Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 26-27 Mar 42

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 26-27 Mar 42 Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 26-27 Mar 42 - 1/29/2015 5:53:14 AM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
Have you thought about evacuating Darwin? or leave a token garrison? with little supply, they won't last too long

And you know he can make you spend supply quickly with daily bombings, naval bombardments, artillery

3 good brigades

< Message edited by Jorge_Stanbury -- 1/29/2015 6:55:57 AM >

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 151
RE: 26-27 Mar 42 - 1/29/2015 3:45:54 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

Have you thought about evacuating Darwin? or leave a token garrison? with little supply, they won't last too long

And you know he can make you spend supply quickly with daily bombings, naval bombardments, artillery

3 good brigades



Short answer....yes. But not yet. With the Amph bonus about to expire, L_S_T isn't probably going to land directly at Darwin, he's going overland from Wyndham. That's not a short route - and from a level 1 port, his supply will be stretched.

I'll be moving some Bdes from Daly Waters and Katherine to the river line astride his route of march. Probably pull at least one or two Bdes from Darwin to this position as well. IF this position falls (which is likely at this point), I'll start a more deliberate withdrawal from Darwin.

Best case, he'll be slow to move out of Wyndham allowing me to bring both troops and supply up from Alice Springs. But, can't count on best case, right?

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 152
RE: 26-27 Mar 42 - 1/29/2015 3:56:35 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: IdahoNYer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

Have you thought about evacuating Darwin? or leave a token garrison? with little supply, they won't last too long

And you know he can make you spend supply quickly with daily bombings, naval bombardments, artillery

3 good brigades



Short answer....yes. But not yet. With the Amph bonus about to expire, L_S_T isn't probably going to land directly at Darwin, he's going overland from Wyndham. That's not a short route - and from a level 1 port, his supply will be stretched.

I'll be moving some Bdes from Daly Waters and Katherine to the river line astride his route of march. Probably pull at least one or two Bdes from Darwin to this position as well. IF this position falls (which is likely at this point), I'll start a more deliberate withdrawal from Darwin.

Best case, he'll be slow to move out of Wyndham allowing me to bring both troops and supply up from Alice Springs. But, can't count on best case, right?

Right! He will almost certainly bring tanks, and until you get some of your own he can chase the Allied troops all over North Australia.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 153
RE: 26-27 Mar 42 - 1/29/2015 5:27:26 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: IdahoNYer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

Have you thought about evacuating Darwin? or leave a token garrison? with little supply, they won't last too long

And you know he can make you spend supply quickly with daily bombings, naval bombardments, artillery

3 good brigades



Short answer....yes. But not yet. With the Amph bonus about to expire, L_S_T isn't probably going to land directly at Darwin, he's going overland from Wyndham. That's not a short route - and from a level 1 port, his supply will be stretched.

I'll be moving some Bdes from Daly Waters and Katherine to the river line astride his route of march. Probably pull at least one or two Bdes from Darwin to this position as well. IF this position falls (which is likely at this point), I'll start a more deliberate withdrawal from Darwin.

Best case, he'll be slow to move out of Wyndham allowing me to bring both troops and supply up from Alice Springs. But, can't count on best case, right?

Right! He will almost certainly bring tanks, and until you get some of your own he can chase the Allied troops all over North Australia.


BBfanboy - I've learned that lesson the hard way in NE China!! I've got an Aus Arm "Reg" with Matildas just shy of Daly Waters and two AT Regiments in "the pipeline" north of Alice Springs. A US Tank Battalion is also on the rails headed to Alice Springs. So, AT systems are coming - its just a long march and it doesn't do any good to push them north without getting the supply line established. So I'm not sure I'll win the race - it depends on how fast he moves out of Wyndham.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 154
RE: 26-27 Mar 42 - 1/29/2015 5:34:52 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
I am hardly an expert, but I read somewhere that developing the port and putting a lot of supplies in Port Augusta helps on pushing supply up north

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 155
RE: 26-27 Mar 42 - 1/29/2015 9:58:56 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

I am hardly an expert, but I read somewhere that developing the port and putting a lot of supplies in Port Augusta helps on pushing supply up north

That has been my experience in supplying N. Australia. Of course you need to build up the other bases along the rail line too. The only caveat is that the extra supply flow could have come from the southern part using less (as TOE gets filled out in units) and producing more (from fuel and resources reaching the south).

But the developed base = increased supply flow seems universal so I believe in that one. And since rail lines will disperse supply wherever they run, delivering by ship to Port Augusta is the best way to get the supply to the start point of the northern line to Alice Springs (rather than waiting for the same amount to flow in from Sydney and Melbourne to Port Augusta).

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 156
RE: 26-27 Mar 42 - 1/30/2015 4:07:27 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

I am hardly an expert, but I read somewhere that developing the port and putting a lot of supplies in Port Augusta helps on pushing supply up north

That has been my experience in supplying N. Australia. Of course you need to build up the other bases along the rail line too. The only caveat is that the extra supply flow could have come from the southern part using less (as TOE gets filled out in units) and producing more (from fuel and resources reaching the south).

But the developed base = increased supply flow seems universal so I believe in that one. And since rail lines will disperse supply wherever they run, delivering by ship to Port Augusta is the best way to get the supply to the start point of the northern line to Alice Springs (rather than waiting for the same amount to flow in from Sydney and Melbourne to Port Augusta).


While I'll certainly take the advice to expand Port Augusta - Alice Springs has no problem with supply. I've got over 30k there with minimal airbase (2) and fort (2). The problem - and one of my major "goofs" in the overall campaign, is failing to develop Tennant Creek, Daly Waters and Katherine. While I brought up about 2 divisions worth of combat troops starting on turn 1, I failed to bring engineers - they went to build up the NE coast bases. So now, the "max supply draw" at Tennant Creek is 300 and Daly Waters is 100. No where near enough to sustain the forces at those bases, let alone "push" supply north to Darwin. Expanding these bases is the key, and that will take a while - but at least I've got engineers w/dozers in place now.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 157
28-29 Mar 42 - 1/31/2015 7:09:28 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
28-29 Mar 42

Highlights - Wyndham falls in the first assault to overwhelming force; an IJN convoy goes down at Derby.

