Turn 27: 8-13 January 1944

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Turn 27: 8-13 January 1944

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the West >> After Action Reports >> Turn 27: 8-13 January 1944

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Turn 27: 8-13 January 1944 - 10/8/2015 8:01:11 PM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

Turn 27: 8-13 January 1944

Main events in the Allied turn were that they made some gains around the bridgehead and were following up my units retreating from the south.

In the air, the US 8 Airforce had another bad week.

I'm taking gambles with my fighter deployments and tending to set them in clusters while leaving other areas relatively exposed. The result is some turns the allied airforce comes to where I am strong. I expect this to lose its impact as the Americans gain better escorts but for now I'm pretty content with my air defensive planning.

Seems that Bomber Command were given the week off, presumably they were being retrained in how to fly their planes

In Italy, I fling in the Luftwaffe again, trying to minimise re-supply and set up some interdiction to hurt any allied breakout.

I then execute a huge run away ...

Leaving stay behind garrisons at Naples and Gaeta.

It was tempting to fight one more turn, really for the VP gain but I've managed to achieve my first goal of pulling out all the units in southern Italy. If the Allies enter northern Italy that is one set of garrison rules I can ignore and I'd like to move XIV Pzr Corps to France before the Allies start to bomb my rail net.

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 31

RE: Turn 27: 8-13 January 1944 - 10/9/2015 1:21:17 AM

Seminole

Posts: 2105
Joined: 7/28/2011
Status: offline

Did he break the line at Termoli, or just exploit your retreat after invading at Rome with that advance by the Canadian armor?
What armor have you identified in Italy thus far?

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 32

RE: Turn 27: 8-13 January 1944 - 10/13/2015 7:55:09 PM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Seminole

Did he break the line at Termoli, or just exploit your retreat after invading at Rome with that advance by the Canadian armor?
What armor have you identified in Italy thus far?

the east coast advance was unopposed. His stuff in the west/centre is snagged up on a weak defensive line and my stay behind division at Naples. So I think there are only 2 armoured divisions in action, that Canadian unit and another that was part of his landings north of Rome. There may have been more off to sea but it seems as if the Allied forces in Italy are mostly infantry.

_____________________________

(in reply to Seminole)

Post #: 33

Turns 28-30: 15 January - 4 February 1944 - 10/13/2015 7:57:21 PM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

Turns 28-30: 15 January - 4 February 1944

Again, I'm going to conflate a number of turns as events are fairly repetitive.

Following my successful (or disastrous) escape at Rome, the land war settled down to a stalemate. I'd suspect that without Naples and with a limited rail net, the Allies are struggling for supply in central Italy. In addition, I strongly suspect most of their better units will be pulled out for the invasion of France.

The air war continued as before. Generally each major allied airforce went for a single hex target, 15 Air made its first appearance and ran into a fighter cluster I'd deployed waiting for them. From my own experience, its hard to properly escort this air group in southern Germany/Austria and inflicting heavy losses should render it inactive for a while.

Last turn of this sequence shows a typical pattern. Bomber Command hit Stuttgart.

8 Airforce mostly went for the V-weapon factories on the Baltic. Oddly so far the Allies haven't hit the launch sites in France which is unusual. I find them easy to knock down simply using the Halifax/Wellingtons of Bomber Command. A second raid hit Braunschweig.

15 Air was hiding after being beaten up the previous week.

VP situation for the end of January. The liberation of Rome is boosting the allied per-turn gain, lack of sustained combat keeps their lost VP for casualties pretty low. But overall I'm happy enough with the VP situation for the strategic air war.

The last turn they had limited air losses as all their raids evaded the bulk of my fighter cover. I've no idea if the overall loss situation is ok, but at the moment all my fighter units are only using trained pilots and most are fully operational.

I think I've inflicted fairly heavy losses on the Allied strategic bombers (both Lancasters and B-17s).

This shows my Italian defensive line at the end of January.

