Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Groundhog Day!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Groundhog Day! Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/25/2015 12:07:25 AM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
He is making a dent in my B17 fleet but I love to watch his planes drop to damage when they fly. Must make a mess for him in maintenance and repair.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 361
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/25/2015 12:09:55 AM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
Betty's carrying 250KG bombs hit a destroyer with the group unloading at Tabituea




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 362
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/25/2015 12:15:13 AM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
NJP hit the Australian troops at 3-1 odds and caused a bit of damage and put them into retreat mode. The group came together into the hex and NJP decided to try his luck again.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 363
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/25/2015 12:17:00 AM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
The first thing in the combat replay is the 65th Brigade drops in strength to 0 AV.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 364
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/25/2015 1:22:38 AM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
Ouch! That's a lot of disabled squad. That brigade will be out for some time and so will the division. If Japan continues to waste LCUs like that in OZ then you are right that you will be able to hold. Perhaps I think too much what I would do in his shoes as opposed to what NJP is doing.

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 365
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/25/2015 2:03:08 AM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sangeli

Ouch! That's a lot of disabled squad. That brigade will be out for some time and so will the division. If Japan continues to waste LCUs like that in OZ then you are right that you will be able to hold. Perhaps I think too much what I would do in his shoes as opposed to what NJP is doing.


It is so easy to fear every attack rather than see that he has way too much stuff to cover. And also to see the perfect attack while not realizing the complications involved.

He has/had 600AV in that stack between the brigade and division. Another 250AV in the stack in portland and 950AV at Tasmania. that gives him 1800AV in the vicinity.

I have approximatly 850AV in the area in portland and west of portland and 900AV in both Sydney and Melbourne with other forces scattered about.

Having him consolidate those forces at either Melbourne or Sydney creates problems for the other areas of the map. he needs 2000-3000 AV of troops in one area yet he has to cover everything else. I can still swing 1200 AV of troops around while keeping 600AV at the other city.

The Japanese simply do not have enough troops to besiege both Sydney and Melbourne at the same time.

Tomorrow I march into Mildura with 150AV of tanks, AA and other annoying stuff. He will have to respond in some way and I can advance on Broken Hill, Adelaide or Port Augusta from there. Just another thing he has to worry about.

He has long lines of supply, I do not suffer from that problem. Also, I do not care if he cuts sydney off from Melbourne, it doesnt matter at this point.

NJP will not be given the luxury of a long siege unless I see it is to my advantage. And depending on the outcome of this next combat, he may re-think the assault altogether. 300+ squads disabled means most of the division and all of the brigade. My counterattack might be devastating or it might just put us back on even ground. I am shock attacking next turn of course. Hopefully my tanks have AV upon attack.



_____________________________


(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 366
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/25/2015 3:26:44 AM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
Got a shot at the Akagi. It failed. I think one hit but it was a dud... On the bright side, the Akagi is smoking which usually means that it needs maintenance.

That might mean he has to go back to Soerbaja for repairs within a month or so.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 367
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/25/2015 6:39:27 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wargmr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sangeli

Ouch! That's a lot of disabled squad. That brigade will be out for some time and so will the division. If Japan continues to waste LCUs like that in OZ then you are right that you will be able to hold. Perhaps I think too much what I would do in his shoes as opposed to what NJP is doing.


It is so easy to fear every attack rather than see that he has way too much stuff to cover. And also to see the perfect attack while not realizing the complications involved.

He has/had 600AV in that stack between the brigade and division. Another 250AV in the stack in portland and 950AV at Tasmania. that gives him 1800AV in the vicinity.

I have approximatly 850AV in the area in portland and west of portland and 900AV in both Sydney and Melbourne with other forces scattered about.

Having him consolidate those forces at either Melbourne or Sydney creates problems for the other areas of the map. he needs 2000-3000 AV of troops in one area yet he has to cover everything else. I can still swing 1200 AV of troops around while keeping 600AV at the other city.

The Japanese simply do not have enough troops to besiege both Sydney and Melbourne at the same time.

Tomorrow I march into Mildura with 150AV of tanks, AA and other annoying stuff. He will have to respond in some way and I can advance on Broken Hill, Adelaide or Port Augusta from there. Just another thing he has to worry about.