Jpn ships sunk:
PB: 2
xAK: 7

Allied ships sunk:
xAP: 1 (small)
xAK: 3
xAKL: 1

Air loss:
Jpn: 7
Allied: 7

Subwar:
Jpn: 4 Attacks, 4 ships hit (xAP, xAK, xAKL sunk; xAK dam)
Allies: 2 Attacks, 1 ship hit (PB dam)

Amph Inv: None

Bases lost:
Wyndham (SWPAC)
Cheribon (DEI)
Damar (DEI)

SIGINT/Intel: 25th Army is planning to attack Darwin. Not unexpected that Darwin is a target - but the 25th Army’s target is interesting - I take this as there isn’t going to be a major push toward India.

West Coast. 41st IN Div departs SF bound for Australia in convoy about 5 fast transports.

In NOPAC. US BB TF (2BB, CL, 6DD) approach Attu for bombardment. Sub confirms enemy PBs present - perhaps a convoy as well?

CENPAC. NSTR.

In SOPAC, KB sighted east of the New Hebrides as reinforcement convoy docks at Noumea carrying engineers and AA. This is a juicy target for the KB if sighted and I’m counting on Noumea’s 150+ fighters to provide enough CAP. SBDs claim to have hit the SS I-168 off Auckland (again!).

In SWPAC, the turn starts off with a bang as the Aussie CA TF (CA, 2CL, 5DD) ravage an IJN convoy offloading at Derby likely sinking all 9 big xAKs and 2 PBs in two engagements for no loss. Even the Allied torpedoes worked! Nice. The expected escorting CL TF (2CL, 5DD) was instead bombarding Broome with little effect. That good news was offset by the loss of Wyndham to the first assault. Two IJA divisions (38th and 5th) plus assorted supporting units rolled over the 2nd Aus Cav Bde and Sparrow Bn. Aus forces will fall back toward Darwin and we’ll try and establish a river line defense west of Katherine. Again, moving supplies will determine if we’ll be able to hold off the assault - and on that note, 3 small ships carrying supplies bound for Darwin didn’t make it - 2 sunk by subs and one by 4 DDs loitering near Darwin. Overland supply is the only viable option - and I’m not sure viable is the correct term….

In the Philippines, Bataan supply level under 1000, but AV remains good at 714. IJA ground and air bombardments continue.

In China, the Chinese hold an attack at Chuhsien in the SE, just north of Wenchow. Wenchow remains a target and is constantly under bombardment. In the NE, Sian is swept by Oscars, but the AVG remains on the ground. Yenan is firmly cut off and single squadron airlift is the only source of supply.

In India/Burma, RN CL TF (3CL, 8DD) arrives west of the Andaman Islands and will loiter (hopefully the bad weather will prevent air detection or attack) and see if an invasion TF arrives at Port Blair. In Burma, an attack on Lashio was held - primarily by the Chinese Division defending.

In the DEI, the IJA noose gets tighter as Chiribon on the north coast of Java falls to the IJA 4th Div and lead enemy troops close on Tjilatjap.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 158
RE: 26-27 Mar 42 - 1/31/2015 7:17:12 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: IdahoNYer

Expanding these bases is the key, and that will take a while - but at least I've got engineers w/dozers in place now.


Can you clarify this for the benefit of a new player? How exactly are you "expanding" these inland bases? Fort? Airfield? What else can you do?

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 159
RE: 26-27 Mar 42 - 1/31/2015 7:38:06 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
Did you got any hint of what troops were killed?
looks like air support; maybe a base force

To Jwolf: airfield expansion will do it. Of course it doesn't hurt to put some fort in case the Japanese comes knocking the door; but AFAIK, fort won't contribute to supply draw

(in reply to jwolf)
Post #: 160
RE: 26-27 Mar 42 - 1/31/2015 10:12:50 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

Did you got any hint of what troops were killed?
looks like air support; maybe a base force

To Jwolf: airfield expansion will do it. Of course it doesn't hurt to put some fort in case the Japanese comes knocking the door; but AFAIK, fort won't contribute to supply draw

I was also thinking BF, but they usually have engineers, so now I am thinking tanks!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 161
RE: 26-27 Mar 42 - 2/2/2015 2:47:01 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jwolf


quote:

ORIGINAL: IdahoNYer

Expanding these bases is the key, and that will take a while - but at least I've got engineers w/dozers in place now.


Can you clarify this for the benefit of a new player? How exactly are you "expanding" these inland bases? Fort? Airfield? What else can you do?


jwolf - as J_S stated, the "supply draw" increases as facilities are increased - example below shows Tennant Creek going from AF 1 to AF 2 - note the supply draw increasing from 300 to 400. I do think fort level increase also increases the supply draw since Daly Waters had its draw go from 100 to 200 when its fort level went to level 1 a couple of turns ago.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by IdahoNYer -- 2/2/2015 3:49:20 AM >

(in reply to jwolf)
Post #: 162
RE: 26-27 Mar 42 - 2/2/2015 2:55:05 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

Did you got any hint of what troops were killed?
looks like air support; maybe a base force

To Jwolf: airfield expansion will do it. Of course it doesn't hurt to put some fort in case the Japanese comes knocking the door; but AFAIK, fort won't contribute to supply draw

I was also thinking BF, but they usually have engineers, so now I am thinking tanks!


Have no idea what type of unit went down with the ships - perhaps a HQ?? He's got enough combat power to take Broome though...its just a matter of time. Denying that level 3 airfield is a priority though!