Really my goal is to allocate enough forces to be annoying and delay the allies but hopefully have the bulk of the army ready in France.

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 34

RE: Turn 26: 1- 6 January 1944 1943 - 10/21/2015 9:21:39 AM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: XXXCorps

quote:

ORIGINAL: LiquidSky

I can see them. Is it only Loki's screenshots you can't see, or is it everyone?

Just Loki's. I've checked other AAR's and threads on the main forum where screenshots are posted and they are fine.

Thanks for your reply, Loki. I thought it was just me.

Just as a follow up to this, I had this email from imageshack (this is what I use for image hosting), main bits are:

quote:

Dear ImageShack users, on September 29th '15, ImageShack has suffered a very large service outage. We wanted to take time to explain what happened, and how it affected your accounts as well as Image delivery.

During a routine maintenance, a small mistake crept up into one of our management tools that caused all our of servers to wipe out their operating systems as well as most of the image storage systems. You may want to ask, how can something small cause such a large issue? Don't we have backups. And Yes, indeed, we do have at least 3 copies as backups of all your images.

ImageShack has been around since 2004, during that time we have grown to store billions of images, and used hundreds of servers to deliver those images to the internet. We always relied on automated systems that allowed us to keep our team relatively small, so that we could pass to cost savings to you, our users. Unfortunately, with system automation comes a risk of a mistake such as described above.

The good news, we were able to restore most of the images,and continue to deliver them to you pages. The bad news is that we lost about 4% of all images, across all accounts (paid and free). This means that if you have a page with 100 images embedded, there perhaps would be between 3 to 5 images missing. .... .

< Message edited by loki100 -- 10/21/2015 10:23:59 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to IslandInland)

Post #: 35

Turns 31-34: 5 February � 3 March 1944 - 10/30/2015 8:36:54 AM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

Turns 31-34: 5 February � 3 March 1944

Again I'm going to conflate quite a lot of turns. Same reason, I'm finding the German side very reactive (as it should be) and a combination of setting up some long term ideas and fiddling around with the relative layout of my fighter defences and so on.

So far, I've been keeping the experience level of my fighter squadrons high by setting them to TPI only for replacements. The result is I have increasing number of planes in the pools and a few squadrons below the eligible to fly % [1].

I'm going to try to manage this by scrapping some squadrons and manually re-assigning their pilots to my best units. In effect, I want to see what happens if you end up with a small but elite fighter force in the late game. In the reverse game, Dave allocated untrained pilots from about September 1944 and the result was massive operational losses and I stopped even bothering to hunt down the Luftwaffe (as I had been doing from May-September) as it was no meaningful threat.

Anyway, my brave troops are determined to prevent the fine people of Naples from being forced to drink milky tea by the British ...

[2]

On T31, US 8 Air was the one that flew into a trap

They decided to do the same on T32 as well

On both turns the hapless 15 Air was clearly sent off on a compulsory training course. Many cows wandering around in Swabia found themselves being used for target practice.

T33 brought an odd VP event. I lost 10 for the east front, despite, as far as I can work out more than meeting the requirements. Any ideas why?

T33, both US strategic air groups hid and whimpered (at least that is what the email discussion claimed) but Bomber Command took over the task of flying to where my fighters were most concentrated,

On T34 my chums in 15 Air returned, this time clearly aiming at something more important than the Swabian dairy industry.

VP situation at the end of February. Given the lack of much ground fighting, I think that is ok.

[1] I know I can reset this but its a useful safety net in case a unit is caught and hammered early in a turn as it prevents massive losses of both pilots and morale.
[2] Idea here is to delay any chance the Allies have to build up supply in Italy � finally fell on T33.

< Message edited by loki100 -- 10/30/2015 9:47:46 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 36

RE: Turns 31-34: 5 February � 3 March 1944 - 10/30/2015 3:49:19 PM

Joel Billings

Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline

The front line is at 212, but it should be at 214. Since it has moved 2 hexes west of the victory line, the Allies score 2x5 or 10 points.

