Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Playable!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: Playable! Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Playable! - 11/13/2014 1:44:20 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dabrion

When it works one day in the far future.. it will be stuck on RAW7, and the cool kids will play RAW666. You don't want to hear it but this whole thing is headed for a train-wreck. You just cannot admit it.. So keep tinkering and have fun if you can ;)

warspite1

Wrong....as usual.

It does not matter that it will be "stuck" on RAW7. It will be a WIF game for the computer that uses RAW7 as its base. So what?
Who is to say RAW666 will be better? Not all changes ADG have incorporated are for the better.

I continued playing Civ II after Civ III came out, I bought, but do not touch Civ V (I wonder if I can get a refund?) I still prefer Civ IV. Newer isn't always better.

quote:

You don't want to hear it but this whole thing is headed for a train-wreck.


Okay, if you believe that, why not quit trolling and go do something useful with your life and stop boring the pants off everyone?

quote:

Bottom line is: it is nice.. but I want my money back, because it sucks for the €150 I had to drop on it. Next year at equinox we plan to have a big fire and I will sacrifice the MWiF books if this doesnt get much better!


There's a comment I could make here - but despite the fact that you have been distinctly unpleasant to people on this forum in the past - I won't make it.

However, if you want to make yourself useful - how about you send the books to me instead. That way I can have a copy to use and a copy to sit on my book shelf in pristine condition.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Dabrion)
Post #: 31
RE: Playable! - 11/13/2014 4:04:21 AM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
As for playing time, all gamers are different. I love World in Flames because it introduced me to Fractional Odds. Factor perfect maximizers, go away.

But I too play WiF without MWiF pretty fast. I was pretty surprised to read in an AAR that the game stops every time a ship enters a 0 box in a sea zone, and this can't be turned off in advance. Tonight I talked it over with my usual face-to-face opponent, who told me the game also stops for each nation that has a unit in the sea zone. So when 20 Royal Navy ships leave Gibraltar to patrol the West Med but the Italians have a cruiser out there and the Germans have a fighter but the Axis have no other aircraft in range, the game stops twice to ask the Germans and ask the Italians if they want to intercept, before the RN task force can move up to the 3 box. This never happens in 3D play. It is correct rules procedure, sure, but the game will need standing orders to speed up play. Super-Deluxe World in Flames features one heck of a lot of counters on the board in 1944, and every little thing will help keep games going. Too slow games will be abandoned.

I look forward to playing it, having the program enforce the rules and keep inadvertent errors from happening will be great. But I still can't believe that the first thing created wasn't a simple counter management mode so I could use the beautiful new maps and counters however I want, and give money to Matrix and ADG for that. Instead, I use a freeware program to do that, and buy new cardboard from ADG.

And until the AI Convoy Routing is just optional, I don't plan to play it. I am in the Commander-in-Chief, and I choose what my convoys carry. Exploring how the Allies can help each other is a major portion of the game. Isolated Re-Org and Guards Banner Armies are pretty important too.

(in reply to etsadler)
Post #: 32
RE: Playable! - 11/13/2014 8:30:12 AM   
Joseignacio


Posts: 2449
Joined: 5/8/2009
From: Madrid, Spain
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio

IMO if the game needs Skype, it's not playable (at least as intended to be). For me it's not.


Hi Jose, I just downloaded skype for more testing doing net play and it is a wonderful tool, before when I would test with Cad we would have to type out instructions to each other but now we can communicate like we were in the same room together. I have a cheap headset with a mic, cost about 12 to 15 dollars US or you can go go hog wild with some of the headsets for 200 or 300 US dollars

When net play gets finished skype will be a must for better enjoyment of the game the only problem with skype is that you can not hand a beer to your opponent through skype, sorry!

Bo



Bo, I have been using Skype for like 5 or more years, maybe 8 or 10... It is a wonderful tool, indeed.

Problem are;

1 - The game was supposed not to have need of this aides.
2 - You cannot lift the counters of your opponent to see the lower unists in the stacks. For this you need Team Viewer or similar, and security should be an issue.

(in reply to bo)
Post #: 33
RE: Playable! - 11/13/2014 10:41:50 AM   
joshuamnave

 

Posts: 967
Joined: 1/8/2014
Status: offline
You honestly think the game is playable in its current condition?

