RE: wall of steel suggestion

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: wall of steel suggestion

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> The War Room >> RE: wall of steel suggestion

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: wall of steel suggestion - 10/29/2014 8:18:26 PM

Peltonx

Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gabriel B.

quote:

ORIGINAL: heliodorus04

quote:

ORIGINAL: Northern Star

Vitebsk

It's turn 4, and you have played a pretty typical advance to the land bridge. Infantry just cannot be there by Turn 4, and your tanks aren't going to have enough fuel to conduct deliberate attacks nor to maneuver. .

Vitebsk is in reach of german infantry by turn 4.

Typical advance is Lida , turn 1.
Minsk ,turn 2.
landbridge turn 3.

Sure they get there but can not do anything out of MP's.

Its not until around turn 7 that things can get moving again in center. Which is why there is a wall in center. SHC has
7 turns to set up.

In the north GHC can hit hard turn 5 as HQBU's can be done turn 4. GHC has a min 7 90+ morale infantry divisions, so holding Leningrad is no easy thing. Forts are much easyer to drop with the right set-ups.

The south is same a center now (.08) as by turn 4-5 GHC is at end of logistics chain,
so if SHC has an IQ above 2 they can guess where to set up the checker board and where the first real line of defense
will be on or around turn 11 in south.

42+43 are both really going to be interesting.

< Message edited by Pelton -- 10/29/2014 9:26:16 PM >

_____________________________

Beta Tester WitW & WitE

(in reply to Gabriel B.)