_____________________________

All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 37

RE: Turns 31-34: 5 February � 3 March 1944 - 10/31/2015 8:53:55 AM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joel Billings

The front line is at 212, but it should be at 214. Since it has moved 2 hexes west of the victory line, the Allies score 2x5 or 10 points.

ah, thanks, I was clearly reading the table upside down

_____________________________

(in reply to Joel Billings)

Post #: 38

Turns 35-36: 4 March � 17 March 1944 - 11/4/2015 7:37:36 AM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

Turns 35-36: 4 March � 17 March 1944

Usual bombing patterns on T35, 8 Air hit Jena and Bomber Command went for the Ruhr (15 Air hid under the duvet and whimpered).

Increasingly 8 Air seems to be well enough escorted not to take many losses in air combat but my night fighter force is still effective. Add on the flak concentrations in the Ruhr and the British took heavy losses.

Anyway with the new patch, I decided to see if I could escalate the war at night. There is a new (and rather fun) air superiority mission now that you fly in your opponent's air phase and it basically puts your interceptors over their bases when they return [1].

This was also accompanied by a day time recon mission.

Despite their losses, next turn theBritish returned again to the Ruhr [2] and 8 Air went for the v-weapon sites. My favourite chums in 15 Air returned with another devastating raid on the Swabian milk industry.

Allied losses are starting to reduce.

First signs they are becoming nosy about what is going on in Europe.

This turn led to a major re-organisation of my day fighter deployments. First I swapped out all the long range fighters for the new FW models. I then stripped out some squadrons and allocated them to the France for escort duties. Final step was to create two clusters in Germany with all the remaining day fighters in them.

My logic is if I now intercept with limited planes it makes little difference to the well escorted Americans (already most of their losses are due to flak). I'd rather try to catch them out badly if they walk into a trap rather than contest every mission.

[1] � the only problem is you don't get to see the outcome ... I think it works as the units I have allocated to this mission have taken some losses.
[2] � so we've reached that phase where losses (numbers and morale) might weaken the allied bombing campaign but not actually stop it

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 39

RE: Turns 35-36: 4 March � 17 March 1944 - 11/5/2015 2:08:50 AM

Q-Ball

Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline

Good job on Italy; I personally think it's not worth it to hold Rome much past April, because you're going to want to pull troops from Italy anyway once France is invaded. That's easier to do along the Gothic Line.

His 8th AF strikes don't seem to have much of an escort, if any......he should have plenty of P-38 to use in that role, not sure what the story is there

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 40

RE: Turns 35-36: 4 March � 17 March 1944 - 11/5/2015 3:03:20 AM

Seminole

Posts: 2105
Joined: 7/28/2011
Status: offline

quote:

Good job on Italy; I personally think it's not worth it to hold Rome much past April, because you're going to want to pull troops from Italy anyway once France is invaded.

I'm very curious how the VP difference in this game develops compared to my current AAR with S2Tanker.
I'm still not sold on running away without much fight because the fighting alone generates points for the German player.

(in reply to Q-Ball)

Post #: 41

RE: Turns 35-36: 4 March � 17 March 1944 - 11/8/2015 6:46:48 PM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

Good job on Italy; I personally think it's not worth it to hold Rome much past April, because you're going to want to pull troops from Italy anyway once France is invaded. That's easier to do along the Gothic Line.

His 8th AF strikes don't seem to have much of an escort, if any......he should have plenty of P-38 to use in that role, not sure what the story is there

quote:

ORIGINAL: Seminole

quote:

Good job on Italy; I personally think it's not worth it to hold Rome much past April, because you're going to want to pull troops from Italy anyway once France is invaded.

I'm very curious how the VP difference in this game develops compared to my current AAR with S2Tanker.
I'm still not sold on running away without much fight because the fighting alone generates points for the German player.

re Italy, this is my first game with the Axis and I know that smokindave is more than competent at the land war side. I agree that making the allies fight is basically a good idea but as I hadn't fortified Tuscany in the end he would have had a battle on open ground with decent air support - though I think he would have suffered for supply.

