49-IIb Helen x 15

Allied aircraft
Corsair II x 1
Thunderbolt I x 1
Kittyhawk IV x 1
P-38J Lightning x 1
P-40K Warhawk x 2
FM-2 Wildcat x 74
F4U-1A Corsair x 5

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-49-IIb Helen: 10 destroyed

No Allied losses

Allied Ships
CVE Shipley Bay, on fire
CVE Petrof Bay, Kamikaze hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
CVE Thetis Bay

Aircraft Attacking:
6 x Ki-49-IIb Helen flying as kamikaze
Kamikaze: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Sorong at 82,107

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 80 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 22 minutes

Japanese aircraft
B7A2 Grace x 12

Allied aircraft
Corsair II x 1
Thunderbolt I x 1
Kittyhawk IV x 1
P-38J Lightning x 1
P-40K Warhawk x 2
FM-2 Wildcat x 55
F4U-1A Corsair x 4

Japanese aircraft losses
B7A2 Grace: 7 destroyed, 1 damaged

No Allied losses

Allied Ships
CVE Shipley Bay, on fire

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Sorong at 82,107

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 67 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 22 minutes

Japanese aircraft
D4Y3 Judy x 6

Allied aircraft
Corsair II x 1
Thunderbolt I x 1
Kittyhawk IV x 1
P-38J Lightning x 1
P-40K Warhawk x 2
FM-2 Wildcat x 52
F4U-1A Corsair x 4

Japanese aircraft losses
D4Y3 Judy: 4 destroyed

No Allied losses

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Sansapor at 84,107

Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid detected at 75 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 20 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zero x 8
B7A2 Grace x 9

Japanese aircraft losses
B7A2 Grace: 5 damaged
B7A2 Grace: 1 destroyed by flak

Allied Ships
APA Cavalier, Torpedo hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
APA James O'Hara, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires

Allied ground losses:
89 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 3 (1 destroyed, 2 disabled)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Sansapor at 83,107

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid spotted at 8 NM, estimated altitude 20,000 feet. My mistake here - no CAP here and I meant to withdraw
Estimated time to target is 2 minutes

Japanese aircraft
D4Y3 Judy x 19

Japanese aircraft losses
D4Y3 Judy: 2 damaged
D4Y3 Judy: 1 destroyed by flak

Allied Ships
LST-338, Bomb hits 4, and is sunk
LST-122, Bomb hits 2, and is sunk
AM Gladstone, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
LST-343, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
SC-751, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
LST-350, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Sorong at 82,107

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 65 NM, estimated altitude 19,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 21 minutes

Japanese aircraft
D4Y3 Judy x 11

Allied aircraft
Thunderbolt I x 1
Kittyhawk IV x 1
P-38J Lightning x 1
P-40K Warhawk x 2
FM-2 Wildcat x 52
F4U-1A Corsair x 4

Japanese aircraft losses
D4Y3 Judy: 4 destroyed

No Allied losses

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Sorong at 82,107

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 77 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 22 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-48-IIc Lily x 14

Allied aircraft
Corsair II x 17
Thunderbolt I x 7
Kittyhawk IV x 6
P-38J Lightning x 6
P-40K Warhawk x 12
FM-2 Wildcat x 36
F4U-1A Corsair x 29

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-48-IIc Lily: 5 destroyed

No Allied losses

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Sorong at 82,107

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 80 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 26 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zero x 14
A6M5b Zero x 58
B6N2 Jill x 13
B7A2 Grace x 15
D4Y3 Judy x 43

Allied aircraft
Corsair II x 12
Thunderbolt I x 5
Kittyhawk IV x 4
P-38J Lightning x 4
P-40K Warhawk x 8
FM-2 Wildcat x 34
F4U-1A Corsair x 19

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zero: 5 destroyed
A6M5b Zero: 16 destroyed
B6N2 Jill: 2 damaged
B7A2 Grace: 3 destroyed, 2 damaged
D4Y3 Judy: 4 destroyed, 12 damaged
D4Y3 Judy: 1 destroyed by flak

Allied aircraft losses
Kittyhawk IV: 1 destroyed
F4U-1A Corsair: 1 destroyed

Allied Ships
CVE Thetis Bay, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
CVE Shipley Bay, Bomb hits 1, on fire
CVE Petrof Bay, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
DE Levy
DE Bangust, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DE Sanders, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
DE Acree