He has long lines of supply, I do not suffer from that problem. Also, I do not care if he cuts sydney off from Melbourne, it doesnt matter at this point.

NJP will not be given the luxury of a long siege unless I see it is to my advantage. And depending on the outcome of this next combat, he may re-think the assault altogether. 300+ squads disabled means most of the division and all of the brigade. My counterattack might be devastating or it might just put us back on even ground. I am shock attacking next turn of course. Hopefully my tanks have AV upon attack.



With what you have there I thin this is the moment to go all-in, so well played. It could break him there, and one success like that could start to unravel the entire campaign.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 368
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/25/2015 10:33:44 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
The allied shock attack goes in at only 1-1 but the equivalent of 2 regiments are evaporated on the Japanese side. Also, the units do not retreat which is not particularly good for NJP as it gives me another turn to beat his forces to death.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 369
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 1:17:29 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Once those Aussie Armoured units get proper tanks, the IJA in 1942 cannot cope with them. Go get-em ... again!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 370
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 7:55:41 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Once those Aussie Armoured units get proper tanks, the IJA in 1942 cannot cope with them. Go get-em ... again!


+1

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 371
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 10:26:53 AM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
NJP sends a strike in against my landing force at Tarawa. It is heartbreaking to watch troop ships burn!!

Luckily the embedded Portland puts some punishing rounds into the Furutaka and leaves it heavily burning.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Wargmr -- 4/26/2015 11:28:04 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 372
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 10:33:37 AM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
The allies deal a little payback to the assault force!!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 373
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 10:45:42 AM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
Another direct attack goes in on the army near Portland. They do get the chance to retreat but lose another 235 squads.

That means that given FOW he lost almost all of the combat troops out of both the division and the brigade. Those units may be able to be rebuilt but they will never be the same.








Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Wargmr -- 4/26/2015 11:46:14 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 374
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 10:55:20 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Your tanks should be able to catch up with the remnants of the IJA division & brigade, no? Did they retreat into a hex you do not wish to go into? Or is draining their pools with rebuilding units part of your strategy?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 375
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 11:32:44 AM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Your tanks should be able to catch up with the remnants of the IJA division & brigade, no? Did they retreat into a hex you do not wish to go into? Or is draining their pools with rebuilding units part of your strategy?


They retreated into the jungle hex northeast of Portland.

He has over 900 AV just freed up from Tasmania. I am not going to try to get ahead of myself. I am trying to extract my troops from Portland and wish to pull back and see what he wants to do.

Most of what is left of those troops is support and he is never going to run out of that...

< Message edited by Wargmr -- 4/26/2015 12:33:42 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 376
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 1:00:11 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wargmr

NJP sends a strike in against my landing force at Tarawa. It is heartbreaking to watch troop ships burn!!

Luckily the embedded Portland puts some punishing rounds into the Furutaka and leaves it heavily burning.



I know it's early, and there are limited options, but I'd consider not using the 12 knot ships in the same TF with the AP/AK which are faster. Also, if that is all one TF it's pretty big. A lot of Allied players tend to go over 15 ships but I've tried not to do that for two reasons; one you have less ability to coordinate escort against subs, AA and suffer more collisions, and two, you risk ALL being caught by one SCTF or CV TF. I've seen escort perform better in smaller TFs too, but here it's likely it wouldn't matter against those CAs.

Not at all sure the situation here but if the AP/AK unload faster they also might get out before the rest, thus not getting hit at all. I only learned this because Jocke was very good at quick one day amphibious ops where unless i predicted and took a chance at it, he would be gone before I could react.

What is the final talley after the several battles here?

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 377
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 1:08:48 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Or is draining their pools with rebuilding units part of your strategy?


For most items, Japan really has no pools. They build to suit.

Well, I guess you could mean the armaments pool...but that is generally never a problem. Same with manpower which never is.

Heavy Industry can be depending what is happening on the plane, ship, and economic front.

Supply definitely can be drained.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 378
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 1:17:53 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
I hate using and then losing any APs that become APAs in early '43. Its easier to use your plentiful xAPs despite their slow unload rates.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 379
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 6:05:44 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wargmr

NJP sends a strike in against my landing force at Tarawa. It is heartbreaking to watch troop ships burn!!