Without giving too much away, that line let me release XIV Pzr for deployment ***somewhere else***. I think he can break it, its a case of whether he really wants to bother.

re 8 AF, since I'm only picking out the first city raid of the turn it maybe a bit misleading. They seem well escorted but I'm still holding my own over Germany. Mainly as I have concentrated, so some places are defended just by flak, but if I catch him I can make him pay a price in the air too.

VP, given I chucked away about 80 early on for ignoring the garrison reminder, I think this is pretty normal. Most games seem to see the allies having a small positive score before the main landings in France, then they dip due to losses till they capture enough cities for the score to recover?

_____________________________

(in reply to Seminole)

Post #: 42

Turns 37-39: 18 March 1944 � 14 April 1944 - 11/8/2015 6:48:04 PM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

Turns 37-39: 18 March 1944 � 14 April 1944

As predictable, pattern of the game was as expected over this phase. End of March in Italy saw the Allies reach my new defensive line (the air battles are related to me beating up 15 Air).

On the subject of 15 Air, they seem to have given up bombing cows and are trying to either (a) blow up the highest glacier in Austria or (b) they really do not like Julie Andrews.

More being nosy over France, I am starting to suspect the allies have a bit of a fixation with this particular region.

Start of April actually saw a battle happen. Two in fact.

The vital beaches from Rimini to Ravenna will remain barred to British and American tourists for a while yet.

At the end of that sequence of turns, not much shift in the VP situation.

< Message edited by loki100 -- 11/11/2015 8:17:23 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 43

Turn 40: 15-21 April 1944 - 11/11/2015 7:16:58 AM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

Turn 40: 15-21 April 1944

This turn saw a renewed effort by the Allies to seize the sun loungers and prime beach spots north of Rimini.

Initially they were politely told to wait their turn as it was far too early

But rather rudely they persisted

15 Air risked a day trip to a big city, but found the locals rather too rough. However, unusually bomber command also tried to hit the south this turn.

This turn I started to scrap some NF squadrons and redeploy the crews to day fighters. Basically I am taking relatively few NF losses and I think I'll need all the day fighters I can muster from May/June onwards.

In France, the allies continue to be very nosy

VP situation remains pretty much as expected. Doubt it will change much till they invade France.

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 44

RE: Turn 40: 15-21 April 1944 - 11/11/2015 2:29:34 PM

Q-Ball

Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline

As Germany, I think you pretty much have to disband NFs, otherwise you end up with WAY more of those than you need, and no day fighters.

How is your Manpower Pool? How about AFVs and Vehicles?

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 45

RE: Turn 40: 15-21 April 1944 - 11/11/2015 4:21:34 PM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

As Germany, I think you pretty much have to disband NFs, otherwise you end up with WAY more of those than you need, and no day fighters.

How is your Manpower Pool? How about AFVs and Vehicles?

aye, I'd do it earlier in another game, its the sort of longer term feedback loop you have play 1-2 games to understand.

From a few turns later, my manpower is 65,000 for Germany, I've got about 95% of the trucks I need (>100% in depots so good for supply movement and about 90% in units), tank numbers look ok though I suspect once the Typhoons start flying that will be less healthy.

smokindave hasn't really gone for my specialist factories - I now think hitting the Luftwaffe factories is a bit of a waste (apart maybe from the ME-262s), but I think there is a return to going for named tanks. He's also not really hit my rail depots (we're in mid-May), which I think is a mistake, I'd start flattening them in 1943, its one less demand in the build up to the invasion and causes useful hassle for the axis player.

No idea where he is going to land, I strongly suspect Picardy as a lot of his interdiction is there and it has the advantage of dislocating any German defense of the Seine as well as leaving units in Normandy etc potentially at risk.

