Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Japanese land in OZ!!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Japanese land in OZ!! Page: <<   < prev  45 46 [47] 48 49   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 6:46:34 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
1st September -42
______________________________________________________________________________

A new month and new planes. Pretty good one for the Allies as the P40K and Kittyhawk III starts producing at 65 and 12 planes/mo respectively. The 370MPH top speed will help no doubt but sadly the max alt. is too low to make any major impact. So Iīll continue to be dived on for a while longer.

Sadly this is also the last day before I have to start working again. So the turn pace will drop significantly starting tomorrow. Probably down to 2-3 turns per day.

------------------------
SOPAC/OZ
------------------------

200 4Es hits the blocking force NW of Brisbane. As Iīm limited to 10k minimum altitude damage is underwhelming. Seems like Tom is worried though as he is reinforcing. Iīm planning a trap here. Might work!

------------------------
CENTPAC
------------------------

Trying to sneak a small 4 ship DD TF through the gap between the Gilberts and the Ellice Islands. Got a 2/2 DL while refueling at Baker. Will try further south.

Have 2 big TFs approaching Baker. One with fuel for Baker and one with engineers for Baker and Howland.

------------------------
Burma/IO
------------------------

As seen in the above post I had to scrap the PB landing. I have some other ideas though. Update on that coming later today or tonight.

The USAAF is almost operational in India. Need about a week more of training to get DEF up.

------------------------
Logistics
------------------------

Man, SL makes things annoyingly difficult at times. I have a crapload of Engineers sitting at San Fran. But nowhere to send them. There simply isnīt any room to put them.

Only NZ and OZ have room for them. And I donīt want or need them there. Will have to start moving combat troops of the Samoans and Fijis just to get room for the engineers. And those troops have to be shipped to OZ or NZ...which means a heavily protected convoy...

Annoying but quite amusing at the same time...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1381
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 6:52:16 AM   
BattleMoose

 

Posts: 231
Joined: 2/17/2014
Status: offline
After China get cleaned up, what do you suppose he will do with all those LCUs? Seems like Java and Sumatra got reinforced. Do you think he will send a number of them to reinforce Burma?

Cape Town to Perth is a slower but much safer option for getting things to Australia.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1382
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 8:13:47 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BattleMoose

After China get cleaned up, what do you suppose he will do with all those LCUs? Seems like Java and Sumatra got reinforced. Do you think he will send a number of them to reinforce Burma?

Cape Town to Perth is a slower but much safer option for getting things to Australia.


Very good question! He will no doubt use a good amount to make the mountains to Burma rock solid. With the rest...not sure. Garrison requirements are ridiculously low so he will no doubt have the ability to buy out a huge amount of troops.

But as I have noticed SL will make it harder for him to create massive fortresses. But no doubt he will pack all the possible approaches to the limit. Marianas, Marshalls, Sumatra, DEI... much will go to Burma Iīm sure. He can probably buy out an ID every second month or so. So I will be facing at least an extra 6 IDs in the coming year besides the 3(?) he has already bought out.

(in reply to BattleMoose)
Post #: 1383
Here we go...! - 9/9/2014 10:38:43 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Operation "Get off my lawn"
______________________________________________________________________________

This operation has been going on parallel with the IO operation. My initial thought was to first go haywire in the IO and then quickly dash back to CENTPAC to provide cover for the landing.

But only 5 days after announcing the PB operation SIGINT picked up the 56th ID en route to PB. So I immediately turned the entire fleet around and back to Pearl. There they have been sitting basically waiting for prepp.

------------------------
Targets
------------------------

Main target is Tabiteuea.
Secondary target is Tarawa.

Known enemy strength is only the 32nd JAAF Coy on Tabiteuea.

We are going in a bit lighter then I would have wished. 145th and 148th Infantry RGT backed up by the 1st Pioneer Battalion and 637th Tank Destroyer Battalion. I would have preferred a full ID but donīt have the troops. Considering Tom hasnīt even expanded the AF I hope he wonīt have more troops then the Coy and the Nav Guard used to secure it 3 months back. I do have some BBs with me to soften up resistance. In fact I have all of them with me...

