Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A) Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/22/2015 9:50:40 AM   
Crackaces


Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline
Ok so I think very soon the following units show up:


44th British Division

Cape Town


9th Australian Division

Aden


2nd British Para Brigade

Cape Town


7th South African Armoured Brigade

Cape Town


27th Rhodesian Brigade

Cape Town


1st AA Brigade
Aden


Natal Mounted Rifles Regiment
Cape Town


quote:

The mobilization convoy also has planes. I will have 50 Mitchell II, 50 Vengeance I, and as many Spitfires. Australian squadrons operating around Singapore are on their way back home. Other fighter squadrons, notably those from Luzon, are moving in too. Unless everything happens much faster than I think, I should soon have a nice defense force down under.


India is another possibility .. these forces plunging into Burma in late 1942 (saying no AV) is a possibility also ...

BTW) Your play is a testament against the "Brave Sir Robin" play .. Well Done!

Those 32 Spitfires are deadly .. use wisely ..

< Message edited by Crackaces -- 12/22/2015 11:00:54 AM >

(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 121
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/24/2015 3:25:23 PM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
Hi Crackaces,
I have received these troops (except the 9th Australian, which is nowhere in sight), most of them are now sailing to Australia.


January 9th 1942

Sydney


During the night, two light cruisers tried to bombard Sydney, but one of them found the minefield, the other met the PT boats. Abukuma shows up as sunk on Tracker, I very much doubt it, but every little damage helps.

TF 216 encounters mine field at Sydney (90,167)
Japanese Ships
CL Abukuma, Mine hits 1

Night Time Surface Combat, near Sydney at 90,167, Range 1,000 Yards
Japanese Ships
CL Kinu
CL Abukuma, Shell hits 2

Allied Ships
PT-43
PT-44
PT-45
PT-46
PT-47, Shell hits 2, and is sunk
PT-48, Shell hits 1, and is sunk


Later, there was another deliberate attack, which reduced the forts, but failed to achieve 1:1 odds. I am not destroying as many enemy squads as I wish, but a regiment worth of squads were disabled, and the enemy will need to rest, to repair its disruption, which should help my boys recover. Sydney will fall within a week though.

Ground combat at Sydney (90,167)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 52452 troops, 457 guns, 134 vehicles, Assault Value = 1559
Defending force 28355 troops, 412 guns, 334 vehicles, Assault Value = 424
Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0
Japanese adjusted assault: 801
Allied adjusted defense: 937
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
1865 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 138 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 15 disabled
Allied ground losses:
1335 casualties reported
Squads: 58 destroyed, 80 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 54 disabled
Engineers: 4 destroyed, 17 disabled
Guns lost 39 (5 destroyed, 34 disabled)
Vehicles lost 16 (4 destroyed, 12 disabled)


It seems that KB will stay a bit longer. After sailing north of Newcastle, the Japanese fleet returned to its previous position, off Sydney.

Elsewhere, in Australia, two Indian brigades are disembarking in Perth, and the First AVG just arrived in Geraldton. I will soon have enough to confront his air force.

(in reply to Crackaces)
Post #: 122
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/25/2015 9:34:33 AM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
January 10th 1942

Singapore


After a long delay, the Japanese crossed the causeway today. There were two divisions (Imperial Guards and 18th), two infantry regiments (124th and 143rd), three engineer regiments and four artillery outfits. More troops are probably getting ready in Johore and will soon join the fray. Overall, the enemy had 1157, I have 564, behind level three forts.

I was bloody (it always is). The engineers failed to reduce the forts, odds ended below par, which means disruption for the attackers, and two regiment equivalents were lost, one destroyed, one disabled.

Japanese ground losses:
4123 casualties reported
Squads: 170 destroyed, 130 disabled
Non Combat: 9 destroyed, 79 disabled
Engineers: 10 destroyed, 57 disabled
Guns lost 40 (20 destroyed, 20 disabled)
Vehicles lost 12 (2 destroyed, 10 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1723 casualties reported
Squads: 36 destroyed, 88 disabled
Non Combat: 17 destroyed, 40 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 32 (7 destroyed, 25 disabled)


After the rapid Japanese advance I had thought Singapore would be captured before mid-January. It seems it might hold a little longer.

An interesting question is arising. I have evacuated all the planes and ships in Singapore, except a few few patrol boats, which are doing a great job discouraging naval and port attack, and a handful of ships that were in the yards. Over the last weeks, most of those ships repaired (my opponent has been targeting the airfield), and managed to flee to Batavia. Two are left today, a transport that should be ready in a few days, and BC Repulse, which is in very bad shape, but which my opponent most likely believes is already sunk.

A few days ago, I took her off the yards, and she should be ready tomorrow. I want to try to sail her to Singkep and disband, and then to Muntok and disband, and again to Toboali, and so on to Batavia. Her system damage is in the 80s, so the probability she sinks on the way is quite real, but she is worth a try.

Joseph has been careless with his naval search in the area. I managed to sail several cargoes from Manila along the coast of Borneo, and none of my evacuees from Singapore got attacked by bombers.

A convoy too far

After the failed attack on Balikpapan, the Japanese have been reinforcing Samarinda, and several task forces were detected in the harbor. As I had success with my cruisers so far, a squadron under CL Java and Marblehead was sent, in the hope to catch a few ships on their way back. They found Kongo and Takao instead, and then another task force led by CA Mogami, Mikuma, Suzuya and Kumano. We did put a few shells into the cruisers, most certainly sunk at least one destroyer (helps by a collision during the battle), but my two cruisers and four destroyers were lost with all hands

This brings the toll to six cruisers lost, three lights and as many regulars, and four destroyers. Three Japanese cruisers (one regular two lights) and a dozen of destroyer types (including APD and DMS) were sunk in return.

Little blessings

Bathurst, the base north of Sydney seized by paras a few days ago, was recaptured today. My opponent had tried to air transport infantry reinforcements, but there were too few of them to make a difference. This is a very small success: we’re too close to Sydney to even hope to hold the place, and damage was light, but this was the second time the paras of the 1st raiding regiment were defeated, and I am pretty sure Joseph has very little air transport capabilities left now.