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 163
30-31 Mar 42 - 2/2/2015 6:42:31 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
30-31 Mar 42

Highlights - Allied TF unloading at Noumea is slaughtered by IJN and most importantly, the Amphib bonus ends!

Jpn ships sunk:
DD: 1 (Shigure)
SS: 1 (I-28)
xAK:1

Allied ships sunk:
SS: 1 (KXV)
DMS: 1
KV: 1
PC: 1
xAP: 2
xAK: 8
TK: 1

Air loss:
Jpn: 26
Allied: 22

Subwar:
Jpn: 2 Attacks, 1 ships hit (Dutch SS KXV sunk by RO-33 off Ceylon)
I-28 sunk by escorts off Attu
Allies: 2 Attacks, No ships hit

Amph Inv: None

Bases lost: None

SIGINT/Intel: Imperial Guards Div moving to Wyndham

West Coast. NSTR

In NOPAC. US BB TF (2BB, CL, 6DD) bombards Attu with moderate effect, but no IJN surface forces were found; IJN SS I-28 fails to penetrate screen and is sunk in the process.

CENPAC. NSTR.

In SOPAC, while I’m focused on the KB launching an airstrike on Noumea, a BB TF (2BB, 2CA, 6DD) strikes the port, sinking every ship of the offloading TF (divided into two TFs for docking - only managed to do a screen shot on one of them) and then bombards Noumea with very good effect, destroying 15 a/c on the ground and closing the AF with 53 AF Runway damage. Not good…on the bright side, the majority of ships in the TR TF offloaded, and Noumea AA brought down 16 Vals that were apparently on search or recon. Still, it clearly demonstrates how vulnerable the Allies are still at this stage in the war - is there any defense against a naval bombardment??? Fort level 3 - No. Mines - No. CD Regiment - Not that I know of! In any case, Noumea has 87 engineers with 21 dozers - it will be up and running shortly, and its fort level is at 3.97, so with some luck, I’ll get a breather for a couple of days, repair the damage and get it to level 4. Lastly, I’m thinking this BB TF was detached from the KB as it had the “usual suspects” BBs Hiei and Kiri, CAs Chikuma and Tone. This leads me to believe that this isn’t prelude to an invasion, but just a raid. We’ll see….






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by IdahoNYer -- 2/2/2015 7:44:22 PM >

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 164
RE: 30-31 Mar 42 - 2/2/2015 6:45:10 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
In SWPAC, The Aussie CA TF (CA, 2CL, 5DD) heading back from Derby is intercepted off Exmouth by a very superior IJN TF (BB, 2CL, 7DD). Despite being very low on ammo, the Aussies manage not only to escape without any significant damage, but manage somehow to sink DD Shigure! On land, the lead IJA forces move quickly out of Wyndham. To counter, I’m pulling a Bde and two Bns immediately from Darwin via rail, and the Bde at Katherine will also move toward the river defenses. I’ll commit more troops, in the coming turns. Supply is still the main problem - and hopefully will be for the IJA moving out of Wyndham as well. Still, with the Imperial Guards Div enroute, three divisions plus support is going to very hard to stop without adequate supplies. There is just no fast way to push supplies up overland and even with expanding bases, the supply requirement is going to be more than the draw capability due to the increased number of troops - this just isn’t going to work well….

In the Philippines, Bataan supply goes to zero and the two small resupply ships are sunk by the patrolling PBs off the base. Not surprised. Will continue to bring small amounts of supply with the 5 subs, but I’m not putting more subs or any more ships to the task. Will see how long Bataan can hold - and hopefully the IJA will launch a premature attack and get a bloody nose.

In China, NSTR.

In India/Burma, The main RN TF (2CV, BC, 2CA, CL, 6DD) sortied the other turn in support of the last convoy of Aus I Corps troops to Perth. They will detach and move toward Exmouth to perhaps catch some IJN TFs off the NW Australian coast. The RN CL TF (3CL, 8DD) off of Andaman Is found no targets, so after cutting loose 2DDs with low fuel, the rest will go hunting to Rangoon - I’ve been very conservative so far in this war, and both of these moves (especially Rangoon) will hopefully be a surprise move catching L_S_T unprepared - the weather is bad, he’s got at least two large convoys at Rangoon, and the Mini KB is down to a single CVL. With some luck, we can do some significant hurt on the IJN; if we have bad luck, well…let’s not go there just yet. Elsewhere, the IJN sub force continues to have success against the Allied sub fleet - catching yet another damaged sub heading to port - in this case the Dutch KXV off Ceylon. Also, an IJN sub was found off Karachi - so much for unescorted shipping out of Adaban. Having subs in the Indian Ocean will only stretch our limited ASW capabilities - both naval and air.

In the DEI, two bases behind IJA lines went back to Allied control - I’m assuming he’s not putting a garrison behind the 4th and 21st Divs as they attack west - so I’m also assuming this just cut his supply lines. I’ll through some LRCAP over his advance - perhaps they can knock out some supply planes. With some luck, this will delay his advance west. With a lot of luck, he’ll put some lightly guarded ships to resupply - the Allied AF in western Java still has some potential….





Attachment (1)

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 165
1 April 42 Summary - 2/3/2015 2:35:30 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
Made it another month! This one ended strangely similarly to the last one - lost a convoy on a run to Noumea - at least the troops didn’t drown enroute this time! The Noumea raid highlights the precariousness of the situation - the IJN can still project overwhelming power where and when they need to. The Allies are still a few months away from being able to do that, but, we can project a locally effective force. Overall, like last month, no war changing disasters is the best news. Losing Derby and Wyndham - and the probability of Broome and possibly Darwin in the coming weeks - have hurt the cause, but they haven’t been easy walkovers for the enemy and we’re fighting rather than running. This month effectively ends the Jpn First Phase of operations with the ending of the Amphib bonus - and he’s largely accomplished all his objectives - although Western Java and Bataan still hold. But he’s suffered some serious losses that will have long term effect. Naval losses for the month were very much in the Allies favor - IJN reported losses for the month were 2CVL, 1CA, 4CL, 5DD and 2SS as compared to the Allies losing 1CL, 2DD and 2SS. Air losses were also in the Allies favor, but not as good as last month, 379 for Jpn to 299 Allied.