Tarawa on the other hand has a full ID landing. I will hold back this landing initially though. If the Tabi landing fails I will land on either Maiana or Kuria which still hasnīt flipped.

------------------------
Japanese response
------------------------

Unsure. With at least parts of the KB (Kakus?) away on refits and most of the CA force either temporarily out of action or out of range (Brisbane) Tom may decide its not worth risking a CV battle on equal terms over the Gilberts. Tom has also neglected to build up the AFs in the Gilberts meaning he will have no LBA support. Tarawa and Tabi are only level 1 AFs.

To sum it up its probably as a disadvantageous position for Tom as it can be with 42 standards. He may also have little to no interest in the Gilberts. But if he comes I will not shy down. I have the entire USN with me. Against a weakened KB without much SCTF support this is as good as a chance I will get.

If the KB is at Truk or Rabaul he will not arrive until the second day if going at full speed. Rabaul is the most likely of the two.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by JocMeister -- 9/9/2014 11:40:27 AM >

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1384
RE: Here we go...! - 9/9/2014 10:53:54 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Should perhaps add here that I went in a bit unprepared. Spotting the Japanese CVs 12 turns ago I decided to move immediately. So Tarawas BFs are still between SF and PH. Subs are not in place and AUX ships are still 10-12 days behind.

Not optimal but I decided I was better off moving fast.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1385
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 11:20:14 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister
Burma for instance is still lightly held and a big allied push here might not push Tom out but cause him a lot of headaches.

Donīt want to bog down the armor in the jungles though.


$&^*! I got shot down, abused, and kicked while on the ground for mentioning this instead of Sumatra...



(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1386
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 11:39:11 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister
Burma for instance is still lightly held and a big allied push here might not push Tom out but cause him a lot of headaches.

Donīt want to bog down the armor in the jungles though.


$&^*! I got shot down, abused, and kicked while on the ground for mentioning this instead of Sumatra...


Maskirovka!

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1387
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 11:45:23 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister
Burma for instance is still lightly held and a big allied push here might not push Tom out but cause him a lot of headaches.

Donīt want to bog down the armor in the jungles though.


$&^*! I got shot down, abused, and kicked while on the ground for mentioning this instead of Sumatra...


Maskirovka!



Just don't get cut off with an amphibious invasion and destroyed.


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1388
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 12:04:43 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
Just don't get cut off with an amphibious invasion and destroyed.


That would certainly be undesirable!

Not too worried about an counter attack. Atolls are horrible, horrible to attack. Even more so for Japan. In my 2nd game my opponent wrecked 2 full IDs trying to counter land against a lone USMC RGT backed up by a Tank BTL and a Engineer RGT on Makin.

Even after blasting them with BBs and bombing from the air for 3 months his landing force was completely wrecked. And my troops didnīt even have any supply. Atolls are NASTY. And even if Tom decided to try it will be the same krux as with his Kandavu landing. He would need the KB there for the duration. So the KB parked in the Gilberts for 100 days. Iīll take that for the price of the troops invested.

I think it was GJ who said that as a RoT Japan should never ever under any circumstances try to retake atolls.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1389
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 12:07:43 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
Just don't get cut off with an amphibious invasion and destroyed.


That would certainly be undesirable!

Not too worried about an counter attack. Atolls are horrible, horrible to attack. Even more so for Japan. In my 2nd game my opponent wrecked 2 full IDs trying to counter land against a lone USMC RGT backed up by a Tank BTL and a Engineer RGT on Makin.

Even after blasting them with BBs and bombing from the air for 3 months his landing force was completely wrecked. And my troops didnīt even have any supply. Atolls are NASTY. And even if Tom decided to try it will be the same krux as with his Kandavu landing. He would need the KB there for the duration. So the KB parked in the Gilberts for 100 days. Iīll take that for the price of the troops invested.