Luckily the embedded Portland puts some punishing rounds into the Furutaka and leaves it heavily burning.



I know it's early, and there are limited options, but I'd consider not using the 12 knot ships in the same TF with the AP/AK which are faster. Also, if that is all one TF it's pretty big. A lot of Allied players tend to go over 15 ships but I've tried not to do that for two reasons; one you have less ability to coordinate escort against subs, AA and suffer more collisions, and two, you risk ALL being caught by one SCTF or CV TF. I've seen escort perform better in smaller TFs too, but here it's likely it wouldn't matter against those CAs.

Not at all sure the situation here but if the AP/AK unload faster they also might get out before the rest, thus not getting hit at all. I only learned this because Jocke was very good at quick one day amphibious ops where unless i predicted and took a chance at it, he would be gone before I could react.

What is the final talley after the several battles here?


Agreed about the ships but that was what was available for such a large convoy. I tend to break off unloaded ships and either just put them in port or head them back for further operations.

Maybe several smaller task forces would have been better but I didnt have enough DD's to cover each individual force then. The CA's were never on the radar so I did not see them coming.

It is very likely that he lost a cruiser and 2 destroyers. Another cruiser is severely wounded/on fire and may or may not survive the contact. Nothing has shown up on the sunk ship list but he entered the combat with 6 ships and when it was over he had a TF of 1 ship (a CA) which I believe was the cruiser that broke off at the first encounter and was likely escorted by a destroyer that was also crippled. That or the destroyer just wasnt picked up in FOW.

The other TF was 2 ships and the one CA never suffered significant damage so that would definitely be that TF.

On my side I definitely lost 4 nice AP's. The total could be 5-6 AP's. On the flip side only about 120 troops were lost, the remaining troop ships were driven back to Tabituea where they are unloading the remainder of the units.

I got over 400AV unloaded on Tarawa which was not defended. Airfields are at 36% to level 1 there. At Tabituea which was never in japanese hands the airfield is 60%. Many other troop transports are inbound with advanced air bases, construction troops, etc. Also, many of these waves will be hitting near Pago Pago and other smaller islands within the next week or so.

Lets see what NJP decides to do.

My plan is to continue to push into the Pacific until it gets too dangerous.

_____________________________


(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 380
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 6:08:22 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

I hate using and then losing any APs that become APAs in early '43. Its easier to use your plentiful xAPs despite their slow unload rates.


Slow unload rates were not an option for most of this operation. I did not lose many troops because they unloaded fast enough to get everything on the ground before the attack.

_____________________________


(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 381
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 6:18:01 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wargmr


quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wargmr

NJP sends a strike in against my landing force at Tarawa. It is heartbreaking to watch troop ships burn!!

Luckily the embedded Portland puts some punishing rounds into the Furutaka and leaves it heavily burning.



I know it's early, and there are limited options, but I'd consider not using the 12 knot ships in the same TF with the AP/AK which are faster. Also, if that is all one TF it's pretty big. A lot of Allied players tend to go over 15 ships but I've tried not to do that for two reasons; one you have less ability to coordinate escort against subs, AA and suffer more collisions, and two, you risk ALL being caught by one SCTF or CV TF. I've seen escort perform better in smaller TFs too, but here it's likely it wouldn't matter against those CAs.

Not at all sure the situation here but if the AP/AK unload faster they also might get out before the rest, thus not getting hit at all. I only learned this because Jocke was very good at quick one day amphibious ops where unless i predicted and took a chance at it, he would be gone before I could react.

What is the final talley after the several battles here?


Agreed about the ships but that was what was available for such a large convoy. I tend to break off unloaded ships and either just put them in port or head them back for further operations.

Maybe several smaller task forces would have been better but I didnt have enough DD's to cover each individual force then. The CA's were never on the radar so I did not see them coming.

It is very likely that he lost a cruiser and 2 destroyers. Another cruiser is severely wounded/on fire and may or may not survive the contact. Nothing has shown up on the sunk ship list but he entered the combat with 6 ships and when it was over he had a TF of 1 ship (a CA) which I believe was the cruiser that broke off at the first encounter and was likely escorted by a destroyer that was also crippled. That or the destroyer just wasnt picked up in FOW.