Let's see - once again, the game is not recognizing allied CP's for delivering supply (or I should say it's doing it sporadically, but the only common denominator I can find is that supply is being traced through allied CP's). Try running Operation Torch when the US and the UK need their own separate supply lines. Playable? Sure, in the sense that the game doesn't crash, but not in the sense that it works close enough to intended to serve its purpose.

Try loading units onto ships moving through ports.

Try declaring war on a minor country that was conquered by a major power that has itself been conquered. In my current game China conquered French Indo China after Japan demanded it from the Vichy government. On the next turn, Japan conquered China and now FIC is permanently neutral. Playable? Sure, it didn't crash the game. Playable in the way it's intended to be played? No.

Try setting up pickets to intercept ships that are aborting from a sea zone (either aborting from combat, or returning home at the end of the turn) or units that have been overrun and forced to rebase. That will often crash the game. Playable? Only if you voluntarily choose not to play that part of the naval war.

Try setting up your convoy chains and getting the resources to route the way you want them to. But hey, it's apparently not a bug if resources go from cape verde to central atlantic and then to the bay of biscay instead of just going straight from CV to BoB. The problem, you see, is that I'm just not smart enough to figure out the easy to use, user friendly production planning form. Playable? I suppose. Fun? Not hardly.

Try making a blitz attack or using engineers in an attack or using winterized units in an attack, then ignoring the prompt to destroy the armor/eng/winterized unit as the first combat loss. Sure, you can self enforce it, but isn't the value of MWiF over Vassal supposed to be the software enforcing the rules for us?

Try starting a netplay game. For anyone who bought the game primarily for netplay, based on the promise made on release day that Netplay would be working soon, it's definitely not playable.

I think the comparison Warspite made to Civ V was a good one. Civ V is a great game - but only if you've never played Civ I-IV. MWiF is a great game, but only if you've never played it live and don't know the rules as they are supposed to be coded. I can see how someone with little or no WiF experience prior to MWiF would rave about what a great game it is, but that's not me.

Right now MWiF is like buying a new car only to find that the radio works only intermittently, the air conditioner doesn't work at all, and the electric window controls have been replaced with manual cranks. But it's driveable!

(in reply to Joseignacio)
Post #: 34
RE: Playable! - 11/13/2014 2:20:32 PM   
bo

 

Posts: 4176
Joined: 5/1/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio


quote:

ORIGINAL: bo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio

IMO if the game needs Skype, it's not playable (at least as intended to be). For me it's not.


Hi Jose, I just downloaded skype for more testing doing net play and it is a wonderful tool, before when I would test with Cad we would have to type out instructions to each other but now we can communicate like we were in the same room together. I have a cheap headset with a mic, cost about 12 to 15 dollars US or you can go go hog wild with some of the headsets for 200 or 300 US dollars

When net play gets finished skype will be a must for better enjoyment of the game the only problem with skype is that you can not hand a beer to your opponent through skype, sorry!

Bo



Bo, I have been using Skype for like 5 or more years, maybe 8 or 10... It is a wonderful tool, indeed.

Problem are;

1 - The game was supposed not to have need of this aides.
2 - You cannot lift the counters of your opponent to see the lower unists in the stacks. For this you need Team Viewer or similar, and security should be an issue.


Very good Jose it is me who is about 10 light years behind everyone, the reason I downloaded skype was not to play Mwif in net play but to test net play with a few of the beta testers where we could talk to each other rather than type out instructions. If you want put me on your skype contact and we could discuss this, my e-mail is [bowenw1@verizon.net] of course only if you want to

Bo

< Message edited by bo -- 11/13/2014 3:21:39 PM >

(in reply to Joseignacio)
Post #: 35
RE: Playable! - 11/13/2014 2:51:36 PM   
bo

 

Posts: 4176
Joined: 5/1/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zartacla

You honestly think the game is playable in its current condition?

Let's see - once again, the game is not recognizing allied CP's for delivering supply (or I should say it's doing it sporadically, but the only common denominator I can find is that supply is being traced through allied CP's). Try running Operation Torch when the US and the UK need their own separate supply lines. Playable? Sure, in the sense that the game doesn't crash, but not in the sense that it works close enough to intended to serve its purpose.