Screenshot shows Allied Forces disposition - Notes: 1)Ships are in service, not under refit or stood down. 2) a/c shown are combat available, not trainers or deployed on CVs. 3) CENPAC subs are those against IJN shipping, other Theater subs shown are “in close” for defense of that Theater. 4) En are Construction or Port Maint Bns, not BFs.



The question now is, “What is the Jpn next objective?” While he’s already working toward seizing NW Australia, what else? What are his capabilities? While he can project overwhelming power anywhere with the KB and other fleet units, the real issue is staying power - the KB is a raiding force. To seize well defended territory, he’ll need the Army. Lets take a look at his available Army divisions - this is a rough look, and of course L_S_T could have bought out restricted forces. So what is available for the Pacific/India theaters?? I come up with 12 Infantry Divisions (miss any?), and what they have been doing since the war’s start:
2nd: Mindanao, then?
4th: Moresby, then Java (confirmed)
5th: Singers, then Wyndham (confirmed)
16th: PI, Soerabaja, then moving to Derby (mid Mar)? (SIGINT)
18th: Singers, then ?
21st: PI, then Java (confirmed)
33rd: Singers, then ?
38th: Hong Kong, Singers, then Wyndham (confirmed)
48th: Bataan (confirmed)
55th: Burma? (estimated)
56th: Balikpapan, Palembang (mid Mar), part on Java (confirmed)
Im Gd: Singers, Palembang, then enroute to Wyndham (SIGINT)

From this list, at least three, and likely four, Divisions are actively involved in NW Australia (5th, 16th, 38th, Imp Gd). Two are still committed to Java (4th and 21st). One (48th) is laying siege to Bataan. I’m guessing -- that’s the best way to describe it - that one Div (55th) is in the Rangoon/Burma area. That leaves three Div (2nd, 18th, 33rd) whose locations are currently not known and therefore available. Unfortunately, this gives L_S_T the ability to take the most defended Allied locales - I do not have enough ground power to defeat a 3 division attack. However - and this is a big however - without the Amph bonus, he’ll be hard pressed to land 3 divisions at one time - AND - sustain that sized force. Still, this does mean that Noumea, Suva, and Pago are more vulnerable vs. other potential targets such as NE Australia or India/Ceylon due to the lack of multiple AFs for the defense of those island bases. In other words, he can mass more effectively that the Allies can in those areas. So, priority will be to strengthen SOPAC - which is already in the works - as well as maintain as much force (as supply allows) to hold Darwin. By Theater, here’s the overall situation.

West Coast/USA/Rear Areas: Pilot training progresses well for all but US Army bomber pilots. Still very short bomber pilots, and am short airframes in any case for all Nationalities. Naval refit is the priority for warships, and we’ll start frontloading ships into yards immediately on the 1 Apr turn.

NOPAC. No enemy activity other than taking Attu, so we’ll land at Amchitka and continue to build up combat power. SIGINT still shows the 7th Div planning for Amchitka, but whether or not it’s been released yet is the issue. Will maintain some surface forces, including some BBs, as well as supporting ships, but will rely on land based air to provide cover. Will likely increase a/c from Hawaii after AFs build up at Adak and later Amchitka.

CENPAC. Other than grabbing the Ellice Islands, little enemy interest here in the central Pacific. CV Lexington is about to finish refit, and Yorktown just started. Will likely bring both carriers south in the coming weeks.

SOPAC. Goal is to get Noumea to fort level 4 first and foremost. It was at 3.97 when it got clobbered. It has enough engineers to get there. Once at level 4, priority will be to begin an AF at La Foe and begin to project airpower offensively. With enemy landings at Efate and Luganville, troops will land at Tanna (just south of Efate) and build up an airfield to bring Efate under fighter cover. A third Marine Regiment is at sea enroute to complete the 2nd Mar Div, and the 7th Marine Reg will embark shortly. Of course, this assumes the enemy isn’t going to land a major force on New Caledonia for a couple of weeks - once I get LaFoe AF operational, I think his window will have passed - we’ll be able to project offensive airpower to hold, and even think about retaking Efate and then Luganville. For now, we’re vulnerable….

SWPAC. Priority remains NW Australia - building up bases enroute to Darwin and see if we can hold it. 41st US Div is enroute, but the issue isn’t numbers of troops - its supplying those troops. Broome will likely fall, and cost a good Aus brigade, but holding that base for the past month has surely upset the Jpn timetable - and denied the best port/AF other than Darwin. Will attempt to hold Port Hedland and points west and south, but we’re limited to an airbridge to send in troops for the moment. Help is on the way in the form of the Royal Navy which will augment the Aus-US cruiser force currently operating out of Perth. How long the Royal Navy remains will depend on 1) where the KB is, and 2) Jpn intentions against India. While the fight for NW Australia is ongoing, the threat to NE Australia remains - ground defenses are still weak, but we can mass a significant amount of aircraft from multiple AFs.

DEI. Surprisingly, still holding western Java. Two IJA divisions are progressing west, but slowly - and an amphib on the SW coast was pretty well repulsed, then contained. Hopefully, one or more of those available IJA divisions will commit to take Java. In any case, will continue to maintain an air threat until Batavia falls.

Bataan. Well, Bataan still holds. That’s about all that can be said - its tying down a Division plus force - but supplies have run dry and its time is limited.

