Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE.

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War I] >> Commander - The Great War >> RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. - 5/29/2015 10:22:21 AM   
kirk23


Posts: 2885
Joined: 10/15/2010
From: Fife Scotland
Status: offline 		Thank you I am recovering.


1 : Russian PP has been increased in the western regions.

The Central Powers do have a very good reason for being more aggressive against Russia on the Eastern front. Since I changed the penalty Countries suffer for loosing any Capital Cities,for example Russia has four Capitals in the game at the present time, if the Central Powers capture WARSAW,PETROGRAD and MOSCOW Russia's national morale will drop to a point that Russia will surrender, if she lost these 3 Capitals.

_____________________________

Make it so!

(in reply to TripleCP)
Post #: 121
RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. - 5/29/2015 12:15:48 PM   
operating


Posts: 3158
Joined: 1/19/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kirk23

Thank you I am recovering.


1 : Russian PP has been increased in the western regions.

The Central Powers do have a very good reason for being more aggressive against Russia on the Eastern front. Since I changed the penalty Countries suffer for loosing any Capital Cities,for example Russia has four Capitals in the game at the present time, if the Central Powers capture WARSAW,PETROGRAD and MOSCOW Russia's national morale will drop to a point that Russia will surrender, if she lost these 3 Capitals.

In MP I'm finding that if CP is capturing between 18 to 20 Russian cities, including Warsaw and Tsaritsn (for good measure Russian dreadnaught fleet sunk), causes Russia to surrender.

(in reply to kirk23)
Post #: 122
RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. - 5/30/2015 9:51:51 AM   
kirk23


Posts: 2885
Joined: 10/15/2010
From: Fife Scotland
Status: offline 		Yip if Central Powers are aggressive towards Russia, Russia will surrender, if you take out Petrograd and Moscow these result in the biggest hit to National Morale.

_____________________________

Make it so!

(in reply to operating)
Post #: 123
RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. - 5/30/2015 4:15:12 PM   
operating


Posts: 3158
Joined: 1/19/2013
Status: offline 		Kirk

What do you think about putting names to the rivers and bodies of water on the map? (in really small letters)

Bob

< Message edited by operating -- 5/30/2015 5:15:33 PM >

(in reply to kirk23)
Post #: 124
RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. - 5/30/2015 9:35:52 PM   
DanielHerr

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 2/7/2015
Status: offline 		That seems unnecessary.

_____________________________

danielherr.github.io

(in reply to operating)
Post #: 125
RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. - 5/30/2015 10:32:49 PM   
aaatoysandmore

 

Posts: 2848
Joined: 9/11/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DanielHerr

That seems unnecessary.


I agree. Wasted resources if you ask me and of course someone did ask me.

(in reply to DanielHerr)
Post #: 126
RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. - 5/30/2015 11:03:14 PM   
operating


Posts: 3158
Joined: 1/19/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DanielHerr

That seems unnecessary.

Geographically I thought it would be interesting, for everybody that does not know, what everybody else must know, but then: Does everybody know it all?

(in reply to DanielHerr)
Post #: 127
RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. - 5/30/2015 11:06:18 PM   
Cataphract88


Posts: 728
Joined: 10/5/2012
From: Britannia
Status: offline 		I always think that it is a nice touch to show the names of rivers; it certainly makes the map more interesting.

_____________________________

Richard

(in reply to operating)
Post #: 128
RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. - 5/30/2015 11:14:18 PM   
DanielHerr

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 2/7/2015
Status: offline 		If you were going to name rivers, then you might as well label every other geographic formation, such as mountain ranges and deserts. That seems better suited to the hex information panel than on the map.

_____________________________

danielherr.github.io

(in reply to Cataphract88)
Post #: 129
RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. - 5/30/2015 11:22:24 PM   
operating


Posts: 3158
Joined: 1/19/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: aaatoysandmore


quote:

ORIGINAL: DanielHerr

That seems unnecessary.


I agree. Wasted resources if you ask me and of course someone did ask me.

I'm not saying: That every river and what-not be named, at least give the map a slightly more polished look, plus sometimes during a match I'd like to know what I am fighting over, at the glance of the eye. Perhaps an overlay "button/key" that would superimpose an information map over the standard game map? No big deal, Just a suggestion...

(in reply to aaatoysandmore)
Post #: 130
RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. - 5/30/2015 11:31:17 PM   
operating


Posts: 3158
Joined: 1/19/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DanielHerr

If you were going to name rivers, then you might as well label every other geographic formation, such as mountain ranges and deserts. That seems better suited to the hex information panel than on the map.

Question: Is there something wrong with learning about the historical significance of the map during the course of playing the game other than cities?

(in reply to DanielHerr)
Post #: 131
RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. - 6/7/2015 9:06:08 PM   
AdmiralSarek

 

Posts: 30
Joined: 1/31/2015
Status: offline 		naming things is fine, though I would suggest that we are allowed to zoom in more than we can now, and only then the extra names show up.

(in reply to operating)
Post #: 132
RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. - 6/8/2015 1:24:46 PM   
Cataphract88


Posts: 728
Joined: 10/5/2012
From: Britannia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AdmiralSarek

naming things is fine, though I would suggest that we are allowed to zoom in more than we can now, and only then the extra names show up.


+1

Extra zoom would be great.

_____________________________

Richard

(in reply to AdmiralSarek)
Post #: 133
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War I] >> Commander - The Great War >> RE: COMMANDER THE GREAT WAR AND ITS FUTURE. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.344