Peltonx
Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rosseau quote:
ORIGINAL: Pelton quote:
ORIGINAL: loki100 quote:
ORIGINAL: Pelton ... Germany only has about 10 units that can do anything, all 15+ CV - so when allies land you have to move them to the invasion area. Then if they leave there is no way you can get CV lvls back to "normal" System needs a delay Pelton the problem here is you have been min-maxing your response to invasions (as you do very well), this response exposes that approach from a similar perspective. The reality is the Germans didn't dare strip say France of mobile reserves to deal with Italy as they didn't know the allies lacked the capacity (or will) to try a second invasion. So you've been dealing with one threat and ignoring the latent second threat. This rather gamey Allied strategy is a response in kind. Its unfortunate that you are back to screaming 'Middle Earth' in response to be being out-gamed. As to the VPs. I don't care about the negative concept. I can see the objection but it doesn't worry me. I'd like to see the T1 hit on allied VPs removed (as someone says those losses are from when someone else was in command), not least its scarcely needed for end of game balance (judging by completed games so far). I actually like the VP system as a reflection of external issues. I presume the U-Boat focus is a way to build in the diversion of effort (for both sides) of the Battle of the Atlantic? V1/2 reflects the importance the allies gave to ending that threat. I'm not that worried about the game tending to an allied loss (regardless of who holds Berlin) if losses go too high or progress is too slow. Given the economic ruin of the war for the UK and France, you could make a case that by 1943 this war had long abandoned the traditional logic of fighting for defined goals and had indeed become about winning at any cost and worry about the consequences later. What might be nice is a second set of victory conditions. WiTE is, as noted above, too driven in its victory conditions by player performance not context. Something along these lines in WiTW as a separate metric for 'success' might be quite useful, though of course player(s) can always come up with their own informal measures for this (as many do in WiTE). Dude build it anyway you want, but exploits aree exploit and tring to BS people is simply BS people. The player base is not as stupid as you and others would like to think. They ALWAYS exploit the rules be it WitE or WitW if the rule set is piss poor its piss poor and playes game it to Middle Earth and back. Star Trek is not World War II? You think the current garrison rule set is not Middle Earth? Sorry bro but people that have helped design WitW thk its stupid they just simply can't say it in dev forum or here. Its simply not possible to wave a majgic wand and have unit move 50+ hexes. I am very very very very happy some peeps that play WA's are 1/2 as smart as MT.Sapper, Bomazz, Hoooper, Kamil ect winning as WA's is way way to easy. I am simply asking that WA be given some lov as VP system is off and garrison system is way to exploitable. Now 2by3 can be like the old days of WitE and be made complete fools of by some stupid redneck retard called Pelton ( morale bug, ammo bug, armament bug ect ect yes I wat 100% right and 2by3 100%wrong) or they can be drama queens. Dude just fix the sht and make 2 simple changes that balance the game. Way way to much drama and not enough IQ I don't know who Pelton is, but we can do without the name-calling, dude. Generally speaking I am the dude that called out 2by3 and said that national morale was broken and they said no. I said there was an ammo bug and they said no I said there was a armament bug and they said noper I said there was a swapping bug and they said noper. So for months 6+ I was called stupid ect ect ect and guess what? I was right and 2by3 wrong and they asked me to be part of deving this game check the credits - I am not going to blow sht up peeps butts when sht is simply wrong. Have some respect for yourself. So I simply have no need to call the kettle black as I was right. Can anyone say that's played at all say that the WA's don't need some VP love? Bro I have played WitE like WitW more then anyone and the WA's need some VP love. Also I have found as many exploits and cheats and found the best of the cheaters (ask Erik) so I know based on actions and not BS what I am talking about. I don't know who you are but I respect your opinion based on? but I respect it. I know what I am talking about based on 4+ yrs of playing. Its great you spent $ on the game, but play it some bro before blowing your horn.
< Message edited by Pelton -- 2/15/2015 2:16:08 AM >
_____________________________
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
|