I think it was GJ who said that as a RoT Japan should never ever under any circumstances try to retake atolls.


I was thinking more along the lines of an invasion into lower India...

I had to look up that word...I like it.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1390
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 12:15:54 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Operation "Get off my lawn" - Day 2
______________________________________________________________________________

Everything goes exactly as planned. For once...

No Japanese opposition whatsoever. No ships and no planes sighted.

quote:

Pre-Invasion action off Tabiteuea (137,134)

2 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Allied Ships
BB Resolution
BB Ramillies
BB Mississippi
BB New Mexico

DD Talbot
DD Stuart
DD Allen
AP Crescent City
DD Norman


Japanese ground losses:
435 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 12 destroyed, 32 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled



quote:

Amphibious Assault at Tabiteuea (137,134)

TF 183 troops unloading over beach at Tabiteuea, 137,134

Allied ground losses:
116 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 16 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 25 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 10 (0 destroyed, 10 disabled)
Vehicles lost 38 (2 destroyed, 36 disabled)


That Japanese are thrown off the island on the first attempt.

quote:

Ground combat at Tabiteuea (137,134)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 9658 troops, 137 guns, 186 vehicles, Assault Value = 329

Defending force 909 troops, 5 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2

Allied adjusted assault: 354

Japanese adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 354 to 1 (fort level 2)

Allied forces CAPTURE Tabiteuea !!!

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
H8K1 Emily: 1 destroyed
H6K4 Mavis: 1 destroyed


Combat modifiers
Defender:
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
909 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 37 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 14 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 5 (5 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 2


Allied ground losses:
43 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Assaulting units:
145th Infantry Regiment
148th Infantry Regiment
637th Tank Destroyer Battalion
1st Pioneer Battalion
93rd Coast AA Regiment
1st AmphTrac Engineer Battalion
318th Base Group


Defending units:
13th Naval Construction Battalion
32nd JAAF AF Coy




I wasnīt to worried about today. Its the next turn I dread. If Tom sortied the KB at full speed from Truk or Rabaul we will have a CV battle tomorrow. If we do I have a lot of BB/CAs and transports with me to soak up TTs and bombs.

Fingers crossed for tomorrow...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by JocMeister -- 9/9/2014 1:31:43 PM >

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1391
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 12:21:13 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I was thinking more along the lines of an invasion into lower India...

I had to look up that word...I like it.


Ah, my bad. Well I think the timetable for an Indian invasion is way past now. I havnīt counted but I probably have (if you include the restricted Indian divisions) something like 5-7000 AV in India. Add to that the reinforcements from the states that are currently unloading...Not to mention the fact that the Indian IDs have gotten their EXP/MRL up from the starting 30/30 to more respectable levels. Most are around 50/100 now.

Not sure if anyone has ever tried to move into India this late?


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1392
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 12:59:52 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Hmm...my CV battle sense is tingling...still no turn back!

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1393
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 1:07:18 PM   
BattleMoose

 

Posts: 231
Joined: 2/17/2014
Status: offline
Good Luck!

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1394
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 1:10:28 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
A couple more landings and you will be knocking on the Marianas!

(in reply to BattleMoose)
Post #: 1395
Allies land in the Gilberts! - 9/9/2014 1:54:03 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Operation "Get off my lawn" - Day 3
______________________________________________________________________________

No CV battle thankfully... Not a single Japanese TF spotted despite 18 CATs flying from Tabi and Kuria on range 20.

Iīve decided to go ahead with the Tarawa landing. It might turn out to be "a bridge too far" but recon confirms the island is empty?!

Started moving in more BFs for Tabi and the surrounding islands.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1396
RE: Allies land in the Gilberts! - 9/9/2014 1:56:28 PM   
offenseman


Posts: 768
Joined: 2/24/2007
From: Sheridan Wyoming, USA
Status: offline
Wonderful! Now go sack Roi Namur. Well done. It must be nice to do something offensive for a change.