Burma/India. Central Burma with Rangoon has fallen, but the IJA advance toward Lashio and Shwebo hasn’t been very aggressive. Will continue to withdraw northwest. Surprisingly, no landings took place yet at Akyab or Cox Bazaar. They are still weakly held, but the RAF can contest landings here. Will see what the naval raid on Rangoon produces - both for effects and enemy response. The US 27th ID remains in Cape Town and can be released to India should the IJA/IJN make a move toward Calcutta or Ceylon. But he’ll need the KB for that kind of endeavor…

China. Fighting has stagnated as the IJA focuses on isolating Yenan. This apparently proved more challenging than anticipated, but was accomplished - Yenan will fall within a few weeks. This has however slowed the advance on Sian and points northwest. In the SE, Wenchow is still the focus, but it is also still holding. The AVG hasn’t been as successful as the IJA has effectively re-equipped its fighters with Oscars - and is using them aggressively. Will continue to delay and make the IJA expend troops and supplies - the supply expenditure is key…




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by IdahoNYer -- 2/3/2015 4:29:29 AM >

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 166
RE: 1 April 42 Summary - 2/5/2015 2:03:23 AM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
I think he missed the Indian boat; he can get Bangladesh at most, but trying to get into Diamond Harbor without the bonus seems unrealistic.
Be careful with NE Australia, your opponent is likely also counting your divisions and noticing you have moved significant forces in the NW, thus he might know you are weak on the east.

Interesting to see you are dividing your CVs

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 167
RE: 1 April 42 Summary - 2/6/2015 2:24:35 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

I think he missed the Indian boat; he can get Bangladesh at most, but trying to get into Diamond Harbor without the bonus seems unrealistic.
Be careful with NE Australia, your opponent is likely also counting your divisions and noticing you have moved significant forces in the NW, thus he might know you are weak on the east.

Interesting to see you are dividing your CVs



I really haven't moved much out of NE OZ - I've stripped a lot from Brisbane south...even so, defenses from Brisbane to Cooktown are pretty weak on the ground - maybe 150+ or so AV at each base. Not much. But....I do have plenty of AFs and supply to put airpower to work. That's what I don't have to support a defense of Darwin.

as for the CVs, I like to keep my US CVs in pairs in early '42 - for raiding and providing focused ASW efforts for convoys. I don't intend to challenge the KB any time soon, so I don't need to mass - yet....

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 168
1-2 Apr 42 - 2/6/2015 2:31:34 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
1-2 Apr 42

Highlights - Rangoon Raid stirs up a hornet’s nest!

Jpn ships sunk:
DD: 2 (Akigumo, Kazegumo)
xAK: 1
xAKL:2

Jpn ships un-sunk:
DD: 1 (Harusame)

Allied ships sunk:
CL: 1 (Enterprise)
DD: 1 (Fortune)
PC: 1
xAK: 3

Air loss:
Jpn: 29
Allied: 10

Subwar:
Jpn: 1 Attacks, 1 ship hit (xAK sunk)
Allies: 2 Attacks, No ships hit

Amph Inv:
Bathurst Is (SWPAC)
Billiton (DEI)

Bases lost:
Bathurst Is (SWPAC)
Santa Maria (SOPAC)

SIGINT/Intel: NSTR

West Coast/Admin. Refits begin in earnest; 2CV, 5CA, 5CL, 22DD all begin refits on the 1st. Bremerton, Seattle, LA, San Diego, PH, Sydney, Melbourne and Auckland all take some ships for refit. Also, 8 DE conversions are also started. Will continue heavy emphasis on refits (with ships awaiting refit swapped one for one as ships complete) until refits caught up.

In NOPAC. BF begins landing at Attu; AF should be operational shortly.

CENPAC. CV Lex finishes refit as CV Yorktown begins one. She’ll stay portside until Yorktown finishes.

In SOPAC, before the KB pulls NNE toward Luganville, it apparently detaches a small bombardment TF (CL, 2DD) to bombard Noumea which accomplishes nothing - but of course, the mines and CD accomplish the same. The KB also launches a total of 85 Kate/Val sorties against the base at night which also accomplish nothing, but lose 7V and 4K to AA and Ops. While engineers continue to work to repair damage to the AF, I’m bringing in 8PTs to Noumea as well as a squadron of PBYs for “Black Cat” nighttime searches and torp attacks. I don’t expect either to do much, but its all I can offer at the moment. I’m not willing to commit any sizeable surface TF right now.

In SWPAC, Darwin is bombarded by a small TF (CL, 6DD) which cause some casualties, but do not damage the base. Darwin AF is back operations - its tempo hindered by a lack of supplies at the base - still USMC SBDs manage to hit and sink 2 small xAKLs off Bathurst Is which falls to invasion. A resupply attempt to Darwin is wiped out off Horn Island by Moresby based a/c, losing a small PC and two small xAKs sunk. That route is closed for the foreseeable future. Lastly, IJA tanks continue to push out from Wyndham, driving back the remnants of the Wyndham defenders across the river.

In the Philippines, 3 subs drop supply to Bataan, which helps a small bit.

In China, the Chinese actually pulled off a successful counterattack to break the siege of Pakhoi. Two Chinese Corps defeated an IJA Bde causing over 1700 casualties, including 44 destroyed combat squads. Nice.

In India/Burma, the main event for the entire turn was the naval raid on Rangoon by the RN. Adm Palliser took 3CL, 6DD on the raid to destroy shipping and bombard the AF and wound up finding and engaging 3 separate IJN transport (or Amphib) TFs for a total of 6 rounds of combat! Palliser eventually lost the CL Enterprise (took a DD torp early and finished off by a Betty in the day) and a DD sunk, and two other DDs moderately to heavily damaged. Although Allied gunnery and torpedo attacks were abysmal, best estimates have 2 DDs and an xAK sunk, CL Naka crippled and a good 6-10 xAKs with moderate or so damage. Due to the heavy naval concentration (2CL, 7DD, 2 PB, 32xAK in three separate TFs), no bombardment took place as the ships were pretty much out of ammo and time! All in all, it wasn’t a bad expedition (assuming the remaining ships make it back to Columbo), and I’m fairly certain at least one of the three TFs was an Amphib TF (perhaps Port Blair or Akyab), and with some luck this sortie at least disrupted his plans and may pull forces from other theaters to increase security.