My Australians will now retire towards Wagga Wagga, to try and confront the enemy armored spearheads. Anything that can damage the advance on Canberra and Melbourne is good.

And now for the serious things

Christmas is upon us, and with it, the harsh responsibility of choosing wine for the family lunch. And so, I spent the best part of the morning rummaging in the cellar. My house has a decent cellar, half buried, walls of stone, earth on the floor, opening to the north, bottle rack on the north wall, and I have been using it to keep and age wine. I have about 170 bottles now.

Today, the main course is a leg of lamb with greens, so we obviously need a bottle of red, with one of the same in reserve in case we drink all of it. I am set on a Bordeaux, because most of my other vineyards need a few more years. The usual choice for lamb is a Pauillac (because they raise lambs in this area, and so you match the vineyard with the local products). I have two bottles left of Chateau Haut Bages Averous, which was the second wine of Chateau Lynch Bages (a famous Pauillac, quite above my budget). They changed its name since, to Echo de Lynch Bages (I suppose it makes more sense from a marketing standpoint, and will help drive the prices high), so the 2007 bottles are the last of this wine. They should go well with the local cheese too, we live in the Brie area, and have all sorts of this famous cheese (today, Melun, Montereau and Nangis).

We will also need a white for the salmon and the starters (and I do like white on cheese anyway). I have some Riesling left from Christmas eve, and there is some Champagne that needs to be drunk anyway.

Merry Christmas, readers.

(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 123
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/25/2015 12:08:10 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
Singapore - I don't know why Joseph came across with some Rgt. In my experience they get trashed. I don't bring any infantry over unless its in a rebuilt division.

Christmas dinner - I'm having a family favorite, a James Beard recipe of "Filet of Roast." 6 pound top round roast, with lots of slivers of garlic in her side, rubbed with Tabasco, salt, pepper, and marinated in olive oil, soy sauce, red wine, bay leaf, and thyme for two days. I should have come here and asked you for wine choice.

_____________________________


(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 124
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/26/2015 10:21:52 PM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
I had Spam, Ritz Crackers, and a bottle of Gallo..a mixture of red and white as I had two half gallons left; one red and one white.

Merry Christmas,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 125
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/27/2015 2:35:28 AM   
Crackaces


Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline
quote:

Hi Crackaces,
I have received these troops (except the 9th Australian, which is nowhere in sight), most of them are now sailing to Australia.


I would look in the LCU screen for this unit .. it should be in Aden .. a nice complement to India/Burma ....or taking the long way to OZ

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 126
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/27/2015 10:38:05 AM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Crackaces
I would look in the LCU screen for this unit .. it should be in Aden .. a nice complement to India/Burma ....or taking the long way to OZ


I just checked in the editor. It seems that whereas the 9th Australian comes in the mobilization package, and arrives in 1943 instead, in stock, this unit has been removed from the OOB in DaBabes.
Another thing I found curious : the mobilization package provides me with a lot of Matilda II replacements, but it looks like I don't have units that can use them (either having them in their OOB, or having devices that can upgrade to Matildas, according to Tracker, there is only one).

Francois

(in reply to Crackaces)
Post #: 127
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/27/2015 2:10:41 PM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
We’re back after a brief Christmas truce.
January 11th 1942

China


I haven’t mentioned this theater in a while. Very little is happening here. Joseph has conquered the central plains, except Loyang which will fall as soon as he moves in as it is hardly garrisoned. Elsewhere, the roads to Sian are garrisoned, up to the stacking limit, with empty hexes behind so that they can retreat, and most units there have field fortifications level two or above. Elsewhere inn the north, my garrisons are dug in, slowly repairing morale and disablements, and Japan doesn’t seem interested in moving forward.

In Central China, enemy troops are concentrating around Pingsiang and Chuhsien. Kukong and Pucheng should be next, but this is slow, and it suits me. I have transferred one squadron of Warhawks from the Philippines, they never saw real action, but it makes my opponent careful about committing his bombers, and this is fine. In Changsha, forts will reach level five in a few days, enemy buildup is going on, but I suspect it is too late for a move against central China.

The South is calm, maybe because troops are moving in, maybe because Japan is focused on Changsha.

Overall, the situation is good. I have lost units to the initial retreats, but the rest of the KMT is nicely recovering, and the supply situation is good: we went from 70K supplies at game start, to 145K right now, and the total is going up. This means I can afford to rebuild a few corps, build forts, and wait for the Japanese advance, while still getting the Burma road bonus.

Singapore

There were no attacks today. The enemy is licking his wounds. BC Repulse made it to Singkep and disbanded at no additional damage. I am trying Muntok tomorrow, and sending a pair ofDD to escort her to Batavia.

Sydney

Another attack, today, ended in 1:2 odds, and disruption. I am suffering more than my opponent, but he had reinforced his beachhead (with a tank regiment), yet did not break through. 100 more enemy squads were disabled: I am buying time.

Allied cruisers bombarded Rockhampton . My infantry should arrive there the day after tomorrow, and with a little luck, the base will fall at once.

South of Sydney, Canberra was invaded by a tank regiment. They will attack tomorrow, and I will try to bomb and prevent them from capturing the base. The rest of the armored spearheads seem to be retreating from Goulburn. It needs to be confirmed, but together with the tank regiment reinforcing Sydney, this seems to suggest the Japanese advance towards Melbourne had slowed, and this is very good news.

Wine and stuff

Ny59giants, with roast beef, the usual recommendation is a tannic wine, Cabernet Sauvignon, or Sirah/Shiraz, aged in wood barrels. The age would depend on whether you serve it rare or well done. Basically, the more you cook the meat, the older the wine, to get a more “round” taste. Personally, I like Spanish wines over beef, Rioja, or Tempranillo, Toro if you can find some. I like my beef rare, so I’d go for the crianza, which are the younger wines (the older vintages are known as reserva or gran reserva). For French wine, a Haut Medoc would probably be very good (Sociando Mallet is my favorite), but a Côtes du Rhône would do as well. In the US, I think California has good Cabernet, but the better Washington state wines would probably do well. But as always, you’ve got to try, and see what you like best.