Try loading units onto ships moving through ports.

Try declaring war on a minor country that was conquered by a major power that has itself been conquered. In my current game China conquered French Indo China after Japan demanded it from the Vichy government. On the next turn, Japan conquered China and now FIC is permanently neutral. Playable? Sure, it didn't crash the game. Playable in the way it's intended to be played? No.

Try setting up pickets to intercept ships that are aborting from a sea zone (either aborting from combat, or returning home at the end of the turn) or units that have been overrun and forced to rebase. That will often crash the game. Playable? Only if you voluntarily choose not to play that part of the naval war.

Try setting up your convoy chains and getting the resources to route the way you want them to. But hey, it's apparently not a bug if resources go from cape verde to central atlantic and then to the bay of biscay instead of just going straight from CV to BoB. The problem, you see, is that I'm just not smart enough to figure out the easy to use, user friendly production planning form. Playable? I suppose. Fun? Not hardly.

Try making a blitz attack or using engineers in an attack or using winterized units in an attack, then ignoring the prompt to destroy the armor/eng/winterized unit as the first combat loss. Sure, you can self enforce it, but isn't the value of MWiF over Vassal supposed to be the software enforcing the rules for us?

Try starting a netplay game. For anyone who bought the game primarily for netplay, based on the promise made on release day that Netplay would be working soon, it's definitely not playable.

I think the comparison Warspite made to Civ V was a good one. Civ V is a great game - but only if you've never played Civ I-IV. MWiF is a great game, but only if you've never played it live and don't know the rules as they are supposed to be coded. I can see how someone with little or no WiF experience prior to MWiF would rave about what a great game it is, but that's not me.

Right now MWiF is like buying a new car only to find that the radio works only intermittently, the air conditioner doesn't work at all, and the electric window controls have been replaced with manual cranks. But it's driveable!




My dear Zar

I personally agree with most of your comments and I could see where a new person would feel the game is playing very well and we all know it needs more fixing in all areas, the beta testers [volunteers without pay Zar, and if you do not like that word then ask the Matrix powers that be, to get professional help, not my call] feel the same way IMO and they all want this game to come to fruition ASAP.

I do understand that if I paid good money like others here including you and Dabrion I personally would not be a happy camper When some beta people here suggested that you might consider coming to the inside [beta tester] helping us test the game with your knowledge of the game your answer was I did not buy the game to be a tester, IMHO that is the correct answer and I commend you for that as I would not have thought of a good answer like that.

I cannot speak for Matrix or Steve or even the other beta testers, I am speaking from the heart here, I tease sometimes and joke on the forums but when it is a serious situation like now I do not BS anyone not my bag. Come into the beta testing but that is not my call to ask you in. OR!

Go on and keep complaining which is your right to do so and I respect that, or go on like Dabrion wanting a refund and I respect his opinions also, well most of them ] or put your feelings in your old kit bag [my mothers saying many years ago, and it was a song] pull up your britches and maybe just maybe yours and Dabrions knowledge of the game would be of tremendous assistance to Steve if he feels he needs it, his call. Not looking for an argument Zar its just I would like to play this game with net play and the AI in my lifetime, WITH or WITHOUT yours and Dabrions assistance.

Bo

< Message edited by bo -- 11/13/2014 5:14:03 PM >

(in reply to joshuamnave)
Post #: 36
RE: Playable! - 11/13/2014 4:08:49 PM   
bo

 

Posts: 4176
Joined: 5/1/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio


quote:

ORIGINAL: bo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio

IMO if the game needs Skype, it's not playable (at least as intended to be). For me it's not.


Hi Jose, I just downloaded skype for more testing doing net play and it is a wonderful tool, before when I would test with Cad we would have to type out instructions to each other but now we can communicate like we were in the same room together. I have a cheap headset with a mic, cost about 12 to 15 dollars US or you can go go hog wild with some of the headsets for 200 or 300 US dollars

When net play gets finished skype will be a must for better enjoyment of the game the only problem with skype is that you can not hand a beer to your opponent through skype, sorry!

Bo



Bo, I have been using Skype for like 5 or more years, maybe 8 or 10... It is a wonderful tool, indeed.