_____________________________

Sometimes things said in Nitwit sound very different in English.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1397
RE: Allies land in the Gilberts! - 9/9/2014 2:30:12 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: offenseman

Wonderful! Now go sack Roi Namur. Well done. It must be nice to do something offensive for a change.


Yes, until this point of the replay/CR...

quote:

Ground combat at Chungking (76,45)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 8469 troops, 702 guns, 729 vehicles, Assault Value = 1786

Defending force 217346 troops, 172 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 5619

Allied ground losses:
1855 casualties reported
Squads: 101 destroyed, 39 disabled
Non Combat: 12 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 2 (2 destroyed, 0 disabled)


This is despite level 6 forts in a UL hex. Starting to wonder if something is up with those huge Manchurian guns...losing 10-40 VPs per turn to this.

(in reply to offenseman)
Post #: 1398
RE: Allies land in the Gilberts! - 9/9/2014 3:00:04 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Starting to wonder if something is up with those huge Manchurian guns


IMO, their TO&E should be changed to include a static device that doesn't upgrade to a non-static device until at least mid-42 or beyond. They would have taken months to move IRL, not less than two weeks.

_____________________________


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1399
RE: Allies land in the Gilberts! - 9/9/2014 3:06:27 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
About those engineers sitting in the USA that you haven't found a use for: if you move them to OZ they can build the bases there to improve supply flow. They will also be closer to the islands that you will conquer and need to build up in SOPAC/SWPAC.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1400
RE: Allies land in the Gilberts! - 9/9/2014 3:09:00 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

quote:

Starting to wonder if something is up with those huge Manchurian guns


IMO, their TO&E should be changed to include a static device that doesn't upgrade to a non-static device until at least mid-42 or beyond. They would have taken months to move IRL, not less than two weeks.

+1
IRL I'm sure there were few Chinese bridges that could take the weight of these monsters and their prime movers. And soft roads plus rain would bog them right down.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 1401
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 3:11:45 PM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister


quote:

ORIGINAL: BattleMoose

After China get cleaned up, what do you suppose he will do with all those LCUs? Seems like Java and Sumatra got reinforced. Do you think he will send a number of them to reinforce Burma?

Cape Town to Perth is a slower but much safer option for getting things to Australia.


Very good question! He will no doubt use a good amount to make the mountains to Burma rock solid. With the rest...not sure. Garrison requirements are ridiculously low so he will no doubt have the ability to buy out a huge amount of troops.

But as I have noticed SL will make it harder for him to create massive fortresses. But no doubt he will pack all the possible approaches to the limit. Marianas, Marshalls, Sumatra, DEI... much will go to Burma Iīm sure. He can probably buy out an ID every second month or so. So I will be facing at least an extra 6 IDs in the coming year besides the 3(?) he has already bought out.


Speaking as someone who's knocked the Chinese out of the war, expect MrKane to have an abundance of medium to large LCU's ready to deploy where he wants them. You'll likely find yourself up against a fair number Ind. Mixed Brigades dotted all over the place.

The IJA in China is particularly flush with brigades that can be combined with reinforcement units to form a division. These units are ideal for those locations where MrKane will want more than some Naval Guards/SNLF or a IJA brigade to defend.

However, don't let the notion of having 3 or 6 or 12 extra "divisions" get you down. Most of the IJA divisions that start in China are little more than a few hundred infantry squads with some field guns and mortars. They're cheap to buy out and should do a good job holding behind forts and support units, but they're not the monster IJA divisions that have a nice artillery train and some tanks - they cost a fair number of PP's.

Once China falls, there's also the support assets that are freed up. There's no longer any need for any excess engineers or aviation support, so Japanese engineering efforts get a nice little boost, and the extra aviation support goes some way towards solving the AS crunch at the frontlines.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1402
RE: Allies land in the Gilberts! - 9/9/2014 3:30:05 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

About those engineers sitting in the USA that you haven't found a use for: if you move them to OZ they can build the bases there to improve supply flow. They will also be closer to the islands that you will conquer and need to build up in SOPAC/SWPAC.