In the DEI, Billiton Is is invaded and the Dutch bombers hit nothing. Will sortie the last three MTB to the invasion site and see they can accomplish something.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 169
3-4 Apr 42 - 2/9/2015 6:25:27 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
3-4 Apr 42

Highlights - IJN lands troops on Tanna in SOPAC by fast transport; Allied air loses heavily over Java.

Jpn ships sunk:
DD: 1 (Harusame)
SS: 1 (RO-62)
xAKL: 1

Jpn ships un-sunk:
CL: 1 (Oi)
DD: 1 (Shigure)

Allied ships sunk:
DD: 1 (Decoy)

Air loss:
Jpn: 12
Allied: 39

Subwar:
Jpn: 1 Attacks, no ships hit
Allies: 1 Attack, no ships hit

Amph Inv:
Tanna (SOPAC)

Bases lost:
Djokjajarta (DEI)
Billiton (DEI)
Tanna (SOPAC)
Kalidjati (DEI)

SIGINT/Intel: Combined Fleet planning for an attack on Noumea is very interesting! Also, the 3/Imp Gds Division planning for an attack on Akyab I find odd - it was reported to be moving to Wyndham attacking toward Darwin.

West Coast/Admin. CV Hornet arrives safely at San Diego where she’ll begin refit.

In NOPAC. 102nd Eng Regiment lands at Amchitka.

CENPAC. NSTR.

In SOPAC, an IJN fast transport TF lands troops at Tanna, just NE of Noumea - was hoping to put US troops there in about two weeks! Now it looks as though we’ll have to invade Efate and or Tanna in the coming months rather than putting troops ashore in a few weeks. No activity at Noumea as the KB has apparently moved north.

In SWPAC, SBDs out of Darwin hit a DD off Darwin which also hit a mine in a newly laid minefield just off the base. Fighters are moved back into Darwin to provide LRCAP for an inbound small resupply convoy - the bigger question is whether the IJN will stay away. The RN CV TF (2CV, BC, 2CA, CL, DDs) arrived off SW Australia and refueled - so far apparently undetected. A CA TF (CA, 2CL, 4DD) will depart Perth and rendezvous with the CV TF and then they’ll strike toward Broome.
In the Philippines, NSTR.

In China, large numbers of IJA Oscars hit ground targets near Nanyang - so we’ll send the AVG to intercept them next turn.

In India/Burma, Bettys sink a heavily damaged DD (Decoy) heading for Calcutta, the rest of the Rangoon Raiding Force should make Colombo tomorrow. A CL TF (3CL, 5 DD) will depart Colombo to loiter SW of Calcutta to strike at any attempt at Akyab. Fighters will sortie LRCAP over Akyab in hopes of catching a Nell strike. Allied forces start pulling out of Shwebo as IJA forces attempt to outflank and cut them off.

In the DEI, IJA ground forces resume their westward attack along both coasts of Java. IJA Oscars sweep Bandoeng clearing the skies of Allied fighters.



(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 170
5-6 Apr 42 - 2/11/2015 10:04:42 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
5-6 Apr 1942

Highlights - Synch bug hits hard with both sides taking losses that weren’t in the replay - so no screen shots of any of this! In any case, hopefully, this is the “truth”..CVE Hosho is hit in the Java Sea, CA Furutaka is bombed off Darwin while on the other side, two Allied CLs and a DD attract sub torpedoes. Noumea reaches fort level 4!!

Jpn ships sunk:
CA: 1 (Furutaka; sunk by SBDs off Darwin)
SS: 1 (I-169)

Jpn ships un-sunk:
SS: 1 (I-175)

Allied ships sunk:
DD: 1 (Patterson)
PT/MTB: 2
AM: 1
xAK: 1
xAKL: 1

Air loss:
Jpn: 53
Allied: 25

Subwar:
Jpn: 5 Attacks, 3 ships hit (DD Paterson sunk and CL Raleigh dam by I-4, CL Perth dam by I-155)
Allies: 2 Attacks, no ships hit

Amph Inv:
Arorae (CENPAC)

Bases lost:
Ningsia (China)

SIGINT/Intel: 112 IN Reg planning to attack Akyab - now its just a question of when.

In NOPAC. Enroute back from Amchitka, the small surface TF (CL, 4DD) is attacked by I-4 just north of Adak Is. I-4 sinks the DD Patterson and CL Raleigh takes a fish giving it 34 float dam - so it should make DH, but it will need to head back to the West Coast for repair. Adak AF becomes operational and a P-40 squadron arrives from Unmak. Will develop Adak into a level 4 AB in time.

CENPAC. With the IJN landing troops at Arorae, due west of Baker Is, I’ve made the decision to occupy Baker Is. This will involve CV support from Lex and Yorktown, and hopefully we can get a USMC battalion and engineers landed before the IJN decide to occupy Baker.

In SOPAC, Noumea reaches fort level 4, so I’m hoping this helps against any future bombardment efforts. This is the trigger to start expanding its AF to level 5 and also begin the AF at LaFoe - and start offensive air operations against the enemy bases to the north. The 6th Marine Reg, just arrived at Auckland, will transit to Noumea/LaFoe initially for defense, but eventually to re-take Luganville (7th Marine Reg is planning for Efate). Auckland is a very busy port with two convoys currently offloading, one heading back to LA and another heading out to Suva.