Problem are;

1 - The game was supposed not to have need of this aides.
2 - You cannot lift the counters of your opponent to see the lower unists in the stacks. For this you need Team Viewer or similar, and security should be an issue.


Jose I am afraid I do not understand what you are saying [par for me] Skype is not an aid for the game of MWIF, IMO, I do not have a cam with skype I was referring to be able to talk to each other while playing net play, as far as you examining stacks of naval units of your enemy isn't that what the Naval Review Details Screen is for?

Bo

< Message edited by bo -- 11/13/2014 5:38:52 PM >

(in reply to Joseignacio)
Post #: 37
RE: Playable! - 11/13/2014 4:18:14 PM   
Grotius


Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline
Zartacia, the game is quite playable for me, even given the issues you cite. My current game is in December 1940, and I've had a blast with it. The most annoying bug so far hasn't been anything you listed, but rather the tendency of the air-to-air form to lose focus, requiring me to reload the phase using an autosave. Irritating, but it hardly makes the game unplayable.

Most of the problems you cite -- convoys, pickets, transports, blitz/engineers, even supply -- can be worked around. Annoying, but not a big deal to me. The declaration of war issue is more serious, but even that doesn't stop me from enjoying the game. I'll concede that Netplay isn't playable, but I'm personally not interested in Netplay. For that reason, I indeed can honestly answer your question "yes, it's playable for me."

That said, I do fall into the category of a WIF newb, so maybe that's why I love MWIF and you don't. There's just no way I'd ever get through a solitaire game on Vassal. I love learning wargame rules as much as the next person, but for whatever reason, I've never had the patience do to that while using Vassal. MWIF enforces the rules for me, or at least 99% of the rules. For me, that's the difference between playing and not.



_____________________________


(in reply to bo)
Post #: 38
RE: Playable! - 11/13/2014 7:31:38 PM   
paulderynck


Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/24/2007
From: Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio

Bo, I have been using Skype for like 5 or more years, maybe 8 or 10... It is a wonderful tool, indeed.

Problem are;

1 - The game was supposed not to have need of this aides.
2 - You cannot lift the counters of your opponent to see the lower unists in the stacks. For this you need Team Viewer or similar, and security should be an issue.

I have yet to play a game online without Skype and indeed any online game plus Skype is close to 80% of the FTF playing experience. It's hard to imagine playing interactively online without Skype or a tool like it.

1. NetPlay does have a chat ability, but really, who'll bother with the tedious typing?
2. NetPlay provides all the same command functions as for Solitaire.

So it seems you are complaining about things you can't do when trying to play Hot Seat online and those complaints will not be applicable to NetPlay once the bugs in it are solved.



_____________________________

Paul

(in reply to Joseignacio)
Post #: 39
RE: Playable! - 11/14/2014 7:15:18 AM   
Joseignacio


Posts: 2449
Joined: 5/8/2009
From: Madrid, Spain
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio


quote:

ORIGINAL: bo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio

IMO if the game needs Skype, it's not playable (at least as intended to be). For me it's not.


Hi Jose, I just downloaded skype for more testing doing net play and it is a wonderful tool, before when I would test with Cad we would have to type out instructions to each other but now we can communicate like we were in the same room together. I have a cheap headset with a mic, cost about 12 to 15 dollars US or you can go go hog wild with some of the headsets for 200 or 300 US dollars

When net play gets finished skype will be a must for better enjoyment of the game the only problem with skype is that you can not hand a beer to your opponent through skype, sorry!

Bo



Bo, I have been using Skype for like 5 or more years, maybe 8 or 10... It is a wonderful tool, indeed.

Problem are;

1 - The game was supposed not to have need of this aides.
2 - You cannot lift the counters of your opponent to see the lower unists in the stacks. For this you need Team Viewer or similar, and security should be an issue.


Very good Jose it is me who is about 10 light years behind everyone, the reason I downloaded skype was not to play Mwif in net play but to test net play with a few of the beta testers where we could talk to each other rather than type out instructions. If you want put me on your skype contact and we could discuss this, my e-mail is [bowenw1@verizon.net] of course only if you want to

Bo


Will do, Bo. I just saw the post and I am at work now, not at home, so ... later.

