RE: Need some names!

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Need some names!

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Need some names!

Page: << < prev 19 20 [21] 22 23 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Need some names! - 1/15/2015 7:56:27 PM

msieving1

Posts: 526
Joined: 3/23/2007
From: Missouri
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: General Patton

Bainbridge (I believe this name is or was the name of one of the first USN nuclear powered cruisers)

Also the name of the USN's very first destroyer, DD-1, commissioned in 1902.

There was also a Clemson class DD named Bainbridge, DD-246, commissioned in 1921. She spent WW2 in the Atlantic and Caribbean theaters.

< Message edited by msieving1 -- 1/15/2015 8:59:04 PM >

_____________________________

-- Mark Sieving

(in reply to btd64)

Post #: 601

RE: Need some names! - 1/17/2015 1:02:31 AM

DOCUP

Posts: 3073
Joined: 7/7/2010
Status: offline

What extended map pack do I install for BTS. I lost it all a while back and I'm now tring to get back into it. Also was thinking the Dutch would of liked to of had a CAV probably more than the Aussies and Kiwis.

(in reply to msieving1)

Post #: 602

RE: Need some names! - 1/17/2015 11:50:35 PM

DOCUP

Posts: 3073
Joined: 7/7/2010
Status: offline

I was looking around and didn't find the 3 big Aussie CD units? I believe they are the 5th, 6th and the 7th CD regiments.

(in reply to DOCUP)

Post #: 603

RE: Need some names! - 1/18/2015 10:14:47 PM

btd64

Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DOCUP

What extended map pack do I install for BTS. I lost it all a while back and I'm now tring to get back into it. Also was thinking the Dutch would of liked to of had a CAV probably more than the Aussies and Kiwis.

The one on the Babes site....GP

_____________________________

Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

WPO,WITP,WITPAE-Mod Designer/Tester
DWU-Beta Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton

(in reply to DOCUP)

Post #: 604

RE: Need some names! - 1/19/2015 5:44:59 PM

Alikchi2

Posts: 1785
Joined: 5/14/2004
Status: offline

Hey guys (John in particular) - do you mind if I use some BTS/RA assets for a project I'm working on? I'm particularly interested in the new IJNAF aircraft. I'd credit the mod, John, and whoever else was involved, obviously.

(I tried to PM John but his inbox is full!) Thanks to all for your work!

_____________________________

(in reply to btd64)

Post #: 605

RE: Need some names! - 1/19/2015 11:16:37 PM

btd64

Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alikchi

Hey guys (John in particular) - do you mind if I use some BTS/RA assets for a project I'm working on? I'm particularly interested in the new IJNAF aircraft. I'd credit the mod, John, and whoever else was involved, obviously.

(I tried to PM John but his inbox is full!) Thanks to all for your work!

Alikchi,
I'll email john for you....GP

_____________________________

(in reply to Alikchi2)

Post #: 606

RE: Need some names! - 1/19/2015 11:20:10 PM

btd64

Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: General Patton

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alikchi

Hey guys (John in particular) - do you mind if I use some BTS/RA assets for a project I'm working on? I'm particularly interested in the new IJNAF aircraft. I'd credit the mod, John, and whoever else was involved, obviously.

(I tried to PM John but his inbox is full!) Thanks to all for your work!

Alikchi,
I'll email john for you....GP

DONE....GP

_____________________________

(in reply to btd64)

Post #: 607

RE: Need some names! - 1/20/2015 1:06:38 AM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

Sorry guys. My Mother staged a surprise visit over the last four days and I have been unable to do much or read the threads. Apologies...

Responses:
1. LOVE the additional DD Names. Will use those once Juan gets his changes to me.
2. French CL withdrawal issue: I think you are stuck with it unless you start a new game. Got that 'sinking' feeling that it does change unless a game is started over. Very disappointing and I am sorry about that.

Alikchi:
You are more then welcome to use our hard work. Any chance I can help another fellow modder have an easier time is something I will JUMP AT! Footnotes as to where the source material came from is greatly appreciated by the RA/TM/BTS Team!

Juan wrote me and said that he has a ways to go regarding the off-map modifications. QUESTION: Do you guys want me to make the changes in names (making for a double update) and all that or wait for Juan to get his work done and do the next updates as a single one? Am open either way...

_____________________________

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to btd64)

Post #: 608

RE: Need some names! - 1/21/2015 1:15:37 PM

btd64

Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline

Single update.