In SWPAC, SBDs out of Darwin hit CA Furutaka with two 1000lbs bombs, and is listed as sunk. This disrupted the IJN bombardment run on Darwin, which only inflicted minor damage to the base. Still, supplies are running low as that IJN bombardment TF did catch and sink the small xAK and xAKL inbound. Allied airstrikes on the Wyndham area were met by Zeros - and lost heavily (4 SBD, 3 B-25, 4 Hudsons). In the Broome area, IJN sub I-155 puts a fish into CL Perth off Exmouth (17sys, 20flt, 28eng). She’ll head back to Perth with 2DDs. The Allied TFs off Exmouth re-organize creating a Bmb TF (BC,CA,2CL,4DD) and a CV TF (2CV, 2CA, 6DD) for operations against Broome. The Bmb TF will bombard the IJA troops at Broome and the CV TF will provide LRCAP over Broome and the ships, hoping to catch the Bettys that have been hitting ground targets without any escorts. There’s some risk here, so it will be interesting.

In the Philippines, two subs drop supplies.

In China, NSTR as the AVG didn’t affect an intercept.

In India/Burma, the air ambush over Akyab did fairly well; 11 Oscars, 14 Sonia, 7 Mary, 4 Zero in exchange for 3 P-40s and 2 Hurris and a Buff. A small CL TF (2CL, 4DD) is enroute to Diamond Harbor to react to anything moving to Akyab, and we’ll also sortie the BB Warspite and escorts from Colombo shortly. I think I can provide LRCAP from Chittagong effectively for a naval strike if he invades for Akyab Will also mine Akyab with a fast minelayer as part of this operation. Just hope I can get these assets in place before the IJN get to Akyab. Lastly, the US 87th Mtn Reg will depart Cape Town aboard the xAP Queen Mary, bound for India - the first commitment of US combat forces to this theater.

In the DEI, the defenders of Java had a good couple of days. A large IJN troop convoy (assume to be the Imperial Guards Div departing Palembang) was first sighted by PT/MTBs off Tobali, which attacked with no hits, but lost the last surviving Brit MTB (Hong Kong) and US PT (PI). But that sighting gave Java air the location, and airstrikes hit CVE Hosho with 2 bombs from Swordfish and Dutch bombers hit an xAK as well. Hosho suffered an ammo storage explosion and heavy fires - good chance she was at least crippled if not sunk. On the ground front, IJA division assault on Tjilatjap is repulsed, but its fall is imminent. Still a good day for the Java defenders!


(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 171
7-8 Apr 42 - 2/15/2015 3:13:38 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
7-8 Apr 42

Highlights - Bad day on the ground with both Yenan and Broome falling to first assaults.

Jpn ships sunk: None

Jpn ships un-sunk:
CL: 1 (Tama)
SS: 2 (I-173, I-28)

Allied ships sunk: None

Air loss:
Jpn: 12
Allied: 16

Subwar:
Jpn: 3 Attacks, 1 ship hit (CL Raleigh hit and dam by I-4 again!)
Allies: 6 Attacks, no ships hit

Amph Inv:
Sampit (DEI)
Toboali (DEI)

Bases lost:
Guiuan (PI)
Tacloban (PI)
Katha (Burma)
Broome (SWPAC)
Yenan (China)
Toboali (DEI)
Semarang (DEI)
Tjilatjap (DEI)

SIGINT/Intel: NSTR

West Coast/Admin. NSTR

In NOPAC. CL Raleigh takes a another fish from I-4 just off DH giving it 78 float dam as it docks. She’ll be here for a while, but at least she made it! This does eliminate the last available CA/CL to NOPAC for the next few weeks at least.

CENPAC. NSTR

In SOPAC, it remains quiet as shipping is sorted out in Auckland. 6th Mar Reg begins loading to transit to Noumea - this convoy will have surface escort.

In SWPAC, Broome falls to the first assault despite the bmb TF (BC, CAL, 2CL, 4DD) hitting IJA positions. Losing Broome costs the 19th Aus Bde which held it since landing their on 2 Mar - under constant pressure since debarking. Was losing a good brigade worth holding the base for 5 weeks? Time will tell, but it did divert the IJA 16th Div to land at Derby to take Broome. This action has prevented a good port and the best AF on the NW coast (outside of Darwin) from falling intact into Jpn hands - the AF and port are both wrecked. With 2 Brit CVs off SW Australia, I’m going to attempt to hold Port Hedland - sending I Corps Eng and another Bde to hold and establish the base. The goal here is not only to hold the base, but to perhaps draw the attention of the KB to these waters - and out of SOPAC.

In the Philippines, bombardments, both air and ground continue as supplies dwindle.

In China, Yenan falls with all troops surrendering. The cost was high - 444 combat squads destroyed - largely from one Corps. Yenan did slow his drive on Sian, but I should have pulled out when I could. Hopefully I’ve learned my lesson and won’t get trapped in Sian.

In India/Burma, NSTR.

In the DEI, as expected, Tjilatjap falls.

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 172
9-10 Apr 42 - 2/17/2015 4:45:43 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
9-10 Apr 42

Highlights - Quiet couple of turns; Shwebo in Burma falls

Jpn ships sunk:
CL: 1 (Tama - listed back as sunk)
DD: 1

Allied ships sunk: None

Air loss:
Jpn: 14
Allied: 3

Subwar:
Jpn: No Attacks, no ship hit
Allies: 1 Attack, no ships hit

Amph Inv: None

Bases lost:
Sampit (DEI)
Shwebo (Burma)

SIGINT/Intel: NSTR

West Coast/Admin. 7th Marine Reg and the Army’s 24th (Sep) IN Reg depart LA on a fast convoy to Auckland.

In NOPAC. NSTR

CENPAC. CV TF (2CV, 2CA, CL, 7DD) depart PH to raid Wake Is and then support landing of DB and Eng at Baker. CV Lex has a composite Marine air group (2xF, DB) aboard as her airgroup is in SOPAC. Once done supporting CENPAC, the CVs will head to SOPAC and deliver 2xF squadrons.

In SOPAC, still quiet with no sign of the KB. Convoy to Noumea to depart with CA escort TF.