(in reply to bo)
Post #: 40
RE: Playable! - 11/14/2014 8:23:15 AM   
Joseignacio


Posts: 2449
Joined: 5/8/2009
From: Madrid, Spain
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bo

[...]

Jose I am afraid I do not understand what you are saying [par for me] Skype is not an aid for the game of MWIF, IMO, I do not have a cam with skype I was referring to be able to talk to each other while playing net play, as far as you examining stacks of naval units of your enemy isn't that what the Naval Review Details Screen is for?

Bo


Bo, I met one guy who had the game and after many intents, we couldn't play right at Slitherin's the game kept crashing...

So, we played the game in each of our computers and when the game was not working well, we sent the save through email or chat. We also used an option of Gmail which is called 'hangouts" to see the other players moves/rolls/ et caetera.

The problem came because this system was not perfect cause you cannot send such big files as frequently as errors came, considering the huge number of phases, subphases, ..., and how many crashes used to happen. BEcause of this we ended, many times taking decissions just by seeing the other player's screen as he run the game (being mine frozen because of Slitherin) through hangouts and commenting through skype. And the problem was...

... that if you just saw the screen in his computer, you could only see the top unit, be it a division or a plane usually, and maybe hiding faster or special untis (like paratroopers or marines). At least in my circle, and in Eurowif as well, this (if suspected to be on purpose and for an unfair advantage) is considered dirty/not honest playing.

When suddenly a mech div which would normally be atop of a stack appeared from under slower units (that I had no way to see because I could not see cycle through the other player's stacks, cause I only could see the static image ) we had an argument cause I hadn't has the opportunity to see them.

That's why I consider the Skype (or hangouts) an aide, cause it helps the game to work, as it should have worked if not for the bugs. Of course I am meaning (maybe I should have mentioned this) through the camera facilities, that I understand is what make the game be playable in spite of the problems. Maybe I got it wrong?

(in reply to bo)
Post #: 41
RE: Playable! - 11/14/2014 8:45:43 AM   
Joseignacio


Posts: 2449
Joined: 5/8/2009
From: Madrid, Spain
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: paulderynck


quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio

Bo, I have been using Skype for like 5 or more years, maybe 8 or 10... It is a wonderful tool, indeed.

Problem are;

1 - The game was supposed not to have need of this aides.
2 - You cannot lift the counters of your opponent to see the lower unists in the stacks. For this you need Team Viewer or similar, and security should be an issue.

I have yet to play a game online without Skype and indeed any online game plus Skype is close to 80% of the FTF playing experience. It's hard to imagine playing interactively online without Skype or a tool like it.

1. NetPlay does have a chat ability, but really, who'll bother with the tedious typing?
2. NetPlay provides all the same command functions as for Solitaire.

So it seems you are complaining about things you can't do when trying to play Hot Seat online and those complaints will not be applicable to NetPlay once the bugs in it are solved.




Of course Skype includes a voice/image of player service that I guess was not included.

What I am referring to is using Skype or Hangouts as a a tool to be able to play through seeing the other guy's screen because you cannot netplay normally, which was included in the specifications.

(in reply to paulderynck)
Post #: 42
RE: Playable! - 11/14/2014 2:19:25 PM   
bo

 

Posts: 4176
Joined: 5/1/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio


quote:

ORIGINAL: bo

[...]

Jose I am afraid I do not understand what you are saying [par for me] Skype is not an aid for the game of MWIF, IMO, I do not have a cam with skype I was referring to be able to talk to each other while playing net play, as far as you examining stacks of naval units of your enemy isn't that what the Naval Review Details Screen is for?

Bo


Bo, I met one guy who had the game and after many intents, we couldn't play right at Slitherin's the game kept crashing...

So, we played the game in each of our computers and when the game was not working well, we sent the save through email or chat. We also used an option of Gmail which is called 'hangouts" to see the other players moves/rolls/ et caetera.

The problem came because this system was not perfect cause you cannot send such big files as frequently as errors came, considering the huge number of phases, subphases, ..., and how many crashes used to happen. BEcause of this we ended, many times taking decissions just by seeing the other player's screen as he run the game (being mine frozen because of Slitherin) through hangouts and commenting through skype. And the problem was...