....GP

_____________________________

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 609

RE: Need some names! - 1/21/2015 5:33:06 PM

Symon

Posts: 1928
Joined: 11/24/2012
From: De Eye-lands, Mon
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd
Sorry guys. My Mother staged a surprise visit over the last four days and I have been unable to do much or read the threads. Apologies...

quote:

Anyone who waits on their time to take care of their Mother, need not EVER apologize. Just tell us to be go to hell, you got more important things to do.

quote:

Juan wrote me and said that he has a ways to go regarding the off-map modifications. QUESTION: Do you guys want me to make the changes in names (making for a double update) and all that or wait for Juan to get his work done and do the next updates as a single one? Am open either way...

Just a small suggestion. People don't like playing scenarios with daily/weekly updates. I understand it is a WIP, but I really think you should post a Scen, and have all the other stuff done in background. Only post an update if it has substantive data changes that might require a restart.

Just thinking. Just tell me to go to hell. I'm non denominational. Ciao. JWE

_____________________________

Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la libert�! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 610

RE: Need some names! - 1/22/2015 3:12:32 AM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

Thanks for the laugh John. I think that we'll wait until Juan has got his Mark Two version complete then I shall finish the naming stuff and we'll simply take care of it in a single pass.

_____________________________

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Symon)

Post #: 611

RE: Need some names! - 1/26/2015 1:59:15 PM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

Found another anomaly in a TOE.

The British 2nd Division shows 494/496 under TOE percentages.

A look at the TOE shows why. It has the TOE of some kind of base force with no troops and 12 AV.

I think my game is 1.8.

_____________________________

Hans

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 612

RE: Need some names! - 1/26/2015 2:58:49 PM

JuanG

Posts: 906
Joined: 12/28/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

Found another anomaly in a TOE.

The British 2nd Division shows 494/496 under TOE percentages.

A look at the TOE shows why. It has the TOE of some kind of base force with no troops and 12 AV.

I think my game is 1.8.

I'm going to take a guess and say TOE ID should be #2840 (Brit 41 ME Div) instead of #2841 (Jun-43 Base Force).

_____________________________

Coral Sea HDM
AltWNT Scenarios

(in reply to HansBolter)

Post #: 613

RE: Need some names! - 1/26/2015 3:35:50 PM

btd64

Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

I think my game is 1.8.

I thought that was fixed Juan.
Also I believe we are at 10.0 Hans.

Hey Juan, just sent you my turn....GP

< Message edited by General Patton -- 1/27/2015 12:56:22 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to HansBolter)

Post #: 614

RE: Need some names! - 1/26/2015 4:20:33 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

Juan just wrote me earlier with thoughts regarding his improvement of the off-map purchases. Am sure it will be Posted here for commentary.

Hans--will look at and FIX the TO&E issue with next release. Some of these issues must be coming from all of JWE's hard work importing all of RA into the newest DaBabes database. He had a monumental job and I am thankful for him getting that done. It has, however, led to a few issues. Nothing horrific but still nagging things...

_____________________________

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to btd64)

Post #: 615

RE: Need some names! - 1/26/2015 11:33:52 PM

JuanG

Posts: 906
Joined: 12/28/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: General Patton

quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

I think my game is 1.8.

I thought that was fixed Juan.
Also I believe we are at 1.10 Hans.
Hey Juan, just sent you my turn....GP

The version number or the TOE for the British division? I don't think version number (or rather, scenario name) changes even if you update mid-game. As for the TOE ID, I don't think I've seen that particular one before, and as I got those numbers from the editor using the version we are playing, its probably not working in our game either. I can either patch it now for our game or we can wait until the next larger release.

As for the plane changes, this was the proposal list I sent to John, based on feedback here and in the AAP thread a little while ago. I think overall the costs are in a good place, as PPs are fairly scarce, especially in 1942. These changes will basically make a few of the units a little more expensive, and a little slower to arrive, taking the edge off in early '42 which I think was a worry. The only major '43 unit I touched was the F6F-3 one that arrived on the same month production started, now it arrives the month afterwards.