_____________________________

(in reply to Q-Ball)

Post #: 46

RE: Turn 40: 15-21 April 1944 - 11/11/2015 6:07:28 PM

Q-Ball

Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline

Having played Germany with the recent changes, I think hitting Vehicles is a good idea for the Allied player. You don't really need to him them all, but definitely the factories in Antwerp and Cologne which are really easy reaches, and the huge Opel plant in Mainz. There is a smaller Renault factory in Versailles as well, which is also an easy reach for 2Es or other planes.

Hitting TANKS is also a good idea, though I would limit to Panther and Panzer IV, as there are never enough of those. There is a Panther plant in the Ruhr, and the Panzer IV is only produced in two locations, so that's easy to take out. More players should bomb these. Hitting the Panther plants before they expand is a really good idea. There are 2 Panzer IV factories and 4 Panther ones, so that's not alot of targets to crimp German tank production.

I agree on the LW; the only aircraft factory worth bombing is the Me-262.

Have you built depots near the coast in France?

What does your Atlantic Wall look like? IMO, you should be configured to defeat paras first and foremost

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 47

RE: Turn 40: 15-21 April 1944 - 11/11/2015 9:16:08 PM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

Having played Germany with the recent changes, I think hitting Vehicles is a good idea for the Allied player. You don't really need to him them all, but definitely the factories in Antwerp and Cologne which are really easy reaches, and the huge Opel plant in Mainz. There is a smaller Renault factory in Versailles as well, which is also an easy reach for 2Es or other planes.

Hitting TANKS is also a good idea, though I would limit to Panther and Panzer IV, as there are never enough of those. There is a Panther plant in the Ruhr, and the Panzer IV is only produced in two locations, so that's easy to take out. More players should bomb these. Hitting the Panther plants before they expand is a really good idea. There are 2 Panzer IV factories and 4 Panther ones, so that's not alot of targets to crimp German tank production.

I agree on the LW; the only aircraft factory worth bombing is the Me-262.

Have you built depots near the coast in France?

What does your Atlantic Wall look like? IMO, you should be configured to defeat paras first and foremost

Aye, my bombing list is now:

a) manpower-HI-train stations with Bomber Command
b) specialist targets (U-boats or VWs), HI/fuel, trucks/tanks with 8 and 15 Air

Think that gives a good balance between VP generation and creating pressure points in the German economy, especially as you can undermine the capacity of the Pzr divisions to recover if they are short of trucks and Pz IV/V

Depots in France are ready, I stripped out a lot a while back, set others just to 1 and have the ones along the channel all nice and full.

I've tried to para proof. My instinct is a successful and effective landing in Picardy is the most dangerous. Its easy to keep temp ports as long as needed as there is a long gap with no actual ports to attrite your task forces. So there, any attempt at moving off the beaches under cover of para drops has hopefully been blocked, also want to have a line of forts behind the landing hexes to avoid the mistake I made in Italy.

_____________________________

(in reply to Q-Ball)

Post #: 48

Turns 41-43: 22 April � 12 May 1944 - 11/15/2015 4:42:19 PM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

Turns 41-43: 22 April � 12 May 1944

Really by this stage of the game its all about waiting for the influx of British and American tourists.

But while we wait, its another chance to meet and greet my old chums from 15 Air.

At the same time the allies are clearly getting impatient. I can only assume they are eager to start planning their summer holidays? Not sure why, I mean there must be plenty of travel guides in the library?

In response the German transport planes are ordered to end their winter skiing break in the Alps and redeploy to bases along the Rhine.

So by early May, the VP situation is predictable.

Rumours were going around that the Germans were listening to the BBC Shipping Forecast with great interest. Probably as the only alternative was Gardener's Question Time or Money Box Live?

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 49

Turns 44-45: 13 � 26 May 1944 - 11/18/2015 8:09:41 PM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

Turns 44-45: 13 � 26 May 1944

My new found obsession with the BBC weather reports continued. For T44 all looked very good ... mud.

Unfortunately the Soviets took advantage and lunged westwards.