Working on that. Lacking fuel in SOPAC right now though. Donīt want any more convoys stranded without fuel in the middle of nowhere!

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1403
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 3:33:20 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing
Speaking as someone who's knocked the Chinese out of the war, expect MrKane to have an abundance of medium to large LCU's ready to deploy where he wants them. You'll likely find yourself up against a fair number Ind. Mixed Brigades dotted all over the place.

The IJA in China is particularly flush with brigades that can be combined with reinforcement units to form a division. These units are ideal for those locations where MrKane will want more than some Naval Guards/SNLF or a IJA brigade to defend.

However, don't let the notion of having 3 or 6 or 12 extra "divisions" get you down. Most of the IJA divisions that start in China are little more than a few hundred infantry squads with some field guns and mortars. They're cheap to buy out and should do a good job holding behind forts and support units, but they're not the monster IJA divisions that have a nice artillery train and some tanks - they cost a fair number of PP's.

Once China falls, there's also the support assets that are freed up. There's no longer any need for any excess engineers or aviation support, so Japanese engineering efforts get a nice little boost, and the extra aviation support goes some way towards solving the AS crunch at the frontlines.


Good info! Thanks!

I encountered a bunch of those IDs in the Marianas. As you say they didnīt have much stopping power. At least not against a -44 USMC ID and Shermans...




(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 1404
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 4:25:55 PM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister
Man, SL makes things annoyingly difficult at times. I have a crapload of Engineers sitting at San Fran. But nowhere to send them. There simply isnīt any room to put them.

BS! There are half a dozen islands in the Gilberts with 10k+ stacking limits that can be built up to level 5 air bases. They are just sitting there waiting for SeaBees. Especially Tabiteuea with its 40k stacking limit as it can be brought up to level 6; I wouldn't hesitate in dropping 10 SeaBee battalions here.

Also certainly you can use engineers in Burma/India to build up some of those jungle bases. OZ can also use some engineering assets in the far north like Portland roads which is only 8 hexes from Port Moresby. If you can't find uses for engineers throughout 1942 you're doing it wrong. And I know this because I had the same thoughts in my last game and I know for a fact I underutilized my engineering assets and paid for it in 1943.

As for your current OP, it seems like the KB isn't going to show up. The fact the Gilberts were so undeveloped tells me that Japan isn't planning on risking the KB for the OP. That being said, I would be willing to bet the Japanese match your invasion of the Gilberts with a buildup of the Marshalls in the coming months.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 1405
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 4:55:15 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sangeli

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister
Man, SL makes things annoyingly difficult at times. I have a crapload of Engineers sitting at San Fran. But nowhere to send them. There simply isnīt any room to put them.

BS! There are half a dozen islands in the Gilberts with 10k+ stacking limits that can be built up to level 5 air bases. They are just sitting there waiting for SeaBees. Especially Tabiteuea with its 40k stacking limit as it can be brought up to level 6; I wouldn't hesitate in dropping 10 SeaBee battalions here.

Also certainly you can use engineers in Burma/India to build up some of those jungle bases. OZ can also use some engineering assets in the far north like Portland roads which is only 8 hexes from Port Moresby. If you can't find uses for engineers throughout 1942 you're doing it wrong. And I know this because I had the same thoughts in my last game and I know for a fact I underutilized my engineering assets and paid for it in 1943.

As for your current OP, it seems like the KB isn't going to show up. The fact the Gilberts were so undeveloped tells me that Japan isn't planning on risking the KB for the OP. That being said, I would be willing to bet the Japanese match your invasion of the Gilberts with a buildup of the Marshalls in the coming months.


Iīll ship a lot of the engineers there for sure. In fact most are already on route directly from the WC since PH is stacked to the rafters.

Working on getting more Engineers to OZ. Fuel issues!

Donīt know if Tom will build up the Marshalls or not. Havnīt done so yet but as you say this might trigger it. Would be kind of cool if he did. Never fought in the Gilberts or Marshalls before so it will be a new experience for me.