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Sorong at 82,107

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 76 NM, estimated altitude 20,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 25 minutes

Japanese aircraft
D4Y3 Judy x 21
J2M3 Jack x 9
Ki-100-I Tony x 11

Allied aircraft
Corsair II x 9
Thunderbolt I x 2
Kittyhawk IV x 3
P-38J Lightning x 4
P-40K Warhawk x 4
FM-2 Wildcat x 21
F4U-1A Corsair x 12

Japanese aircraft losses
D4Y3 Judy: 14 destroyed
J2M3 Jack: 1 destroyed
Ki-100-I Tony: 1 destroyed

No Allied losses

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Sorong at 82,107

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 80 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 26 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5b Zero x 46
B7A2 Grace x 15
D4Y3 Judy x 41

Allied aircraft
Corsair II x 9
Thunderbolt I x 2
P-38J Lightning x 2
P-40K Warhawk x 3
FM-2 Wildcat x 12
F4U-1A Corsair x 11

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5b Zero: 4 destroyed
B7A2 Grace: 5 destroyed, 6 damaged
B7A2 Grace: 1 destroyed by flak
D4Y3 Judy: 10 destroyed, 8 damaged
D4Y3 Judy: 2 destroyed by flak

Allied aircraft losses
FM-2 Wildcat: 1 destroyed
F4U-1A Corsair: 1 destroyed

Allied Ships
CVE Thetis Bay, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Lardner
DD McCord
DD Bennett
APA Feland
CL Leander
DD Haggard
DD Yarnall
DD Rowe, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DE Levy
DD Erben
DD Perkins
APA Fuller, Bomb hits 1, on fire

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Manokwari at 85,109

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid detected at 36 NM, estimated altitude 31,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-49-IIb Helen x 19

Allied aircraft
Kittyhawk III x 9

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-49-IIb Helen: 12 destroyed
Ki-49-IIb Helen: 1 destroyed by flak

No Allied losses

Allied Ships
AK Phobos, Kamikaze hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
DD Fat Albert, Kamikaze hits 1
AK Caelum, Kamikaze hits 4, on fire, heavy damage

Allied ground losses:
78 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 7 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 744
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/3/2016 9:49:09 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Where I'm from, this is referred to as DAKKADAKKADAKKA sometimes. If only I'd had more dakka, though. I lost about 70 planes in the theater, counting the 40 lost aboard CVEs. Looking at the VP changes for the day, I got 348 of his planes. Aside from 1-2 Judys on the ground at Moulmein, it was all here. About half to 2/3 of the air wing on a presumed 8 CVs for what ends up being 6 Jeeps and a strategic trigger point.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 6/3/2016 9:51:49 PM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 745
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/3/2016 9:51:20 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Here's what the map looks like. I'll withdraw back to Noemfoor, and then Biak, with all the stuff at Sorong/Sansapor... except for the CAs and DDs. They'll head NE, on the slim chance he doesn't retreat with his CVs (the DDs) or sends more cruisers towards the beaches (the CAs).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 746
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/3/2016 9:53:03 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
As for what got ashore...

quote:


Ground combat at Sorong (82,107)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 5049 troops, 51 guns, 16 vehicles, Assault Value = 253

Defending force 1820 troops, 37 guns, 57 vehicles, Assault Value = 55

Allied ground losses:
31 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled

Assaulting units:
2nd Amphibious Brigade
4th Raiding Rgt /1
18th JAAF AF Bn
26th JAAF Base Force
46th JNAF AF Unit
19th JAAF Base Force
27th Special Base Force
77th Field AA Battalion
209th JAAF AF Bn

Defending units:
34th Combat Engineer Regiment
223rd Field Artillery Battalion
131st Field Artillery Battalion


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Sansapor (83,107)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 13296 troops, 244 guns, 246 vehicles, Assault Value = 558

Defending force 9721 troops, 109 guns, 48 vehicles, Assault Value = 198

Allied adjusted assault: 140

Japanese adjusted defense: 115

Allied assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 4)

Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 3

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
245 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 29 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled

Allied ground losses:
295 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 33 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
27th Infantry Division
24th (Sep) Infantry Regiment
112th Cavalry Regiment

Defending units:
51st Ind.Mixed Brigade
17th Ind.Mixed Regiment
56th Construction Battalion
16th Field AF Construction Battalion
29th Fld AA Gun Co
13th Field AF Construction Battalion
37th JNAF AF Unit


We should be fine at Sansapor, although supplies there are lower than I'd like. Sorong was more lightly defended than I thought, but since the ID wasn't able to make it there I'm going to have to try to lift out some of the combat engineers to save the unit from complete destruction over the next few days.