... that if you just saw the screen in his computer, you could only see the top unit, be it a division or a plane usually, and maybe hiding faster or special untis (like paratroopers or marines). At least in my circle, and in Eurowif as well, this (if suspected to be on purpose and for an unfair advantage) is considered dirty/not honest playing.

When suddenly a mech div which would normally be atop of a stack appeared from under slower units (that I had no way to see because I could not see cycle through the other player's stacks, cause I only could see the static image ) we had an argument cause I hadn't has the opportunity to see them.

That's why I consider the Skype (or hangouts) an aide, cause it helps the game to work, as it should have worked if not for the bugs. Of course I am meaning (maybe I should have mentioned this) through the camera facilities, that I understand is what make the game be playable in spite of the problems. Maybe I got it wrong?


I am not versed enough with skype yet to say you got it wrong, that is for people who have had skype a lot longer than I have had it,[ 3 weeks].

Bo

(in reply to Joseignacio)
Post #: 43
RE: Playable! - 11/14/2014 2:29:54 PM   
bo

 

Posts: 4176
Joined: 5/1/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio


quote:

ORIGINAL: bo

[...]

Jose I am afraid I do not understand what you are saying [par for me] Skype is not an aid for the game of MWIF, IMO, I do not have a cam with skype I was referring to be able to talk to each other while playing net play, as far as you examining stacks of naval units of your enemy isn't that what the Naval Review Details Screen is for?

Bo


Bo, I met one guy who had the game and after many intents, we couldn't play right at Slitherin's the game kept crashing...

So, we played the game in each of our computers and when the game was not working well, we sent the save through email or chat. We also used an option of Gmail which is called 'hangouts" to see the other players moves/rolls/ et caetera.

The problem came because this system was not perfect cause you cannot send such big files as frequently as errors came, considering the huge number of phases, subphases, ..., and how many crashes used to happen. BEcause of this we ended, many times taking decissions just by seeing the other player's screen as he run the game (being mine frozen because of Slitherin) through hangouts and commenting through skype. And the problem was...

... that if you just saw the screen in his computer, you could only see the top unit, be it a division or a plane usually, and maybe hiding faster or special untis (like paratroopers or marines). At least in my circle, and in Eurowif as well, this (if suspected to be on purpose and for an unfair advantage) is considered dirty/not honest playing.

When suddenly a mech div which would normally be atop of a stack appeared from under slower units (that I had no way to see because I could not see cycle through the other player's stacks, cause I only could see the static image ) we had an argument cause I hadn't has the opportunity to see them.

That's why I consider the Skype (or hangouts) an aide, cause it helps the game to work, as it should have worked if not for the bugs. Of course I am meaning (maybe I should have mentioned this) through the camera facilities, that I understand is what make the game be playable in spite of the problems. Maybe I got it wrong?


I am not versed enough with skype yet to say you got it wrong, that is for people who have had skype a lot longer than I have had it,[ 3 weeks].

Bo


(in reply to bo)
Post #: 44
RE: Playable! - 11/14/2014 2:30:22 PM   
bo

 

Posts: 4176
Joined: 5/1/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio


quote:

ORIGINAL: bo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio

IMO if the game needs Skype, it's not playable (at least as intended to be). For me it's not.


Hi Jose, I just downloaded skype for more testing doing net play and it is a wonderful tool, before when I would test with Cad we would have to type out instructions to each other but now we can communicate like we were in the same room together. I have a cheap headset with a mic, cost about 12 to 15 dollars US or you can go go hog wild with some of the headsets for 200 or 300 US dollars

When net play gets finished skype will be a must for better enjoyment of the game the only problem with skype is that you can not hand a beer to your opponent through skype, sorry!

Bo



Bo, I have been using Skype for like 5 or more years, maybe 8 or 10... It is a wonderful tool, indeed.

Problem are;

1 - The game was supposed not to have need of this aides.
2 - You cannot lift the counters of your opponent to see the lower unists in the stacks. For this you need Team Viewer or similar, and security should be an issue.


Jose I am afraid I do not understand what you are saying [par for me] Skype is not an aid for the game of MWIF, IMO, I do not have a cam with skype I was referring to be able to talk to each other while playing net play, as far as you examining stacks of naval units of your enemy isn't that what the Naval Review Details Screen is for?