(USN) 20 plane ADD F4F-4 unit (cost 180) moved from 2/42 to 3/42
(USN) 20 plane ADD F4F-4 unit (cost 160) moved from 3/42 to 4/42
(USN) 20 plane PRT F4U-1 unit (cost 240) plane count from 20 to 16, cost from 240 to 220
(USN) 20 plane ADD F6F-3 unit (cost 200) moved from 4/43 to 5/43
Note: Bumping the F4F-4s back to coincide with on-map production start, making the F4U 'early' unit a little more expensive per plane, bumping back F6F-3 first additional unit to slow introduction a little

(USAAF) 16 plane ADD P-38E unit (cost 160) changed to DIV, moved from 5/42 to 6/42
(USAAF) 20 plane PRT P-38F unit (cost 240) moved from 6/42 to 7/42
(USAAF) 16 plane ADD P-38E unit (cost 140) changed to P-38F, chaned to DIV, moved from 7/42 to 9/42, plane count from 16 to 20, cost from 140 to 200
Note: First P-38E unit become a Divert and is moved back, early P-38F also delayed. Second P-38E group changed to P-38F and moved to september, made larger but also more expensive per plane

(British) 16 plane ADD Hurricane IIb unit (cost 130) moved from 5/42 to 7/42, cost from 130 to 120
Note: Bumping 3rd Hurricane II unit back by a month, to split the group arrivals into Mar/Apr, Jun/Jul

Still checking a few of the other groups, but if anyone have any that seem like they need a look at please let me know. Will try to get these implemented and back to John tommorow or Wednesday at the latest so he can move on with the rest of the patch.

_____________________________

Coral Sea HDM
AltWNT Scenarios

(in reply to btd64)

Post #: 616

RE: Need some names! - 1/27/2015 12:01:56 AM

btd64

Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline

Juan,
For our PBEM, I think we should wait for the Big patch from John. The dates, costs and numbers of units seem to fit better, IMO....GP

_____________________________

(in reply to JuanG)

Post #: 617

RE: Need some names! - 1/27/2015 1:39:25 AM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

I'll do the update as soon as Juan has the files updated with his changes and back to me. Whenever you can Juan--shoot them over.

Appreciate the help and effort!

_____________________________

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to btd64)

Post #: 618

RE: Need some names! - 1/27/2015 2:12:41 AM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

Change List:

Juan changes the Off-map Allied Planes as described above.

Japan
1. Reintroduce Coastal Command HQ in Osaka. This unit was in early RA and it has since gotten 'lost.' It appears in mid-42 and is a Restricted Command HQ.
2. Move Paratroopers to 'original' starting positions prior to DaBabes corrections.
3. Remove any duplicated SNLF units that are present on Dec 7th when they are already accounted for in Brigade form. (See point 2 above)
4. Consolidate 55th ID into parent ID. It will not spread all about. It will begin intact with the Imperial Guards. Same reasoning as above.

Submarines
I am interested in playing with the SS SOME but not a lot. Here is my thought:

The 'cruiser' submarine is not rejected immediately. Navies see them as an 'experiment' and pursue them for another year or two. This change is allowed for at London and a slight adjustment in tonnage is allowed. Several of these additional SS survive to begin the war in 1941. Result:
USA: Gains an additional pair of Argonauts.
JPN: Adds three more ML SS (three due to tonnage difference under the Argonauts).
FR: Add another Surcouf to the Pacific side.

Naming Issues:
Could someone find out EXACTLY which ships are double named. I need ID number so the names can be changed quickly without having to search and search and then STILL miss one or two.

Have I missed anything? Anything to say about the above points?

< Message edited by John 3rd -- 1/27/2015 3:13:58 AM >

_____________________________

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 619

RE: Need some names! - 1/27/2015 11:21:14 AM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

Looks great John3rd.

I'll keep reporting any bugs I find.

My current game is at December 27th, 1942.

_____________________________

Hans

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 620

RE: Need some names! - 1/30/2015 4:09:36 AM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

Time to talk UPDATE. Juan just sent me his revised changes to the Allied off-map aircraft purchase system. I'll start work on the Mods and get them straight. Figure Sat or Sun release.

_____________________________

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to HansBolter)

Post #: 621

Treaty Mod (045) 2.0 - 1/30/2015 3:48:19 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

Had some time this morning and got the easiest of the three Mods updated. Treaty Mod (045) is now version 2.0. It is Posted on the website.

I hope to get to RA tonight and then tackle BTS tomorrow.

Change Log: Treaty 2.0
1. CV Princeton II is now South Mountain.
2. USS Manatee (Argonaut) and Dungeness (Narwhal) added to US SS. Start in Pearl Harbor.
3. I-125, 126, 127 (Japanese ML) added to Fleet and placed at Hiroshima.
4. Only one USS Paulding here so this did not need changing.
5. Japanese Carrier double-naming.
6. Raised Japanese Type 88 Mine Production some to reflect having more boats at war's start.

Pretty simple changes.