I've clearly mismanaged the EF box. I've sent quite a lot east and only drawn out some mountain divisions. I think if I played the Axis in another PBEM I'd leave it off and work with historical arrivals and withdrawals.

Anyway, the German army in the west is mostly ready. Beach front reception areas are set up for any lost Allied soldiers and reserves are on hand in case the front line catering staff can't cope.

{as an aside, I juggled that around a bit over these turns as I wanted to catch out any opportunisitic paratroopers who might be trying to avoid the queues in the coastal resorts}

Next turn was good fun for the Luftwaffe as their old chums in 15 Air returned. However, it was Bomber Command that ran into my air defences when they tried a deep raid at Leipzig.

I think this supports my current idea that the best approach in defending Germany is to abandon some areas and really concentrate around particular targets. When you catch the allies you can do substantial damage.

As an aide to this, must say the new on map data for the location of your airforce and how to move it around is excellent.

The German army went to bed on 26 May re-assured by the BBC that mud was going to persist.

Even that there was a possibility of heavy rain. While this might delay the start of the tourist season it was felt that some sacrifices just have to be made.

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 50

RE: Turns 44-45: 13 � 26 May 1944 - 11/19/2015 12:41:49 AM

Seminole

Posts: 2105
Joined: 7/28/2011
Status: offline

quote:

I've clearly mismanaged the EF box. I've sent quite a lot east and only drawn out some mountain divisions. I think if I played the Axis in another PBEM I'd leave it off and work with historical arrivals and withdrawals.

Are you actively managing the units into refit in the EF box each turn, or have you ignored it?
Am I reading it correctly that you have 254 divisions in the east and 254 of them are on the line?

About EF box scoring, does it only start if the EF line is 2 hexes away from historical? Do I understand correctly that each turn the lines is 6 hexes beyond historical the Allies score another 30 points on you? That could be a nasty snowball!
I assume you can't push it back east and have to just wait for historical to catch up to the current line at best if you get stability rolls, correct?

Lastly, are the Stable/Fluid/Critical Front Values derived independently in each game from date/weather/soviet potential/etc., or are they are fixed like the historical front line?

Anyone have a table of the historical front line hex value / turn?

Being in the dark on these factors makes it kind of hard to plan assets on the early play throughs.

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 51

RE: Turns 44-45: 13 � 26 May 1944 - 11/19/2015 6:02:18 AM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Seminole

quote:

I've clearly mismanaged the EF box. I've sent quite a lot east and only drawn out some mountain divisions. I think if I played the Axis in another PBEM I'd leave it off and work with historical arrivals and withdrawals.

Are you actively managing the units into refit in the EF box each turn, or have you ignored it?
Am I reading it correctly that you have 254 divisions in the east and 254 of them are on the line?

About EF box scoring, does it only start if the EF line is 2 hexes away from historical? Do I understand correctly that each turn the lines is 6 hexes beyond historical the Allies score another 30 points on you? That could be a nasty snowball!
I assume you can't push it back east and have to just wait for historical to catch up to the current line at best if you get stability rolls, correct?

Lastly, are the Stable/Fluid/Critical Front Values derived independently in each game from date/weather/soviet potential/etc., or are they are fixed like the historical front line?

Anyone have a table of the historical front line hex value / turn?

Being in the dark on these factors makes it kind of hard to plan assets on the early play throughs.

I think you've spotted one mistake I've clearly made - no I've not looked after refit for the EF units so I guess I may have the formations but they are weak. Ah well, that may explain why my manpower etc pools are pretty full.

Each advance is a one off hit on your VPs. So if it moves from 4 ahead of normal to 6 then you lose the VPs for those 2 hexes but its not a per turn loss.

I guess that some of the extra pts I've gained for garrisons may be a bit of an offset (as my divisions in the west may be a bit stronger than standard).

As to the rest, I'm really not that sure.

In part this is why I think I'd now opt to leave it off. I'm happy that the on map western army drains away to the east over the game and I guess I'd be content to let historical flows handle this rather than try to work out an optimum management. Anyway, next turn I get back, I'll address the refit issue.