The other TF was 2 ships and the one CA never suffered significant damage so that would definitely be that TF.

On my side I definitely lost 4 nice AP's. The total could be 5-6 AP's. On the flip side only about 120 troops were lost, the remaining troop ships were driven back to Tabituea where they are unloading the remainder of the units.

I got over 400AV unloaded on Tarawa which was not defended. Airfields are at 36% to level 1 there. At Tabituea which was never in japanese hands the airfield is 60%. Many other troop transports are inbound with advanced air bases, construction troops, etc. Also, many of these waves will be hitting near Pago Pago and other smaller islands within the next week or so.

Lets see what NJP decides to do.

My plan is to continue to push into the Pacific until it gets too dangerous.


Well, losing CAs is never good for Japan, so could be to your benefit. At least you're doing something while he's over-extended.


< Message edited by obvert -- 4/26/2015 7:18:36 PM >


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 382
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/26/2015 11:19:23 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
August 4, 1942... The courageous dutch troops continue to hold the mountain high ground.

They have re-built the forts to 2 and still have slightly over 200 AV and more than 2000 supply.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 383
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/28/2015 3:20:34 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
The DD that slipped through my lines and attacked a transport heading for New Zealand is engaged two more times and takes heavy damage in the second combat. The ship is just 1 hex northwest of the base at this time which might suggest it is in serious trouble.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 384
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/28/2015 3:25:15 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
NJP mentioned I was doing well against him in the Pacific last turn. Probably due to the attack on his destroyer at Savii and the amphibious landing at Ta'u. There will be two more landings next turn, one on Pago Pago and one on Upolu.

He never increased the airfields in this area beyond level one so I do not fear any dive bombers or torpedo bombers. Maybe he can use some of his patrol planes to attack me but with 3 invasions going on simultaneously I dont think he can repel them all.

This is the repercussions of trying to embargo Australia.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 385
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/29/2015 10:22:36 AM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
Having trouble withdrawing a troop ship. Moved it to Sydney but it will not let me withdraw it.

Where is the closest port where I can withdraw this ship?

Sydney is a level 9 port which should allow withdrawl.

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 386
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/29/2015 11:19:12 AM   
setloz

 

Posts: 97
Joined: 1/14/2013
From: Romania
Status: offline
there is another rule, in order for withdraw to be available, no IJ troops should be within 10 hex distance.

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 387
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/29/2015 11:52:04 AM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: setloz

there is another rule, in order for withdraw to be available, no IJ troops should be within 10 hex distance.


I learned this one the hard way recently trying to withdraw from a level 9 Rangoon while IJA troops sat at Moulmien.

Had to race to Colombo and lost PPs for two days in the transaction.

< Message edited by HansBolter -- 4/29/2015 12:52:29 PM >


_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to setloz)
Post #: 388
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/29/2015 3:21:20 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
Major Troop Movements appear to be occurring in eastern Australia.

I think NJP has realized the potential cost of a siege of the continent. Otherwise he is shifting assets to assault either Sydney or Melbourne although I do not believe he would remove these units if he did intend to move forward on the siege.

I have managed to insert a few companies in between him and Brisbane and that may have added to the concern.

So, I can expect a presence in the Pacific soon.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Wargmr -- 4/29/2015 6:16:22 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 389
RE: Groundhog Day! - 4/29/2015 5:13:33 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
Tarawa and Tabituea are firmly under allied control. I lost about 7 transport ships but it was worth the position in the Pacific.

We shall see if NJP contests these areas or reinforces farther north and west. Once Tarawa fell in the last game I knew that the Marshall and Gilbert islands would be under my control due to the reach of 4EB.

Tabituea is already level 2 and well on the way to dominance in the area.

Based on the activity of eastern Australia, I believe that activity will heat up in the Pacific although I cannot be sure of the timeline. Also, India is not completely off the table if NJP thinks he can get away with it. I have moved a good deal of the forces at Comilla away. A standoff at Chittagong is not what I am looking for.

Maybe I can leapfrog over him.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 390
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Groundhog Day! Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.844