Bo


(in reply to bo)
Post #: 45
RE: Playable! - 11/14/2014 2:33:28 PM   
bo

 

Posts: 4176
Joined: 5/1/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio


quote:

ORIGINAL: bo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio


quote:

ORIGINAL: bo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio

IMO if the game needs Skype, it's not playable (at least as intended to be). For me it's not.


Hi Jose, I just downloaded skype for more testing doing net play and it is a wonderful tool, before when I would test with Cad we would have to type out instructions to each other but now we can communicate like we were in the same room together. I have a cheap headset with a mic, cost about 12 to 15 dollars US or you can go go hog wild with some of the headsets for 200 or 300 US dollars

When net play gets finished skype will be a must for better enjoyment of the game the only problem with skype is that you can not hand a beer to your opponent through skype, sorry!

Bo



Bo, I have been using Skype for like 5 or more years, maybe 8 or 10... It is a wonderful tool, indeed.

Problem are;

1 - The game was supposed not to have need of this aides.
2 - You cannot lift the counters of your opponent to see the lower unists in the stacks. For this you need Team Viewer or similar, and security should be an issue.


Very good Jose it is me who is about 10 light years behind everyone, the reason I downloaded skype was not to play Mwif in net play but to test net play with a few of the beta testers where we could talk to each other rather than type out instructions. If you want put me on your skype contact and we could discuss this, my e-mail is [bowenw1@verizon.net] of course only if you want to

Bo


Will do, Bo. I just saw the post and I am at work now, not at home, so ... later.


That sounds good Jose looking forward to talk to you.

Bo

(in reply to Joseignacio)
Post #: 46
RE: Playable! - 11/14/2014 3:41:41 PM   
bo

 

Posts: 4176
Joined: 5/1/2009
Status: offline
Sorry for the double posts I am having trouble with my edit button, could be from my end or Matrix's end not sure yet.

Bo

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 47
RE: Playable! - 11/15/2014 3:51:08 PM   
bo

 

Posts: 4176
Joined: 5/1/2009
Status: offline
Hey Jose thought we were going to add each other to skype. I must have misunderstood.

Bo

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 48
RE: Playable! - 11/17/2014 8:13:03 AM   
Joseignacio


Posts: 2449
Joined: 5/8/2009
From: Madrid, Spain
Status: offline
NO, Bo, I forgot for some time, sometimes my weekends are hectic...

But as you know we're now connected.

(in reply to bo)
Post #: 49
RE: Playable! - 11/17/2014 2:35:00 PM   
bo

 

Posts: 4176
Joined: 5/1/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio

NO, Bo, I forgot for some time, sometimes my weekends are hectic...

But as you know we're now connected.



Jose please watch that wording "connected" some posters might think a catfish scenario is going on here instead of a Barbarossa scenario

Bo

(in reply to Joseignacio)
Post #: 50
RE: Playable! - 11/18/2014 8:17:08 AM   
Joseignacio


Posts: 2449
Joined: 5/8/2009
From: Madrid, Spain
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio

NO, Bo, I forgot for some time, sometimes my weekends are hectic...

But as you know we're now connected.



Jose please watch that wording "connected" some posters might think a catfish scenario is going on here instead of a Barbarossa scenario

Bo



(in reply to bo)
Post #: 51
RE: Playable! - 11/19/2014 7:30:08 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
Happy Birthday Joseignacio!

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Joseignacio)
Post #: 52
RE: Playable! - 11/19/2014 11:19:02 PM   
bo

 

Posts: 4176
Joined: 5/1/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio


quote:

ORIGINAL: bo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Joseignacio

NO, Bo, I forgot for some time, sometimes my weekends are hectic...

But as you know we're now connected.



Jose please watch that wording "connected" some posters might think a catfish scenario is going on here instead of a Barbarossa scenario

Bo






Oh okay, connected is fine, but just for your birthday Feliz cumpleanos! Jose.

Bo

(in reply to Joseignacio)
Post #: 53
RE: Playable! - 11/20/2014 8:20:23 AM   
Joseignacio


Posts: 2449
Joined: 5/8/2009
From: Madrid, Spain
Status: offline
Thanks you both.

I am no fan of birthdays, even mine I think they are given too much importance... I did my usual life except for a special dinner...

(in reply to bo)
Post #: 54
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: Playable! Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.406