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 747
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/3/2016 9:54:03 PM   
savelius2

 

Posts: 57
Joined: 3/10/2016
Status: offline
Yeah, I keep seeing these late war turkey shoots, and it doesn't seem like they get the consideration they should from the Japanese side. If it takes 400 planes (not to mention pilots) to sink a handful of APAs that isn't really a net gain. CVEs, sure, if it were possible to keep control of their numbers it would help a lot with the late war, but a couple losses here and there won't stem the tide.

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 748
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/3/2016 9:58:35 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
I think we'll call this:

Operation Hangman - August 6, 1944

I imagine some people will think I'm misusing these on ground attack, but it is for a larger strategic purpose. Plus, I've already seen in my other game the level of destruction they can cause on ground troops - especially in the open and/or without fighter cover. About 10 units of them can completely wipe out a division in a matter of 4-5 days (as in dead, not shattered - dead).

As it is, this looks to be about 1/4 of the division disabled from just these strikes. The division wasn't there yesterday - it was just a smaller unit, which I was hoping to completely wipe out for what was coming next.

quote:


Afternoon Air attack on 33rd Division, at 61,59 (Udon Thani)

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 13 NM, estimated altitude 4,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 3 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-29-1 Superfort x 14

No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
440 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 36 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 14 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Guns lost 18 (2 destroyed, 16 disabled)

Aircraft Attacking:
7 x B-29-1 Superfort bombing from 2000 feet
Ground Attack: 20 x 500 lb GP Bomb
7 x B-29-1 Superfort bombing from 2000 feet
Ground Attack: 20 x 500 lb GP Bomb



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on 33rd Division, at 61,59 (Udon Thani)

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 15 NM, estimated altitude 6,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-29-1 Superfort x 20

No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
612 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 43 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 23 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 21 (1 destroyed, 20 disabled)
Vehicles lost 7 (2 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Aircraft Attacking:
7 x B-29-1 Superfort bombing from 2000 feet
Ground Attack: 20 x 500 lb GP Bomb
6 x B-29-1 Superfort bombing from 2000 feet
Ground Attack: 20 x 500 lb GP Bomb
7 x B-29-1 Superfort bombing from 2000 feet
Ground Attack: 20 x 500 lb GP Bomb



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on 33rd Division, at 61,59 (Udon Thani)

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 17 NM, estimated altitude 7,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-29-1 Superfort x 13

No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
331 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 27 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Vehicles lost 6 (3 destroyed, 3 disabled)

Aircraft Attacking:
7 x B-29-1 Superfort bombing from 2000 feet
Ground Attack: 20 x 500 lb GP Bomb
6 x B-29-1 Superfort bombing from 2000 feet
Ground Attack: 20 x 500 lb GP Bomb


And what came next:




More of those drops to come, although I'll have to come back for Udon Thani. He's left a large number of these bases undefended. Keeping a close eye out for any movement dots west of here from here on out.

I lost this turn in progress while I was doing it and it costs me a little bit the next day when I redo the orders, as I get riskier than I did the first time doing them.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 6/3/2016 10:02:47 PM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 749
RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - N... - 6/3/2016 10:03:52 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: savelius2

Yeah, I keep seeing these late war turkey shoots, and it doesn't seem like they get the consideration they should from the Japanese side. If it takes 400 planes (not to mention pilots) to sink a handful of APAs that isn't really a net gain. CVEs, sure, if it were possible to keep control of their numbers it would help a lot with the late war, but a couple losses here and there won't stem the tide.


This brings me up to 15, plus Long Island. I get 90 in total and still have 43 active right now. I'm not trying to trade them for no sunk IJN in return, but I was willing to lose some here - which is why I only sent 7. Probably enough to stand up to most of the LBA, but if I'd had 25 here that still wouldn't have been enough to stop KB's air wing completely and I still would've suffered a fair amount of damage. I also know there are 4 roaming Kongos and if he's using AKEs he could've been back here.

(in reply to savelius2)
Post #: 750
Page:   <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Headhunter - Lokasenna (A) vs. mind_messing (J) - No MM yet Page: <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.797