In SWPAC, Broome is hit by B-17s from the 11th BG now based out of Meekatharra. Goal is to keep Broome AF and port closed. Allied focus will be at Port Hedland where the first of three convoys (supply run) docked. Second convoy carrying I Corps Engineers is rounding the NW coast and should arrive in the next two days. Last convoy carrying an IN Bde is forming at Perth. Brit CV TF will provide air cover, and TF centered around Repulse (BC, 2CA, 2CL, 6DD) departing Perth for surface cover. Enemy focus seems to be at Darwin for now as BB TF looks to be about to bombard - I clear serviceable a/c to Katherine. Supplies now critical at Darwin as only subs shuttling small quantities in.

In the Philippines, NSTR

In China, Pakhoi is bombarded (2CA,2DD) and Chinese drive enemy besieging Pakhoi to Kwangchowan. In the SE, Chuhseien holds off two attacks, but forts are reduced - it will likely fall shortly.

In India/Burma, Shwebo is abandoned and falls. Allied defenders attempting to exfiltrate NE through the jungle as the IJA has cut the rail/road. BB Warspite TF (BB, 2CL, 6DD) will depart Colombo for Calcutta to join CL TF awaiting any invasion of Akyab.

In the DEI, IJA forces close on Bandoeng.

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 173
11-12 Apr 42 - 2/19/2015 6:30:46 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
11-12 Apr 42

Highlights - As expected, Darwin is bombarded and Chuhsien falls

Jpn ships sunk:
SS: 1 (I-164)

Allied ships sunk:
SS: 1 (Drum)

Air loss:
Jpn: 29
Allied: 12

Subwar:
Jpn: 2 Attacks, no ship hit
SS I-164 reportedly sunk by D/Cs off Ceylon
Allies: 1 Attack, no ships hit
SS Drum - newly arriving off Tokyo bay is hit by a Sally w/3 bombs and is sunk (so much for radar providing an edge)

Amph Inv: None

Bases lost:
Chuhsien (China)

SIGINT/Intel: NSTR

West Coast/Admin. NSTR

In NOPAC. NSTR

CENPAC. CV TF (2CV, 2CA, CL, 7DD) remains undetected heading to raid Wake Is and will be in position to launch strikes tomorrow. Convoy to land troops on Baker Is departs PH, heading towards Canton where it will loiter until CV TF can move to support.

In SOPAC, convoy enroute to Noumea so far remains undetected. Small two squadron bomber strikes from Noumea hit Luganville meeting no opposition.

In SWPAC, Darwin is bombarded (BB, CA, CL, 6DD) with moderate effect - the AF remains open, but damage will need to be repaired, slowing fortification efforts. Two Darwin based SBDs manage to land 1000lb bombs on two DDs just north of the base. Another bombardment TF looks to be approaching from the NW so most a/c will remain dispersed in Katherine and Daly Waters. Tennant Creek AF expands to level 3, increasing the supply flow by 100. Broome now has two convoys offloading both supplies and engineers. Air cover being provided by 2x Brit CVs to the NW - weak air cover, and I expect Ms Betty to raid shortly. Also enroute is the Allied surface cover force (BC, 2CA, 2CL, 6DD) which is rounding Exmouth. Intent here is to provide cover for the offload, and perhaps also bombard either Broome or Derby. 18th Aus Bde will depart Perth for Port Hedland shortly, so heavy focus on Port Hedland in the coming days. Lastly, the first major daylight strike on Port Moresby (BG effort - 3 squadrons out of Cooktown) put 12 B-17s over the target, and despite 15 Zeros intercepting, put bombs on target (minimal effect) without losing a single B-17. It’s a strart…

In the Philippines, NSTR

In China, Chuhsien falls as expected, destroying another Chinese Corps in the process. On a rare bright spot in China, a Chinese attack destroys the 3rd Ching An Tui Brigade that was a lead element near Kuichuan. IJA air begins attacks on Sian AF and I’ve moved the two squadrons of the AVG back to Sian to intercept. Sian is the next major objective in the IJA attack and my goal here is not to get surrounded and destroyed, so I’ve started to pull back forces to the SE of Sian.

In India/Burma, a Nell strike against shipping off Cox’s Bazaar is handled roughly by LRCAP, losing 7 Zeros and 7 Nells to 2 Allied fighters. BB Warspite TF is attacked by SS I-164 off Ceylon and the sub is reportedly sunk by escorts.

In the DEI, I expect Bandoeng to fall shortly, leaving Batavia as the only viable position remaining.


(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 174
RE: 11-12 Apr 42 - 2/20/2015 2:57:02 AM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
any hint of where the KB is ?
I hope its far away from Wake island

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 175
RE: 11-12 Apr 42 - 2/20/2015 4:49:19 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline
just caught up reading your AAR, have never seen anyone dishing out so much damage against the IJN with the Dutch/Brit/US ships. Very well done Sir

_____________________________


(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 176
RE: 11-12 Apr 42 - 2/20/2015 6:08:07 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

any hint of where the KB is ?
I hope its far away from Wake island



Funny you should mention the KB appearing....which it did unexpectedly in CENPAC, but fortunately, not at Wake!

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 177
RE: 11-12 Apr 42 - 2/20/2015 6:09:35 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy

just caught up reading your AAR, have never seen anyone dishing out so much damage against the IJN with the Dutch/Brit/US ships. Very well done Sir



Thanks - I've have been very fortunate with the dice rolls in combat so far - especially the long lance dice rolls!

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 178
RE: 11-12 Apr 42 - 2/20/2015 9:39:54 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline

You have been doing an amazing job with the early fleet
Rolls sometime help, sometime don't... you created the opportunities; very well done

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 179
RE: 11-12 Apr 42 - 2/21/2015 7:35:21 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury


You have been doing an amazing job with the early fleet
Rolls sometime help, sometime don't... you created the opportunities; very well done



Thanks J_S

Hope I can continue to create opportunities and keep the good rolls! I fear the IJN Long Lances chances HAVE to get better!


(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 26-27 Mar 42 Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.984