kbfchicago
Posts: 359
Joined: 10/17/2009 From: NC, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Vitelski A couple of questions: Is it necessary for a naval bomber squadron to have both naval bombing and nav search to be effective? Is it necessary for an ASW squadron to have all three of nav search, nav bombing and ASW to be useful for the ASW mission? As noted above, depends. Folks tend to get lost in all the options game play allows, there is seldom "one" right or best way. For how I approach CV air sqdns & missions, answer to #1 is yes (for TBs), no for #2. Playing either IJN or Allied for CV air units I train TB's in Torpedo attack, Search, Naval attack (in that order of priority). DBs in Naval Attack, Search. Float support planes in Search, ASW For IJN my search aircraft of choice are the TBs, longer range, with 30-50% on search (Nav (Torp) Attk mission). Put the DBs on secondary arcs or more likely leave on "Nav Attk" only. So I tend to train less search for DBs. I tend not to focus on ASW for CV based AC. Search will expose them (subs), raising detection, avoiding attack. You don't sink much (especially early on) with airborne ASW anyway. While not a complete waste of time, in my book its a luxury item for experienced sqdns chilling while the CV is in refit. While I may be luck'ier than your average moose, this seems to have worked for me, I also tend not to linger CV TFs in shipping lanes or too close to major ports if I can help it. No science, but I think more successful in PBEM vs AI... darn AI seems to get inside my head on occasion (or reads my turn ) You may find a completely different approach supports you play style better... The one sure thing is...if you can't find'em, you can't sink'em.
|