Today was my birthday, and we had beef stew and carrots (boeuf carottes in French), with a bottle of Fronsac, a small area north of the more famous vineyards of Bordeaux (St Emilion, Pomerol). I now need to rest, and get ready for New Year, and more interesting stuff, to try to forget about the loss of Sydney and Singapore.


(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 128
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/27/2015 5:54:44 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
I went with the Cabernet Sauvignon as the wine selection in this part of Tennessee is not very good. I may have to join an on line wine club or something else to get a better selection. Thanks for the feedback.

_____________________________


(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 129
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/27/2015 8:54:59 PM   
Kofiman

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 7/8/2014
Status: offline
How effective were the B-17 squadrons in China?

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 130
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/29/2015 8:42:58 AM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
January 12th 1942

Fun with the buffs


My B-17 squadrons (and a few LB-30 upgrades) have many uses. I have 45 B-17, and 3 LB-30 in Chungking, 22 B-17 in Melbourne, and seven more B-17 and as many LB-30 in Clark Field, awaiting transfer. I have lost 12 B-17 so far, have 15 in the pool, hav 20 more arriving as reinforcements at the end of the month, and will produce about 20 four engine bombers a month for the rest of the year. The situation is stable.

In China, Chungking is now a level six airfield, which means my B17 operate a full efficiency, and out of enemy reach. I have been bombing units in clear terrain, and troops about to attack, and usually disable half a dozen squads every day. This is not a lot, but I am confident it plays its role. My best results were achieved against armored units, and I try to target them whenever I can find them.

In Australia, after a couple of missions against Rockhampton, to prevent the base from building, my buffs are flying from Melbourne, against the tank column near Canberra. They fly every other day, but on a typical day, I get to destroy five tanks, and disable 15 more.

From Clark Field, I flew a few missions against Hong Kong, damaging the industry.

As for efficiency, I am not too impressed so far, but I suspect this is because I change target often, and usually operate against targets with low detection levels. I am considering moving recon unit to China and Australia, and coordinate them with my bombers. I suspect it would change a lot of things.

Small turns, big wonders

I have little to report today. The Japanese are resting in Singapore and Sydney, KB has not retired, and seems to be sailing around Sydney, together with a number of transports. I find this puzzling. I can understand why KB might wait for Sydney to fall, protecting his beachhead against cruisers, and perhaps Allied carriers, but why keep the transports at sea when he could just leave them in one of the two ports he captured ?

I am also wondering what his next move might be. Keeping KB so far south, and in need of refill and perhaps repairs in Truk, suggests his advance in the DEI will remain slow. After Sydney, his next move should be either Brisbane or Melbourne. I don’t see the point of landing so many troops and not going for a large campaign in Australia. On the other hand, since the invasion began, I didn’t see any attempt to blockade western or eastern Australia, and limit my ability to reinforce. At this point, KB should be harassing the coast, and trying to prevent convoys from moving in or out of the continent, this is not the case.

Could he be planning to reembark troops once Sydney fall, and invade elsewhere? This would explain KB and the transports, and a division or more could certainly capture New Caledonia, and even Fiji. But this would probably limit his options in Australia, and doom his beachhead once the reinforcements arrive. In the end, the net result of his Australian attack would be me getting mobilization troops, in exchange for losses on both sides.

He could reembark for a nearer destination : Tasmania, and some bases closer to Melbourne. But I am not sure I understand the benefit of it. Tasmania could be had earlier, and another landing means more risk, and more losses, probably, for little strategic benefit (I have nothing he can cut off between Sydney and Melbourne).

(in reply to Kofiman)
Post #: 131
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/29/2015 9:09:11 AM   
Crackaces


Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

I went with the Cabernet Sauvignon as the wine selection in this part of Tennessee is not very good. I may have to join an on line wine club or something else to get a better selection. Thanks for the feedback.


There are certainly "exclusive" wines made available to wine club members like the 2011 Stags Leap Cellars Fay Fifty, but I just saw at Costco a 2012 Stags leap Cellars Cask 23 for $190 .. club price was $225 Also BevMore and other discount retail outlets offer great wines at reasonable prices .. Just requires a trip to the big city .. Sometimes the savings is worth the trip ..

There is always the excuse to travel to Napa and find wines you like and join a club


Ok back to the War

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 132
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/29/2015 3:11:36 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fcharton

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crackaces
I would look in the LCU screen for this unit .. it should be in Aden .. a nice complement to India/Burma ....or taking the long way to OZ


I just checked in the editor. It seems that whereas the 9th Australian comes in the mobilization package, and arrives in 1943 instead, in stock, this unit has been removed from the OOB in DaBabes.
Another thing I found curious : the mobilization package provides me with a lot of Matilda II replacements, but it looks like I don't have units that can use them (either having them in their OOB, or having devices that can upgrade to Matildas, according to Tracker, there is only one).

Francois



All of the Aussie infantry divisions have been removed in DBB to my knowledge. You have to fight with brigades for the duration.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 133
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/29/2015 6:25:34 PM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
January 13th 1942

Wasted Matilda


Today was a big day for the Empire, both Sydney and Canberra were captured, and Japanese victory points went up 3 000 (yeah, three thousand).

Ground combat at Sydney (90,167)
Japanese Shock attack
Attacking force 51928 troops, 464 guns, 203 vehicles, Assault Value = 1462
Defending force 26276 troops, 399 guns, 338 vehicles, Assault Value = 183
Japanese adjusted assault: 1315
Allied adjusted defense: 629
Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 0)
Japanese forces CAPTURE Sydney !!!
Japanese ground losses:
1325 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 29 disabled
Non Combat: 27 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 19 destroyed, 14 disabled
Guns lost 9 (3 destroyed, 6 disabled)
Units destroyed 1
Allied ground losses:
6822 casualties reported
Squads: 348 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 761 destroyed, 73 disabled
Engineers: 109 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 287 (275 destroyed, 12 disabled)
Vehicles lost 177 (172 destroyed, 5 disabled)
Units retreated 16
Units destroyed 3
Defeated Allied Units Retreating!


An engineer regiment (the 56th if the combat animation is to be trusted) was destroyed. The assaulting stack was 1462 AV strong, to be compared with the 1720 of the first attack (and knowing that a tank regiment reinforced the attackers during the battle). The defenders have retreated off the road network, which is a good thing as it means pursuing them will take a while.

The fall of Sydney frees a lot of troops. 320 AVwill be needed for garrison duty, and about 300 seems to have been lost so far (some will be back), which means about 1600 AV are free to march on Melbourne or Brisbane. Here is the disposition of forces.




As you see, two columns, each an infantry regiment and an armored unit (tank or recon regiment) are in Canberra, and on the road north of Newcastle. Neither of them can do much damage. If they advance too fast, they run the risk of being cut off, and I probably have enough troops to resist them anyway. The main force is in Sydney, where about 1100 AV should be available for further rampaging.

Both Brisbane and Melbourne have level three forts, Melbourne will certainly reach four by the time he arrives. I have 200 AV west of Melbourne (two Indian brigades), and 250 around Rockhampton, which should be available once the enemy beachhead is destroyed. The first contingents from Cape Town should be arriving at the end of the month. By mid-February, about 1000 AV and a lot of tanks will be around.

KB seems to be retiring. If it goes back to Truk to rearm, there is no way it can be back before the end of the month. A small CV force has been spotted off Rockhampton, probably two or three light and escort carriers, but it is much smaller, and runs the risk of an attack if is sails too close to my coastal bases.

So, there. Joseph holds a central position between Brisbane and Melbourne. If he splits his forces, he might have just enough for Brisbane, but I don’t think he can capture Melbourne before I reinforce it. So his best course of action would be to focus on one objective (this is what the central position is all about). I would love him to go for Brisbane, because I think it will buy me enough time to build the counter attack, and sweep him northwards, but Melbourne seems the more likely choice. I don’t see the point of landing so many troops, so far south, triggering reinforcements, just to stop at Sydney and settle for the northeast.

If he goes for Melbourne, the debate will revolve around the time he needs to get close, and the amount of troops he needs to use to prevent spoiling attacks on his northern flank, build enough air bases to support his assault (he needs the air superiority, and having KB parked in the straits between Melbourne and Tasmania looks like a bad idea), and garrison enough to defend his supply lines. But in any case, I am pretty hopeful.


[Edit]I forgot to mention... when a port is captured, all the ships in port and most of those in the yards, materialize at once as a series of task forces. As a result, 70 ships just appeared in Sydney, in various states of damage, but all with full bunkers. I organised them into small task forces, sorting the cripple from the valid and grouping them by speed, and tried to send them in as many direction as possible. I am certain Joseph will have submarines, and planes, and maybe even surface ships looking for them, but as I was expecting to lose all, every ship saved is a bonus. I wonder how many I can get to port...



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by fcharton -- 12/29/2015 8:39:40 PM >

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 134
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/29/2015 8:19:40 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
I don't know if you've played DBB before; your comment re the 9th Aussie suggests it's as new to you as it is to me. If you haven't you might spend some time looking at the Aussie OOB, queue, and withdrawals. They're very different than stock.

The LH units in the eastern part of the country almost all withdraw very early. Some you may lose in the next month; don't recall dates. Also, your early "armor", which is full of Improvised AFVs (pickup trucks more or less), also withdraws at inconvenient times for an early invasion. In my game it's Brisbane and Perth under siege, but still . . .

There is a new base north of Melbourne on the DBB map. Puly-something. It's small, but it's the arrival base for the follow-on real armor you get in late March/early April. Those units arrive with over 80% disabled devices, but when they heal up they are good armor units. That base is worth defending if you can. I don't know if the arrivals will bump elsewhere if the base is lost.

You also get high-level Aussie HQs pretty soon. They're useful of course for leveraging AV points.

Just a few thoughts.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 135
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/30/2015 9:54:35 AM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
Hi Bullwinkle,

This is my first time playing the Allies after the first few weeks, so the OOB (DBB or stock) is all news to me.

For what I understand, if their arrival base is occupied, reinforcements arrive in the "national home base" instead, at no cost and with no delay. For Australia, this is Sydney and Melbourne. So long I can keep Melbourne, all reinforcements from occupied bases will arrive there. But this is not happening anytime soon. Next month reinforcements (three brigades, a tank regiment, an AA unit and a pioneer battalion) arrive in Aden. The next batch is in two months, and arrives split between Colombo and Adelaide, so even if all my bases are theirs by then, I still get a significant part of the package. As for the tanks and the Puckapunyal units, they are due in three months, which is when most of the LH withdrawals happen. By then (late April or early) I am pretty certain the fate of Australia will be decided, but I am moving US troops to the South Pacific just in case.

I might be wrong, but I think Joseph's strategy is predicated on a quick capture of Southern Australia. If he cannot capture Melbourne soon, reinforcements will start arriving, and his task will become more and more difficult, unless he reinforces, and therefore slows his capture of the East Indies.

Francois


(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 136
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/30/2015 2:50:41 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
If you don't know the stock OOB then you can't miss those fantastic Aussie IDs, the best fighters you have after the USMC.

DBB is more historical, but it isn't built to withstand a major Oz invasion. You are doing very well, better than I am with a lot more Allied experience. You seem unflappable, which is a good thing to be in 1942.

I have also learned a lot from your wielding of the Allied navy in the early days. I did a Sir Robin and am near auto-victory ratios due to it in April 1942.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 137
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 12/30/2015 6:38:38 PM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

If you don't know the stock OOB then you can't miss those fantastic Aussie IDs, the best fighters you have after the USMC.

DBB is more historical, but it isn't built to withstand a major Oz invasion. You are doing very well, better than I am with a lot more Allied experience. You seem unflappable, which is a good thing to be in 1942.

I have also learned a lot from your wielding of the Allied navy in the early days. I did a Sir Robin and am near auto-victory ratios due to it in April 1942.


Moose-

I thought the same thing as I followed Francois' AAR: Unflappable!

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 138
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 1/4/2016 7:58:32 PM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline

January 14th 1942

The hunt


Of the seventy ships that left Sydney yesterday, seventeen were sunk today. Among them were three good tankers, a troop transport, and DD Voyager. I will lose more ships tomorrow, but I have good hope of saving about half the ships. This keeps KB, and Japanese cruisers, and Japanese submarines, busy around Sydney, which is fine by me. In the meantime I am landing troops in Noumea and Pago Pago, and my mobilization reinforcements are about to arrive on map.

I am patrolling the sea lanes between Perth and Cape Town, and have moved Catalinas to Western Australia, to try and detect submarines around the coast. I am more than a bit worried about Joseph trying to sink my reinforcements. That would not be sufficient to derail the planned counterattack, but it wouldn’t be nice…

The fall of Rockhampton

Five Australian regiments attacked Rockhampton today, and easily dispatched the base force and air and port units there. This frees about 300 AV between Townsville and Brisbane. I will lightly reinforce the coast, and send the rest to Brisbane and Toowoomba. I should be able to have about 400 AV in Brisbane soon, which will not resist a full-fledged assault, but should be enough to prevent a small force from capturing the coast.

I am abandoning all the area between Brisbane and Melbourne. Let Joseph occupy it. I am also retiring my bombers. He has too many fighters around, and KB. I am now waiting for the reinforcements to arrive, and for Joseph to reveal his axis of advance.

A bad day in China

Several days ago, I relocated a squadron of Warhawks from the Philippines to China. I had based them in Kukong, waiting for the bombers. Joseph apparently noticed the move, and sent Oscars sweeping, and I lost fifteen fighters (and no Oscars were shot down). This hurts all the more as my fighter pools are very low, but fighters in China seem to be helping, as my opponent is new bombing my troops less often than in December.

The Warhawks will transfer to Chungking and rebuild. They will be joined by a squadron of Hurricanes that might be better used here than waiting in Burma. I don’t plan to use them aggressively, but I hope they can make Joseph a bit careful, and therefore reduce the bombing runs against the KMT.


(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 139
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 1/4/2016 8:29:22 PM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
January 15th 1942

Almost there


HMS Repulse made it to Toboali today. She was spotted by a squadron of Nells which, operating at extreme range, failed to do any damage. Tomorrow, I will convoy her to Merak and from there to Batavia. She is still a long way home, but extricating her from Singapore is a small victory already. The last ships and planes in Singapore were evacuated today. We are now ready for the enemy onslaught.

Balikpapan

The 146th infantry regiment, having failed to capture Balikpapan in December, was reinforced by three SNLF units. They attacked today, and reduced the forts one level. I believe Balikpapan will be captured within a week, but it will have been a nice roadblock (and I have good hope that the long siege result in damage to the oilfields).

Enemy advance in the Dutch Indies is stalled. Balikpapan and Ambon still need to be captured, there were no further landings in the Celebes, or on Mindanao. This suits me fine.

To flap or not to flap

In Australia, I am waiting for the cavalry, in this case, the 7th South African, the British paras and the 7th Hussars, which should all arrive in a couple of weeks. Today, the Japanese were busy attacking my fleeing merchants (eleven more were sunk, which means I will have saved about 40 of the 70 merchies in Sydney), and KB fighters patrolled over Canberra, shooting a few B17 down.

I am happy with this state of affairs. I am bidding for time, and the more methodical my opponent is, the more he focuses on defending his territory, or on chasing my merchants, the more time I have to reinforce Melbourne.

The first reinforcements convoys have appeared today on the Cape Town to Perth lane. Their vanguard is a small cargo force, with a few motorized support squads from the 7th SA. So far, no enemy ships or submarines have been detected, but those will be two frightening weeks.

But overall, I can’t help thinking prospects are very good. So far, the Japanese advance was very slow in the East Indies, in Burma and in China (in China, the supply situation is actually improving, thanks to the lack of combat), and if I can land most of the reinforcements, I very much doubt the move against Australia can be long lived. The only downside is that my pools, planes and replacements both, are very low


(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 140
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 1/4/2016 9:46:22 PM   
Rio Bravo


Posts: 1794
Joined: 7/13/2013
From: Grass Valley, California
Status: offline
Francois-

It is very interesting reading about your counter measures in Australia and you do a great job keeping us apprised as to events in China and the DEI.

I am relatively new, but from what I can tell, I think you are doing awesome and are unflappable.

Going to dash over and read Squeeze's latest post now.

Best Regards,

-Terry

_____________________________

"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."

-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven

(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 141
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 1/5/2016 3:25:03 PM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
January 16th, 1942

An eventless turn. In China, Joseph is chasing the small units that are still stranded in the central plains. The first of these defeated units will be arriving in Chungking in a few weeks. Tracker announces that they arrive at third strength, and with 40 experience and morale, which is not bad for KMT troops. I need to organize the rebuilding of these units, and begin to move forward the units I have been nursing in Chungking since the beginning of the war.

Over Pingsiang, my B17 fell into a trap set by enemy Oscars. Three B17 were shot down, I can survive this, but I need to change my objectives more often. Near Loyang, I am having a few successes with a small Chinese fighter unit.

In Australia, nothing happened, I am retreating, Joseph is sweeping empty airfields, the evacuees from Sydney made it to port, and the cavalry is on its way.

January 17th, 1942 – Storms over the good guys

As the war is moving slowly, and since I had a few successes, I tend to forget that we are in January 1942, when Japan is very strong. Several reminders came today, first in Singapore, where Joseph almost achieved 2:1 odds.

Ground combat at Singapore (50,84)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 59580 troops, 584 guns, 357 vehicles, Assault Value = 2100
Defending force 39138 troops, 454 guns, 237 vehicles, Assault Value = 529
Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 2
Japanese adjusted assault: 2541
Allied adjusted defense: 1391
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 2)
Japanese ground losses:
1163 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 110 disabled
Non Combat: 20 destroyed, 52 disabled
Engineers: 27 destroyed, 46 disabled
Vehicles lost 30 (8 destroyed, 22 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
2507 casualties reported
Squads: 58 destroyed, 102 disabled
Non Combat: 6 destroyed, 59 disabled
Engineers: 11 destroyed, 17 disabled
Guns lost 48 (13 destroyed, 35 disabled)
Vehicles lost 9 (1 destroyed, 8 disabled)


If he attacks tomorrow, the lion city might fall. It will be later than I expected, but still.

Then, Balikpapan lost the last of her forts :

Ground combat at Balikpapan (64,97)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 9047 troops, 85 guns, 21 vehicles, Assault Value = 256
Defending force 4717 troops, 72 guns, 5 vehicles, Assault Value = 117
Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)
Japanese ground losses:
273 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 17 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Allied ground losses:
96 casualties reported
Squads: 6 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 9 (6 destroyed, 3 disabled)


The end is near there too…

To try and compensate, we defeated the enemy near Rockhampton, but it seem clear that the Japanese will soon be advancing again in the East Indies.

(in reply to Rio Bravo)
Post #: 142
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 1/9/2016 11:42:45 AM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
January 18th 1942

Palembang’s next


Three squadrons for fighter swept Palembang for the third day in a row, and escorted Betties bombed the airfield, damaging a few planes. This is obviously the next invasion site. I am fine with it: Palembang is almost empty, the last units are boarding shipsin Oosthaven. I still have 70 AV behind level two forts, to ward against a lighthearted attempt, but any larger invasion will succeed.

Southern Sumatra is mostly empty. I have a few roadblocks in the north, which I might evacuate at some point, but I believe the methodical approach my opponent seems to follow gives me some time.

Balikpapan

I am proud of my Dutch defenders. A second attack on Balikpapan, fortless, failed to take the base, achieving 1:2 odds.

Ground combat at Balikpapan (64,97)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 5145 troops, 54 guns, 5 vehicles, Assault Value = 243
Defending force 4651 troops, 70 guns, 5 vehicles, Assault Value = 110
Japanese adjusted assault: 37
Allied adjusted defense: 53
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)
Japanese ground losses:
503 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 44 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Allied ground losses:
211 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 6 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 6 (2 destroyed, 4 disabled)


45 disabled squads means a nice reduction in enemy AV, and 1:2 odds mean disablements, and the need to wait a few more days. With Ambon still under Allied control (and the troops there probably suffering from the lack of supply), and Balikpapan only falling by the end of January, this means the conquest of the Celebes, will not happen before February, and the conquest of Java and a possible move on Darwin, will happen even later.

This is where, I believe, early aggressive moves pay dividends. They force Japan to act carefully, and move slowly. And the more the conquest of the SRA is delayed, the more the Japanese player is wary of further roadblocks, and gets more careful as a result.

Australia

The Japanese captured Bathurst, with a division and two armored regiment (one tank, one recon). The base was empty, and most of my units are now far away, either in Brisbane or on the road to Melbourne. After Sydney fell, I was expecting a quick advance on Melbourne (or Brisbane), but this failed to materialize, and Joseph is slowly expanding his perimeter.

This suits me fine: it buys time for the cavalry.

China

Pingsiang was bombarded today. Joseph has two divisions, engineers and artillery, about 750 AV, which might not be enough to dislodge my 650 AV, soon behind level three forts.

Forces seem to be concentrating in Central China, but defenses are progressing nicely too. Changsha now has level five forts, and will be level six in a month unless Joseph does something about it. Tsiaotso will soon be level four, and even Chuhsien, which I believed was doomed a week ago, seems to be nicely progressing towards level three. Morale is nicely improving, especially among front line troops, supply levels are stable, at about 145 000 tons.

And I still haven’t attacked, even once…

(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 143
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 1/9/2016 4:00:16 PM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
January 19th 1942

Bombing for fun


The key to decent ground bombing result seem to be enemy detection. In China, units sometime popup as “detected” for a day or two, with a number of troops shown when you mouse over the week. I don’t know whether this is signal intelligence, or partisans, but sending my bombers the next day seems an efficient use of my bombers in Chungking, which can reach pretty much all of the territory.

Today, a mixed brigade was attacked this way, on the railroad near Nanking. 30 squads were disabled, half of them combat.

Morning Air attack on 13th Ind.Mixed Brigade, at 89,49 , near Hwainan
Japanese ground losses:
135 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Japanese ground losses:
154 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Japanese ground losses:
11 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Australia

Port Macquarie was captured today, and troops were detected near Tamworth. This suggests an advance towards Brisbane, which strikes me as very “unstrategic”. What is the point of striking south of Brisbane, if the final goal is the Eastern coast of Australia.

All the mobilization reinforcements are now at sea, slowly sailing towards the western coast of Australia. The first troops will begin unloading in about ten days. So far, no enemy submarines of surface forces were detected in the area, and KB seems to be in Sydney (judging by the large number of Vals and Kates participating in attacks against land targets).

January 20th 1942

Not much to report today. There was another deliberate attack in Singapore, which reduced the forts and achieved 2:1 odds. We did manage to destroy a decent number of engineers and tanks, but Singapore will probably be Japanese tomorrow or the day after.

Japanese ground losses:
763 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 51 disabled
Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 42 disabled
Engineers: 19 destroyed, 43 disabled
Vehicles lost 57 (17 destroyed, 40 disabled)


In Australia, B17 bombed an infantry regiment near Sydney, and the following message appeared in the combat report: “Carrier support unable to supply air cover..” This seems to indicate that KB, or at least part of it (but I doubt Joseph would split it) is in Sydney.

A task force was detected near Tarawa, either a resupply convoy or a small invasion force. A carrier squadron was sent to investigate. With a little luck…

January 21st 1942

Australia


Brisbane was swept today, by two squadrons of Zeroes and one of Oscars. I had 45 Warhawks on patrol, and lost 22 to thirteen Zero and one Oscar. This is not an excellent result, but I suspect a number of the zeroes were KB squadrons, and as the battle happened over my base, several Japanese pilots are probably missing today. I have more fighters in the area, and will go on defending for a while, but my fighter pools are very thin, and I am seriously considering disbanding some continental squadrons.

Tamworth was captured today, after a large raid by KB. The base was empty. Finally, the “carrier support unable to provide air cover” was seen again as my B17 bombed troops near Sydney.

All this seems to suggest that Joseph is marching north, along the coast. Brisbane has 400 AV behind level three forts. To capture the city, he will need to commit a significant part of his forces on the continent. There is still no sign of movement towards Melbourne.

Singapore

Much to my surprise, Joseph bombarded the city today, and achieved little. Tomorrow should be the day.

(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 144
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 1/9/2016 7:12:00 PM   
Yaab


Posts: 4552
Joined: 11/8/2011
From: Poland
Status: offline
Fcharton, you know a lot about China. Hopefully, you can defend her in this game. Remember, General Dai Li and his Juntong are closely watching your progress.

(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 145
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 1/11/2016 7:25:16 PM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
January 22nd 1942

To Brisbane and beyond?


Brisbane was swept today by two squadrons (one of Zeroes, one of Oscars). I had nothing on CAP. Then a large raid, with almost a hundred Kates, escorted by another squadron of zeros, attacked the airfield, and did little damage. I will try to be back on CAP tomorrow, see if I can catch Joseph off guards.

Coff’s Harbor, two hexes south of Brisbane, was capture today by a recon regiment. Another column, with one infantry regiment, is marching inland, and captured Armidale. Nothing seems to be moving south, towards Melbourne. I am bombarding Canberra tomorrow, see what he has there.

Anyway, it looks like he is focusing on Brisbane. This makes some Napoleonic sense: he holds the central position, and should go for the weaker enemy first, and that would be Brisbane. Two regiments are obviously not enough to take the base, but once he holds the coast, he can rail the big guys in, to Coff’s Harbor or Lismore. This means Brisbane could be attacked at the end of the month. I will have about 400 AV, behind level three forts, but the terrain is not as nice as what I had in Sydney.

Brisbane will fall eventually, but I believe it will cost him troops, from damage, and the need to occupy all the conquered territory. And while he is busy up north, the cavalry is closing in.

Artillery follies

Both Singapore and Balikpapan were bombarded again, and a couple more Sallies were shot down over Singers. I don’t really understand the point: both bases will fall to the next deliberate attack, and there is no way I can complete forts until then.

China

This looks quieter every day. It seems that the Japanese have evacuated Nanyang, and there is still no attempt to take Loyang (which is almost empty). Around Changsha, there was very little troop movement. I am bombarding Pingsiang, and disabling several dozens of squads a day. Is Jospeh trying to move his troops south, and turn me ? He certainly can do it, as I am not trying to build a continuous line of defense, but leaving Sian and Changsha together with large stacks in the north, look like a dangerous gamble.

I am not complaining, of course. I am conserving my supplies, building forts where I can and have even begun taking replacements in some of my front line units, my industry is producing supplies, and the Burma road is open, I am even considering sending more supplies through Rangoon, since the enemy offensive against Burma is still nowhere to be seen. There is nothing to complain about.

@yaab: I will certainly try to defend China, and I believe this is going in the right direction, but it is still too early to get a good idea of what Joseph is up to. The early invasion of Australia seems to suggest he won't go for India, but the imminent fall of Singapore means he could invade Burma by sea, and push forward to Assam, cutting the supply for good. I think we'll have a clearer picture in a month.


(in reply to Yaab)
Post #: 146
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 1/25/2016 4:57:50 PM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
This AAR is about ten days behind, I am now trying to catch up, bear with me, or read my opponent if you want the newer news…

January 23rd 1942

The pearl of the Orient


… or whatever Singapore is called when Allied military historians try to wax lyrical, fell today. It wasn’t even fun. The Japanese attacked for the fourth time, I think and the base just fell, and all the brits there surrendered. The Japanese had about 2000 AV there, and probably lost 150 in the last attack, so there should be about 1800 available for redeployment, in Sumatra, and perhaps in Burma.

Holding Singapore until the 23th of January is a nice surprise. Given his commitment to Malaysia, I had expected Joseph to take it earlier. At any rate, this means Burma will still be Japanese for a while, and I probably can deliver a little more supplies to China. VP wise, the fall of Singapore tipped the balance, and Japan now leads 1.05:1.

What now? My opponent seems to have split all his units out of China into two large stacks. One is in Australia, the other one in Singapore. There are troops elsewhere, but none of them has seen much action so far. Palembang is the next destination, no doubt about it, but what next? Will my opponent split his force, and send half to Java and the rest to Burma or India, or will he go on operating one theater at a time, finishing Java before he goes for Burma (or the other way around)?

Pyrrhus on line one

I did something stupid in Australia today: I tried to defend Brisbane. I moved a squadron of Warhawks, and had forty of them flying. I was lucky at first, as the bombers arrived before the sweeps. There were 93 Kates, escorted by 36 Zeroes, all KB most certainly. I shot down five Kates and three zeroes, for a Warkhawk, and the raid totally missed its target.

But then came the sweeps, and my Warhawks proved once again that they are no match for enemy Oscars and Zeroes. I lost 25 fighters, to three or four Japanese. I have retired my fighters, and will leave Brisbane defenseless for a while.

Air losses for today were 15 Japanese for 29 ours. Overall, we are about 450:600, nothing too dramatic, but I need to conserve my air force for a while.

Over China, my bombers had a field day over Pingsiang. I am transferring Hurricane squadrons which I don’t need in Burma right now. I am pretty sure they can do some damage, while training my pilots.


(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 147
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 1/25/2016 5:49:31 PM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
January 24th 1942

Pingsiang under attack


The Japanese, having reinforced the hex, attacked Pingsiang today. Joseph is obviously proceeding in a very methodical way, one hex after the other. I am happy with this, as it buys me time.

In Pingsiang, the forts were reduced one level, and the assault was a stalemate. 100 squads were disabled on each side, odds were below par, which means more disruption, and time to rebuild the forts.

Ground combat at Pingsiang (82,54)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 39412 troops, 460 guns, 50 vehicles, Assault Value = 1124
Defending force 24382 troops, 184 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 663
Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 2
Japanese adjusted assault: 788
Allied adjusted defense: 807
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 2)
Japanese ground losses:
1075 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 61 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 22 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 18 disabled
Allied ground losses:
885 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 82 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled


Australian affairs

An empty Brisbane was swept today, and then, the airfield was bombed by a full KB contingent. A few Kates were lost in the process, I am hoping to shoot more down in the upcoming weeks.

Lismore, just south of Brisbane, was captured today. Enemy intentions are clear : rail troops from Sydney, and take Brisbane. I have 500 AV behind level three forts, and am hoping to delay them, and maybe do some damage.

Meanwhile, an infantry regiment bombarded the units the retreated from Sydney, now encamped iin the mountains inland. The enemy had 120 AV, we have more than 200, moving up, and the supply lines are open. This stack is safe for now.

The rest of Australia is quiet. My first reinforcements will arrive in Perth tomorrow.

(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 148
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 1/25/2016 7:47:44 PM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
January 25th 1942

Medan ?


For several days, Medan has been bombed. I have precious nothing there, but I did use the base a while ago to evacuate troops from Singapore. Maybe Joseph concluded I have fortified this area, and will land there once he is done with Palembang. I certainly would love this, as it would delay his already slow advance.

Balikpapan and a couple of bugs

It fell today. There is some damage to the installations, a few points, and all my troops have retreated, even those tagged as “garrison”, which as no longer static, since they have lost their “garrison” devices (those which make them static) during the battle. And so, I have one 75 mm CD gun walking through the jungle as we speak… I suspect a bug here.

Another thing I have noticed is that unit HQ sometimes become ‘unknown’ once they get rebuilt from smaller components. I have seen this happen to Australians, the 13th Brigade and the 10th LH Cav, namely.

One last glitch is that my troops in Chungking seem to lose their “plan for” and prep level from time to time. I suspect this happens when units respawn.

Rising Matilda

The 7th SA just landed in Perth, the British paras will arrive tomorrow, and then the 44th Division, and then the 7th Hussars, the 2nd Royal Tank, the Natal regiment, and assorted small units. The cavalry has arrived.

I need about two weeks to get them into position, but if Joseph goes on preparing to take Brisbane, I will probably try to raid the bases around Canberra and Sydney, and maybe even free its former defenders, now stranded in the hills. The goal would not be to take the area back, but rather to damage his units there, and try to take advantage of his overextension (from Canberra to Brisbane).

February should be fun!

January 26th 1942

A good day in the air


I have two fighter squadrons based in China, one of Warhawks, that was rebuild after being swept away in Kukong a month ago, and another one of Hurricanes, which arrived a week ago. Both of them were in Changsha today, waiting for the enemy. And the enemy came, Oscars sweeping low. We shot down a dozen, for five or ours, not a great victory, but I am happy with this. The fighters will now retire, but I hope this will make my opponent careful.

After several days over Pingsiang, my bombers focused on the road near Ichang, which is garrisoned by an RGC unit.

Closing on Brisbane)

Toowoomba was captured today. Save for a base force, it had been evacuated and its defenders are now in Brisbane. KB raided the port, damaged a number of ships, and bombed the industry. I suppose Joseph wants to collect some Strategic Bombing points. There is little I can do to prevent it.




< Message edited by fcharton -- 1/25/2016 9:13:12 PM >

(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 149
RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fchart... - 1/27/2016 5:58:24 PM   
fcharton

 

Posts: 1112
Joined: 10/4/2010
From: France
Status: offline
January 27th 1942

Rockhampton again


My opponent wants the northeastern coast of Australia, and he wants it badly. The 33rd Infantry division landed in Rockhampton today. Preparation must have been bad, as more than 20 squads were destroyed in the process, but I had very little to oppose it, a few shells apparently hit Japanese cruisers from the screen. I have about 50 AV in Rockhampton, and so the base will fall tomorrow.

I have to say I don’t quite understand enemy strategy. The northeast is very lightly defended, and Joseph should know it by the time it took me to recapture Rockhampton after his first landing. Why commit a division, out of the five he landed in Australia, knowing that he needs at least two to attack Brisbane, and one more to garrison Sydney? Why open such a large front? I understand the railroad network allows for fast movement of units, but still.

But anyway this suits me fine. Reinforcements are landing in Perth, and will soon be moving towards Melbourne and the area north of it. In a couple of week, I should have enough for a small counteroffensive, while enemy troops are concentrating in the north. And once all the reinforcements are in place, capturing Melbourne will become very difficult, and the net result of the landings will have been to provide me with early reinforcements, and a lot of combat experience.

Of course, I might be missing something very obvious, but I think the invasion of Australia has failed already.

Third Pingsiang

Pingsiang was attacked today. Joseph achieved 1:1 odds and the level two forts were reduced, , but that cost him another 100 disabled or destroyed squads, and the level two forts take only two days to rebuild (and you can’t bombard a base without infrastructure, like Pingsiang…)

Ground combat at Pingsiang (82,54)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 38598 troops, 460 guns, 49 vehicles, Assault Value = 1073
Defending force 24077 troops, 185 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 600
Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)
Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 1
Japanese ground losses:
1204 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 83 disabled
Non Combat: 6 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 13 destroyed, 4 disabled
Vehicles lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
933 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 118 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled


The rest of the continent is quiet. It seems clear that Joseph has concentrated most of his forces around Changsha, and is trying to methodically eliminate all the troops I have here. I am happy with this, and I can’t wait until he tries Changsha, which should reach level six forts in a couple of weeks.

Poor Houston

… got torpedoed on its way back from a bombardment run to Ambon. She will survive, if she can escape the cruiser force that is patrolling the area. The enemy cruisers, on the other hand, will survive if they manage not to trigger the many torpedo bombers I have in Surabaya and Bali.

(in reply to fcharton)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Being good, for a change – SqzMyLemon (J) vs fcharton (A) Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.844