_____________________________

(in reply to Seminole)

Post #: 52

RE: Turns 44-45: 13 � 26 May 1944 - 11/19/2015 12:42:04 PM

Seminole

Posts: 2105
Joined: 7/28/2011
Status: offline

quote:

I think you've spotted one mistake I've clearly made - no I've not looked after refit for the EF units so I guess I may have the formations but they are weak.

From the first turn I make sure to refit any units that are of course unready, and beyond that I start refitting units that are below 60 morale. For armored formations I like to rest anything below 70, and once that is reached try to get everyone up towards 75 - the divisions at least.
If you haven't looked at it for over half a year you probably have a lot of mauled units contributing nothing on the line.

quote:

Each advance is a one off hit on your VPs. So if it moves from 4 ahead of normal to 6 then you lose the VPs for those 2 hexes but its not a per turn loss.

Ok, that's a lot less scary. I guess I need to click through a game to chart the historical progress and try to understand whether the level of demand is relatively static per turn/season, or if there is too many variables in play to worry about that aspect. What I'd been considering was shipping away most of my panzer reserves in the first winter to try and build a 'gap' on historical, so I had some cushion. As luck would have it I found use for my panzers whilst they were still on trains, and one week away from being shipped east!

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 53

RE: Turns 44-45: 13 � 26 May 1944 - 11/19/2015 4:02:30 PM

Joel Billings

Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline

You only lose points on the first turn of each month. That's when the historical front line is adjusted to the west.

_____________________________

All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard

(in reply to Seminole)

Post #: 54

RE: Turns 44-45: 13 � 26 May 1944 - 11/23/2015 7:37:55 AM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Seminole

quote:

I think you've spotted one mistake I've clearly made - no I've not looked after refit for the EF units so I guess I may have the formations but they are weak.

From the first turn I make sure to refit any units that are of course unready, and beyond that I start refitting units that are below 60 morale. For armored formations I like to rest anything below 70, and once that is reached try to get everyone up towards 75 - the divisions at least.
If you haven't looked at it for over half a year you probably have a lot of mauled units contributing nothing on the line.

Yep, its a real mess, Pzr divisions very weak and about 40% of the infantry divisions unready. So a massive process of sending fresh units east ... they've been lazing around France drinking champagne so they can do some work ... and trying to redeem the situation as best I can.

*ahem*

quote:

ORIGINAL: Seminole

quote:

Each advance is a one off hit on your VPs. So if it moves from 4 ahead of normal to 6 then you lose the VPs for those 2 hexes but its not a per turn loss.

Ok, that's a lot less scary. I guess I need to click through a game to chart the historical progress and try to understand whether the level of demand is relatively static per turn/season, or if there is too many variables in play to worry about that aspect. What I'd been considering was shipping away most of my panzer reserves in the first winter to try and build a 'gap' on historical, so I had some cushion. As luck would have it I found use for my panzers whilst they were still on trains, and one week away from being shipped east!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joel Billings

You only lose points on the first turn of each month. That's when the historical front line is adjusted to the west.

thanks for the clarification ... was sure that each gain over the norm triggered a one off VP loss - and of course brings the end of the war that bit nearer

_____________________________

(in reply to Joel Billings)

Post #: 55

Turn 46: 27 May � 2 June 1944 - 11/23/2015 7:40:09 AM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

Turn 46: 27 May � 2 June 1944

Well all I'll say is never trust the BBC. Clear skies meant the expected tourist invasion happened before all the new hotels were ready.

apparently they were pretty annoyed, and wrecked a few places in their search for accommodation

Even in Italy

[1]

Anyway here's the VP situation as the game moves into its decisive phase.

In response I decided to gamble on a one-off (I doubt I can sustain this) attempt by the luftwaffe to disrupt the flow of supplies across the Channel. Some hexes are now contested but I doubt its enough to make any real impact?