To be honest I havnīt even looked at the Marshalls yet. Not sure its worth grabbing at all. If Tom invests heavily I will probably just bypass it.

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 1406
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 5:03:34 PM   
Cribtop


Posts: 3890
Joined: 8/10/2008
From: Lone Star Nation
Status: offline
Good show!

Re Burma. How well is Ramree Island defended? An amphib there can quickly burst into the plains and take Rangoon. Meanwhile, a slower infantry thrust down from the Chittagong region along the coastal road will create a land LoC. Jungle bypassed! Nemo did this once very well, but most Japanese players now know to secure Ramree to the hilt. Still, if Burma is really emptyish for now, hmm.

< Message edited by Cribtop -- 9/9/2014 6:04:17 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 1407
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 6:02:33 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing


quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister


quote:

ORIGINAL: BattleMoose

After China get cleaned up, what do you suppose he will do with all those LCUs? Seems like Java and Sumatra got reinforced. Do you think he will send a number of them to reinforce Burma?

Cape Town to Perth is a slower but much safer option for getting things to Australia.


Very good question! He will no doubt use a good amount to make the mountains to Burma rock solid. With the rest...not sure. Garrison requirements are ridiculously low so he will no doubt have the ability to buy out a huge amount of troops.

But as I have noticed SL will make it harder for him to create massive fortresses. But no doubt he will pack all the possible approaches to the limit. Marianas, Marshalls, Sumatra, DEI... much will go to Burma Iīm sure. He can probably buy out an ID every second month or so. So I will be facing at least an extra 6 IDs in the coming year besides the 3(?) he has already bought out.


Speaking as someone who's knocked the Chinese out of the war, expect MrKane to have an abundance of medium to large LCU's ready to deploy where he wants them. You'll likely find yourself up against a fair number Ind. Mixed Brigades dotted all over the place.

The IJA in China is particularly flush with brigades that can be combined with reinforcement units to form a division. These units are ideal for those locations where MrKane will want more than some Naval Guards/SNLF or a IJA brigade to defend.

However, don't let the notion of having 3 or 6 or 12 extra "divisions" get you down. Most of the IJA divisions that start in China are little more than a few hundred infantry squads with some field guns and mortars. They're cheap to buy out and should do a good job holding behind forts and support units, but they're not the monster IJA divisions that have a nice artillery train and some tanks - they cost a fair number of PP's.

Once China falls, there's also the support assets that are freed up. There's no longer any need for any excess engineers or aviation support, so Japanese engineering efforts get a nice little boost, and the extra aviation support goes some way towards solving the AS crunch at the frontlines.


Chinese territory is not the same as the Chinese .

There's a key difference between this game and ours - stacking limits. MrKane will be limited in where he can send all those "extra" units.

(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 1408
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 6:10:26 PM   
Spidery

 

Posts: 1821
Joined: 10/6/2012
From: Hampshire, UK
Status: offline
Expect more divisions released than you have suggested. If he starts deliberate attacks at Chungking he will have divisions, including some of the better ones, suffering heavy disablements. If he plans ahead he will have the PP available to buy these out at a cheap rate.

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 1409
RE: Japanese land in OZ!! - 9/9/2014 6:13:10 PM   
offenseman


Posts: 768
Joined: 2/24/2007
From: Sheridan Wyoming, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Spidery

Expect more divisions released than you have suggested. If he starts deliberate attacks at Chungking he will have divisions, including some of the better ones, suffering heavy disablements. If he plans ahead he will have the PP available to buy these out at a cheap rate.


Absolutely correct. Damaged divisions can be bought out much more cheaply.

_____________________________

Sometimes things said in Nitwit sound very different in English.

(in reply to Spidery)
Post #: 1410
Page:   <<   < prev  45 46 [47] 48 49   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Japanese land in OZ!! Page: <<   < prev  45 46 [47] 48 49   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.047