Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

IJN Cruiser history chart

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> IJN Cruiser history chart Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
IJN Cruiser history chart - 5/17/2015 11:54:04 PM   
ChuckBerger

 

Posts: 278
Joined: 8/10/2006
Status: offline 		I've been doing a bit of fooling around with Adobe Illustrator, and made this chart showing the history of IJN CAs during WW2. If people like it, I can do other ship classes too. Would be interesting to track the destroyers this way... Used the TROMs on Combined Fleet for the data.







Attachment (1)
Post #: 1
RE: IJN Cruiser history chart - 5/18/2015 12:06:38 AM   
dr.hal


Posts: 3335
Joined: 6/3/2006
From: Covington LA via Montreal!
Status: offline 		Very nice, thanks for sharing. It's amazing that only two were ordered after the start of the war given what the USA ordered and launched.

_____________________________


(in reply to ChuckBerger)
Post #: 2
RE: IJN Cruiser history chart - 5/18/2015 12:18:35 AM   
Mooshh

 

Posts: 34
Joined: 7/22/2004
Status: offline 		very nice work. other classes would be interesting to see also.

(in reply to dr.hal)
Post #: 3
RE: IJN Cruiser history chart - 5/18/2015 12:27:14 AM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline 		Leyte was a big "game over"

(in reply to Mooshh)
Post #: 4
RE: IJN Cruiser history chart - 5/18/2015 12:43:20 AM   
SierraJuliet


Posts: 2319
Joined: 2/23/2009
From: Brisbane, Australia
Status: offline 		Very good work. The destroyers would be interesting to see.

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 5
RE: IJN Cruiser history chart - 5/18/2015 1:20:05 AM   
ChuckBerger

 

Posts: 278
Joined: 8/10/2006
Status: offline 		Yes indeed, in addition to the six CAs lost during the battle itself, a further five were either picked off in the aftermath, or so severely damaged they were turned into AA platforms or hulks. Total of 11 Heavy cruisers lost from active service at Leyte.

Doing this reminded me of just how awesome (and lucky) the Americans were at Samar. Chokai was basically sunk by a 5-inch shell from a CVE or DE, which ignited her torpedoes and left the ship dead in the water. Suzuya was sunk by 2 bomb near-misses, one of which set off her torpedoes on deck. Chikuma gets rendered unnavigable by a lucky torpedo hit that disable one of her propellers and her rudder, leaving her a sitting duck for more.

They were tough ships, the IJN CAs - but ironically at Samar their Long Lance torpedoes did them more harm than good!



(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 6
RE: IJN Cruiser history chart - 5/18/2015 1:36:41 AM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline 		Japanese industry was limited. They could only produce enough steel for so many ships. The Yamato program was sucking up most of the resources when the war started, but after Midway, carrier construction became priority 1. The need to build and convert more carriers distorted everything else.

Once carrier aviation came into its own, surface ships fell into two categories: escorts and targets. Sometimes both. The only time surface ships larger than light cruisers ever squared off was when carriers were not around (due to being out of position as happened at Leyte, or the carriers were damaged) to do the job, or they were thrown a bone like when US surface ships engaged some of the ships fleeing Truk.

After Midway, the only warships larger than DDs that got serious attention were carriers and a few CLs already well along in the construction program. The Japanese realized what the realities of airpower were by then. They also knew the US had a massive carrier building program and were probably aware that it had been expanded beyond its original size.

Bill



_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to ChuckBerger)
Post #: 7
RE: IJN Cruiser history chart - 5/18/2015 1:42:02 AM   
Major Shane


Posts: 195
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline 		Awesome chart. I would be interested in seeing the carriers next.

(in reply to wdolson)
Post #: 8
RE: IJN Cruiser history chart - 5/18/2015 3:57:42 AM   
Feltan


Posts: 1160
Joined: 12/5/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline 		Very nice.

Thank you.

Regards,
Feltan

(in reply to Major Shane)
Post #: 9
RE: IJN Cruiser history chart - 5/18/2015 6:08:59 AM   
oaltinyay

 

Posts: 593
Joined: 12/20/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ChuckBerger

I've been doing a bit of fooling around with Adobe Illustrator, and made this chart showing the history of IJN CAs during WW2. If people like it, I can do other ship classes too. Would be interesting to track the destroyers this way... Used the TROMs on Combined Fleet for the data.









very informative... I'ld like to see the case for DDs and Escort ships but that'll be sort of impossible I guess

_____________________________


(in reply to ChuckBerger)
Post #: 10
RE: IJN Cruiser history chart - 5/18/2015 7:22:47 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ChuckBerger

I've been doing a bit of fooling around with Adobe Illustrator, and made this chart showing the history of IJN CAs during WW2. If people like it, I can do other ship classes too. Would be interesting to track the destroyers this way... Used the TROMs on Combined Fleet for the data.




warspite1

ChuckBerger I have never seen (or thought of) information being presented in this way before but I am really impressed. This gives a real understanding of what was available at any one time in one easy to read format.

One suggestion I would offer is to put a single line at the end of each (where applicable) just to complete the picture. So for example:

Kako X Torpedoed by USS S-44 10/08/42

Just a thought.



_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to ChuckBerger)
Post #: 11
RE: IJN Cruiser history chart - 5/18/2015 6:55:24 PM   
jamesjohns

 

Posts: 135
Joined: 12/2/2013
Status: offline 		Thanks for sharing this! Interesting chart, as others said, it would be interesting to see carriers and battleships.


(in reply to ChuckBerger)
Post #: 12
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> IJN Cruiser history chart Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.734