Picking up on the discussion around the previous turn, here's some of the EF OOB. I think my mistake in not using the refit status is pretty clear. Not shown but a lot of infantry divisions are 'unready'.

And for next turn ... more clear weather.

[1] Interesting confirmation of the view that while individual mountain regiments look incredibly strong, in reality they are easy enough to push out of a hex.

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 56

RE: Turn 46: 27 May � 2 June 1944 - 11/23/2015 12:42:28 PM

Seminole

Posts: 2105
Joined: 7/28/2011
Status: offline

I'm amazed at the high morale unit on most of your armor/mech formations. I wonder if that a an outcome of having so many divisions (even if many were unready).

quote:

[1] Interesting confirmation of the view that while individual mountain regiments look incredibly strong, in reality they are easy enough to push out of a hex.

Well, it was 3k men vs 105k men, and he obliterated your level 3 forts, and apparently gave you a dozen or so unit bombings on top of that...

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 57

RE: Turn 46: 27 May � 2 June 1944 - 11/23/2015 1:00:04 PM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Seminole

I'm amazed at the high morale unit on most of your armor/mech formations. I wonder if that a an outcome of having so many divisions (even if many were unready).

quote:

[1] Interesting confirmation of the view that while individual mountain regiments look incredibly strong, in reality they are easy enough to push out of a hex.

Well, it was 3k men vs 105k men, and he obliterated your level 3 forts, and apparently gave you a dozen or so unit bombings on top of that...

I think it was Terje43 in a WiTE AAR who managed to reduce one of his own Pzr divisions to a single tank ... it did though have really impressive morale and experience levels

. Guess the crew must have become convinced of their personal invincibility.

aye, there is good reason for the victory but in a way that is quite important if any allied players are relying too much on apparent cv in determining their attacks. Up front that was 1.6-1, but the reality is a regiment can't hold as the rest of the combat model means they are overwhelmed.

the loss of the fort is a bit misleading, its an easy misinterpretation as the combat report shows the final drop (after you have been bounced from the hex ... which erases the entire value), I'd guess the actual fighting was with a level 2 fort. Also in this case, doubt air power as such had much impact.

_____________________________

(in reply to Seminole)

Post #: 58

RE: Turn 46: 27 May � 2 June 1944 - 11/23/2015 1:25:25 PM

Seminole

Posts: 2105
Joined: 7/28/2011
Status: offline

quote:

the loss of the fort is a bit misleading, its an easy misinterpretation as the combat report shows the final drop (after you have been bounced from the hex ... which erases the entire value), I'd guess the actual fighting was with a level 2 fort. Also in this case, doubt air power as such had much impact.

Thanks, that's nice to know. I was actually surprised at the drop given his relative dearth of engineer support displayed.

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 59

RE: Turn 46: 27 May � 2 June 1944 - 11/23/2015 2:53:54 PM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Seminole

quote:

the loss of the fort is a bit misleading, its an easy misinterpretation as the combat report shows the final drop (after you have been bounced from the hex ... which erases the entire value), I'd guess the actual fighting was with a level 2 fort. Also in this case, doubt air power as such had much impact.

Thanks, that's nice to know. I was actually surprised at the drop given his relative dearth of engineer support displayed.

a good way to see this is to run a combat at speed 5 (maybe 4 will do). Its pretty boring but you learn a lot about the combat engine (can always press escape when you've had enough). What you'll see is the incremental destruction of the fort first by heavy artillery, then by engineers before the actual close combat. If you win, this'll show how the final step (retreat) clears the fort, so the combat image is a bit misleading.

The info in WiTW is far better than in WiTE, so there is less need to do this if all you want to understand is what weapons really work, but its still useful.

In WiTE, especially with the mid/late war Soviets, you can often clear two fortification levels before the attack goes in (once you have artillery and rocket divisions the amount of firepower is truely impressive), to which can then be added a lot disruptions. Its another reason why you can't just play on the basis of pre-attack notional combat values.

_____________________________

(in reply to Seminole)

Post #: 60