_____________________________

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 622

RE: Treaty Mod (045) 2.0 - 1/30/2015 4:34:43 PM

ny59giants

Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline

How about pairing the ML SS so you have three groups of two?? Any Allied player WHO DOES NOT form a Minesweeping TF first at Manila will pay!!

_____________________________

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 623

Reluctant Admiral 7.8 - 1/31/2015 1:38:15 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

Ouch. RA took a bit more time then Treaty to do changes and fixes!

Change List:
1. Deleted 4 SNLF China units that were accidentally left in the OOB when JWE imported all the unit to his newest DaBabes standard. Moved over 4 IJA Garrison units to replace the SNLF units.
2. Placed all of 55th ID with Imperial Guards.
3. Karafuto Bge placed under Northern Area Command.
4. Added Coastal Command arriving at Osaka in June 42.
5. Army Paras moved to Hanoi.
6. Brit 2nd ID TOE fixed.
7. Added a CLAA Omaha upgrade in late-43.
8. Checked and corrected naming issues with wessels.

Think that is all.

Will move to Between the Storms tonight.

< Message edited by John 3rd -- 1/31/2015 2:39:28 PM >

_____________________________

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to ny59giants)

Post #: 624

New Release "Between the Storms" 2.1 - 1/31/2015 9:41:40 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

OK. These updates were darned near exponential in work done! BTS 2.1 is ready for work. The vast majority of the changes pertain to the opening of the war but there are others contained within the update for later in the war.

Change List:
1. CV Princeton II is now South Mountain.
2. USS Manatee (Argonaut) and Dungeness (Narwhal) added to US SS. Start in Pearl Harbor.
3. I-125, 126, 127 (Japanese ML) added to Fleet and placed in their own TF to raise HELL on the 7th..
4. USS Paulding naming fixed.
5. Japanese Carrier double-naming.
6. Raised Japanese Type 88 Mine Production some to reflect having more boats at war's start.
7. Deleted 4 SNLF China units that were accidentally left in the OOB when JWE imported all the unit to his newest DaBabes standard. Moved over 4 IJA Garrison units to replace the SNLF units.
8. Placed all of 55th ID with Imperial Guards.
9. Karafuto Bge placed under Northern Area Command.
10. Added Coastal Command arriving at Osaka in June 42.
11. Army Paras moved to Hanoi.
12. Brit 2nd ID TOE fixed.
13. Added a CLAA Omaha upgrade in late-43.
14. Checked and corrected naming issues with wessels.
15. Added 6th Ind Brigade to Pacific duty (replacing the 55th ID Regiment).
16. Made sure the LIZ upgrades to the RITA without issue.
17. Added French Bouvier (Surcouf-Class SS) by popular demand!
18. Added Juan's 2.0 aircraft off-map purchase system.

OK Boys...that is it. If you have been waiting then GO FOR IT! If you have a game in progress then do your update and enjoy...

< Message edited by John 3rd -- 1/31/2015 10:48:28 PM >

_____________________________

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 625

All Scenarios Updated! - 1/31/2015 9:53:59 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

That is it gang. All scenario are now updated.

_____________________________

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 626

RE: All Scenarios Updated! - 2/1/2015 5:06:04 PM

btd64

Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline

Thanks John. Wish I had the 2 extra SS's at PH though. Oh well.

....GP
1600

< Message edited by General Patton -- 2/1/2015 6:06:24 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 627

RE: All Scenarios Updated! - 2/2/2015 7:01:21 PM

Cavalry Corp

Posts: 3107
Joined: 9/2/2003
From: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Status: offline

John

OK noted on French CL
Please note as allied in Feb42 - I have a run out of pilot slots message when adding pilots to units - what s that about?

(in reply to btd64)

Post #: 628

RE: All Scenarios Updated! - 2/2/2015 7:58:07 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

Which nationality? My guess would be that is in a limited pilot pool like the Dutch/Chinese. Is it?

< Message edited by John 3rd -- 2/2/2015 8:58:23 PM >

_____________________________

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Cavalry Corp)

Post #: 629

RE: All Scenarios Updated! - 2/3/2015 4:16:51 AM

wdolson

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline

Some of the minor force pilot pools are pretty limited. I believe the Dutch run out completely in mid-42. The Chinese are very limited too. You have to wait a few months for the pool to fill back up again.

The training pools for the major forces are large enough it is tough to run out of pilots in the entire training system, but you may draw some low EXP pilots as you draw deeper into the system.

Bill

_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer